- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Extracting mbox format from Dovecot IMAP (mdbox)
by Giles Coochey 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

Hi, I'm looking for a quick tool that can connect to my IMAP account grab all the messages in a particular folder and dump them to a mbox format file? Anyone know a quick easy tool to do that? This is a spam folder that I'd like to do some Bayes spam learning on, but since I've migrated to mdbox I don't think I can do this directly on the mailbox. Any thoughts appreciated. -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd UK Mobile: +44 7983 877 438 Business Email: giles.coochey(a)netsecspec.co.uk Email/MSN/Live Messenger: giles(a)coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey

2 4

Re: [Dovecot] Question about folder creation/delete and logging
by Maria Arrea 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

mail_log plugin is just what we need, thank you for your support. Yes, we are using bacula+doveadm import for this project. If you are interested, we have in production an home-brew message-tracking system for our end-users. We parse qmail / postfix / clamav / spamassassin/ dovecot / sieve logs and insert them in a mysql database, and a logged user in our webapp can see what happened with her mails (sent mails or messages waiting for arrival). Affero GPL software, of course. Some screenshots (Spanish only, sorry) here: https://gestionproyectos.us.es/attachments/download/321/Seguimiento_de_mens… https://gestionproyectos.us.es/attachments/download/145/Captura_de_pantalla… https://gestionproyectos.us.es/attachments/download/156/Seguimiento_de_mens… URL of the project (Seguimiento, spanish word for "tracking"): https://gestionproyectos.us.es/projects/seguimiento Regards Maria ----- Original Message ----- From: Timo Sirainen Sent: 03/12/12 02:04 PM To: Maria Arrea Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Question about folder creation/delete and logging On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:56 +0100, Maria Arrea wrote: > > - Is there any way of Dovecot logging to write when a folder is > deleted or created? We do not want to increase too much our "normal" > logging level. We use Dovecot 2.0.18+mdbox+zlib You can configure mail_log plugin to only log mailbox creations and deletions. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailLog > - Does anybody know of any other project to create an easy-restore > for Dovecot? I guess you're using "doveadm import"? So other than that, haven't heard of any.

1 0

[Dovecot] Question about folder creation/delete and logging
by Maria Arrea 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

Hello We are working in a web based restore system for our Dovecot users. In this web form a user must log-in and after successful login can estore a deleted folder from date X. We will release it under the GPL. I have a couple of questions: - Is there any way of Dovecot logging to write when a folder is deleted or created? We do not want to increase too much our "normal" logging level. We use Dovecot 2.0.18+mdbox+zlib - Does anybody know of any other project to create an easy-restore for Dovecot? Regards Maria

3 2

[Dovecot] Dovecot LDA breaking .qmail forwarding?
by Wouter van der Schagt 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

Good morning all, I've a problem, I'm using the Dovecot LDA in my .qmail file: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER However when I add a forward, such as: |/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d $EXT@$USER <mailto:&wouter@vdschagt.com> &wouter(a)vdschagt.com The mail isn't forwarded and stays in the queue on the mail server, the same is the case when I reverse the lines. The error in the log file is: @400000004f5de5f7033bc434 delivery 824026: deferral: qmail-inject:_fatal:_qq_trouble_creating_files_in_queue_(#4.3.0)/system_erro r_calling_qmail-inject/ When using another LDA, for example when specifying the Maildir, it works, but then i cannot use Sieve scripts. Any ideas? Am I doing anything wrong? Sincerely, - Wouter van der Schagt

1 0

[Dovecot] nfs error fcntl(read-lock) locking failed for file
by Rajesh M 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

hi i am using qmailtoaster with dovecot version 2 mailbox format is maildir i have a domain with around 5000 users which are distributed over 2 servers webmail (squirrelmail) runs using dovecot v2 is being used from server number one server number 2 had all the data stored in it and also has pop and smtp running from it. i am not using dovecot for pop as yet on the server with dovecot i get such errors in the log file access to data on server number 2 is via nfs on server number 1 i get errors as such Error: fcntl(read-lock) locking failed for file Input/output error squirrelmail gives error imap connection closed and i am not able to login so i set the parameters as such in the dovecot conf file and the error stopped mmap_disable=yes dotlock_use_excl = yes lock_method = dotlock can somebody please advise me if the above is correct ? or is it preferred to use fcntl with lockd (note that my mailbox is maildir format) thanks very much for your help rajesh

