- dovecot - dovecot.org

[dovecot] a few other problem
by Farkas Levente 07 Apr '03

07 Apr '03

hi, I still has a few other problem with dovecot and mozilla. - when I open mozilla mail I can only see the toplevel folders in the left handside folder list and when I close the imap folder and open it again (click on the arrow left to the imap server in the folder list) mozilla show me all folders and subfolders correctly (but not at the startup). it can be mozilla's bug, but this was worked when I use courier?! - when I'd like to sort the messages by thread than the thread is usualy ok, but I'd like to see the the different threads sorted by date (as it was while using couirer or cyrus) but now it seems to me random:-(( it's very anoying. my be it's mozilla fault again, but may be mozilla use server side thread support. - in OE6 when we only select headers only sometime some message "disappear"! which means we see in OE6 a red line over the message (as it would be deleted), but no one delete it (yes I know you don't belive me, I also don't belive our users, but once I saw it). just click on it to see the message and inmediately become as deleted. while when I look at in the server the file is still there and _not_ deleted. and OE6 show "the message already removed from the server". - what about the ssl (imaps) problem? yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 1

[dovecot] Re: NFS mounted IMAP dirs
by Maikel Verheijen 05 Apr '03

05 Apr '03

Hi Timo, > On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 23:23, Maikel Verheijen wrote: > > While reading through the dovecot documentation, I read > that I could > > do without indexes (well: use memory indexes), > > Currently that's not really good idea, since message UIDs > aren't then stored permanently. In CVS there's support for > this with mbox format, and I've also been writing support for > Courier-like uidlist-file, but that's still not really working. Well: I am working with Maildir mailstores, so I guess I need to have a uidlist kinda file then? Sorry it wasn't clear in my post that I am using Maildir style mailboxes... But I figured maildir was better than Mbox over nfs... > > My problem is now that dovecot writes it's subscriptions to the > > mailstore. Since I want as little difference between my > frondends as > > possible, (and as static as possible), I would love to see dovecot > > handle subscriptions in a database, or perhaps a nfs-safe file. > > Database? SQL? Another problem is also .customflags file > which isn't NFS-safe. With mbox it's not really required, but > with Maildir it is if you want custom message flags. It > wouldn't be too difficult to change the code to use dotlock > files with these files anyway, I've been going to make it > configurable. My current setup is with postgresql and Maildir. So in a way, a lot of info COULD come from my database, if it isn't safe enough via nfs. Can you make all file locking configurable? Or will you do it on a "per-type" basis? (eg: mailbox locking, index locking, flag-file locking, etc). regards, Maikel Verheijen.

2 2

[dovecot] maildir_copy_with_hardlinks doesn't work
by Kimura Fuyuki 05 Apr '03

05 Apr '03

On my box maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=yes causes the following IMAP error: Some of the requested messages no longer exist. A possible fix follows. --- src/lib-storage/index/maildir/maildir-copy.c 19 Feb 2003 21:32:21 -0000 1.21 +++ src/lib-storage/index/maildir/maildir-copy.c 5 Apr 2003 09:23:34 -0000 @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ ret2 = index_messageset_deinit(ctx); if (ret2 < 0) ret = -1; - else { + else if (ret2 == 0) { mail_storage_set_error(src->box.storage, "Some of the requested messages no longer exist."); ret = -1; -- fuyuki

1 0

[dovecot] Re: Question about the password field in a postgres ql database
by Maikel Verheijen 04 Apr '03

04 Apr '03

> Works fine with me.. Only thing I can think of is that it's > some stupid > configuration mistake, like not uncommenting the line :) Hi Timo, I just (double) checked my config files, and it LOOKS ok. My dovecot is from cvs, updated yesterday, and running on Redhat 7.3 (if that matters). Here is my dovecot-pgsql.conf: --8<-- # # Postgress connect string. Similar to PHP connect = host=A.B.C.D dbname=maildb user=mailuser password=****** password_query = SELECT password FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%u' AND password != '' AND locked='f'; user_query = SELECT maildir as home, 100 as uid,498 as gid FROM aliases where alias = '%u'; #default_pass_scheme = PLAIN #default_pass_scheme = PLAIN-MD5 default_pass_scheme = CRYPT --8<-- My NON-working DB entry is: --8<-- maildb-> default_pass_scheme = CRYPT maildb-> select * from aliases where alias = 'marc(a)test.com'; ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "#" maildb=> ; maildb=> select * from aliases where alias = 'marc(a)test.com'; alias | maildir | password | locked ---------------+------------------------+----------------------------------- -+-------- marc(a)test.com | test.com/marc/Maildir/ | $1$JJN5H82p$yKs5jnb/csQVYsZZ/4WFS0 | f (1 row) --8<-- and the one that IS working: --8<-- maildb=> select * from aliases where alias = 'maikel(a)test.com'; alias | maildir | password | locked -----------------+--------------------------+------------------------------- ------------+-------- maikel(a)test.com | test.com/maikel/Maildir/ | {CRYPT}$1$JJN5H82p$yKs5jnb/csQVYsZZ/4WFS0 | f (1 row) --8<-- Both strings are crypted versions of 'qwerty' Thank you, Maikel Verheijen

