- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] [PATCH] quota-status: remove unnecessary newlines
by Ulrich Zehl 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Here's a trivial patch for quota-status.c that removes unecessary newlines present in the default overquota message. It applies to 2.2 and 2.1. Ulrich --- a/src/plugins/quota/quota-status.c 2013-08-01 14:35:35.000000000 +0200 +++ b/src/plugins/quota/quota-status.c 2013-08-01 17:58:26.000000000 +0200 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ /* over quota */ value = mail_user_plugin_getenv(user, "quota_status_overquota"); if (value == NULL) - value = t_strdup_printf("554 5.2.2 %s\n\n", error); + value = t_strdup_printf("554 5.2.2 %s", error); } value = t_strdup(value); /* user's pool is being freed */ mail_user_unref(&user);

1 0

[Dovecot] trouble with setting individual quota values for multiple namespaces
by Andreas Oster 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Hello all please apologize that I repost this problem again. I tried to get some help several times on the list but did not find/get a solution. I am still struggling to setup different quotas for namespaces. In addition to the default "INBOX" namespace I have created a namespace called "MailArchive" which should have its own quota value of 5G per user. At first I configured quota2 like this: quota2 = maildir:MailArchive quota:ns=MailArchive/ quota2_rule = *:storage=5G and this seemd to work quite well. Users, accessing the MailArchive namespace can see the 5G limit in their mail client, unfortunately in the mail.err log file, errors like these repeatedly appear: Jul 29 11:40:24 mailserver dovecot: imap(testuser): Error: quota: Unknown namespace: MailArchive/ Jul 29 11:41:43 dovecot: last message repeated 47 times In the WIKI I have read, that in order to have quota for different namespaces, one would have to use different quota backends so I changed the quota config for the MailArchive namespace to SQL. namespace inbox { disabled = no hidden = no ignore_on_failure = no inbox = yes list = yes location = mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { auto = no driver = special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } namespace { disabled = no hidden = no ignore_on_failure = no inbox = no list = yes location = maildir:/var/vmail/archive/%Ln/Maildir mailbox "Archived Mails" { auto = subscribe driver = } prefix = MailArchive/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } plugin { quota = maildir:User quota:ns= quota2 = dict:Archive Quota:%u.mailarchive:ns=MailArchive/:proxy::sqlquota quota2_rule = *:storage=5G quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+200M } dict { sqlquota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } Unfortunately this did not change anything. Quota is working like expected but I still get the same errors in mail.err. I am currently using dovecot version 2.2.4. Thank you for your kind help best regards Andreas

2 4

[Dovecot] SSL warning messages
by Anand Kumria 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Hi, I've had the following appear in my logfile, and am just wondering what the warning means? dovecot: managesieve-login: Warning: SSL alert: where=0x4008, ret=256: warning close notify [a.b.c.d] dovecot: imap-login: Warning: SSL alert: where=0x4004, ret=256: warning close notify [w.x.y.z] Should I be worrying about these kinds of messages? Dovecot 2.2.4 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS if it is important. Thanks, Anand

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] Maildir permissions and Solr re-indexing
by Joseph Tam 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Michael Welsh Duggan writes: > All the files in my Maildir are owned by md5i:mail (I am md5i), and have > 660 permissions. All directories have the same user:group permissions, > and 770 with the setguid bit set. (That last may not be necessary, but > ... > > doveadm(md5i): Error: fchown(/home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test/dovecot.index.log.newlock, group=8(mail)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1000(md5i), group based on /home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test - see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm) > > After this, each directory has a dovecot.index.log with md5i:md5i 600 > permissions. I think the cause is clear enough: you (user=md5i/uid=1000) are not part of group mail (gid=8), so the dovecot user process doing things on your behalf cannot create index files that are anlogous to the mailbox it's indexing. You can either 1) add "md5i" to group mail 2) remove g+w permission on your mail files (making group membership irrelevant) 3) fiddle with "mail_privileged_group = mail", but I'm a little hazy on all the ramifications of this. I don't know your particular circumstances, so I don't know which is best. If (big if) nothing on your system (particularly the MTA) requires access to your mail spool files by running as group=mail, probably 2) is your best option. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

2 1

[Dovecot] LMTP: userdb lookup - user-filter with variables
by Burckhard Schmidt 31 Jul '13

