- dovecot - dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] unknown namespace with Mac OS client
by Kenny Dail 26 Jan '07

26 Jan '07

> > I just tried it now, I can get invalid namespace on your setup. Let me > > know if you need me to hit it more > > Looks like Mail.app is just being broken and changes '.' characters to > '/' internally.. > How hard would it be to put in a workaround for Mail.app, to ignore the namespace being supplied by the client and to use the namespace defined by the server? -- Kenny Dail <kend(a)amigo.net>

1 0

[Dovecot] Advice, Converting a Live/Production server.
by Michael Dilworth 26 Jan '07

26 Jan '07

I want to mess with a live server. (a Bad thing). I have googled until my eyes boogled, wiki'ed until my fingers are wonked, have read as much as I can read, however I'm left with a few questions/worries. Issue: I am currently running Dovecot as a pop3 server with standard /var/mail mbox's I would like to run a mixed Imap/Pop3 server with ~/maildir inbox's The thread http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-February/011304.html is fairly close to what I want to do, but I would like to go ahead and convert to maildir. (Mixed pop3/imap access for each user) I don't have a system to test, "I used have one but it's now the production server... PW/Disk failed, thank G-D(s) for rsync/backups". Setup: procmail, dovecot 1.0 beta 8.2 (fc5), squirrelmail. all users use outlook (2000,2003) or outlook express (random versions) (^^^^ not my choice, I just have to deal with it {and use it} ^^^^^) the majority of users will continue to use pop3, however some would like to convert to imap and have all mail stored on the server. Questions: /etc/procmailrc? just set default to ~/maildir? do I need to define "INBOX"? aka $MAILDIR=~/maildir/, $ORGMAIL=~/maildir/, $DEFAULT=~/maildir/ Same as above, what about new/cur should I set up a /etc/skel? close to above, if I create rules, for spam, etc. do I need to worry about cur/new. close to above, what about Sent Items, Drafts etc... for imap users, I do understand that client rules would likely be needed to store sent items. conversion, anything to look for? mb2md seems to work, but some users have "don't delete from server set", will they get dups? (I can live with this) archiving, can I (or a script) mess with the files in the maildir? aka keep the number of files/messages less than 16k for the outlook users. Bugs, should I cool my heals, and wait for rc16 or 1.0 final? I am currently running problem free, and I do hate to mess with something which is not busted. TIA Michael.

4 3

[Dovecot] Dovecot POP3 fails to chdir under FC6
by James A. McDonald 26 Jan '07

26 Jan '07

I started the Dovecot POP3 server under Fedora Core 6 (rpm dovecot-1.0-1.1.rc15.fc6), but some users couldn't connect, with /var/log/maillog show the message Jan 24 13:20:00 mmace dovecot: chdir(/branch/home/mmace) failed with uid 205: Permission denied Jan 24 13:20:00 mmace dovecot: child 18792 (pop3) returned error 89 (I had already edited first_valid_UID in /etc/dovecot.conf to allow UID's >= 200.) However, only users who had their home directory under /branch/home couldn't connect. Users with homedirs under /home connected via POP3 just fine. I found out POP3 connection failures also logged an error to /etc/messages: Jan 24 13:20:00 mmace kernel: audit(1169662800.479:160): avc: denied { search } for pid=18792 comm="dovecot" name="/" dev=sda3 ino=2 scontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:mnt_t:s0 tclass=dir So, selinux was the culprit. My home directories had the right selinux security context, but the root of the disk holding those home directories (/branch is a separate disk drive) had a security context (system_u:object_r:mnt_t) that Fedora's selinux rules for dovecot did not allow. I changed the context of /branch to system_u:object_r:usr_t, and dovecot POP3 access worked for all users.

