- dovecot - dovecot.org

SSL overview...
by SH Development 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Can someone help me understand the overall picture of SSL certificates in this scenario? I have a working dovecot/postfix/mysql server. It has a certificate. I now want to create a second, essentially duplicate configured server for use with replication. What is the relationship between the certificate and the hostname, or the DNS entry since the certs are created using the server’s domain name? mail.serverA.mydomain has a certificate that was created using mail.serverA.mydomain. The server's hostname is mail.serverA.mydomain. Now enter the new server. It would probably be: mailserverB.mydomain and a certificate created using mail.serverB.mydomain. The server’s hostname would be mail.serverB.mydomain. My questions: 1. Can I use the same certificate on both servers since they are serving email for the same domain? 2. Does the hostname have to be the same as the domain name, and thus the name used to create the cert? Sorry if I’m muddled about this. It was never really an issue until I wanted to add a secondary server into the mix. Ethon B.

2 3

Convert from mbox to Maildir
by Josef Wolf 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Hello everybody, I am in the process to install dovecot as an IMAP server. Currently, this system runs postfix and uses procmail for local (mbox style) delivery. Procmail ist started by postfix like this: /etc/postfix/main.cf: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail ~/.forward: "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 # jw" Before going into IMAP details, I decided to convert the system to Maildir as a first step. So I created a procmail-entryrecipe to populate a test folder: ~/.procmailrc: :0 * ^Subject:.*dovecot-test { ORGMAIL="${HOME}/Maildir/" DEFAULT=${ORGMAIL} DELIVER="/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -o mail_location=maildir:~/Maildir -o lda_mailbox_autocreate=yes" :0 | $DELIVER -m dovecot-test } This setup seems to work. But there is one point that bugs me: in the first tests, dovecot was mis-configured (the two -o options were missing) and the test mails were silently lost. No errors in the procmail logfile. Only dovecot reports errors in its logfile. But the error seems not to be noticed by procmail. Therefore procmail assumes deliver could store the mail successfully and won't keep a backup of it. I am sure, I'm doing something stupid here. I have never seen such behavior from procmail before. Normally procmail would report failure of sub-commands. Now I hesitate to go forward in this conversion process. I don't want to loose mails if something is wrong with the dovcot setup. Besides: I wonder whether the setting DEFAULT=${ORGMAIL} is a good idea. Wouldn't it be better to have DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/$USER so there would be a fallback in case there are delivery problems to ${ORGMAIL} Any thougths? -- Josef Wolf jw(a)raven.inka.de

4 5

Question about ITERINDEX in 2.2.32
by María Arrea 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Hello I have a question about the new setting ITERINDEX. This is my filesystem layout /indices_dovecot : 8 x Fast SSD drives /buzones : 32x SAS 10k rpm disks /buzones/alternativo : 24 x SAS 7.2k rpm slow disks This is my mail_location: mail_location = mdbox:/buzones/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:INDEX=/indices_dovecot/indices/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n:ALT=/buzones/alternativo/domain/%2.26Hn/%2.200Hn/%n What should I write in mail_location with the new ITERINDEX setting? Regards María

2 6

Locking Errors
by List 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

We recently upgraded to version 2.2.10-8 on Centos 7 (from 2.2.10-7) and immediately started experiencing errors in the log file that look like this: Error: Broken file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist line 891: Invalid data: Error: Timeout (180s) while waiting for lock for transaction log file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot.index.log Error: /mail/user/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot-uidlist: next_uid was lowered (421 -> 419, hdr=418) Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: invalid record size Error: Broken file /mail/user/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot-uidlist line 156: Invalid data: Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: invalid record size Error: Index /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot.index: Lost log for seq=2 offset=2392 Error: fcntl(write-lock) locking failed for file /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot.index.log: Stale file handle We are not sure what might be causing this, can anyone help illuminate what’s going on?

3 5

Setting up replication - First steps...
by SH Development 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Just had my first (non-Dovecot) server failure due to dried out caps on the motherboard. Got me to thinking about my single-point-of-failure mail server. Currently running Dovecot and Postfix with no issues, but want to start taking steps just to be safe. I currently run a filesystem backup every 24 hours to a tar file over NFS to another server in our rack. I am backing up: /home/vmail /etc/dovecot /etc/postfix Unfortunately, the vmail directory has grown to 27GB and takes around 7 hours now to backup as described above. Which leads me to start thinking about how quickly I could restore the server from a backup if need be, and that time is at least 7 hours just to copy and untar the files onto another hard drive. I’m sure I could hook up a HD up directly to the backup server, then I could considerably reduce the time, but I’m making the assumption that I won’t always have quick physical access to the location. So I believe my first step is to set up another server, on another IP, different hostname, with Dovecot and Postfix, and simply use the files from the /etc directories of the existing server to configure it (changing the IP and hostname of course). Am I on the right track so far? Next steps involve setting up replication with dsync? If I have successfully setup replication between the two servers, does this mean users can then actually log into either server and have their “stuff” intact? So I could set up DNS failover in case the primary server fails? Would this make the setup acceptable for secondary MX as everything should sync to the primary server when it comes back online? Sorry for thinking out loud, but I want to make sure I’m understanding the bigger picture here. Jeff

