- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Three oddities
by Bob Hall 24 Aug '03

24 Aug '03

FBSD 4.8, Dovecot-0.99.10 1) I have mail accounts for people who use Macs and Windows, so their mail is stored on a Unix box where they don't have accounts. When their mail comes in, it is stored in /var/mail/<accountname>. When I was setting this up, I used my own Unix account for testing, and that works fine. But for the other mail accounts, which don't correspond to Unix accounts, I want to give ownership of the /var/mail/* files to another account that doesn't have my privileges. However, no one can access their mail unless I own their files. As long as I own all the /var/mail/* files, everything works fine. But if I shift ownership to another account, users can log on to Dovecot but attempts to access an IMAP folder return an error. >From maillog: Aug 18 16:39:46 kongemord imap(philrodrigues): mkdir_parents(/var/mail/philrodri gues/.imap/INBOX) failed: Permission denied All files and directories in /var/mail/* are in the mail group. I tried adding dovecot to that group, but that didn't help. Since everyone can log on to Dovecot, but can't access their mail unless I own their files, I'm assuming that there's some simple ownership setting that I'm overlooking. But I haven't a clue what it is. Can someone tell me what I need to change? 2) The Macs have Eudora 4.2 installed, and the Win boxes have Eudora 5.1. The Macs can delete mail, put it in the trash, and empty the trash. The Win clients can mark mail deleted, but they can't remove it. The mail stays in the IMAP folder until the same user accesses their mail from a Mac and deletes it. If a user drags a message to another folder, a copy is created in the new folder but the old copy remains in the original folder. I'm not having this problem with Mutt, so it the problem seems to be specific to the Windows verson of Eudora. Is there a fix? 3) We're pulling our e-mail off our ISP's POP server and loading it into Dovecot to allow people to work with their mail from different machines. I'm using getmail to make the transfer. Is anyone else doing POP to IMAP, and how are they doing it? Any suggestions? TIA, Bob Hall

3 24

Re: [Dovecot] please add MySQL Support!
by Matthew Reimer 24 Aug '03

24 Aug '03

Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 02:57, eLgino wrote: > >>Hi, Developer(s) >> >>I will use this fantastic IMAP/POP -Server but i dislike, no a realy HATE >>PostgreSQL!, please make a hack or code a MySQL support. >> >>I know its a strange mail, and "question" but every one's first choice for >>SQL-DBs is MySQL! :) and i love it!. > > > And I really hate MySQL :) I'm still hoping someone else would write the > support for it. I might end up doing it eventually, but currently > there's more important things to do. Just yesterday I got this working, using the pgsql stuff as a guide. After I clean up the patch and make sure I'm not leaking memory, I'll send it to the list. Matt

1 0

[Dovecot] please add MySQL Support!
by eLgino 24 Aug '03

24 Aug '03

Hi, Developer(s) I will use this fantastic IMAP/POP -Server but i dislike, no a realy HATE PostgreSQL!, please make a hack or code a MySQL support. I know its a strange mail, and "question" but every one's first choice for SQL-DBs is MySQL! :) and i love it!. thanks in advance eLgino

2 1

[Dovecot] ssl failure !!
by thomas may 24 Aug '03

24 Aug '03

Hi, i havent yet any problems with dovecat but in my dovecot log i get the following warning, does anybody know what its wrong. imap-login: Aug 23 22:14:47 Warning: SSL_read() syscall failed: Connection reset by peer [192.168.1.139] imap-login: Aug 23 22:14:48 Info: Login: info(a)domain1.com [192.168.1.139] -th

3 2

[Dovecot] postfix+dovecot
by eLgino 22 Aug '03

22 Aug '03

Hi folks, I will setup an mailserver with postfix an dovecot, but i would like to add the users and domains to postfix is this possible? because postfix can handle mysql. and if this possible anyone can say me HOW?, i do not find anything about this. if not anyone can say me how i do configure it with postgresql (dovecot)? ( i have NO pgsql skills). i hope anyone can understand my poor english, and thx in advance bye