3 2

[dovecot] INBOX at /var in maildir storage format
by Sebastian Pachuta 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

Hi I'm trying to figure out how to set default_mail_env to support such config: INBOX is in '/var/mail/%u/' (note last slash at the end, %u is an folder with new/tmp/cur subdirs - standard maildir structure). Other imap folders are stored as files (in mbox format) in direcotry '%h/Mail/'. Please advise.

3 4

[dovecot] Question about the password field in a postgresql database
by Maikel Verheijen 03 Apr '03

03 Apr '03

Hi List, When I try to set the default_pass_scheme in dovecot-pgsql.conf to CRYPT, the dovecot does not recognize my crypted passwords. If I prepend my encrypted passwords with {CRYPT}, dovecot DOES recognize it. (even when I set default_pass_scheme to PLAIN). Is this supposed to work, or am I misinterpreting things here? Thank you! Maikel Verheijen.

2 1

[dovecot] Failure in the presence of too many connections
by Mark E. Mallett 02 Apr '03

02 Apr '03

Had an event today where dovecot refused new connections and would not accept more until restarted, whereupon it worked for a few minutes and locked up again. Looking at the logs it appeared that it had run out of file descriptors. I increased the open files limit and started it again-- which worked but it only pushes off the problem. Does dovecot keep an open file descriptor for every imap or pop3 child? If so, this would argue more towards a tcpserver sort of control. If not, perhaps something is leaking.. -mm- PS: assume you saw recent RFCs 3501 and 3502 ?

3 14

[dovecot] dovecot-0.99.8.1 @ old redhat6.2 box
by Sebastian Pachuta 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

Hi I have some odd problem with running dovecot. Program dies with message in maillog: Mar 31 21:04:02 test-box dovecot: Dovecot starting up Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: Login process died too early - shutting down Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: child 28870 (login) returned error 84 (exec() failed) Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: child 28869 (login) returned error 84 (exec() failed) Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable System is redhat6.2 (with all updates), kernel is 2.2.25 (with openwall patch). Under rh7.3 dovecot launches fine.

2 4

[dovecot] NFS mounted IMAP dirs
by Maikel Verheijen 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

Hi list, I am trying to build an email system that is using multiple frontends, to a clustered backend using nfs. The backend mounts his filesystems from a central storage, and will be running active-active. While reading through the dovecot documentation, I read that I could do without indexes (well: use memory indexes), and could then be able to run dovecot over NFS. Well: that was until friday, when I was reading a little bit better through nfs.txt. :) My problem is now that dovecot writes it's subscriptions to the mailstore. Since I want as little difference between my frondends as possible, (and as static as possible), I would love to see dovecot handle subscriptions in a database, or perhaps a nfs-safe file. Since I am only a junior programmer (my code is really not far from "Hello world", although I am trying to find some time to teach myself more), I might not be able to be of much assistance to you all in coding stuff, but I am willing to help out where-ever possible. Can anyone help me solve my problem in any way, and how can I contribute as well? Thank you all, Maikel Verheijen.

2 1

[dovecot] FETCH BODY[part]<partial>
by Jesse Peterson 29 Mar '03

29 Mar '03

2003-03-24 12:59 Timo Sirainen <tss(a)iki.fi> This CVS update didn't actually seem to fix the problem. I still get the problem as before, like this capture: 10 UID FETCH 60 BODY.PEEK[]<8192.1915> * 60 FETCH (UID 60 BODY[]<8192> {1915} ) 10 OK Fetch completed. Not quite 1,915 bytes =). Perhaps the "[]" (without a part) is confusing it? But still, it grabs the first chunk correctly. At any rate, any input would be great.

2 6