September 2006 - dovecot

[Dovecot] sieve problem unresolved
by Amadou Toure 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

hello, I follow your suggestions : _cyrus timsieved installed on the two LDA server _the sieve script stored in the /var/home (which is the virtual home directory) and in /var/mail/user/ for testing purposes But nothing happened when the user receive a email. Below the sieve script. Regards #################################################### # This script has been automatically generated by avelsieve # (Sieve Mail Filters Plugin for Squirrelmail) #AVELSIEVE_VERSIONYTo0OntzOjU6Im1ham9yIjtpOjE7czo1OiJtaW5vciI7aTowO3M6NzoicmVsZWFzZSI7aToxO3M6Njoic3RyaW5nIjtzOjU6IjEuMC4xIjt9 #AVELSIEVE_CREATED1157627930 #AVELSIEVE_MODIFIED1157628524 require ["fileinto","reject","vacation","imapflags","relational","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","regex","notify","redirect"]; if header :contains "subject" ["order", "test"] { keep; redirect "amadou.toure(a)sentoo.sn"; } vacation # Reply at most once a day to a same sender :days 0 :subject "Out of office reply" # List of allowed recipient addresses from auto reply should be sent. :addresses ["ctsarr(a)sentoo.sn"] "I'm out of office, please contact Amadou TOURE instead. Best regards CHEIKH SARR"; #################################################### Amadou TOURE Sonatel Multimedia, 136 Sacre Coeur, Pyrotechnie, BP 21100 Dakar Tel +221-8699810. Fax +221-8641094 http://www.sentoo.sn DAKAR - SENEGAL ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Peacock" <jpeacock(a)rowman.com> To: "Amadou Toure" <atoure(a)sentoo.sn> Cc: <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 2:44 PM Subject: Re: [Dovecot] sieve unresolved problem > Amadou Toure wrote: >> What about the directory sieve script storage ? >> We use avelsieve on the squirrel mail web interface to edit and create >> script and the script are stored on the /var/home/first letter/username/ >> (shared across the NFS) but it seems that at the delivery process the >> LDA doesn't execute the script > > You can't just place the sieve script in some random location and expect > dovecot to magically find it. Right now, the only place that deliver > expects to find the script (and it *must* be named .dovecot.sieve) is in > the [virtual] user's home directory. After 1.0 is golden, I would expect > that Timo might have some time to make that configurable, but I wouldn't > want to hold up dovecot trying to get that working now. > > John > > -- > John Peacock > Director of Information Research and Technology > Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group > 4501 Forbes Boulevard > Suite H > Lanham, MD 20706 > 301-459-3366 x.5010 > fax 301-429-5748 Amadou TOURE Sonatel Multimedia, 136 Sacre Coeur, Pyrotechnie, BP 21100 Dakar Tel +221-8699810. Fax +221-8641094 http://www.sentoo.sn DAKAR - SENEGAL