31 Jul '13

I tried to use dovcots lmtp instead of dovecot-lda. postfix has in master.cf ... dovecot-lda -f ... -d ${user} to separate the user part from user(a)hostname.domain. So lookup of "user" succeeds in userdb (LDAP) done by dovecot-lda. I have always local addresses like to=<user(a)hostname.domain> postfix/lmtp[6579]: [ID 197553 mail.info] B3CDA66A16: to=<h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de> With lmtp the userpart must be separated also. I tried user_filter (LDAP) with %n, %Ln, %8n without success: userdb lookup: user(a)hostname.domain doesn't exist) dovecot-2.1.17 I used "doveadm user h0094slk" and "doveadm user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de" for my tests. userdb { driver = ldap args = /usr/dovecot/etc/ldapuser.conf } and ldapuser.conf with ... user_filter = (&(uid=%n) (objectClass=cmsAccount)) user_attrs = homeDirectory=home I modified user_filter like uid=%Ln or uid=%8u success for doveadm user h0094slk (because nothing to split) userdb: h0094slk home : /home/p0094/h0094slk but no success for doveadm user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de userdb lookup: user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de doesn't exist It looks for me like user_filter do not use variables at this point? What I'm missing? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen --- Burckhard Schmidt Abteilung Systemsoftware und Kommunikation ZE Computer- und Medienservice der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Postanschrift: Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin Standort: Rudower Chaussee 26; 12489 Berlin Tel.: +49-30-2093-70058 Fax: +49-30-2093-2959 Mail: bschmidt(a)cms.hu-berlin.de

1 1

Re: [Dovecot] LDA vs. LMTP
by Joseph Tam 31 Jul '13

31 Jul '13

Martin Burgraf writes: > > I don't know why you would consider a background process inferior to a > > run-on-demand executable. > > Well, the background process is hogging CPU and RAM while it basically > does nothing. "Hogging" CPU and memory is putting it strongly, as it is basically suspended while blocked on waiting for a connection, and if left for a long time in an idle state, might be swapped out to disk and not consuming (real) memory, or consuming real memory that isn't in use otherwise. As I stated before, the resource usage is small compared with all the other stuff going on, so if you don't have a busy mail server, I don't think you should sweat the difference. The benefits of LMTP should increase with load, as having LMTP resident will save you the overhead of repeatedly loading/unloading LDA, and I'm sure the CPU and memory usage of servicing that overhead will be non-trivial. If you have oodles of memory, then it's no problem keeping a LMTP resident. If you don't have enough memory and are VM disk thrashing, you'll have other problems and LDA/LMTP is the least of your worries. > And when it's running as root there is always the danger > of privilege escalation. LDA only runs when it's needed and since it > uses only user rights it shoudbe more harmless. I didn't contest the privilege separation aspect, as it a necessary design trade-off that one daemon doing things for all user will need overriding access. However, if this is a concern, you can virtualize all your users. LMTP can theoretically be subverted, but at least won't be as root. (I'm assuming LMTP stays as root, and not spawning off user processes to do the real work.) Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda not logging if dovecot runs under daemontools
by Jost Krieger 30 Jul '13

30 Jul '13

On Fri Jul 26 14:51:30 2013, Roberto Puzzanghera wrote: > > Hi Jost, thanks for your reply. > > Il 26.07.2013 13:11 Jost Krieger ha scritto: > >Dovecot-lda runs under qmail, so you'll find the output in qmail's > >logs. If you run, say, doveadm manually, the output will be on your > >terminal. > > I didn't explain myself very well. The qmail's log > /var/log/dovecot/current doesn't show the lda output as expected. I That's dovecot's log, not qmail's. > see onlythe output of imap and pop3. Anyway, running dovecot > manually or as daemon in the normal way (without daemontools) show > the lda output in the log. You are logging to stderr, in the delivery case that means qmail-local's output. This is somewhere in a place like /var/qmal/logs/qmail/current and looks similar to @4000000051f793e218f78c54 delivery 847552: success: lda(xxxxxxxx):_Info:_msgid=<20130730102215.ECB48809E9(a)carlos.noc.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>:_saved_mail_to_NOC-Order/did_0+0+1/ Yours Jost Krieger -- | Jost.Krieger+sig(a)ruhr-uni-bochum.de Please help stamp out spam! | | Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine at RUB Comp. Center | | Sincere words are not sweet, sweet words are not sincere. | | Lao Tse, Tao Te King 81 |