4 3

Re: Newbie question...
by SH Development 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

I see you haven’t received an answer. Sorry people here don’t seem to have time or inclination to answer basic questions. I’ve tried. You’re better to search elsewhere. Ethon > On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Michael Segel <dovecot_mjs(a)hotmail.com <mailto:dovecot_mjs@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve downloaded and built dovecot from the source. > Now I’ve run in to a couple of issues. > Like namespaces. > > Is there an example of the namespaces settings? Nothing fancy, just the basics… > > These are private mailboxes, but still need to know what I have to do to set this correctly. > > Thanks In Advance, > > -Mike >

3 4

Filtering by country
by Anvar Kuchkartaev 16 Oct '17

16 Oct '17

Is it possible to filter out logins by country (I would like to limit dovecot instance users to log in only from specific countries)?‎‎ Anvar Kuchkartaev anvar(a)anvartay.com

3 2

Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33)
by Aki Tuomi 15 Oct '17

15 Oct '17

We'll take a look ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot(a)reub.net> Date: 12/10/2017 07:50 (GMT+02:00) To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi(a)dovecot.fi> Subject: Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33) Hi Aki, I think I posted a bt full of this in the original email I sent to the list: https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-October/109583.html I've got heaps of coredumps if we need to pick apart one specific one now though. Reuben On 12/10/2017 3:36 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > can you provide bt full output from core? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot(a)reub.net> > Date: 12/10/2017 06:22 (GMT+02:00) > To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi(a)dovecot.fi>, dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33) > > Hi, > > Just to confirm this is still a major problem for me with the 2.2.33.1 > release (did not exist in previous releases). > > Reuben > > > On 8/10/2017 6:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Thanks! We'll look into it. >> >> >> >> --- >> Aki Tuomi >> Dovecot oy >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Reuben Farrelly <reuben-dovecot(a)reub.net> >> Date: 07/10/2017 13:08 (GMT+02:00) >> To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org >> Subject: Core Dumps with dovecot-2.2 -git as of 2.2.devel (eaf276b33) >> >> This appears to be breaking dsync at the moment and is caused by >> something committed in the last week or so. This is with the current >> -git of dovecot-2.2 (eaf276b33). >> >> The crash happens all the time - the logs are full of this message. >> >> Oct 7 20:31:24 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Warning: I/O >> leak: 0x7f8bb6581b4c (ostream-file.c:350, fd 14) >> Oct 7 20:31:24 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Panic: file >> ioloop.c: line 126 (io_remove_full): assertion failed: (io->callback != >> NULL) >> Oct 7 20:31:24 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Error: Raw >> backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd48a6) [0x7f8bb654a8a6] >> -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/li >> bdovecot.so.0(+0xd5e26) [0x7f8bb654be26] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7f8bb654ac39] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xf5cb0) [0x7f8bb6 >> 56bcb0] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_remove+0x1d) >> [0x7f8bb656be31] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x10b5f8) >> [0x7f8bb65815f8] -> /usr/lib64/dovec >> ot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_cork+0x5a) [0x7f8bb657e289] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so(+0x6406) [0x7f8bb12d6406] >> -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iost >> ream_openssl.so(openssl_iostream_bio_sync+0x18) [0x7f8bb12d6af6] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so(+0xa52e) >> [0x7f8bb12da52e] -> / >> usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so(+0xa6ef) [0x7f8bb12da6ef] >> -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_sendv+0xc7) >> [0x7f8bb657e765] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_send+0x61) [0x7f8bb657e688] >> -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x10dc2c) [0x7f8bb6583c2c] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x10ddd4) [0x7f8bb6583dd4] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_sendv+0xc7) [0x7f8bb657e765] >> -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_nsendv+0x55) >> [0x7f8bb657e93f] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_nsend+0x61) [0x7f8bb657e8d3] >> -> dovecot/doveadm-server() [0x444a35] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_warning+0xce) [0x7f8bb654afdc] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_destroy+0x2ca) >> [0x7f8bb656d8cd] -> dovecot/doveadm-server() [0x4454d1] -> >> dovecot/doveadm-server() [0x445793] -> dovecot/doveadm-server() >> [0x445dd6] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0xd6) >> [0x7f8bb656d241] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0x225) >> [0x7f8bb656fe58] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x3e) >> [0x7f8bb656d422] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0xbe) >> [0x7f8bb656d345] >> Oct 7 20:31:24 thunderstorm.reub.net dovecot: doveadm: Fatal: master: >> service(doveadm): child 27186 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) >> >> >> thunderstorm reuben # file core >> core: ELF 64-bit LSB core file x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style, >> from 'dovecot/doveadm-server', real uid: 0, effective uid: 0, real gid: >> 0, effective gid: 0, execfn: '/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server', >> platform: 'x86_64' >> >> thunderstorm reuben # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server core >> GNU gdb (Gentoo 8.0.1 vanilla) 8.0.1 >> Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later >> <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> >> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. >> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" >> and "show warranty" for details. >> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu". >> Type "show configuration" for configuration details. >> For bug reporting instructions, please see: >> <https://bugs.gentoo.org/>. >> Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at: >> <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/>. >> For help, type "help". >> Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"... >> Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...done. >> [New LWP 27186] >> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". >> Core was generated by `dovecot/doveadm-server'. >> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >> #0 0x00007f8bb60e7f70 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) bt full >> #0 0x00007f8bb60e7f70 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >> No symbol table info available. >> #1 0x00007f8bb60e9aa7 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 >> No symbol table info available. >> #2 0x00007f8bb654a8f5 in default_fatal_finish (type=LOG_TYPE_PANIC, >> status=0) at failures.c:201 >> backtrace = 0x228e4d8 >> "/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd48a6) [0x7f8bb654a8a6] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd5e26) [0x7f8bb654be26] -> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7f8bb654ac39] -> /usr"... >> #3 0x00007f8bb654be26 in i_internal_fatal_handler (ctx=0x7ffef81daa50, >> format=0x7f8bb65ba898 "file %s: line %d (%s): assertion failed: (%s)", >> args=0x7ffef81daa70) >> at failures.c:670 >> status = 0 >> #4 0x00007f8bb654ac39 in i_panic (format=0x7f8bb65ba898 "file %s: line >> %d (%s): assertion failed: (%s)") at failures.c:275 >> ctx = {type = LOG_TYPE_PANIC, exit_status = 0, timestamp = 0x0, >> timestamp_usecs = 0} >> args = {{gp_offset = 40, fp_offset = 48, overflow_arg_area = >> 0x7ffef81dab50, reg_save_area = 0x7ffef81daa90}} >

