- dovecot - dovecot.org

Server certificate verification error with Dovecot 2.3.2.1
by Robert Gill 14 Sep '18

14 Sep '18

I'm attempting to upgrade my Dovecot installation to 2.3.2.1. My SSL certificate authority provides a bundle containing their CA, plus intermediate CAs, which I configure using the 'ssl_ca' option. The comments in the configuration file say to only set this when you're requiring client certificates, which I'm not, but fetchmail complains with a "Server certificate verification error, Broken certificate chain" error if that setting is not set. This works fine with Dovecot 2.2.34. After upgrading to 2.3.2.1, fetchmail throws that error whether 'ssl_ca' is set or not. Dovecot 2.3.2.1 reports the error SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert unknown ca: SSL alert number 48 in the logs when attempting the TLS handshake. The permissions on the CA bundle haven't changed and should still be readable by Dovecot. I'm running Gentoo Linux on x86_64 and mail is stored on an ext4 file system. I'm attaching my config files for both Dovecot 2.2.34 and Dovecot 2.3.2.1.

3 3

dovecot + centos 7 + internal ca + hostname change
by Matt Bryant 13 Sep '18

13 Sep '18

Not sure if this is dovecot or not but can find very little ie no info around on this ... and added the pem file into /etc/pki/ca-trust/source/anchors and run udpate-ca-trust .. all works ok .. (this is on centos 7 btw) So wanted to change the hostname away from ip-x-x-x-x to something a little bit more descriptive .. but then kaboom .. doesnt work any more and the following errors are seen. Have created and internal CA for domain and added it to Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec) starting up for imap, pop3, lmtp, sieve (core dumps disabled) Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'attr->pValue != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'lexer->tok.field.name && lexer->tok.field.value' not true at p11_lexer_next Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: message repeated 16 times: [ auth: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build] Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'new_memory != NULL' not true at maybe_expand_array Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at p11_array_push Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at sink_object Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'new_memory != NULL' not true at maybe_expand_array Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at p11_array_push Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at sink_object ... ... Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'new_memory != NULL' not true at maybe_expand_array Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at p11_array_push Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at sink_object Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'attr->pValue != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: 'new_memory != NULL' not true at maybe_expand_array Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at p11_array_push Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: shouldn't be reached at sink_object Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: no CKA_CLASS attribute found Sep 13 10:42:04 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth: Error: p11-kit: couldn't load file into objects: /usr/share/pki/ca-trust-source/ca-bundle.trust.p11-kit Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child 14389 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child 14391 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: p11-kit: 'attrs != NULL' not true at attrs_build Sep 13 10:42:05 ip-10-0-40-230 dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child 14393 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled) why would a hostname change make any difference here .. the certs specified in dovecot config are all complete in their chain so not sure what its trying to do ... set hostname back to original works find .. so something is obviously tied or keyed to hostname though cant find anything specific anyone seen anything like this at all ?? rgds Matt

1 1

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 13 Sep '18

13 Sep '18

Must be non root user as well On 9/12/2018 1:05 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Ok. We have that fix as well but for other reasons. Good to know this. > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch(a)whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 12/09/2018 21:36 (GMT+02:00) > To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi(a)dovecot.fi>, dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: make check (pigeonhole) > > Hi Aki, > > I needed this patch > <https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/dovecot.git/tree/dovecot-2.3.0.1-li…> > (fedora): > > |diff -up dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt > dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c --- > dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c.libxcrypt 2018-02-28 > 15:28:58.000000000 +0100 +++ dovecot-2.3.0.1/src/auth/mycrypt.c > 2018-03-27 10:57:38.447769201 +0200 @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ # define _XPG6 > /* Some Solaris versions require this, some break with this */ #endif > #include <unistd.h> +#include <crypt.h> #include "mycrypt.h" All works > well now. Thanks for your help Eric | > > On 9/12/2018 12:35 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> I tried reproducing your problem and I only can make it happen if I >> run the test suite as root, which is not supported. >> >> Aki >> >> >> On 12.09.2018 06:49, Eric Broch wrote: >>> >>> I'll give those a look and make change accordingly. >>> >>> >>> On 9/11/2018 9:26 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>> You know we have rpm packages for 2.3.2.1 available at >>>> https://repo.dovecot.org if you are in a hurry? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Aki Tuomi >>>> Dovecot oy >>>> >>>> -------- Original message -------- >>>> From: Eric Broch <ebroch(a)whitehorsetc.com> >>>> Date: 12/09/2018 00:35 (GMT+02:00) >>>> To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org >>>> Subject: Re: make check (pigeonhole) >>>> >>>> Any news on this error on CentOS 7 ? >>>> >>>> Help! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/10/2018 9:32 AM, Eric Broch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I attempted as non-root user and got the exact same error. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>>>> Have you attempted this as non-root user? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Aki Tuomi >>>>>> Dovecot oy >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Eric Broch >>>>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Eric Broch >>>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Broch >>> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) >> > > -- > Eric Broch > White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