1 0

[Dovecot] user database clarification
by Jared 22 Aug '03

22 Aug '03

Hi, this question gets back to a thread I started back on July 8th. (gosh how time flies) I still am not clear on why PAM is not supported for the user database. I'm in an environment that has users both in local flat files (/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow) AND in an LDAP database. Is it possible for this set up to work with dovecot? (both local and ldap users have imap/pop?) I'd prefer to just have Dovecot use PAM for user db and the password database so that I can configure PAM to try both local users and LDAP users. Thanks a lot. -jared

3 4

[Dovecot] rawlog change suggestion
by Charlie Brady 21 Aug '03

21 Aug '03

I find the separate .in and .out files rather difficult to work with. I think it would be more useful if the in/out traffic were interleaved with a prefix to indicate direction, and suffix to indicate continuation, as recordio (http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/recordio.html) does: <a0002 LIST "" "" >* LIST (\Noselect) ";" "" >a0002 OK List completed. <a0003 SELECT "INBOX" >* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) >* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags + >permitted. >* 18 EXISTS >* 0 RECENT >* OK [UNSEEN 18] First unseen. >* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1055795174] UIDs valid >* OK [UIDNEXT 6741] Predicted next UID >a0003 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. <a0004 STATUS "incoming.foo" (RECENT) >* STATUS "incoming.foo" (RECENT 397) >a0004 OK Status completed. <a0005 NOOP >a0005 OK NOOP completed. Comments? -- Charlie

2 2

[Dovecot] Mozilla dovecot interaction
by Eric S. Johansson 21 Aug '03

21 Aug '03

I think this is more a Mozilla bug but just a heads up the case other people complain. periodically, the Mozilla e-mail client refuses to delete messages. It shows up either as absolutely no action when you press the delete key/button or it shows activity but refuses to perform any other action in that mailbox. Sometimes if you switch to another mailbox and then come back to the mailbox you're deleting e-mail message from, the messages deleted when you re-enter the mailbox. I looked with ethereal and it looks like Mozilla is not sending any imap commands. Hence my assertion that it's a Mozilla problem. The only reason I mention it here is because something about dovecot seems to trigger the problem more quickly. I was seeing this kind of problem before but only after a week or two of uptime in the browser. Now I'm seeing it in just under a week (I think) I've only seen at once but I will keep track for future reference. I got to get me a new client... ---eric

1 0

[Dovecot] transitional weirdnesses
by Eric S. Johansson 20 Aug '03

20 Aug '03

1) not reproducible but when it occurred, its stuck: in the early transition to dovecot I would notice occasionally that messages would come up, I would delete them and then something would hang causing a major delay in the (Mozilla) e-mail client's response. When the system responded, I would notice that occasionally there would be an off by one offset between the index of messages and the message displayed. This error would persist until I killed off the index and the dovecot process. 2) very reproducible: after fetching messages from my inbox, there will be a long (30 sec.) delay. Dovecot demon is clearly busy doing something. I do have a large set of filter rules (approximately 150) sorting messages into different boxes. Is this a reason to switch to maildir? 3) just ended up with a message that displayed the entire header. Will look into this more but it's very strange. ---eric

4 14

[Dovecot] Squirrelmail and Dovecot folder namespace
by Warren Togami 19 Aug '03

19 Aug '03

I am currently using Squirrelmail and Dovecot with this setting: default_mail_env = mbox:%h/mail/:INBOX=%h/mail/INBOX It works well, however folder subscriptions in Squirrelmail annoyingly end up with "./" prefixes because Squirrelmail refuses to work without overriding the folder namespace. All of my other IMAP clients work fine without setting that option. Squirrelmail's default setting is this: $default_folder_prefix = './mail'; This setting breaks Squirrelmail: $default_folder_prefix = ''; This setting becomes default if you attempt to blank that user's preference: $default_folder_prefix = './'; The end result of this is duplicate entries in .subscriptions, one with "./" prefix and one without. Most IMAP clients handle this by showing all the folders again in a folder named ".", or Mozilla displays all folders twice. =( When I asked one of the squirrelmail developers, he said that this might be a dovecot specific problem. Any ideas? Warren Togami warren(a)togami.com

2 1