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] LDA vs. LMTP
by Martin Burgraf 30 Jul '13

30 Jul '13

Joseph Tam wrote: > I don't know why you would consider a background process inferior to a > run-on-demand executable. Well, the background process is hogging CPU and RAM while it basically does nothing. And when it's running as root there is always the danger of privilege escalation. LDA only runs when it's needed and since it uses only user rights it shoudbe more harmless. bye Martin

2 1

[Dovecot] LDA vs. LMTP
by Martin Burgraf 30 Jul '13

30 Jul '13

Hi there, I'm using Dovecot together with Postfix; as I understand it, there are two ways to transfer the mail from Postfix to Dovecot. 1.) by using LDA with mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f "$SENDER" -a "$RECIPIENT" 2.) by using LMTP with mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp (currently using number 1) I'm interessted in the differences and the advantages/disadvantages of each of those solutions. According to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA the recommended way is to use LMTP, since it's supposed to have a better performance. On the other hand, http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP says, that LMTP is a backgound process, while LDA is only called when needed. I've also read, that LDA only uses the users privileges, which both means, that LDA should be better. I've also noticed, that LMTP adds an additional Recieved:-Header to the mail. Are there any other differences? Thank you M.

7 7

[Dovecot] Problem switching from Dovecot LDA to LMTP - on dovecot 2.2.4
by Michael Long 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Dovecot LDA has been working fine for me but when I tried to follow the wiki and switch to LMTP I get: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table; In postfix/main.cf I went from: mailbox_transport = dovecot-spam to mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp Added this: service lmtp { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0600 user = postfix } } protocol lmtp { mail_fsync = optimized postmaster_address = postmaster@domainname mail_plugins = sieve zlib } And some other pertinent parts of the config: passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passdb driver = passwd-file } passdb { driver = pam } protocol lda { mail_fsync = optimized auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = sieve zlib postmaster_address = postmaster quota_full_tempfail = yes rejection_reason = Your message to <%t> was automatically rejected:%n%r lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes }

1 0

[Dovecot] Maildir permissions and Solr re-indexing
by Michael Welsh Duggan 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

I am running a very small dovecot installation with only one user (me). I use the Solr indexer for indexing. Due to complicated reasons, I was forced to remove all the indexes and need to re-index everything. All the files in my Maildir are owned by md5i:mail (I am md5i), and have 660 permissions. All directories have the same user:group permissions, and 770 with the setguid bit set. (That last may not be necessary, but I was trying several things to get my use case to work.) Unfortunately, I can't seem to get re-indexing to work. When I do "doveadm fts rescan -A" as root, I get the following error for each of my subgroups: doveadm(md5i): Error: fchown(/home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test/dovecot.index.log.newlock, group=8(mail)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1000(md5i), group based on /home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test - see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm) After this, each directory has a dovecot.index.log with md5i:md5i 600 permissions. I've read the mentioned page, and played around with the ideas on it, but haven't gotten things to work. Anyone have any clue to ship my way? -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i(a)md5i.com)

1 1

[Dovecot] zlib error when running doveadm
by Michael Long 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Upgraded to dovecot 2.2.4 from 2.1.16 Error I see is: doveadm(root): Error: Module is for different ABI version 2.1.16 (we have 2.2.ABIv3(2.2.4)): /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_zlib_plugin.so How do I resolve this? Configure options: ./configure --with-bzlib --with-ssl --with-mysql --with-zlib --with-pam Configuration: # 2.2.4: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-48-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS doveconf: Warning: Dovecot was last started using /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf, but this config is /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5 disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = * log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S " mail_access_groups = mail mail_debug = yes mail_gid = 8 mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_plugins = " zlib" mail_privileged_group = mail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passdb driver = passwd-file } passdb { driver = pam } plugin { fts = squat sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_debug = yes sieve_dir = ~/ sieve_global_dir = /etc/dovecot sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/dovecot.sieve zlib_save = gz zlib_save_level = 6 } protocols = imap pop3 sieve service auth { unix_listener /var/run/dovecot/auth-master { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-auth { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } user = root } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } inet_listener sieve_deprecated { port = 2000 } } ssl_cert = </etc/postfix/certs/postfix_public_cert.pem ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:ALL:!aNULL:!ADH:!eNULL:!EXP:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM ssl_key = </etc/postfix/certs/postfix_private_key.pem userdb { driver = passwd } verbose_proctitle = yes protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail mail_max_userip_connections = 50 mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = " zlib fts fts_squat zlib imap_zlib" } protocol pop3 { mail_max_userip_connections = 20 mail_plugins = " zlib zlib" pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv } protocol lda { auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = sieve zlib postmaster_address = postmaster quota_full_tempfail = yes rejection_reason = Your message to <%t> was automatically rejected:%n%r }