2 1

[Dovecot] Lock down Shared Mail Accounts?
by Charles Marcus 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

On 3/5/2012 1:30 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: > I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts. > But I'm getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done. This brings up a question I have been meaning to ask. One thing I want to do on my new converted system is to implement shared mail. There will be two different scenarios - users sharing 'folders', which looks to be fairly simple using virtual ACL files - but for the other scenario, I'm not sure about a specific requirement we will have... I want to give multiple people shared access to some actual accounts with all of the special use folders, with the following requirements: 1. They can all read/reply to new messages as they come in, 2. They use shared \seen, \replied and \forwarded flags, so once someone else has read/dealt with a message, the others see that, 3. When they reply to/forward a message, the Sent message gets saved to that accounts 'Sent' folder, 4. They can *move* messages to other folders in that account (ie, 'file' them), and last (this is the tricky part) 5. No one other than a designated user or users (Master User(s)? Users in a specified Group?) can delete any messages in this account, in any of the folders. These emails deal with financial transactions (AP and AR issues) and Faxes, thus the requirement to not be able to delete them. Can this be accomplished with the current state of things? Or would this require some coding? If the latter, could it be done as a plug-in, or would it require changes to the core code? Thanks, -- Best regards, Charles

4 5

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 107, Issue 20 Fscking warnings
by Stephen Davies 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Yes that is the google thread that I saw. I don't see the relevance of your reference to dsync. As I read the man pages for dsync it is used to sync separate servers, to make backups or to convert mailbox formats. When I upgraded from 1.2.15 to 2.1.1 I saw nothing in the doco to suggest that dsync was relevant to my scenario. In a previous thread here (Log sync errors), Timo suggested that the migration fix was to delete all .imap directories. My understanding was that this should fix any differences between 1.2.15 files and 2.1.1. If that were the case, mentioning the migration again would seem irrelevant. However, it seems that deleting the .imap files did not fix the log sync errors or the fscking warnings. Both are still happening continuously. Cheers, Stephen On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:26:55 PM dovecot-request(a)dovecot.org wrote: > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:03:35 -0600 > From: Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com> > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Fscking warnings > Message-ID: <4F57CD27.3000207(a)hardwarefreak.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 3/6/2012 5:07 PM, Stephen Davies wrote: > > Google tells me that these "should go away" but they don't. > > > > > > > > Seems to happen continuously while a user is viewing email. > > Is this thread what "Google tells you"? > > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-October/053909.html > > Timo is the creator of Dovecot, if you didn't know. So you can take his > words for gospel. Also note his last statement in that thread: > > "The next time you could do it with dsync to avoid these kind of > problems." > > It would seem you omitted a very important detail from your problem > report, which is that you recently performed a migration. Please don't > omit such critical details in future requests for help. Provide as much > relevant detail as possible. This speeds the process up for everyone, > and avoids guesswork on our part. > > -- > Stan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 00:26:55 +0100 > From: "Marc" <M.Roos(a)roosit.eu> > To: <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> > Subject: [Dovecot] FW: Centos 6 + dovecot 2 + mail.app + imap -- ============================================================================= Stephen Davies Consulting P/L Voice: 08-8177 1595 Adelaide, South Australia. Fax : 08-8177 0133 Records & Collections Management. Mobile:040 304 0583

2 1

[Dovecot] POP3C storage backend
by Tom Talpey 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

I see a new "POP3C" lib-storage client backend in dovecot 2.1, but I don't see anything in the 2.1 doc directory or in the wiki. Can this be used to synchronize dovecot with external pop servers? Doing away with my current fetchmail and lmtp solution for this would be quite interesting. Thanks for any pointers to configuring and using this, if so...

