- dovecot - dovecot.org

sieve auto-creation/subscription - Thunderbird cannot re-arrange folders
by listy 31 Jan '26

31 Jan '26

Hi guys. In Thunderbird auto-subscribed folders - in my case a path with sub-folders - cannot be moved around, meaning top-bottom order. Parent folders Thunderbird shows in cursive and sub-folders (targets for sieve fules) are shown "normal" It seems impossible to re-arrange top/parent folders - but every other folder, top or not, which is not auto created & auto subscribed, Thunderbird can move around as expected. Anybody seen, anybody knows this and knows a way to "fix" it? many thanks, L.

2 4

How can these MBOX files on a Dovecot-based IMAP server be accessed in Outlook?
by Rawnie Dolgato 31 Jan '26

31 Jan '26

MBOX files stored on a Dovecot-based IMAP server cannot be accessed directly in Microsoft Outlook, because Outlook does not support the MBOX file format. Outlook works with PST files, so a conversion step is mandatory. While it is technically possible to convert MBOX files to EML and then import them into Outlook, this approach is impractical for real-world scenarios. It is time-consuming, difficult to manage, and not suitable when handling bulk mailboxes or large datasets, which is typically the case with server-level backups. For this reason, an MBOX to PST conversion tool (such as BitRecover MBOX to PST Converter) is recommended. It supports bulk MBOX data, preserves folder structure and metadata, and allows selective migration based on criteria like date, sender, or subject. The process runs 100% offline, ensuring data security, and works on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it suitable for both single and multi-mailbox migrations.

1 0

Subscriptions file broken in 2.4.x against 2.3.21 (V2)
by DaLiV 31 Jan '26

31 Jan '26

Hello! /eror at update from 2.3.21 to 2.4.2 / Maildir+ currently is broken. posix - so main hierarchy separator is "/" for file "subscriptions" in versions 2.4 lost possibility to recognize v2 format also as writes v1 instead with header V2 ... so all users will lost their subscriptions and must re-subscribe depsite in folder persist file in format V2 (tab separated) ... on subscribe that appends subscriptions delimeted with "/" namespace Public { type = public prefix = Public/ mail_driver = maildir mail_path = /var/mail/Public/%{auth_user|domain}/ mail_index_private_path = pvt.idx/Public mailbox_list_layout=fs separator = / subscriptions = no list = children } seems not taking in account separators and using "." instead of "/" slighlz debugged - in subsfile_set_subscribed - that gets on subscription for processing : "name"="Public/TEST" but "separator" = "." therefore splits not and decides that is version "0" ... so - somewhere deeper or possible need additional configuration Hello! eror at update from 2.3.21 to 2.4.2 Maildir+ currently is broken. posix - so main hierarchy separator is "/" for file "subscriptions" in versions 2.4 lost possibility to recognize v2 format also as writes v1 instead with header V2 ... so all users will lost their subscriptions and must re-subscribe depsite in folder persist file in format V2 (tab separated) ... on subscribe that appends subscriptions delimeted with "/" namespace Public { type = public prefix = Public/ mail_driver = maildir mail_path = /var/mail/Public/%{auth_user|domain}/ mail_index_private_path = pvt.idx/Public mailbox_list_layout=fs separator = / subscriptions = no list = children } seems not taking in account separators and using "." instead of "/" slighlz debugged - in subsfile_set_subscribed - that gets on subscription for processing : "name"="Public/TEST" but "separator" = "." therefore splits not and decides that is version "0" ... so - somewhere deeper or possible need additional configuration

1 0

New Member
by Jochen Becker 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

Hi all My name is Jochen and I have joined the list in order to get some first hand advice on my journey of migrating my SOHO mail server from 2.3 to 2.4. I set up my first server back in 2005 or so. OpenSuse and Cyrus IMAP. That went fine until all of a sudden, some 8 or 10 years ago, Suse no longer supported Cyrus directly. So I switched over to Dovecot and did not regret it. My current production server (OpenSuse Leap 16, Dovecot 2.4.2) is running fine after a recent migration. But the HW is ageing and disk usage is getting close to 80%. So I got new and larger HW. I run OpenSuse Leap 16.0 and Dovecot 2.4.2 on it. As I ran into unsurmountable problems there (could not move mail_path away from /var/mail), I decided to set up a test system under Ubuntu server 25.10. There I have got Dovecot running much better, but still, I ran into problems I could not solve for quite some time now. So here I am. I will start with questions about Dovecot on Ubuntu - my test system - because there I hope my mistakes are not as bad. Aki, thanks for taking me on board. Kind regards Jochen Mainz, Germany