2 2

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot - postfix SASL
by Matt 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: connection established Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: master_notify: status 0 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: name_mask: resource Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: name_mask: software Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: xsasl_dovecot_server_create: SASL service=smtp, realm=(null) Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: connect from c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210] Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: 67.183.127.210: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: 67.183.127.210: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: 67.183.127.210: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: send attr request = connect Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: send attr ident = smtp:67.183.127.210 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: status Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: status Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute value: 0 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: count Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: count Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute value: 1 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: rate Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: rate Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute value: 3 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: (list terminator) Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: (end) Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: > c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 220 hostyougood.com ESMTP Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: < c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: HELO office Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: > c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 250 hostyougood.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: < c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: MAIL FROM: <admin(a)hostyougood.com> Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: extract_addr: input: <admin(a)hostyougood.com> Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: smtpd_check_addr: addr=admin(a)hostyougood.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: ctable_locate: move existing entry key admin(a)hostyougood.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: extract_addr: in: <admin(a)hostyougood.com>, result: admin(a)hostyougood.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: fsspace: .: block size 4096, blocks free 2152496 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: smtpd_check_queue: blocks 4096 avail 2152496 min_free 0 msg_size_limit 10240000 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: > c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 250 2.1.0 Ok Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: < c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: RCPT TO: <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com> Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: extract_addr: input: <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com> Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: smtpd_check_addr: addr=elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: ctable_locate: move existing entry key elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: extract_addr: in: <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com>, result: elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: >>> START Recipient address RESTRICTIONS <<< Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=permit_mynetworks Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: permit_mynetworks: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net 67.183.127.210 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: 67.183.127.210: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=permit_mynetworks status=0 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=permit_sasl_authenticated Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=permit_sasl_authenticated status=0 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=reject_unauth_destination Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: reject_unauth_destination: elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: permit_auth_destination: elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: ctable_locate: leave existing entry key elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 554 5.7.1 <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com>: Relay access denied; from=<admin(a)hostyougood.com> to=<elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com> proto=SMTP helo=<office> Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: generic_checks: name=reject_unauth_destination status=2 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: > c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 554 5.7.1 <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com>: Relay access denied Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: < c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: QUIT Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: > c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210]: 221 2.0.0 Bye Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 127.0.0.0/8 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostname: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_hostaddr: 67.183.127.210 ~? 205.252.250.12 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: match_list_match: 67.183.127.210: no match Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: send attr request = disconnect Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: send attr ident = smtp:67.183.127.210 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: status Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: status Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute value: 0 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: private/anvil: wanted attribute: (list terminator) Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: input attribute name: (end) Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: disconnect from c-67-183-127-210.hsd1.wa.comcast.net[67.183.127.210] Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: master_notify: status 1 Sep 25 04:53:30 hostyougood postfix/smtpd[17497]: connection closed --- Matt <elitescripts2000(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to replace pop-before-smtp ( yes it is crap ) with Dovecot SASL. > > I have everything configured according to: > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html > > But, does not allow me to SEND mail via POP3 using outlook express... > > Below are my config files. > > Postfix version 2.3.3 > Dovecot version 1.0.rc7 > > dovecot.conf > ------------ > auth default { > mechanisms = plain login > > passdb sql { > args = > /home/digipanel/secure/programs/dovecot/config/dovecot-mysql.conf > } > userdb sql { > args = > /home/digipanel/secure/programs/dovecot/config/dovecot-mysql.conf > } > socket listen { > client { > path = /home/digipanel/secure/programs/postfix/queue/private/auth > mode = 0666 > user = postfix > group = postfix > } > } > } > > main.cf > ------- > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, > reject_unauth_destination > > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes > broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot > smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes > > Now my postconf -a yields: dovecot > > So, I know postfix has compiled in Dovecot support. > > My mail logs say I am not allowd to relay off the mailserver. >

5 5

[Dovecot] Dovecot 1.0.rc7 ioloop-poll.c assertion failed after SIGHUP
by Chris Wakelin 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Anybody else seen this one? We're running Dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a different port on our live server (we're generally live with 1.0.beta5) and after a HUP to reload the user database (in a passwd-file) this morning we got:- > dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Info: IMAP 14482 someuser xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : Disconnected in IDLE > dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Warning: imap-login: SSL_read() syscall failed: No route to host [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] > dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Warning: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration > dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Error: Login process died too early - shutting down > dovecot: Sep 22 07:45:05 Panic: file ioloop-poll.c: line 105 (io_loop_handle_remove): assertion failed: (index >= 0 && (unsigned int) index < ctx->fds_count) and Dovecot had died. "someuser" was me, and I'd left my Thunderbird client logged in (via IMAPS) by mistake when I hibernated my PC last night. I'd seen exactly the same assert on a test box the day before yesterday, (this time without a machine hibernating):- > dovecot: Sep 19 19:00:45 Info: imap-login: Aborted login: user=<testuser>, method=PLAIN, rip=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, lip=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy, secured > dovecot: Sep 19 19:07:42 Warning: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration > dovecot: Sep 19 19:07:42 Error: Login process died too early - shutting down > dovecot: Sep 19 19:07:42 Panic: file ioloop-poll.c: line 105 (io_loop_handle_remove): assertion failed: (index >= 0 && (unsigned int) index < ctx->fds_count) Where yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is actually the test box (I was logging in from the server itself using "openssl s_client"). The thing is, I was hoping to upgrade everyone (~20,000 users) to 1.0.rc7 next Tuesday, but now I'm not so sure! Chris -- --+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+- Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin(a)reading.ac.uk IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 8439 Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094

