- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Upgrading from 0.99.10.5 to 1.1
by Anders 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi, I am upgrading a setup from Dovecot 0.99 to 1.1. There are a bunch of .imap.index* files that it appears that I can just delete, and they will be recreated as dovecot.index* files. Right? Next, there are some .customflags that I have now learned are not being converted to dovecot-keywords (as we skipped the 1.0 version, and the conversion code appears to be removed in 1.1). Is there some way to convert this? Is it just a rename? Thanks, Anders.

2 2

[Dovecot] Deliver question
by Dien Phan 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi, I searched whole 2007-2008 mailing lists for answer but couldn\'t find. I think it\'s easier and quicker to ask here. Suppose I have a message saved in file /tmp/afile. How can I tell deliver to deliver it to user\'s abc(a)domain.com mail box SPAM? I tried two following ways but no success: 1. more /tmp/afile | deliver -d abc(a)domain.com -m SPAM 2. deliver -d abc(a)domain.com -m SPAM < /tmp/afile Thank you for help. --------------- Thư điện tử tiếng Việt, đơn giản và thuận tiện: http://mail.vn-mail.net

2 1

[Dovecot] Future enhancement of imap: sorting?
by Andy Dills 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

After solving a problem with a sweet little application I discovered (more on that below), I wanted to get some feedback about a potential enhancement for IMAP: standardized, MUA independant, server-side sorting. Currently, there are two basic solutions for sorting: handle it during delivery or handle it in the MUA. However, if you handle it in the MUA, you lose some of the client independancy and portability that imap was designed to address, as there is no mechanism to sync sorting rules between clients, and many lightweight clients don't support sorting at all. On the flip side, in distributed mail envrionments sorting at delivery time isn't feasible, as you typically have the entire mailspool owned by a single UID and mounted via NFS. My basic point is that the two paradigms for sorting have fundemental flaws that severaly limit them. It occured to me that it would be ideal to enable sorting in the imap daemon, enabling users to implement sorting rules which are stored in their directory (similar to the other imap metadata), and which get invoked whenever mail is checked. Perhaps that is beyond the reasonable scope of the imap protocol, but in my mind sorting is a critical task that is poorly addressed and needs to be standardized. I'd love to hear opinions on this. See, in our mail cluster environment, it's basically impossible to use procmail without forwarding your mail to our shell server (nor are we able to use the dovecot LDA). So, the question presented to me by one of my business partners was, since Outlook was shortsighted and didn't include the ability to sync sorting rules between clients, nor did they implement sorting functionality whatsoever on the windows mobile version, what options does he have to ensure proper sorting of his mail without having to leave outlook running 24x7? He doesn't want to have to wade through mailing list email on his mobile outlook, nor does he want to have to ensure his filter rules are consistent in both his outlook and our webmail. So, I poked around in the ports tree, and found a gem: imapfilter. http://imapfilter.hellug.gr/ It's configured via lua, supports a very rich array of actions and queries, and has proven to be very robust and lightweight. I helped him get started with some sample rules, added it to run every minute as a cron job, and boom: robust, fully featured, MUA independant filtering in an environment that can't support procmail or the dovecot LDA. As nice as it is, it's still a personal solution. In my mind we need to have standardized, server-side, MUA-independant sorting rules that get invoked when a mailbox is checked. Thoughts? Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 ---

2 5

[Dovecot] Outlook 2003 marks email for deletion
by Jan van den Berg 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi, Im running Dovecot 1.1RC1 (only IMAP). I noticed that when I connect with Outlook 2003; and I start reading new email some mails get marked (completely random) for deletion (,S -> ,ST) ?? I can set this mail to unread, undo the deletion read it again and it will stay OK. But other emails will still get marked. This only seems to happen with Outlook 2003 not with Outlook Express or Thunderbird and only with new unread mail. Any ideas why Outlook marks this mail for deletion? Cheers, Jan

3 3

[Dovecot] auth_debug_passwords only on mismatches?
by Mike 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

>From the configuration notes (1.0.10), it sounds like setting 'auth_debug_passwords' will only log the user supplied password if there was a mismatch.. When I set it (with auth_debug=no), I get a good amount of auth debug info, regardless of password matching.. ------ dovecot.conf: # In case of password mismatches, log the passwords and used scheme so the # problem can be debugged. Requires auth_debug=yes to be set. auth_debug_passwords = yes ------ I'm basically looking to just add a "login failed" line, with the username, and supplied passsword when a mismatch occurs.. Is there currently a way to do this without modifying the code? Thanks! -Mike

2 1

[Dovecot] dovecot-auth-master Error
by Paul Roberts 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

I'm getting this error in my dovecot-deliver.log file... deliver(paul3(a)fleeky.com): Mar 06 10:15:08 Error: net_connect(/usr/local/var/run/dovecot-auth-master) failed: Permission denied What does that mean? If you guys need more information just ask but I just don't now what the problem is... -Paul

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] Wrong message information reported shortly after delivery
by Ron Avriel 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 08:21 -0800, Ron Avriel wrote: > > If an IMAP fetch is issued some "short" time after a message was delivered > > with dovecot deliver then dovecot reports wrong (zero) values > > for that new message. Afterward, it reports the information OK. > > What OS/filesystem do you use? I don't see how this is possible. The > mails are first written to tmp/ directory and then they're atomically > rename()d to the new/ or cur/ directory. > > I also tested this myself, rapidly sending the same FETCH command 1000 > times/sec while delivering 40MB mails to the maildir. The size was > always correct. I'm using standard out of the box Redhat EL 4 with an ext3 filesystem. Since I can reproduce it easily on different RHEL4 machines, tell me what additional information you'd like. Thanks again, Ron ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

2 1

[Dovecot] v1.1.rc1 released
by Timo Sirainen 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc1.tar.gz.sig Finally the first v1.1 release candidate. Please test so we can have a fully stable v1.1.0 release. v1.1.betas are already running in a few large installations, so I don't expect there to be many bugs left. There are no release critical bugs left and no known crash bugs. There are a few issues I'd like to fix before v1.1.0, but I don't expect to have more than 3-5 release candidates this time (certainly much less than 31 anyway..) Changes since beta16: - ioloop defaults now to best one availablable instead of poll - IMAP SEARCH correctness fixes - Fixed proxy_maybe handling with caching and with mysql - IMAP: ENVELOPE's subject field now always has TABs changed to spaces - Some crashfixes

8 13

[Dovecot] dovecot overquota and delete message
by sa 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi all, i use dovecot-1.1_rc1 with postfix and maildrop as deliver. The problem is where user gets overquota, at this point he is unable to delete message in pop3 as imap. dovecot.conf has: plugin { quota = maildir } protocol imap { mail_plugins = quota imap_quota } protocol pop3 { mail_plugins = quota } I change it to plugin { quota = maildir:ignore=Trash } and plugin { quota = maildir:storage=100240:ignore=Trash } but the problem persist. I have to del manually maildirsize file to get the user back to delete. Any suggestion ? tnx s

2 7

[Dovecot] Not using "." as separator?
by Grant Edwards 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

When using maildir storage, is there any way to use something besides "." as the folder separator? I like to use folder names that match people's e-mail addresses (that's a default behavior in mutt), and "." is a pretty popular character in e-mail addresses. Ideally, I'd like to use "/". Is "." allowed in mailbox names when using mbox storage? -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! As President I have at to go vacuum my coin visi.com collection!

4 9