2 1

[Dovecot] Fscking warnings
by Stephen Davies 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Google tells me that these "should go away" but they don't. Seems to happen continuously while a user is viewing email. Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Archive/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Davies/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/FieldNET/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Invoices Out/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Lawrence and Hanson/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Logger Call/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Logger Reset/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/River Murray/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/SMS Emails/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Soil Moisture Alert/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Water Management Alarm/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Water Usage/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Weather Summaries/dovecot.index Mar 7 09:29:52 server dovecot: imap(john): Warning: fscking index file /home/john/Mail/INBOX/.imap/Zerna/dovecot.index -- ============================================================================= Stephen Davies Consulting P/L Voice: 08-8177 1595 Adelaide, South Australia. Fax : 08-8177 0133 Records & Collections Management. Mobile:040 304 0583

3 2

[Dovecot] Single instance storage
by Jean-Daniel Beaubien 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

I have read most of the doc on the dovecot website, and couldn't find any info on the single instance storage feature, so I'm posting my questions here. - Are these 3 parameters the only one necessary for single instance storage? I cannot find any doc on this feature on the website; is there anything specific I need to know about them? (the last one isn't exactly self-explanatory). - mail_attachment_dir = /srv/vmail/attachments - mail_attachment_hash = %{sha256} - mail_cache_min_mail_count = 2 - Is this feature ready for production? Thanks, -JD

2 1

[Dovecot] migrating/converting from system users -> virtual users
by Steve Platt 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hello all, We currently have a traditional mail server where all users have system accounts (ie entries in the NIS passwd map) and mbox-format mail folders in their (system) home directories. I'm trying to setup a dovecot server in which we want all users to have "virtual" accounts (in dovecot) and no entry in the passwd file at all (ie no access to the mail server). This is for security reasons, we want to imagine that users connecting to the mail server in future will not be able to access any resources on the server other than access their email messages. To this end we've set up a "vmail" user that owns all the messages in the Maildir directories. Most of this is working but I'm stuck on how to convert users' mail folders from the existing setup to the new one. I'm using the convert plugin but of course the problem is that the plugin executes as the "vmail" user and cannot access the existing mail folders that belong to the users: and I'd be worried if it could, of course! So I've converted a few users already by making copies of their old-world mailboxes, changing the ownership of the copies and pointing the convert plugin to these copies, instead of the originals. This works (modulo the dreaded "timeouted" error messages) but is very ugly. So I tried looking at the convert-tool but can't find a man page for it so am not sure what I'm doing with it! I have the idea that I should be able to run some command (as a privileged user) on the mail server and have it do the conversion for me, changing the ownership/permissions on the way. Can convert-tool do this? I'd prefer to go with the automatic (plugin) conversion if I can bodge the ownership issues somehow. Failing that, some tool or script may be the next best answer. This is Dovecot 1.2 by the way on Solaris 10. Any suggestions would be welcome! Steve Platt

2 3

[Dovecot] Whether the THREAD command support cross-mailbox thread?
by Andy YB Hu 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

In the real world, the mails which belongs to one thread could be dispersed in different mailbox, at least Inbox and SENT, so whether the command can search different mailboxes and grap them in one talk with dovecot? If Not, any other approach to do that? BTW, what the THREAD=REFS stands for? In the RFC, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5256, i didn't find this algorithm.

2 1

[Dovecot] Advise on upgrading from a jurassic version - please help.
by Martin Mielke 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hi all, I have inherited an old Dovecot installation which is causing headaches almost every day. I know that one of the rules says "Don't bother asking questions about v0.99.x versions. They're no longer supported."...but please bear with me, this will be quick as I only need some advise from experienced Dovecot gurus out there. I have read the Dovecot documentation and there are instructions to upgrade from 0.99.x to 1.x and so on... my question is: can I upgrade from 0.99.11 to 2.x directly or is it a massive leap? If so, what do I have to keep in mind? This is a production system so I should not break anything... or at least have a rollback plan... Thanks a lot in advance! Regards, Martin

2 1

[Dovecot] sieve and utf-7 foldernames
by Andreas Schulze 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hi all, since many dovecot/pigeonhole versions I have an error: Mails are delivered into wrong folders if the foldername contain a german umlaut. ( ä, ö, ü ) setup: dovecot-2.1.1 / pigeonhole-0.3.0 postfix deliver to dovecot-lda .dovecot.sieve contains this: require ["fileinto","reject","vacation","relational","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","regex"]; if header :contains "To" "green(a)example.org" { fileinto "INBOX.gr&APw-n"; stop; } a mail to the mentioned address produces this logging: Mar 9 22:23:10 test dovecot: lda(foo): save: box=INBOX.gr&APw-n, uid=2, msgid=<4711(a)example.org>, size=4642 also a mail_debug=yes log no more lines related to the foldername but at the end I found the mail not in the expected folder. It places in "INBOX.gr&-APw-n" notice the extra minus after & I think it's pigeonholes fault but I may be wrong ... # doveconf -n # 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686 Debian 5.0.9 ext3 ... lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes listen = 127.0.0.1, ::1 protocols = " imap sieve" protocol lda { mail_plugins = quota notify mail_log sieve } ... Andreas