4 3

[Dovecot] Upgrading to dovecot2 broke IDLE on one mailer, but not another
by John Stracke 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Last weekend I upgraded my server (complete reinstall, actually), from Debian sarge to wheezy, which brought me from dovecot 1.x (I think) to 2.1.7. It's all working now, *except* that the MUA I use on Android, Kaiten (a fork of K-9), apparently no longer gets IDLE notifications. Before the upgrade, when mail arrived, Kaiten would pop up an Android notification immediately; now, it never does (or it might, hours later, with all the messages it notices at that time--presumably this happens when its background service gets killed off and restarted). The weird thing is that IDLE still works flawlessly with Thunderbird, which suggests this is a protocol interaction between Dovecot 2 and Kaiten. (I plan to check with the Kaiten folks next.) Has anybody here seen this? Is there something I can turn on in Dovecot to help debug it? I did check my old Dovecot settings, and they didn't specify anything non-default about IDLE. Thanks in advance! My configuration from dovecot -n: # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.9.3-x86-linode52 i686 Debian 7.0 log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S " mail_access_groups = mail mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_privileged_group = mail passdb { driver = pam } protocols = imap pop3 service auth { user = root } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 0 } } service pop3-login { inet_listener pop3 { port = 0 } } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot-2009.cert ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } protocol imap { mail_max_userip_connections = 100 } protocol pop3 { pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv } and the no-comments version of conf.d/20-imap.conf: protocol imap { imap_idle_notify_interval = 10 mins } -- /==============================================================\ | John Stracke | http://www.thibault.org | HTML OK | | François Thibault |---------------------------------------| | East Kingdom | "Okay, one more time, with *vowels*." | | francis(a)thibault.org | -- Ozy and Millie | \==============================================================/

2 2

[Dovecot] how to setup different quota for multiple namespaces
by Andreas Oster 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Hello all, I am using dovecot for some time now but always had very basic configurations. I recently have configured a new, additional namespace in order to move archived mails (Thunderbird Archives) to another storage system. namespace { type = private separator = . prefix = Archives. location = maildir:/var/vmail/archive/%Ln/Maildir subscriptions = yes list = children inbox = no } This works well but unfortunately I cannot find a solution to either ignore this new namespace from quota computation or add a separate quota value for it. I have integrated user authentication with LDAP and fetch some user attributes from LDAP entries: user_attrs = =home=/var/vmail/%Ln/Maildir,=mail=maildir:/var/vmail/%Ln/Maildir/,otherPager=quota_rule=*:storage=%$ I configured the quota plugin in the following way: plugin { quota = maildir:User quota:ns= quota2 = maildir:Archive quota:ns=Archives. quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = ns=Archives.:ignore } unfortunately this does not give the desired result. Folders under the Archives namespace use the same quota as INBOX. Does anyone have an idea how to fix this ? Thank you for your kind help Andreas

4 19

[Dovecot] convert to mdbox
by Birta Levente 29 Jul '13

29 Jul '13

Hi How can I convert all virtual mailboxes from maildir to mdbox? Manually, one by one, working, but I have a lot ... Virtual users and domains stored in sql database. Thats what I want: mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir to mail_location = mdbox:/var/vmail/%d/%n/mdbox Thanks Levi

3 3

[Dovecot] Please help with : undefined symbol: mail_deliver_save_open
by Markus Kalb 28 Jul '13