2 6

[Dovecot] Need to detect event: a user move a message to a “spam folder” (for antispam filter)
by Naefen Raphaël 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

I’m writing an immune system based antispam filter. I need to detect when a user move a message to her spam folder (to inform the filter). I I found “cmd_copy” in imap library so I detect the copy event. But at this level I wasn’t able to find info about which mail and which user copy this message. My question is: Were I can find user Info to know how is moving this message in the spam folder. Ideally if I can have information about message (content or id) will be perfect. Thanks

3 2

[Dovecot] RC7: BUG! and patch [Was: Re: rc7 bug? [Was: deliver LDA and INBOX location] (fwd)] (fwd)
by David Lee 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Could someone confirm, please, that this bug report and its proposed fix are being checked? 1. Is my analysis (message below) about right? 2. Is my proposed patch (attached) about right? 3. Is this being addressed for "rc8" (or whatever) and its successors? Many thanks. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : Durham University : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. : ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:40:00 +0100 (BST) From: David Lee <t.d.lee(a)durham.ac.uk> To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: [Dovecot] RC7: BUG! and patch [Was: Re: rc7 bug? [Was: deliver LDA and INBOX location] (fwd)] On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, David Lee wrote: > Anyone had any thoughts on the item below? [see earlier in thread] > > If the problem is with my config, I'd like to be guided towards how I > might resolve it. > > If it is a bug in rc7, it would be good to fix it, and I'd be happy to > beta-test. BUG in rc7 (and probably from much earlier). The LDA 'deliver' fails to honour any uid (%i) setting in dovecot.conf. So delivery and reading happen in different places if 'default_mail_env' uses a '%i' variant. Clearly incorrect behaviour. Attached is a draft of a patch which fixes the problem. Please could the patch be reviewed and, in some form, applied? Thanks. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : Durham University : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. :

3 3

[Dovecot] Virtual Folders
by James Turnbull 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Hi Just wondering if Virtual Folder functionality was on the roadmap for Dovecot? Thanks James Turnbull -- James Turnbull <james(a)lovedthanlost.net> --- Author of Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) --- PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40)

3 4

[Dovecot] Upgrading
by Chris Kenward 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Hi Folks OK - I'm ready to upgrade my version .99.11 to the latest release candidate but I haven't a clue how to do that on a live mail server without potential disruption. Can anyone help with advice on the best way to do this? CentOS latest release Running Sendmail/Procmail/Dovecot Thanks Chris

3 2

[Dovecot] Allow login via aliases
by Beber 23 Sep '06

23 Sep '06

Hello, I've created aliases for users on my mail server, and I would like that users can login via any of there aliases. Is it possible ? Thanks -- Beber - E-Mail / Jabber (+GMail) : beber_AT_meleeweb.net http://www.meleeweb.net

2 1

[Dovecot] PAM authentication problem: MD5 vs crypt
by bhayden＠umn.edu 23 Sep '06

23 Sep '06

Here's a strange one. I have Dovecot set up on Solaris 9. The auth portion of the config is straight out of the box. Using PAM. We have most users in a dbm file which is just a series of key/value pairs: key is a username, and value is a string equivalent to a shadow entry. nsswitch.conf entry: passwd files dbm. For historical reasons, some users have a classic 13-character Unix crypt password hash, while others have a 34-character MD5 hash. Here's the situation: User location pw Hash Auth succeeds/fails ---------------------------------------------- files crypt succeeds dbm crypt succeeds files MD5 succeeds dbm MD5 FAILS After two days of research, trussing, and etc, I am stumped. Does anyone have a thought? -Brian

2 2

[Dovecot] Wow! Welcome back Timo!
by Charles Marcus 23 Sep '06

23 Sep '06

You were missed... hope all went well with - whatever you were doing... :)

5 8