- dovecot - dovecot.org

[patch] enhancement for tika server protected by user/password basic auth
by John Fawcett 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

Hi The existing code is designed for a tika server on local host, or on a remote host that is either accessable to all or for example taht is protected by ip restrictions via a proxy in front of it. I've configured a tika server behind an apache proxy which enforces basic auth, but sending basic auth credentials for a tika server is not currently supported by Dovecot. The following patch allows to have user and password specified in the fts_tika url in much the same way you can for fts_solr. fts_tika = https://user:password@tika_host/tika John --- dovecot-2.3.11.3-orig/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c 2020-08-12 14:20:41.000000000 +0200 +++ dovecot-2.3.11.3/src/plugins/fts/fts-parser-tika.c 2020-11-15 15:18:24.351281064 +0100 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ tuser = p_new(user->pool, struct fts_parser_tika_user, 1); MODULE_CONTEXT_SET(user, fts_parser_tika_user_module, tuser); - if (http_url_parse(url, NULL, 0, user->pool, + if (http_url_parse(url, NULL, HTTP_URL_ALLOW_USERINFO_PART, user->pool, &tuser->http_url, &error) < 0) { i_error("fts_tika: Failed to parse HTTP url %s: %s", url, error); return -1; @@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ http_url->host.name, t_strconcat(http_url->path, http_url->enc_query, NULL), fts_tika_parser_response, parser); + if (http_url->user != NULL) { + http_client_request_set_auth_simple( + http_req, http_url->user, http_url->password); + } + http_client_request_set_port(http_req, http_url->port); http_client_request_set_ssl(http_req, http_url->have_ssl); if (parser_context->content_type != NULL)

2 9

Re: no shared cipher openssl
by Aki Tuomi 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

> On 16/11/2020 09:54 lists(a)lazygranch.com <lists(a)lazygranch.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:31:07 -0500 > Mike Schroeder <mikeschroe(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > CentOS 7 > > Dovecot 2.2.36 > > > > Nov 14 07:13:08 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth > > attempts in 0 secs): > > user=<>, rip=73.0.0.0, lip=192.64.118.242, TLS handshaking: > > SSL_accept() failed: > > error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no shared cipher, > > session=<> > > > > Was working fine for over a year, until the cert expired and I > > replaced it. I've tried the good cert I have for https and I used the > > Dovecot.org script to generate a self-signed certificate. > > > > 10-ssl.conf > > ## SSL settings > > #ssl = required > > ssl = yes > > #ssl = no > > ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/mydomain.com.crt > > ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/mydomain.com.key > > #ssl_ca = > > #ssl_require_crl = yes > > #ssl_client_ca_dir = > > #ssl_client_ca_file = > > #ssl_verify_client_cert = no > > #ssl_cert_username_field = commonName > > #ssl_dh_parameters_length = 1024 > > #ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 > > > > # SSL ciphers to use > > # ols values ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL > > ssl_cipher_list = > > ALL:!kRSA:!SRP:!kDHd:!DSS:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK: > > !RC4:!ADH:!LOW@STRENGTH > > > > # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. > > #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no > > > > # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. > > #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no > > # SSL crypto device to use, for valid values run "openssl engine" > > #ssl_crypto_device = > > > > # SSL extra options. Currently supported options are: > > # no_compression - Disable compression. > > # no_ticket - Disable SSL session tickets. > > #ssl_options = > > > > =========================== > > # openssl x509 -dates -in mydomain.com.crt > > notBefore=Nov 11 16:31:35 2020 GMT > > notAfter=Nov 11 16:31:35 2022 GMT > > -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- > > : > > =========================== > > # openssl pkey -in mydomain.com.key > > -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- > > : > > > > Thanks for taking a look. Any ideas on what I should do next to > > debug? > > > > Mike > > I remembered this problem was posted and still had the reply post from > Viktor. This may or may not be relevant. A search on this text will > probably drag up the whole thread. > --------------- > Specifically, an ECDSA P-256 certificate, but some systems don't (yet?) > support ECDSA. You'd need an additional RSA certificate to interoperate > with their sending MTA's limited STARTTLS cipher/protocol repertoire. > -------------- > > When this thread went around I looked at my logs and found some no > auth complaints on my dovecot log. I believe they were trying to use > the sslv3 to hack my server. Or at least see if it is hackable. Since > my email server is a personal one and the attack was from a hosting > company, I blocked server IP space. > > The weird thing I get your error now myself but not consistently. Here > is an example. > ------------------------------- > Nov 16 04:18:37 imap-login: Info: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=myvpn, lip=myserverip, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown: SSL alert number 46, session=<rXchrDG06qvGx2p9> > Nov 16 04:18:37 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<me(a)mydomain.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=myvpn, lip=myserverip, mpid=11710, TLS, session=<DSIjrDG05KvGx2p9> > > However the problem isn't present at the moment. Dovecot supports alternative certificate if you have problems with ECDSA and need to use RSA for them. See https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/core/#ssl-alt-cert Aki