28 Jul '13

Greetings dovecot-mailing list! after upgrading from debian squeeze -> debian wheezy and therefore making the big dovecot jump from 1.x to 2.x we are stuck with one final(?) error that we can't get fixed. During login attempts the following is written to the logfiles. Error: dovecot: imap: Error: dlopen(/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib90_sieve_plugin.so) failed: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-sieve.so.0: undefined symbol: mail_deliver_save_open Searching the mailinglist and google in general the only thing i could find was that this error could be connected to loading the sieve plugin outside of lda. But as you can see in the attached config dump, we only load it inside the lda protocol block. ciao markus Our setup: > dovecot --version 2.1.7 > dovecot -n # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686 Debian 7.1 auth_debug = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login digest-md5 cram-md5 auth_verbose = yes mail_debug = yes mail_plugins = acl fts fts_solr mail_shared_explicit_inbox = no managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave imapflags notify namespace { hidden = no list = children location = maildir:/home/lists/.mail/:CONTROL=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/control:INDEX=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/index prefix = lists/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } namespace { hidden = yes list = no location = maildir:/home/security/.mail/:CONTROL=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/control:INDEX=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/index prefix = security/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } namespace { hidden = yes list = children location = maildir:/home/dsys/.mail/:CONTROL=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/control:INDEX=%h/.mail/private/.imap/shared/index prefix = duales_system/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } namespace inbox { hidden = no inbox = yes list = yes location = mbox:%h/.mail/private:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / type = private } passdb { args = scheme=DIGEST-MD5 username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/passwd driver = passwd-file } plugin { acl = vfile:/etc/dovecot/acls:cache_secs=300 sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_extensions = +imapflags +notify } protocols = " imap sieve" service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0666 user = postfix } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 143 } } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/SERVER.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/SERVER.key userdb { args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/passwd default_fields = mail_plugins=sieve system_groups_user=%u driver = passwd-file } protocol lda { mail_plugins = acl fts fts_solr sieve } protocol imap { mail_max_userip_connections = 20 mail_plugins = acl fts fts_solr } # dpkg -l '*dovecot*' |grep ii | cut -c 0-60 ii dovecot-antispam 2.0+20120225-3 ii dovecot-core 1:2.1.7-7 ii dovecot-imapd 1:2.1.7-7 ii dovecot-ldap 1:2.1.7-7 ii dovecot-managesieved 1:2.1.7-7 ii dovecot-sieve 1:2.1.7-7 ii dovecot-solr 1:2.1.7-7

1 1

Re: [Dovecot] LDA vs. LMTP
by Joseph Tam 28 Jul '13

28 Jul '13

"Martin Burgraf" <martin.bg(a)web.de> writes: > According to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LDA the recommended way is to use > LMTP, since it's supposed to have a better performance. The performance gains comes mostly from avoiding the overhead of invoking an executable and spawning a new process for each delivery. If your mail system isn't stressed, I don't think it matters much. > On the other hand, http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP says, that LMTP is a > backgound process, while LDA is only called when needed. I've also > read, that LDA only uses the users privileges, which both means, that > LDA should be better. I don't know why you would consider a background process inferior to a run-on-demand executable. > I've also noticed, that LMTP adds an additional Recieved:-Header to the mail. > Are there any other differences? >From a past discussion on this topic, I think Timo stated that if you use SIS (single-instance storage or de-duping), it's more efficient using LMTP since it knows all message bodies to multiple recipients will be identical. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] Case-insensitive "detail" mailboxes?
by /dev/rob0 27 Jul '13

27 Jul '13

We're using sieve with LMTP. We want to have lda_mailbox_autocreate and lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox. Is there a way to make the "detail" case-insensitive? If so I have not found it yet. I suppose we could lowercase the input string for the SQL userdb query, but that's not what is wanted. The idea being that if a user makes a mailbox called "Test" is that user+test(a)example.com and user+TEST(a)example.com should both go to that "Test" mailbox. If it was lowercased, a mailbox called "Test" would be ignored and "test" used. With autocreate, this could be a problem if mail is delivered to autocreated case-sensitive mailboxes that the user won't see. Hmmm, maybe a global sieve script? -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:

4 5

[Dovecot] dbus support in dovecot?
by Gene Heskett 27 Jul '13

27 Jul '13

Greetings; I am trying to transition from ubu10.04.4 LTS to ubu12.04.2 LTS, but in the changeover I want to setup dovecot as a local only imap server so that I can read & respond to email from any of the other 4 or so machines on my local net. To that end, and given that I have a well working setup right now, using fetchmail driving mailfilter as a pre-check, procmail as the MTA delivering to /var/spool/mail/me, with clamav and spamd in the mix to intercept and send to /dev/null the worst of the spam, or to a quarantine file if clamav triggers. The current transfer mechanism is driven by a script that uses inotifywait to detect newly delivered mail in that directory, and which then sends kmail a dbus message to go get the mail. Since I want to insert dovecot into this chain, does dovecot have a dbus port, and if so, what is the format of the command it expects? Thanks all. Cheers, Gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than 200 million guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens.

4 10

[Dovecot] Namespace, Sieve and upgrading to dovecot 2.0 -- no folder "INBOX/"
by Ben 27 Jul '13

27 Jul '13

I just upgraded from debian squeeze->wheezy. This meant upgrading from dovecot 1.2 to 2.1.7 and upgrading to Pigdeonhole sieve. I have dovecot configured to use sieve and virtual users (I'll post config below) Now any message that come in get filtered by sieve, but any messages that don't hit any filters gives the error (in the sieve log): msgid=<XXXX(a)XXX.com>: failed to store into mailbox 'INBOX/': Invalid mailbox name As far as I can tell, Pidgeonhole has hard-coded to the behavior of 'keep' (that is unfiltered emails) to be: fileinto "INBOX/" However, in my setup "INBOX/" is not a valid folder. "INBOX" is. Is there a way to get pidgeonhole sieve to treat 'keep' as fileinto "INBOX"? Or do I need to reconfigure my dovecot namespaces? I tried playing with them, but everything works right now (sharing, etc) and when I changed my prefix on the inbox, etc, it did weird things (INBOX.INBOX.FOLDER) instead of (INBOX.Folder). Suggestions? Here is, I believe the relevant config info: dovecot.conf: namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = separator = / type = private } namespace { list = children location = maildir:/Mail/Users/%%n/:INDEX=/Mail/Users/%u/shared/%%u prefix = shared/%%u/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } Thanks, Ben

2 1

[Dovecot] Fw: POP3 issues
by Thomas I Higgins 26 Jul '13

26 Jul '13

Sorry - forgot to mention it is on Dovecot version 1.0.7 and RHEL 5.6 Tom >I have been trying off and on for the better part of a year to get a dovecot server migrated from one machine to another. It is currently working on CENTOS and we are trying to get it on Redhat. Currently I have everything migrated and >working in IMAP, but we have one client device that requires POP3 (doesn't support IMAP). To this end, we have set up everything to work in POP3 as far as I can tell. > >In the dovecot.conf file, we show: > >protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s >protocol pop3 { > pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv >} > >The services running include: > >dovecot-auth >imap-login >imap-login >imap-login >pop3-login >pop3-login >pop3-login > >Everything else looks good including the logs which seem to show proper connectivity - messages are being received, accounts are connecting and disconnecting, etc. but the pop connections are not (apparently) passing messages >found in that box. They are still just sitting there, not being read, picked up, or otherwise delivered by dovecot. Any ideas on what else I can check or change to get this to pick up? > >Thanks, >Tom Higgins

2 3

[Dovecot] Duplicate Mails downloding issue
by Kavish Karkera 26 Jul '13

26 Jul '13

Hi All, We are repeatedly getting the below warning / errors on our pop server. Please help us out buy knowing what could be the issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jul 23 15:34:51 popserver dovecot: pop3(14949_kavish): Warning: Locking transaction log file /indexes//mail/v3store/example.com/14949_kavish/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log took 133 seconds Jul 23 15:34:51 popserver dovecot: pop3(kavish(a)example.com): Error: Broken file /indexes//mail/v3store/example.com/14949_kavish/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist line 180: UIDs not ordered (10156 >= 10156) Jul 23 15:35:01 popserver dovecot: pop3(kavish(a)example.com): Error: utime(/indexes//mail/v3store/example.com/kavish/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist.lock) failed: No such file or directory Jul 23 15:35:11 popserver dovecot: pop3(kavish(a)example.com): Error: utime(/indexes//mail/v3store/example.com/kavish/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist.lock) failed: No such file or directory Jul 23 15:35:21 popserver dovecot: pop3(kavish(a)example.com): Warning: Our dotlock file /indexes//mail/v3store/example.com/kavish/.INBOX/dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted (kept it 30 secs) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Kavish Karkera