2 1

[Dovecot] Has dovecot 2.1.1 been built and tested on AIX 6.1???
by Bennett, Tony 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

I have downloaded and built dovecot 2.1.1 using gcc on AIX 6.1. (The output of "dovecot -n" is at the bottom of this email.) I'm trying "baby steps" to get it up, before I give it the final configuration. (My apologies: I was pointed to RFC3501 and told to get an IMAP server, build it, configure it, and bring it up) What is currently occurring when I start dovecot is: Error: service(pop3-login): listen(::, 110) failed: Address already in use Error: service(pop3-login): listen(::, 995) failed: Address already in use Error: service(imap-login): listen(::, 143) failed: Address already in use Error: service(imap-login): listen(::, 993) failed: Address already in use Fatal: Failed to start listeners Using TRUSS and recompiling with log messages I've determined that dovecot is successfully creating and binding to AF_INET sockets... but is failing when trying to do the "bind" the same port to an AF_INET6 socket. The failure is "EADDRINUSE". The logic in the dovecot sources seems driven off of the define of HAVE_IPV6 (defined in config.h by configure) So, the questions I have are: - Is this the correct behavior - If this is the correct behavior, has this been tested against AIX 6.1, and if so, does anyone have an idea of what I did wrong...??? If it has not been tested against AIX 6.1 and is NOT the correct behavior, should I just change "config.h", and undefined HAVE_IPV6 ... or is there a better way to move beyond this issue... (like a change to "configure")??? Thanks, -tony Here is the output of "dovecot -n": # 2.1.1: /attic/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: AIX 1 00C30F654C00 default_login_user = dovecot disable_plaintext_auth = no namespace { inbox = yes location = mailbox { special_use = \Drafts name = Drafts } mailbox { special_use = \Junk name = Junk } mailbox { special_use = \Sent name = Sent } mailbox { special_use = \Sent name = Sent Messages } mailbox { special_use = \Trash name = Trash } prefix = name = inbox } passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /attic/usr/local/etc/dovecot/users driver = passwd-file } service anvil-auth-penalty { name = anvil } service auth-worker { name = auth-worker } service auth-client { name = auth } service config { name = config } service dict { name = dict } service login/proxy-notify { name = director } service dns-client { name = dns_client } service doveadm-server { name = doveadm } service imap { name = imap-login } service login/imap { name = imap } service indexer-worker { name = indexer-worker } service indexer { name = indexer } service ipc { name = ipc } service lmtp { name = lmtp } service log-errors { name = log } service pop3 { name = pop3-login } service login/pop3 { name = pop3 } service login/ssl-params { name = ssl-params } service stats-mail { name = stats } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem userdb { args = username_format=%u /attic/usr/local/etc/dovecot/users driver = passwd-file } protocol lmtp { service anvil-auth-penalty { name = anvil } service auth-worker { name = auth-worker } service auth-client { name = auth } service config { name = config } service dict { name = dict } service login/proxy-notify { name = director } service dns-client { name = dns_client } service doveadm-server { name = doveadm } service imap { name = imap-login } service login/imap { name = imap } service indexer-worker { name = indexer-worker } service indexer { name = indexer } service ipc { name = ipc } service lmtp { name = lmtp } service log-errors { name = log } service pop3 { name = pop3-login } service login/pop3 { name = pop3 } service login/ssl-params { name = ssl-params } service stats-mail { name = stats } } protocol lda { service anvil-auth-penalty { name = anvil } service auth-worker { name = auth-worker } service auth-client { name = auth } service config { name = config } service dict { name = dict } service login/proxy-notify { name = director } service dns-client { name = dns_client } service doveadm-server { name = doveadm } service imap { name = imap-login } service login/imap { name = imap } service indexer-worker { name = indexer-worker } service indexer { name = indexer } service ipc { name = ipc } service lmtp { name = lmtp } service log-errors { name = log } service pop3 { name = pop3-login } service login/pop3 { name = pop3 } service login/ssl-params { name = ssl-params } service stats-mail { name = stats } } protocol pop3 { service anvil-auth-penalty { name = anvil } service auth-worker { name = auth-worker } service auth-client { name = auth } service config { name = config } service dict { name = dict } service login/proxy-notify { name = director } service dns-client { name = dns_client } service doveadm-server { name = doveadm } service imap { name = imap-login } service login/imap { name = imap } service indexer-worker { name = indexer-worker } service indexer { name = indexer } service ipc { name = ipc } service lmtp { name = lmtp } service log-errors { name = log } service pop3 { name = pop3-login } service login/pop3 { name = pop3 } service login/ssl-params { name = ssl-params } service stats-mail { name = stats } } protocol imap { service anvil-auth-penalty { name = anvil } service auth-worker { name = auth-worker } service auth-client { name = auth } service config { name = config } service dict { name = dict } service login/proxy-notify { name = director } service dns-client { name = dns_client } service doveadm-server { name = doveadm } service imap { name = imap-login } service login/imap { name = imap } service indexer-worker { name = indexer-worker } service indexer { name = indexer } service ipc { name = ipc } service lmtp { name = lmtp } service log-errors { name = log } service pop3 { name = pop3-login } service login/pop3 { name = pop3 } service login/ssl-params { name = ssl-params } service stats-mail { name = stats } }

