March 2024 - dovecot - dovecot.org

doveadm backup has problems with some accounts
by roger.meier＠4synergy.com 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

I try to setup for our mailserver (in a dc) a job backup to a secondary server (in our office) with "doveadm backup" via the -R option. (rsync , rsnapshot and so on tooks too long at the moment) For the most user accounts all work as expected, but for three users it always fails First run: /usr/bin/doveadm -Dv backup -Ru user1 tcp:mua01.domain.intra:12345 > Dec 01 08:54:21 doveadm(user1)<70126><qfzHDjyfaWXuEQEAy5X8iQ>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: Mailbox opened because: copy caching decisions > Dec 01 08:54:22 doveadm(user1)<70126><qfzHDjyfaWXuEQEAy5X8iQ>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'Archiv.Allgemein unsortiert': UID=1 GUID=1350559209.P2052Q54.lin-mail1.intra is missing locally > Dec 01 08:54:22 doveadm(user1)<70126><qfzHDjyfaWXuEQEAy5X8iQ>: Debug: brain M: Import Archiv.Allgemein unsortiert: Import change type=save GUID=1350559209.P2052Q54.mail1.intra UID=1 > hdr_hash= result=Reverting local change by deleting mailbox - No more local mails found > Dec 01 08:54:22 doveadm(70126): Debug: brain M: Import Archiv.Allgemein unsortiert: Saved UIDs: > Dec 01 08:54:22 doveadm(70126): Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=661,uid=0): Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=9) So it aborts on the lines above and a incomplete maildir is on the local server. so the next doveadm try say's that he can't delete INBOX , etc. > Dec 01 09:03:33 doveadm(user1)<70169><TzH+MmKhaWUZEgEAy5X8iQ>: Error: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: INBOX can't be deleted. This a very old account on our server which was migrated over different iterations of our dovecot mailserver. The user behind the account uses outlook over years. Is the space here a problem? Another user with a similiar issue has the following error message at the end: > Dec 01 09:22:14 doveadm(user2)<70354><RU12FsWlaWXSEgEAy5X8iQ>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: Mailbox opened because: copy caching decisions > Dec 01 09:22:56 doveadm(user2)<70354><RU12FsWlaWXSEgEAy5X8iQ>: Error: read(mua01.domain.intra) failed: EOF (last sent=mailbox, last recv=mailbox) > Dec 01 09:22:56 doveadm(70354): Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=661,uid=0): Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=9) I see that the user has a very big inbox? when i check in the source server in the "cur" folder of the INBOX it count's around 269372 mails. Is this perhaps the issue for this message? And on the last user it looks like: Dec 01 09:25:19 doveadm(user3)<70376><UoiQAHWmaWXoEgEAy5X8iQ>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'Entwürfe': UID=1265 GUID=1521832311.M6830P7652.mail-mx1.intra,S=1764,W=1809 is missing locally Dec 01 09:25:19 doveadm(user3)<70376><UoiQAHWmaWXoEgEAy5X8iQ>: Debug: brain M: Import Entwürfe: Import change type=save GUID=1521832311.M6830P7652.mail-mx1.intra,S=1764,W=1809 UID=1265 hdr_hash= result=Reverting local change by deleting mailbox - No more local mails found Dec 01 09:25:19 doveadm(70376): Debug: brain M: Import Entwürfe: Saved UIDs: Dec 01 09:25:19 doveadm(70376): Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=661,uid=0): Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=9) The "Entwürfe" folder directly cannot be the issue? On the filesystem the folder has the name ".Entw&APw-rfe" and also other users has similar folders in their mailboxes. The source server has dovecot version 2.2.36 (centos 7.9.2009) and the current destination server dovecot version 2.3.16 (ubuntu 22.04 lts)

2 3

Which DKIM application for postfix 3.9.0
by dovecot＠outputservices.com 25 Apr '24

25 Apr '24

I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous postfix installs, but I would like to start now with the new google rules. I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended, however, other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's maintainers. So I am looking for a good alternative dkim software that will work with postfix that I can compile myself. I do not run on any linux version, so therefore I can not just apt-get a new dkim application. I run Solaris and therefore need to compile my applications, postfix and dkim. Any good suggestions will be appreciated.

7 8

Question about line length limit in lmtp.
by Kamil Jońca 22 Apr '24

22 Apr '24

I have postfix + dovecot server. Mail for local users are saved by dovecot lmtp. Recently I got some messages from postfix: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 4NQ07L4h4LztXXr: breaking line > 998 bytes with <CR><LF>SPAC --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This is because postfix has configured with default value lmtp_line_length_limit (990). I can turn off this limit (set to 0) but I am curious if dovecot lmtp will accept so lengthty lines? Does dovecot lmtp has any line limits? KJ -- http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html

4 6

Bug report: invalid \HasNoChildren in response when asterisk is used in the name
by Merijn Schering 18 Apr '24

18 Apr '24

Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4). I have created a folder called "Test with *". Now when I do a command: A3 LIST "" "%" RETURN (CHILDREN STATUS (MESSAGES UNSEEN)) It responds: * STATUS Test with * ( MESSAGES 0 UNSEEN 0 ) * LIST ( \HasNoChildren \UnMarked ) / Spam But it actually has children! This only happens when I use a * character in the name. I hope you can fix this some day. Thanks! Best regards, Merijn Schering Intermesh https://www.group-office.com https://twitter.com/GroupOffice