1 0

[Dovecot] 1.0.rc19 released
by Timo Sirainen 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc19.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc19.tar.gz.sig Just did a few more fixes to index files. Do they help with anyone's problems? - ACL plugin didn't work unless control dir was separate from maildir - More index file handling fixes

2 1

[Dovecot] FS quota problem on Solaris10
by Kevin Richter 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

Hi, it seems, that I have a quota problem: kric0999@servername:~ $ quota -v Disk quotas for kric0999 (uid 1234): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home 1188850 0 1500000 0 0 0 You see: I have a quota: 1,2GB from 1,5GB The sent-mail, trash, drafts mboxes are in /home/kric0999/mail/ Why does Thunderbird say: "There are no storage quotas on this folder" f.ex when looking at the properties of sent-mail The log says: dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): Loading modules from directory: /opt/dovecot-1.0.rc19/lib/dovecot/imap dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): Module loaded: /opt/dovecot-1.0.rc19/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): Module loaded: /opt/dovecot-1.0.rc19/lib/dovecot/imap/lib11_imap_quota_plugin.so dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): mbox: data=/home/kric0999/mail/:INBOX=/var/mail/kric0999 dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): mbox: root=/home/kric0999/mail, index=/home/kric0999/mail, inbox=/var/mail/kric0999 dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): fs quota add storage dir = /home/kric0999/mail dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): fs quota block device = auto_home dovecot: Jan 25 17:29:31 Info: IMAP(kric0999): fs quota mount point = /home Any ideas? Greets, Kevin Richter

2 2

[Dovecot] X-UID gaps cause Dovecot/IMAP to hang
by Benjamin Howell 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

Hi, When the Dovecot 1.0.rc19 IMAP server encounters X-UID headers with gaps in them, it hangs indefinitely. I've attached a sample mailbox (in mbox format) which repeatably exhibits this behavior. The mbox contains only three messages with the following X-UIDs in order: 774, 785, 787. If I remove the X-UID headers from each message, Dovecot handles the mailbox without any problems. UW-IMAP is able to handle the sample mbox _with_ X-UID headers. A full backtrace is also included. When Dovecot hangs, it appears to continually lock and unlock the mailbox. I'm using dotlocking so a mailbox.lock file appears and disappears constantly. I have to kill the process to log back in. I'm not familiar enough with Dovecot to offer a patch, but if anybody feels they can fix this or needs more information, please let me know. Regards, Benjamin Howell bhowell(a)iglou.com

2 1

[Dovecot] logging pop3 fetch time
by Zbigniew Szalbot 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

Hello, Is it possible with dovcot (rc7) to log how long it takes to complete downloading mail? If so, what do I have to set in the conf file? Thank you! -- Zbigniew Szalbot

2 2

[Dovecot] Dovecot website
by Luigi Rosa 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

I think that the Dovecot website is down/unreachable, at lest from a couple of Italian IPs Ciao, luigi -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

2 1

[Dovecot] rc18->rc19: read/unread/reply flags broken
by Jeff A. Earickson 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

Timo, This might be a bit vague, but I have noticed that rc19 seems to have broken the read/unread/reply flags in imap. My officemate has had problems with messages that are read and marked as read then mysteriously get remarked as unread the next time email is checked. I've had problems where I reply to a message and it does not get marked as "answered". We didn't see this with rc18 and earlier. My setup: Solaris 10, sparc, T2000 system. rc19 (now back to rc18), using mbox format. system mailbox is NFS mounted from another Sun Solaris 10 system, homedirs and dovcot cache files are on local zfs filesystems. Jeff Earickson Colby College

3 3

Re: [Dovecot] X-UID: 4085788205 != 2147483647
by Timo Sirainen 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

On 24.1.2007, at 2.49, Stephen Gowing wrote: > It *is* possible to force a large X-UID, if the user has an empty > inbox > (tested on rc15). Yes, but only if it's the very first message for the user. Afterwards even if user expunges all the messages, there are two things that prevent this from being possible: index files and the UW-IMAP style "FOLDER INTERNAL DATA" message. You could also prevent this completely by stripping the X-UID header in your SMTP server or LDA. For example Dovecot LDA strips all the Dovecot's internal metadata headers. I guess the UID renumbering could be done some day, but for now I think it's just way too much trouble with not that much benefits.

3 4