1 0

no shared cipher openssl
by Mike Schroeder 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

CentOS 7 Dovecot 2.2.36 Nov 14 07:13:08 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=73.0.0.0, lip=192.64.118.242, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no shared cipher, session=<> Was working fine for over a year, until the cert expired and I replaced it. I've tried the good cert I have for https and I used the Dovecot.org script to generate a self-signed certificate. 10-ssl.conf ## SSL settings #ssl = required ssl = yes #ssl = no ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/mydomain.com.crt ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/mydomain.com.key #ssl_ca = #ssl_require_crl = yes #ssl_client_ca_dir = #ssl_client_ca_file = #ssl_verify_client_cert = no #ssl_cert_username_field = commonName #ssl_dh_parameters_length = 1024 #ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 # SSL ciphers to use # ols values ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!kRSA:!SRP:!kDHd:!DSS:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK: !RC4:!ADH:!LOW@STRENGTH # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no # SSL crypto device to use, for valid values run "openssl engine" #ssl_crypto_device = # SSL extra options. Currently supported options are: # no_compression - Disable compression. # no_ticket - Disable SSL session tickets. #ssl_options = =========================== # openssl x509 -dates -in mydomain.com.crt notBefore=Nov 11 16:31:35 2020 GMT notAfter=Nov 11 16:31:35 2022 GMT -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- : =========================== # openssl pkey -in mydomain.com.key -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- : Thanks for taking a look. Any ideas on what I should do next to debug? Mike

2 1

imap dumping core in libdovecot-storage with assert "(block_count == 0 || block_idx+1 == block_count)"
by Renaud Métrich 15 Nov '20

15 Nov '20

Hi, I would like to report an issue which is 100% reproducible with a specific mail available in the reproducer attached to Red Hat's bugzilla <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894418> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1726535) -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- Return-Path: <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX> X-Original-To: XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX Delivered-To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXX.XX.XXX.XX Received: from XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXX.XX.XX (unknown [XX.XX.XXX.XXX]) by XXXXXX.XX.XXX.XX (Postfix) with ESMTP id XXXXXXXXXXX for <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:11:42 +0200 Subject: zoom Message-ID: <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXX.XXXXXXX.XXX> From: "XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX" <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX> To: XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- The email seems completely valid to me, but I'm no email expert. When performing a "FETCH <ID> (BINARY.SIZE[1] BINARY.PEEK[1])" operation, imap crashes with following backtrace: -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- (gdb) bt [...] #5 0x00007ffff7707a25 in i_panic ( format=format@entry=0x7ffff7b7b460 "file %s: line %d (%s): assertion failed: (%s)") at failures.c:523 #6 0x00007ffff7ab5de7 in blocks_count_lines (full_input=0x5555557f1230, ctx=0x7fffffffdb80) at index-mail-binary.c:357 #7 index_mail_read_binary_to_cache (_mail=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, reason=<optimized out>, binary_r=0x7fffffffdc16, converted_r=0x7fffffffdc17) at index-mail-binary.c:395 #8 0x00007ffff7b39c8b in index_mail_get_binary_size (lines_r=0x7fffffffdcc4, size_r=0x7fffffffdd20, include_hdr=false, part=0x5555557e4678, _mail=0x5555557e3b48) at index-mail-binary.c:497 #9 index_mail_get_binary_stream (_mail=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, size_r=0x7fffffffdd20, lines_r=0x7fffffffdcc4, binary_r=<optimized out>, stream_r=0x0) at index-mail-binary.c:557 #10 0x00007ffff7abd204 in mail_get_binary_size (mail=mail@entry=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, size_r=size_r@entry=0x7fffffffdd20, lines_r=lines_r@entry=0x7fffffffdcc4) at mail.c:342 #11 0x00007ffff7b7add8 in imap_msgpart_size (mail=0x5555557e3b48, msgpart=0x5555557e0748, size_r=size_r@entry=0x7fffffffdd20) at imap-msgpart.c:755 #12 0x000055555557917c in fetch_binary_size (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, mail=<optimized out>, body=0x5555557dfa20) at imap-fetch-body.c:212 #13 0x00005555555777e2 in imap_fetch_more_int (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, cancel=false) at imap-fetch.c:562 #14 0x00005555555788ed in imap_fetch_more (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, cmd=cmd@entry=0x5555557c95d8) at imap-fetch.c:617 #15 0x00005555555694b1 in cmd_fetch (cmd=0x5555557c95d8) at cmd-fetch.c:337 [...] #28 0x0000555555566405 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:523 -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- This happens on latest dovecot. Best regards, Renaud METRICH