2 2

Re: [Dovecot] disabling SSLv2 in dovecot 1.2.17
by Steve Platt 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

Hi Mark, I think I may not have been clear enough in my query, sorry! What I'm trying to do is to prevent SSLv2 connections being made to our IMAP server while allowing SSLv3 and TLSv1 connections. I think I've prevented the use of SSLv2 ciphers but this does not prevent SSLv2 protocol connections (as far as I can tell). (Once connected, the SSLv2 client finds it has no ciphers so the session fails at that point but this is not enough to satisfy our security audit. I want to disable the use of the SSLv2 protocol itself, not just the SSLv2 ciphers) steve.platt(a)mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk said: > I see Dovecot2 had the following change a year or so ago, in file src/ > login-common/ssl-proxy-openssl.c: > > - SSL_CTX_set_options(ssl_ctx, SSL_OP_ALL); > + SSL_CTX_set_options(ssl_ctx, SSL_OP_ALL | SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2); > > I tried making the same change to dovecot1's src tree on our test system and > it seems to have the desired effect ... I'm testing this by using: openssl s_client -ssl2 -connect mailhost:993 This should fail immediately with "ssl handshake failure" (for a happy audit!). Thanks again, Steve

1 0

[Dovecot] seeking advice: dovecot versions; mailbox formats.
by Vincent Schut 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

Hi, I'm currently migrating our old (colocated) mail server (running a [terribly outdated, I know] dovecot 1.1.11) to a new VPS (virtual private server). The old server was running gentoo linux (which is mainly the culprit of the old dovecot version: gentoo was too much trouble to keep updating); the new server will run debian (stable: 6). Debian currently has dovecot 1.2.15 in its repositories; not that much newer... I read in the docs about the auto-generated-from-hg debian dovecot packages for 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. Which leaves me to the choice what version to use... OK, 2.2 is development, which leaves the choice to: 1.2.15; 2.0.x, or 2.1.x. I would appreciate any consideration or thoughts on what version to choose. On a related note, there is the possibility to switch from maildir to dbox. I did not really find much pros or cons, except from performance and standards-compliance (ability to use e.g. mutt on the server itself). Any thoughts? About the server: we're just a small company. Think about 15 accounts, normal mail traffic, sometimes relatively large attachments (20mb+). Some accounts have many folders; some accounts are very large (5Gb+). Storage is on ext3, raid10. Performance has never been an issue; reliability and ease of maintenance is more important. Thanks, Vincent Schut.

5 7

[Dovecot] disabling SSLv2 in dovecot 1.2.17
by Steve Platt 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

I've set up a list of ciphers that excludes SSLv2 ciphers (and other weak ones) in the hope of preventing SSLv2 connections: ssl_cipher_list = TLSv1+HIGH : !SSLv2 : RC4+MEDIUM : !aNULL : !eNULL : !3DES : @STRENGTH However, this doesn't prevent the SSLv2 connection being allowed as our Nessus scans show and I'm tasked with trying to plug that "hole". I see Dovecot2 had the following change a year or so ago, in file src/login-common/ssl-proxy-openssl.c: - SSL_CTX_set_options(ssl_ctx, SSL_OP_ALL); + SSL_CTX_set_options(ssl_ctx, SSL_OP_ALL | SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2); I tried making the same change to dovecot1's src tree on our test system and it seems to have the desired effect; however I am very hesitant about putting this into our production system without seeking advice here first :-) Have I missed anything that's obviously bad about doing this please? Thanks again, Steve Platt