1 0

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 13 Sep '18

13 Sep '18

I'll give those a look and make change accordingly. On 9/11/2018 9:26 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > You know we have rpm packages for 2.3.2.1 available at > https://repo.dovecot.org if you are in a hurry? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch(a)whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 12/09/2018 00:35 (GMT+02:00) > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: make check (pigeonhole) > > Any news on this error on CentOS 7 ? > > Help! > > > On 9/10/2018 9:32 AM, Eric Broch wrote: >> >> I attempted as non-root user and got the exact same error. >> >> >> On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>> Have you attempted this as non-root user? >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Aki Tuomi >>> Dovecot oy >> >> -- >> Eric Broch >> White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) > > -- > Eric Broch > White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

2 3

Adding namespace alias_for causes index resync?
by Tom Sommer 13 Sep '18

13 Sep '18

I just added a new namespace-alias with alias_for. Apparently this causes all mailbox indexes to be resynced? Is this intentional and/or is there some way to avoid this? My NFS storage pretty much kills its elf when hundreds of thausands of users needs to resync indexes :) Thanks -- Tom

1 1

Re: LMTP tcp listener with auth?
by Andreas Thienemann 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Hi Stephan, On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Stephan Bosch wrote: > LMTP currently does not support AUTH. Bummer. Thought so. > What is your use case? Most people hide LMTP behind a firewall, or don't > expose it through TCP/IP in the first place. The port is currently only available to a few trusted machines, but having auth available would have been a nice benefit in case the firewall gets misconfigured. Cyrus for example will expose the LMTP port via TCP if configured, but expects valid user credentials. The larger use-case is a migration from cyrus to dovecot. As it's not just the MDA but also the MTA installation that is being migrated I need a way to deliver mail from the old MTA to the new MDA. LMTP comes in handy. https://github.com/ixs/lmtp_proxy/blob/master/README.md#minmal-downtime-mig… has a rough invocation of the steps needed for that. As I said, LMTP auth isn't critical for this, but would have been a nice addition. cheers, Andreas

1 0

Letsencrypt certificate for repo.dovecot.org expired May 14th..
by B. Reino 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Dear all, Just in case you've missed it, the certificate for repo.dovecot.org just expired yesterday. This causes errors in e.g. apt-get update. Thanks in advance for fixing it, -- B. Reino

2 6

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

I attempted as non-root user and got the exact same error. On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Have you attempted this as non-root user? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

2 2

Log sync error
by Jakobus Schürz 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Hi there! I get a lot of errormessages. My dovecot is: dovecot-core 2:2.3.2.1-1~stretch from Debian stable. I found this: https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-July/091648.html So the bug came back... The Log is attached Thanks Jakob