3 9

[Dovecot] dovecot-lda not logging if dovecot runs under daemontools
by Roberto Puzzanghera 26 Jul '13

26 Jul '13

Hello all, I have dovecot running under daemontools and I can't see dovecot-lda in action when I read the logs. I've set the logs to /dev/stderr because daemontools redirects /dev/stderr to /var/log/dovecot/current. The dovecot server works fine and I know that dovecot-lda is actually doing the delivery, because the sieve facility is working as well. I can get lda log working -but only on syslog- if I override the log_path in this way: protocol lda { mail_plugins = $mail_plugins sieve log_path = } I'm calling dovecot-lda in the usual qmail way. This is my .qmail-default: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER As running dovecot under daemontools seems to be a common practice among qmail users, could any of you give me an hint on how dovecot should be configured to achieve the purpose? Thanks in advance. My doveconf follows Roberto Puzzanghera # dovecof -n # 2.2.4: /etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.29-smp i686 Slackware 14.0 auth_default_realm = mydomain.net auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb auth_verbose = yes default_login_user = vpopmail disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_gid = 89 first_valid_uid = 89 last_valid_gid = 89 last_valid_uid = 89 lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes log_path = /dev/stderr mail_access_groups = 89 mail_debug = yes mail_gid = 89 mail_location = maildir:%h/Maildir mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify" mail_privileged_group = 89 mail_uid = 89 managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date ihave spamtest spamtestplus namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot/conf.d/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { autocreate = Sent autocreate2 = Drafts autocreate3 = Junk autocreate4 = Trash autosubscribe = Sent autosubscribe2 = Drafts autosubscribe3 = Junk autosubscribe4 = Trash mail_log_events = delete undelete expunge copy mailbox_delete mailbox_rename mail_log_fields = uid box msgid size quota = maildir:User quota sieve = ~/sieve/dovecot.sieve sieve_before = /etc/dovecot/sieve/ sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_extensions = +spamtest +spamtestplus +relational +comparator-i;ascii-numeric } postmaster_address = postmaster@%d protocols = imap pop3 sieve sendmail_path = /var/qmail/bin/sendmail service auth-worker { user = $default_internal_user } service auth { unix_listener auth-userdb { group = vchkpw mode = 0600 user = vpopmail } user = $default_internal_user } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } service_count = 1 vsz_limit = 64 M } ssl_cert = </etc/dovecot/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/dovecot/ssl/private/dovecot.pem userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot/conf.d/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } verbose_ssl = yes protocol lda { mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify sieve" } protocol imap { mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify imap_quota" } protocol pop3 { mail_plugins = " quota mail_log notify" }

2 1

[Dovecot] Managing IMAP IDLE/Push with Sieve – possible?
by FF 25 Jul '13

25 Jul '13

Hello, I've been using Dovecot with Sieve for a long time already, and I'm very happy with it. Push is working fine too. I was wondering, however, whether it would be possible to define a Sieve rule (perhaps using some plug-in), such that an IMAP push message gets sent out only for specific senders etc.? Have you come across anything like that? Thanks a lot, F.F.

3 4

[Dovecot] POP3 issues
by Thomas I Higgins 24 Jul '13

24 Jul '13

I have been trying off and on for the better part of a year to get a dovecot server migrated from one machine to another. It is currently working on CENTOS and we are trying to get it on Redhat. Currently I have everything migrated and working in IMAP, but we have one client device that requires POP3 (doesn't support IMAP). To this end, we have set up everything to work in POP3 as far as I can tell. In the dovecot.conf file, we show: protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s protocol pop3 { pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv } The services running include: dovecot-auth imap-login imap-login imap-login pop3-login pop3-login pop3-login Everything else looks good including the logs which seem to show proper connectivity - messages are being received, accounts are connecting and disconnecting, etc. but the pop connections are not (apparently) passing messages found in that box. They are still just sitting there, not being read, picked up, or otherwise delivered by dovecot. Any ideas on what else I can check or change to get this to pick up? Thanks, Tom Higgins

1 0