2 1

[Dovecot] [PATCH] Pop3 order in courier migration script
by Christoph Bußenius 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hi, I found a problem in the courier conversion script (courier-dovecot-migrate.pl). In some cases, it does not correctly preserve the order of POP3 UIDLs. Consider the following case, when courierpop3dsizelist contains: /2 9000 1327481629 AAA1:2,S 10000 21:1327481629 AAA2:2,S 10000 22:1327481629 AAA3:2,S 10000 23:1327481629 AAA4:2,S 10000 24:1327481629 AAA5:2,S 10000 25:1327481629 BBB11:2,S 10000 11:1327481629 BBB12:2,S 10000 12:1327481629 BBB13:2,S 10000 13:1327481629 BBB14:2,S 10000 14:1327481629 BBB15:2,S 10000 15:1327481629 and courierimapuiddb contains: 1 1327480919 9000 11 BBB11 12 BBB12 13 BBB13 14 BBB14 15 BBB15 16 CCC16 17 CCC17 18 CCC18 19 CCC19 20 CCC20 21 AAA1 22 AAA2 23 AAA3 24 AAA4 25 AAA5 then call courier-dovecot-migrate.pl --to-dovecot --convert and it will create dovecot-uidlist: 3 V1327480919 N9010 21 PUID21-1327481629 W10000 :AAA1:2,S 22 PUID22-1327481629 W10000 :AAA2:2,S 23 PUID23-1327481629 W10000 :AAA3:2,S 24 PUID24-1327481629 W10000 :AAA4:2,S 25 PUID25-1327481629 W10000 :AAA5:2,S 9000 :CCC17 9001 PUID12-1327481629 W10000 :BBB12:2,S 9002 :CCC16 9003 PUID15-1327481629 W10000 :BBB15:2,S 9004 :CCC20 9005 PUID14-1327481629 W10000 :BBB14:2,S 9006 PUID13-1327481629 W10000 :BBB13:2,S 9007 :CCC18 9008 PUID11-1327481629 W10000 :BBB11:2,S 9009 :CCC19 The problem here is that the BBB files are not in the same order as in courierpop3dsizelist, and will therefore have a different order in the UIDL response in POP3. Also, the CCC files are interleaved while they should appear at the end. The reason is how the script assigns new UIDs: It does not do this in the order of courierpop3dsizelist. In fact the order is random because it depends on how perl traverses hashes. The attached patch fixes this by sorting the messages: First the POP3 messages get their new UIDs in order of their appearance in courierpop3dsizelist (so that the UIDL order will really be the same as in Courier), after that, the IMAP-only messages will be checked for UID clashes. The patch also changes how the $prev_uid variable is handled because that was also needed to always get the order right. The algorithm could probably be optimized to reduce the number of UID re-assignments to a minimum, however this would complicate the code and would only be noticed in a few cases. The patched courier-dovecot-migrate.pl will create dovecot-uidlist like this: 3 V1327480919 N9010 21 PUID21-1327481629 W10000 :AAA1:2,S 22 PUID22-1327481629 W10000 :AAA2:2,S 23 PUID23-1327481629 W10000 :AAA3:2,S 24 PUID24-1327481629 W10000 :AAA4:2,S 25 PUID25-1327481629 W10000 :AAA5:2,S 9000 PUID11-1327481629 W10000 :BBB11:2,S 9001 PUID12-1327481629 W10000 :BBB12:2,S 9002 PUID13-1327481629 W10000 :BBB13:2,S 9003 PUID14-1327481629 W10000 :BBB14:2,S 9004 PUID15-1327481629 W10000 :BBB15:2,S 9005 :CCC16 9006 :CCC17 9007 :CCC18 9008 :CCC19 9009 :CCC20 Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Bußenius Rechnerbetriebsgruppe der Fakultäten Informatik und Mathematik Technische Universität München +49 89-289-18519 <> Raum 00.05.055 <> Boltzmannstr. 3 <> Garching