1 0

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

I did so as non-root user and got the same error. On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Have you attempted this as non-root user? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch(a)whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 10/09/2018 18:03 (GMT+02:00) > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: make check (pigeonhole) > > Dovecot list, > > 1) I downloaded latest dovecot and pigeonhole tar balls and extracted on > latest updated CentOS 7 : dovecot-2.3.2.1.tar.gz and > dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2.tar.gz > > 2) I moved pigeonhole (dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2) directory into > dovecot (dovecot-2.3.2.1) directory > > 3) built dovecot with following config and paramerters: > > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-2.0-defaultconfig.patch > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-1.0.beta2-mkcert-permissions.patch > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-2.2.27-mkcert-paths.patch > > sed -i '/DEFAULT_INCLUDES *=/s|$| '"$(pkg-config --cflags > libclucene-core)|" src/plugins/fts-lucene/Makefile.in > > #export CFLAGS="-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions > -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches > -fno-strict-aliasing" > #export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,relro" > aclocal --install -I m4 > autoreconf -I . -fiv > > ./configure \ > INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p -m644" \ > --docdir=/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.3.2.1 \ > --disable-static \ > --disable-rpath \ > --with-nss \ > --with-shadow \ > --with-pam \ > --with-gssapi=plugin \ > --with-ldap=plugin \ > --with-sql=plugin \ > --with-lua=plugin \ > --with-pgsql \ > --with-mysql \ > --with-sqlite \ > --with-vpopmail=/etc/libvpopmail \ > --with-zlib \ > --with-libcap \ > --with-libwrap \ > --with-lucene \ > --with-ssl=openssl \ > --with-ssldir=/etc/pki/dovecot \ > --with-solr \ > --with-systemdsystemunitdir=/usr/lib/systemd/system \ > --with-docs > > sed -i 's|/etc/ssl|/etc/pki/dovecot|' doc/mkcert.sh > doc/example-config/conf.d/10-ssl.conf > > make -j3 > > 4) built pigeon hole with the following paramters: > > # required for snapshot > [ -f configure ] || autoreconf -fiv > [ -f ChangeLog ] || echo "Pigeonhole ChangeLog is not available, yet" > >ChangeLog > > ./configure \ > INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p -m644" \ > --disable-static \ > --with-dovecot=../ \ > --with-ldap=plugin \ > --without-unfinished-features > > make -j3 > > 5) during 'make check' of pigeonhole got the following error: > > make[3]: Entering directory > `/root/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dovecot-2.3.2.1/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2/src/lib-sieve/util' > for bin in test-edit-mail; do \ > if ! /bin/sh ../../../run-test.sh ../../.. ./$bin; then exit 1; fi; \ > done > test-edit-header(root): Error: Cannot lookup test user: Mail access for > users with UID 89 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid > from mail_uid setting). > ../../../run-test.sh: line 27: 29930 Segmentation fault (core > dumped) valgrind -q --trace-children=yes --leak-check=full > --log-file=test.out.$$ $noundef $* > ==29930== Invalid read of size 8 > ==29930== at 0x404699: mail_raw_user_create (mail-raw.c:142) > ==29930== by 0x40325B: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:105) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== Address 0xb8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd > ==29930== > ==29930== > ==29930== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) > ==29930== Access not within mapped region at address 0xB8 > ==29930== at 0x404699: mail_raw_user_create (mail-raw.c:142) > ==29930== by 0x40325B: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:105) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack > ==29930== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but > ==29930== possible), you can try to increase the size of the > ==29930== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. > ==29930== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608. > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 35 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F377C: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:215) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 36 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 37 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 48 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x403159: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:101) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 52 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x528A74E: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x528A74E: p_strdup_vprintf (strfuncs.c:167) > ==29930== by 0x528A833: p_strdup_printf (strfuncs.c:111) > ==29930== by 0x40318E: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:52) > ==29930== by 0x40318E: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 53 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x5272941: event_create (lib-event.c:54) > ==29930== by 0x4E8797C: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1334) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 56 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x5272952: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x5272952: event_create (lib-event.c:56) > ==29930== by 0x4E8797C: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1334) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 59 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F3741: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:204) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 60 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F2D14: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1924) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 61 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F2D14: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1924) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 62 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x5250ED5: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x5250ED5: buffer_alloc (buffer.c:34) > ==29930== by 0x525110C: buffer_create_dynamic (buffer.c:143) > ==29930== by 0x5272805: array_create_i (array.h:129) > ==29930== by 0x5272805: event_get_field (lib-event.c:383) > ==29930== by 0x5273283: event_add_str (lib-event.c:400) > ==29930== by 0x5273437: event_add_fields (lib-event.c:438) > ==29930== by 0x4E879FD: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1335) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 67 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F377C: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:215) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 68 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 69 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 70 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E8C454: mailbox_attributes_init > (mailbox-attribute.c:17) > ==29930== by 0x4E7F2F5: mail_storage_init (mail-storage.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x4E87139: mail_storage_service_init > (mail-storage-service.c:975) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:66) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 71 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E8714A: mail_storage_service_init > (mail-storage-service.c:977) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:66) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 72 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x528AA66: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x528AA66: p_strconcat (strfuncs.c:223) > ==29930== by 0x51F40ED: settings_parse_keyvalue (settings-parser.c:845) > ==29930== by 0x51F50E0: settings_parse_environ (settings-parser.c:1103) > ==29930== by 0x51ED247: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:648) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== > ==29930== 6,144 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 74 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E876FA: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1238) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 12,288 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 75 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51EDD31: master_service_settings_cache_init > (master-service-settings-cache.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x4E87541: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1073) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 16,384 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 76 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51ED84C: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:580) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > Failed to run: ./test-edit-mail > > *Note: Previous versions of pigeonhole did a 'make check' successfully > even the first version of 2.3 (CE). Pigeonhole v0.5.1 and v0.5.2 fail on > CentOS 7 > > Help would be appreciated. > > > On 9/9/2018 3:11 PM, Eric Broch wrote: > > Anyone? > > > > > > On 9/8/2018 7:36 PM, Eric Broch wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> During the 'make check' (pigeonhole) portion of a building (rpmbuild) > >> a dovecot.spec file I'm getting the following error: > >> > >> testsuite(root): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID > >> (see mail_uid setting) > >> > >> I'm not sure how to resolve this, and any help would be appreciated > >> to help me finish the creating the rpm > >> > > > > -- > Eric Broch > White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) > -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

1 0