2 1

Re: Panic: file imap-sieve-storage.c: line 216 (imap_sieve_add_mailbox_event): assertion failed: (ismt->src_box == NULL || ismt->src_box == src_box)
by Jeffrey Böhm 29 Jan '26

29 Jan '26

Hi, I’m seeing the same issue after upgrading to Dovecot 2.4.2. I reproduced it with both the Alpine Linux build and the official Dovecot Docker image referenced at [1]. In my case, the crash correlates strongly with iOS devices auto-deleting older messages from the Trash folder. As Christian described, it starts after a larger number of IMAP MOVE operations. Key finding: when I disable the imap_sieve extensions, the crashes stop. Personal Sieve rules continue to work as expected, so the problem appears to be specific to imap_sieve (or its interaction with frequent MOVE operations). > sieve_plugins { > sieve_imapsieve = no > } > > protocol imap { > mail_plugins { > imap_sieve = no > imap_filter_sieve = no > } > } My configuration with the enabled imap_sieve extension is located at [2]. Kind regards Jeff [1]: https://github.com/dovecot/docker [2]: https://github.com/jeboehm/docker-mailserver/blob/7433443ebd4af1c422cb4030c…

1 0

Migration to 2.4: Howto get the quota dict writing into a second DB
by volker.jaenisch＠inqbus.de 29 Jan '26

29 Jan '26

Dear Dovecot wizards! I have a question concerning the migration from 2.3.4 to 2.4.1. On 2.3.4 I had the following config dict { sql_store_user_quota = pgsql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-store-user_quota.conf } With /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-store-user_quota.conf: connect = host=127.0.0.1 port=5433 dbname=dddd user=uuuu password=pppp: map { pattern = priv/quota/storage table = fill_user username_field = username value_field = bytes } map { pattern = priv/quota/messages table = messages_user username_field = username value_field = messages } On 2.4.1 I tried dict_map priv/quota/storage { sql_table = emailaddress_fill username_field = emailaddress dict_map_value_field quota_bytes { type = uint } } dict fill { sql_driver = pgsql pgsql pg_mc2 { parameters { dbname = dddd host = hhhh password = ppppp user = uuuuu } } } But it is doing nothing. Am sure I am missing something here (I guess howto connect these config snippets). Any help appreciated. Cheers, Volker -- =========================================================== inqbus Scientific Computing GmbH Dr. Volker Jaenisch Hungerbichlweg 3 +49 (8860) 9222 7 92 86977 Burggen https://inqbus.de ===========================================================

4 8

Pigeonhole 2.4.2 build failure: cannot find -ldovecot-ldap even without LDAP support
by Adesh 29 Jan '26

29 Jan '26

Hi, I'm building Pigeonhole 2.4.2 (fresh tarball from https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-pigeonhole-2.4.2.tar.gz) against Dovecot 2.4.2 compiled without LDAP support (--without-ldap during Dovecot configure, no libdovecot-ldap.so present). The build fails at linking libdovecot-sieve.la: > _CC ext-fileinto.lo_ > _CC ext-reject.lo_ > _..._ > _CC sieve.lo_ > _CCLD libdovecot-sieve.la_ > _/opt/rh/devtoolset-11/root/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/ld: > cannot find -ldovecot-ldap_ > _collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status_ > _make[4]: *** [Makefile:757: libdovecot-sieve.la] Error 1_ NEWS confirms the fix is included: - sieve-ldap-storage: Fix compile without LDAP. Steps tried: * make distclean && ./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/local/apps/dovecot --with-ldap=no * Confirmed no openldap-devel influencing detection (or temporarily removed) * Fresh source extract, no prior build artifacts Configure output shows LDAP as disabled (or paste relevant lines if different). Is there an additional flag needed, or is this a regression/edge case in 2.4.2? Any patch or workaround would be appreciated. System: RHEL-like (devtoolset-11/gcc 11), Dovecot prefix /usr/local/apps/dovecot. -- Thanks and Regards, Adesh Rane Hi, I'm building Pigeonhole 2.4.2 (fresh tarball from [1]https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-pigeonhole-2.4.2.tar.…) against Dovecot 2.4.2 compiled without LDAP support (--without-ldap during Dovecot configure, no libdovecot-ldap.so present). The build fails at linking libdovecot-sieve.la: CC ext-fileinto.lo CC ext-reject.lo ... CC sieve.lo CCLD libdovecot-sieve.la /opt/rh/devtoolset-11/root/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/11/ld: cannot find -ldovecot-ldap collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [Makefile:757: libdovecot-sieve.la] Error 1 NEWS confirms the fix is included: - sieve-ldap-storage: Fix compile without LDAP. Steps tried: o make distclean && ./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/local/apps/dovecot --with-ldap=no o Confirmed no openldap-devel influencing detection (or temporarily removed) o Fresh source extract, no prior build artifacts Configure output shows LDAP as disabled (or paste relevant lines if different). Is there an additional flag needed, or is this a regression/edge case in 2.4.2? Any patch or workaround would be appreciated. System: RHEL-like (devtoolset-11/gcc 11), Dovecot prefix /usr/local/apps/dovecot. -- Thanks and Regards, Adesh Rane References Visible links 1. https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-pigeonhole-2.4.2.tar.gz