2 3

dovecot fts-solr + solr 8.7.0 upgrade: "Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized" + "Transaction commit failed: FTS transaction commit failed: backend deinit" ?
by PGNet Dev 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser(a)example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<8MKVNHmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Queue 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<OHfzNHmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in testing 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<yMxJNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Junk 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<uDCbNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Trash 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<kA/uNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Sent 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: Mailbox Drafts: Transaction commit failed: FTS transaction commit failed: backend deinit (attempted to index 1 messages (UIDs 3..3)) 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<2OUMCHqNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in INBOX I get NO output atm in my solr logs @ this 'index'; just, atm, in the dovecot logs, above I've checked all my usual perms. Indexing _was_ working with a prior solr v8.6.3 ... Either I've misconfigured some perm, and am missing it, or new-solr-version v8.7.0 is causing me some grief. (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x? (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob?

2 9

Submission service capabilities listing
by Dan 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hello all, I'm attempting to implement a submission server with questions in regards to how Dovecot handles the backend hosts capabilities. To my understanding, Dovecot will connect to the host specified in either submission_host or submission_relay_host, and gather a list of capabilities. Once gathered, after the client sends the EHLO greeting Dovecot will respond back with capabilities that the backend host is capable of. My question is, When does this occur? Running a tcpdump with the filter set to the relay host IP, I don't see any traffic until after I send the EHLO command. Dovecot states that CHUNKING is available, but the backend host does not have that capability. Is there a way to disable CHUNKING explicitly? Thanks. submission_relay_host = x.x.x.x submission_host = x.x.x.x submission_relay_ssl = no submission_relay_ssl_verify = no protocol submission { passdb { driver = static args = host=x.x.x.x proxy=y nopassword=y port=587 } }

2 1

How do Cerbot files map to Dovecot?
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

I am postponing the Apache plugin issue (CentOS is not Certbot friendly) and requesting a standalone, generic certificate. After the command "1: Spin up a temporary webserver" I have the following 2 files in the folder /etc/letsencrypt: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 924 Nov 12 11:14 csr/0000_csr-certbot.pem -rw------- 1 root root 1708 Nov 12 11:14 keys/0000_key-certbot.pem The "key" is probably a direct replacement for the file in the distribution. What about the "csr" file? It seems to be a request, not the certificate itself. TIA

3 2

Fwd: Trying to install certbot on CentOS
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

On 11/12/2020 10:44 AM, Raymond Herrera wrote: > Following the advice obtained here, I am trying to get a LetsEncrypt > certificate. > > These are the instructions: > > Step 1: > https://snapcraft.io/docs/installing-snapd > > Step 2: > https://certbot.eff.org/lets-encrypt/centosrhel7-apache > > My problem is this error message: > > # snap install --classic certbot > > error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs > image using "squashfs": mount: > /tmp/sanity-squashfs-881328484: failed to setup loop device: No > such file or directory > > Apparently, RedHat/CentOS are not supporters of snap. > > TIA > > OS: CentOS 7 > Thanks to Leonardo and Michael, I have made some progress. The snaps application is not supported by RedHat/CentOS. The solution is simple, just use: # yum install certbot The new error message is this: # certbot certonly --apache Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log Could not choose appropriate plugin: The requested apache plugin does not appear to be installed The requested apache plugin does not appear to be installed I am trying to find which is the "requested apache plugin". The log mentions "authenticator". I am hoping that an Apache Certificate will be useful for Dovecot.

2 1

Guide on Renewing SSL Certificate for Apache, Postfix and Dovecot on CentOS 6.8 Linux
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

Good day from Singapore, Please check out the following link for my guide. https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=160517863730596&w=2 Thank you very much. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ******************************************************************************************** Singaporean Targeted Individual Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Trying to install certbot on CentOS
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

Following the advice obtained here, I am trying to get a LetsEncrypt certificate. These are the instructions: Step 1: https://snapcraft.io/docs/installing-snapd Step 2: https://certbot.eff.org/lets-encrypt/centosrhel7-apache My problem is this error message: # snap install --classic certbot error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using "squashfs": mount: /tmp/sanity-squashfs-881328484: failed to setup loop device: No such file or directory Apparently, RedHat/CentOS are not supporters of snap. TIA OS: CentOS 7

3 2