3 6

Updating keywords on copy/move
by Daniele Ricci 14 Oct '17

14 Oct '17

Hello, I'm working on my virtual keywords plugin [1] to add an apparently simple feature: add a keyword to a message when it is moved or copied into a virtual folder (let's forget about what keyword to add, I'm starting with a hard-coded one to understand Dovecot plugin development). So I've added a mail_copy hook by the notify plugin [2] and did a simple call to mail_update_keywords [3]. The current source code shows a call to mail_get_backend_mail, this is me experimenting, I've also tried calling mail_update_keywords directly on "dst" mail. The result is an imap crash: Oct 14 21:22:26 notebook dovecot: imap(daniele): Panic: file mail-log-plugin.c: line 461 (mail_log_mail_transaction_commit): assertion failed: (msg->pretext == NULL) Oct 14 21:22:26 notebook dovecot: imap(daniele): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9f0a2) [0x7f81af52f0a2] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9f19a) [0x7f81af52f19a] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7f81af4bfcf8] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib20_mail_log_plugin.so(+0x19e8) [0x7f81aeae89e8] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib15_notify_plugin.so(notify_contexts_mail_transaction_commit+0x58) [0x7f81aecec548] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib15_notify_plugin.so(+0x2105) [0x7f81aeced105] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_transaction_commit_get_changes+0x52) [0x7f81af807ca2] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_transaction_commit+0x21) [0x7f81af807d71] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib20_virtual_plugin.so(virtual_transaction_commit+0x78) [0x7f81ae8e2fb8] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib15_notify_plugin.so(+0x20ec) [0x7f81aeced0ec] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_transaction_commit_get_changes+0x52) [0x7f81af807ca2] -> dovecot/imap(+0x10084) [0x563d0ff2b084] -> dovecot/imap(command_exec+0x5c) [0x563d0ff37d9c] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1b322) [0x563d0ff36322] -> dovecot/imap(+0x1b3bc) [0x563d0ff363bc] -> dovecot/imap(client_handle_input+0x18d) [0x563d0ff3677d] -> dovecot/imap(client_input+0xac) [0x563d0ff36ccc] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x52) [0x7f81af544742] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0x12e) [0x7f81af545d8e] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x36) [0x7f81af5447d6] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x38) [0x7f81af544988] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f81af4ca353] -> dovecot/imap(main+0x329) [0x563d0ff29139] -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1) [0x7f81af1132e1] -> dovecot/imap(_start+0x2a) [0x563d0ff292ca] This happens after my hook returns. Now, before activating core dumps and starting to do some serious debugging and reverse engineering, I ask: do I have to do something extra such as opening a transaction or something? Isn't the notify plugin supposed to do that already? Thanks for your help! [1] http://github.com/daniele-athome/dovecot-virtual-keywords-plugin [2] https://github.com/daniele-athome/dovecot-virtual-keywords-plugin/blob/keyw… [3] https://github.com/daniele-athome/dovecot-virtual-keywords-plugin/blob/keyw… -- Daniele

1 0

Last Login example
by Jorge Bastos 14 Oct '17

14 Oct '17

Howdy, Where can i find a configuration example for the last login plugin, that fits for latest dovecot version? Thanks in advanced! Jorge,

1 0