2 4

doveadm sync - I/O has stalled
by songliny 09 Apr '24

09 Apr '24

Hi All, We are using dovecot 2.3.19.1 We created a account with more than 1000 mail folders in Maildir format to reproduce the issue. After weeks of testing, we have found a logic that may cause dsync to encounter the error - no activity for 900 seconds.... The function, dsync_ibc_stream_input, is the callback function after some data are ready for be read. This is part of what it does. o_stream_cork(ibc->output); ibc->ibc.io_callback(ibc->ibc.io_context); o_stream_uncork(ibc->output); Normally, ibc->ibc.io_callback(ibc->ibc.io_context) reads some data and then processes it. But when dsync connects over tcps, it uses function implementations in lib-ssl-iostream to send and receive data. And this simplified call stack would result in some data are read when calling o_stream_uncork o_stream_uncork => o_stream_flush => o_stream_ssl_flush_buffer => openssl_iostream_bio_sync => openssl_iostream_bio_input If some data arrive after ibc->ibc.io_callback(ibc->ibc.io_context) and before o_stre am_uncork, o_stream_uncork would read the data and then return. After o_stream_uncork returns, dsync then waits for new data to be read or written. But because the data had been read in o_stream_uncork, and there may be no new data to be read, dsync may then wait until timeout is met. It may happen, but it is hard to reproduce. If you also encounter this situation, you may try to use dsync over tcp connection. It does not read data when calling o_stream_uncork. As a result, it may not stuck. Back to the error itself, Maybe openssl-stream should not read data when doing uncork(flush)? Song-Lin Yang

2 4

2.4 ballpark release date?
by Shawn Heisey 05 Apr '24

05 Apr '24

I'm wondering whether there is a ballpark release date for Dovecot 2.4. I know an exact release date is probably not available, but can it at least be narrowed to a specific quarter? Is it likely in 2023? I have seen on previous messages that an Ubuntu repository for 22.04 (jammy) will appear with the 2.4 release. My mail server in AWS is running Ubuntu 20.04 (focal), which I have avoided upgrading for various reasons, including websites that don't work with PHP 8.1. Now the last remaining hurdle is the fact that there is no dovecot repository for jammy. I would prefer the official Dovecot repo over dovecot packages included with Ubuntu, because it's likely to be a newer release, and built from vanilla project code. At the moment jammy includes dovecot 2.3.16, which is even older than the 2.3.20 that I am running on focal from the official dovecot repo. Again, I know that a precise release date won't be possible. I'm just hoping for something like "soon" or "in about six months." Thanks, Shawn

3 5

Implications of LMTP socket being world readable and writable (0666) by default
by da-dovecotlist-15＠abelonline.de 31 Mar '24

31 Mar '24

I was surprised to find that the LMTP socket has permission mode 0666 by default and since configs are merged with defaults, there is no way to disable this AFAICS. # doveconf -d ... service lmtp { unix_listener lmtp { group = mode = 0666 user = } ... } Is this also how it is supposed to be used in production? I understand that LMTP is just for delivering new mails but is there really no need to restrict this further? To me it seems reasonable, to force all services on this machine to go through Postfix and not be able to just put e-mails in the users mailboxes via LMTP. Am I missing something? My use case is a "small" NixOS mail server with Postfix, Nextcloud a.o. installed on the same machine. No chroot jails because of NixOS.

3 4

Re: [Dovecot] [dovecot-2.1.15] mdbox corruption, doveadm force-resync can't repair it (throws segfault)
by Manish Prajapati 31 Mar '24

31 Mar '24

3 2

Separate index get dovecot lost
by Joan Moreau 30 Mar '24

30 Mar '24

Hi I have large number of email (~TB) and want to put the index in a separate, rapid drive Initially, I have mail_location = mdbox:/files/mail/%d/%n If I put mail_location = mdbox:/files/mail/%d/%n:INDEX=/data/mailindexes/%d/%n then dovecot gets totally lost and tries to reach mailboxes content and tree from the INDEX location instead of the original location What is wrong ? Thank you Hi I have large number of email (~TB) and want to put the index in a separate, rapid drive Initially, I have mail_location = mdbox:/files/mail/%d/%n If I put mail_location = mdbox:/files/mail/%d/%n:INDEX=/data/mailindexes/%d/%n then dovecot gets totally lost and tries to reach mailboxes content and tree from the INDEX location instead of the original location What is wrong ? Thank you

2 4

replication timeout
by Andy Balholm 28 Mar '24

28 Mar '24

I have two Dovecot mail servers that replicate to each other. Sometimes there are delays in the synchronization, and I notice that the mail log has entries like this: Error: dsync(spokane): I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mailbox, last recv=mailbox_state) Five minutes seems like a long time to sit there waiting with nothing happening. Is there a way to reduce this timeout so that I don't have so many replicaton connections just sitting around doing nothing? (Of course, a way to prevent the I/O stalls would be great too, but with my limited upload bandwidth, they may be unavoidable.) Andy

2 9