2 3

[Dovecot] v2.1 latest hg: untagged reply to namespace command
by e-frog 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hello Timo, There seems to be something broken in v2.1 latest hg version: # 2.1.1 (94de7605f50f) 1 namespace * NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/" "/")) NIL NIL * OK Namespace completed. Please note that the "OK Namespace completed." is send untagged. It worked on below version: # 2.1.1 (315f0d8cc2b2) 1 namespace * NAMESPACE (("" "/")("virtual/" "/")) NIL NIL 1 OK Namespace completed. Thanks, e-frog

1 1

[Dovecot] Shared mboxes
by Steve Campbell 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts. But I'm getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done. I use mbox for all my pop and imap folders since I've converted from a uw-imap server. The first thing that makes me wonder about setup is that I've been told to not use maildir and mbox on the same machine, although I'm not really sure why since it seems this would work OK, but anyway, I'm guessing I should stick with mbox for the shared accounts. Secondly, I'm sure I'd need a namespace to use which ever format, so there's private, public, and shared types. Most of the stuff I'm reading seems to suggest "public" as a type instead of "shared". So what's shared for anyway? I want to use this shared account so that email can be sent to this account, and be shared by only a few people, but I'm reading where locks and such don't work with mbox, so in my mind, how do you avoid corruption and why not just make a normal account and let people hack away at the data? I've not even got to the questions in my mind about how to set up the account, but figured if I could get the above straight, I might be able to fuddle my way through it. Help would be truly appreciated. steve campbell

2 6

Re: [Dovecot] dsync replication available for testing
by Michael Grimm 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hi -- On 08.03.2012 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote: > You can do for example: > > service config { > unix_listener config { > user = vmail > } > } I will try that later. >> It seems to me, that whenever a larger number of mails arrive on >> both >> servers simultaneously, the replicator gets into trouble [1]. I am >> unsure if one can expect that a replicator should deal with such >> stress, >> though. Or? > > Were these mails delivered via LMTP or dovecot-lda? LMTP > The locks should prevent duplicates I think, so there's something > still > going wrong. Just to be sure that I didn't misunderstand your proposed configuration: @mx1: plugin { mail_replica = remote:vmail@mx2.example.tld } @mx2: plugin { mail_replica = remote:vmail@mx1.example.tld } I do need to define one mail_replica plugin at each server pointing to the other one, correct? Regards, Michael

1 0

[Dovecot] duplicates with multiple To/CC and sieve redirect copy
by Adam Szpakowski 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hi, In one installation we are using sieve "redirect :copy" to create copy of the incoming email (local boss gets copy of its employees mails). There is a problem when the incoming email has multiple To/CC entries with local users. Multiple copy/redirects are created (one for each employee) and there are multiple copies in "boss" account. Each of this emails has the same Message-ID. Is there a way to detect those duplicates and discard them when saving copies into boss account? There was a discussion on the list a while ago (Feb 10/11, 2011) mentioning this problem, but with no clear solution. We are using Dovecot 2.0.15. Mail is delivered via LMTP (MDA/postfix is on separate machine then MAA/dovecot). -- Adam Szpakowski

5 10

[Dovecot] Failing: doveadm sync <--remote host--> dsync mirror
by Michael Grimm 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hi -- I'm used to dsync my two mailservers running 2.0.16. Today, I did upgrade one server to 2.1, and doveadm sync is throwing to following error: mail> doveadm sync -f -u test ssh vmail(a)remote-host.tld dsync -v -f -u test doveadm(test): Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting. It should be empty (default mail_location) in the namespace to be converted. Same error with old running command: vmail> dsync -v -f -u test mirror ssh vmail(a)remote-host.tld dsync -v -f -u test doveadm(test): Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting. It should be empty (default mail_location) in the namespace to be converted. Here's an excerpt of my doveconf -n: mail> doveconf -n mail_home = /var/mail/homedirs/%n mail_location = mdbox:/var/mail/maildirs/%n passdb { args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } userdb { driver = prefetch } userdb { args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf driver = sql } Reverted back for the time being (production servers) until I do understand the issue. Searching Google with "Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting." only shows closed bugs back in 2010. Do I have to upgrade both servers to get syncing running? Any hint, help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Michael

2 18

[Dovecot] FW: Centos 6 + dovecot 2 + mail.app + imap
by Marc 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Anybody also experiencing that imap processes are kept running/open by mac osx mail.app, so eventually users are getting to the mail_max_userip_connections limit? Outlook / other clients seem to run fine. Thanks, Marc

1 0