1 0

Bug-Report config handling with named filters
by Patrick Cernko 27 Jan '26

27 Jan '26

Hello Dovecot devs, I think I found a bug in Dovecot's config handling. The semantic of e.g. ssl_server { cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key } in a config file is slightly different to ssl_server_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem ssl_server_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key If the directives are used in the second (flat) format, they can be overridden by doveadm (or the sieve* binaries), if the first (structured) version is used, they cannot be overridden. Even if the flat format is used in a "local" config file to override the default config as installed by the CE Debian package (which uses the structured), overriding the value of ssl_server_key_file on the doveadm cmdline is not possible. This prevents unprivileged users to use doveadm or the sieve* binaries as they cannot the tools will fail with an access error for the key file, even if the users knows and uses "-o ssl_server_key_file=''" or "-o ssl_server/key_file=''". I did not test overriding other settings in structured format, but I assume, that the issue is also present there. That means, settings that are specified in the structured format CANNOT be overridden with the "-o" cmdline option. I would like to ask you, to fix this issue in one of the next releases, please! Best regards, P.S.: It would be nice, if doveconf would also get a "-o" option to test overrides. -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Scientific IT and Technical Service Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik & Softwaresysteme

1 0

mountpoint.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of function ‘makedev’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
by Andrew Watkins 27 Jan '26

27 Jan '26

Hello, I am trying to build dovecot-2.4.2 on Solaris 11.4 with gcc 14.2 and getting the following error: CC module-dir.lo CC mountpoint.lo mountpoint.c: In function ‘mountpoint_iter_next’: mountpoint.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of function ‘makedev’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 264 | iter->mnt.dev = makedev(ent.ext.mnt_major, ent.ext.mnt_minor); | ^~~~~~~ *** Error code 1 The following command caused the error: echo " CC " mountpoint.lo;/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -std=gnu11 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -mfunction-return=keep -mindirect-branch=keep -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -fno-builtin-strftime -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -MT mountpoint.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/mountpoint.Tpo -c -o mountpoint.lo mountpoint.c make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mountpoint.lo' Current working directory /var/tmp/dovecot-2.4.0/src/lib *** Error code 1 I have been using dovecot for a long time and haven't seen this before. I just checked and rebuilt dovecot-2.3.21 and had no problems. Any ideas? Thanks, Andrew Hello, I am trying to build dovecot-2.4.2 on Solaris 11.4 with gcc 14.2 and getting the following error: CC module-dir.lo CC mountpoint.lo mountpoint.c: In function `mountpoint_iter_next': mountpoint.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of function `makedev' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 264 | iter->mnt.dev = makedev(ent.ext.mnt_major, ent.ext.mnt_minor); | ^~~~~~~ *** Error code 1 The following command caused the error: echo " CC " mountpoint.lo;/bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -std=gnu11 -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -mfunction-return=keep -mindirect-branch=keep -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -fno-builtin-strftime -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -MT mountpoint.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/mountpoint.Tpo -c -o mountpoint.lo mountpoint.c make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mountpoint.lo' Current working directory /var/tmp/dovecot-2.4.0/src/lib *** Error code 1 I have been using dovecot for a long time and haven't seen this before. I just checked and rebuilt dovecot-2.3.21 and had no problems. Any ideas? Thanks, Andrew

2 5

Blocking with RBLs
by Lefteris Tsintjelis 27 Jan '26

27 Jan '26

Hi, Is there a way to block with RBLs? I already have a really good and very trustworthy and accurate internal one that works extremely well and fast with my SMTP servers for years now. Is there a way to apply the same RBL to dovecot? Logs are really going crazy as they stopped with SMTP and started with IMAP for a while now since dovecot is wide open to these attacks. Anvil does not seem to do much here. I am looking for solutions other than fail2ban or anything similar to this. Lefteris

11 26