- dovecot - dovecot.org

Solved an solution: Pop 3 SSL login dos not work any longer
by Jutta Wrage 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

Hi! Logging in with the same use I tested already before, I now get this message in the debug log written by dovecot: pop3-login: Warning: Auth process not responding, delayed sending initial response (greeting): user=<> The SSL negotiation did complete. But then there went something wrong with the user authentification. As ist did work already before, I guess, it is not the clients fault. System where dovecot (pop3 and imap) is installed: latest Ubuntu. My changes after successful repeated pop3 connection with by the testing user: 1. Turning debug logging on 2. minor changes I did search a lot for a solution to this problem but still have no clue how to solve it. Hmm... guess my "minor changes" caused the problem: Found this in debug log now for the start of SSL: "pop3-login: Error: auth: connect(director) failed: No such file or directory" Need to read more about these directors, I think. Maybe they are not needed at the system at all. Jutta

1 0

Thunderbird Issue - Dovecot
by Phillip Bruce 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

I have not ever heard of or use dovecot before. Our users uses thunderbird client which happens to be the lastest version. Below is what we get as you can see we are missing folders from September 2019. Dovecot seem to be running but I am not sure why it be missing these folders. The server Dovecot is running on is Unbuntu 16.04 version. # dovecot --version 2.2.22 (fe789d2) The above is the version of dovecot we are running. I would appreciate anyone Helping to trouble shoot this issue. I don't think this is a thunderbird issue. [cid:image001.png@01D5C4B4.9AD315E0] Thunderbird version is this below: [cid:image002.jpg@01D5C4B4.9AD315E0] It looks like we are not indexing. We are not using a SQL database either for this. Any ideas where I can start. Also far I know there been no outages during that time. I appreciate any thoughts or help. Phillip Bruce Sr. System Engineer 415-590-8491 office "The answer to your Traveling Solutino" [Deem Demo] This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above, and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or you have reason to believe that you received this message in error, you must not read, copy, use or disclose this communication. Please also notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you.

2 1

Re: 2FA for Dovecot
by Kees de Jong 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

I did mention OTP for 2FA, and OTP can be indeed Google Authenticator, the reason I'm not that specific is because the documentation isn't :) PAM can indeed be used for this, I've read some list conversations about this [1], [2]. However, as I mentioned in my first post, I'm interested to know about the internal Dovecot authentication methods. Since using PAM requires local users and I prefer using the virtual users inside Dovecot. There are several OTP authentication mechanisms in the source code [3], [4], [5]. However, these lack documentation [6]. Therefore, I would like to explore these builtin authentication methods first. Is there someone in the Dovecot community that can provide some more information about this, or the status of these authentication modules? [1] https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2013-March/088844.html [2] https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2007-February/019340.html [3] https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/auth/mech-otp.c [4] https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/auth/mech-otp-skey-common.c [5] https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/auth/password-scheme-otp.c [6] https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/authentication_… On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 05:54 +0200, dovecot-request(a)dovecot.org wrote: > You don't say what sort of 2FA you're considering, but wouldn't you > just tell Dovecot to use PAM, and then extend PAM to use a 2FA > module. For example there's a Google Auth one available in the second > link below. > > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/pam/ > https://github.com/google/google-authenticator-libpam > > P. > (Not a dovecot expert, although I know a fair amount about Linux)

1 0

doveadm auth cache flush does not work through director
by Joe Wong 07 Jan '20

07 Jan '20

Hello, I am using Dovecot 2.3.7.2, configure with Director and Dovecot backend. Everything is running fine through director. However, I found the auth cache flush command can only work on dovecot backend server but not in Director. Any idea? - Joe

1 0

Logging what sieve does
by ＠lbutlr 06 Jan '20

06 Jan '20

Is there anyway to log exactly what sieve does with a message? (Like, what rules triggered, flags applied, headers rewritten, if the message was placed anywhere else before final delivery, etc). -- In Genua, stories came to life. In Genua, someone set out to make dreams come true. Remember some of your dreams?

2 1

LDA-DUPES insists mon being created in the wrong home directory
by Hans Rasmussen 06 Jan '20

06 Jan '20

Hi Vacation sieve is not respecting the days: arguement .dovecot.lda-dupes wants to be created in /home/user which doesn't exist. Below is a log fragment.. Jan 5 17:56:24 mailserv dovecot: lmtp(hans): Error: file_dotlock_open(/home/hans/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory dovecot -n says... # 2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.21 (92477967) # OS: Linux 4.15.0-72-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS ext4 auth_mechanisms = plain login first_valid_gid = 999 first_valid_uid = 999 mail_gid = 999 mail_home = /var/lib/vmail/%u mail_location = maildir:/var/lib/vmail/%u/Maildir mail_privileged_group = mail mail_uid = 999 managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext Shouldn't .dovecot.lda-dupes respect the mail_home argument. Thanks much Hans

2 1

Will service restart cause file corruption？
by hfh＠cndns.com 06 Jan '20

06 Jan '20

If the program is writing email content to the disk, will the program restart cause the email content to be written incomplete and the file will be damaged? hfh(a)cndns.com

1 0

Get protocol used in the post login script
by André Rodier 05 Jan '20

05 Jan '20

Hello, I have a post-login script, in Dovecot, that send warnings to users using XMPP. However, I would like hthe warning to include the protocol used, i.e. IMAP or POP3. How can I do this, please? Thanks, André.

1 0

Re: Dovecot, pigeonhole and hardlinks
by Gionatan Danti 03 Jan '20

03 Jan '20

Il 03-01-2020 19:51 @lbutlr ha scritto: > On 03 Jan 2020, at 06:16, Gionatan Danti <g.danti(a)assyoma.it> wrote: >> What surprises me is that hard-linking identical messages saves so >> much space, yet nobody seems to asking/using such feature. >> So, either a) few cares about saving space or b) few are using the >> pigeonhole plugin. And both a) and b) seems unlikely... > > Or > > c) we see nearly no truly identical messages. Well, sure, this is another possibility. However, on all mailserver which I manage, a significant portion of total emails are messages sent to groups/lists rather than single recipient. Cyrus and other proprietary mailservers (eg: CommuniGate Pro) use unix shared storage (aka hardlink) to avoid copying the message to multiple inboxes. This is especially valuable when a) large groups exists or b) a large message is sent to groups/lists. Please also note that, when not using Pigeonhole, Dovecot *does* use hardlink for messages sent to multiple recipients and/or groups. It is only when Pigeonhole is active that the hardlinking does not happen. Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

1 0

Dovecot, pigeonhole and hardlinks
by Gionatan Danti 03 Jan '20

03 Jan '20

Hi list, many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the original thread: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-November/102579.html I would ask the same things today: is dovecot+pigeonhole capable of storing the same incoming message, sent to multiple rcpt or to a group/alias expanding in multiple recipients, as a single hardlink? Note: I know about SIS, but it has some important drawback and I would avoid using it. Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

2 4