- dovecot - dovecot.org

Mail messages are occasionally getting "stuck" behind one message on the server with POP3
by David Salisbury 24 Sep '19

24 Sep '19

I'm currently using Dovecot 2.2.33.2, although I've had this particular issue happen periodically over the last few years with other Dovecot versions. It seems to only affect accounts I'm receiving with POP3, not IMAP ones. What happens is the "top-most" (or, oldest) message in the "cur" folder seems to get "stuck". So I'll, say, come back in after a break to check my email (Thunderbird in my case, latest version), and in one of my folders I'll have 30 copies of the same email (all with the same timestamp), and no newer messages delivered since the timestamp of that message. If I go look in the "cur" folder, it has lots of messages in it. The "new" folder is empty. Every time I click "Get Messages" in the mail client, I get another new copy of the same email and no other mail. If I go manually into the cur folder and move the top-most (again, meaning "oldest") message out (which of course corresponds to the message that I'm receiving copies of over-and-over repeatedly) then when I click "Get Messages" all of the other messages come pouring into my mail client just fine and everything becomes "un-stuck". I've done some experiments, and if I copy that same "bad" message back in to cur with its original filename, it gets stuck again. It is an encrypted message, so I tried decrypting it and putting it back in cur with the original name, and it gets stuck in the same fashion even when it is decrypted. I tried putting the bad message into an account that receives with IMAP, just to see if it would maybe keep messages from delivering or something, but new messages come into the IMAP account just fine, even with the bad message present, so the issue seems specific to POP3. Any ideas what might cause something like that? I've had it happen twice over the last two days (which is unusually frequent, hence my message here), and the message sources are varied. Today it was a normal email message from a person, and yesterday it was a Twitch notification. I don't see anything unusual in the logs (and I did turn on debugging to see if it gave some additional info), just normal POP3 logins and connections closings when I'm clicking "Get Messages". -David

1 0

Any need to be worried about occasional dsync errors ?
by Laura Smith 24 Sep '19

24 Sep '19

I am occasionally (maybe every 4 hours or less frequently) seeing the following two errors appear in my logs. Are they any cause for concern ? Error: Timeout during state=sync_mails (send=done recv=mails) I/O has stalled, no activity for 600 seconds (last sent=mail_request (EOL)

1 0

Quota plug-in, do the directors also need it enabled?
by Kristijan Savic - ratiokontakt GmbH 23 Sep '19

23 Sep '19

I am having an issue with the quota display not showing up in e.g. Roundcube. There are multiple Dovecot servers and three directors. A load balancer also does it's thing. The quota plug-in is enabled everywhere, except on the directors. Do those also need it enabled? -- Kristijan Savic

1 0

pigeonhole sieve "standalone"
by Greg Minshall 22 Sep '19

22 Sep '19

hi. i've been thinking (but, for years now!) of a replacement for procmail, and pigeonhold sieve seems like a good candidate. but, i run nmh, not dovecot. as i started install it (on arch linux), i started to worry that it may be foolish of me to try to run it outside of a dovecot system. any wisdom about that would be gratefully received. thanks in advance, and thanks for the software. Greg Minshall

1 0

mdbox + sis attachments. Error stream is larger than expected by 1 byte
by Oleg Krivonosov 20 Sep '19

20 Sep '19

Hello! I use Dovecot 2.3.4.1-5+deb10u1 (Debian 10 x64) with mdbox, sis and imap. I catch many errors with attachments "Stream is larger than expected" by 1 byte in emails from Xerox WorkCentre 3345. Examples: Sep 20 23:20:04 mailserver dovecot: imap(wasya)<606><AG1zywGTVodVrE84>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: UID=5002: read(attachments-connector(/var/mail/virtual/wasya/mdbox/storage/m.210)) failed: read(/var/mail/attachments/b3/56/b3563977baf186928d38f81480b6443cf6d6d7e4-b86d80062ab36f5d7f190000f7ccf497[base64:18 b/l]) failed: Stream is larger than expected (882801 > 882800, eof=0) (FETCH BODY[]) Sep 20 23:32:27 mailserver dovecot: imap(wasya)<4831><n0a39wGTZ8hVyu8l>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: UID=654996: read(attachments-connector(/var/mail/virtual/wasya/mdbox/storage/m.4372)) failed: read(/var/mail/virtual/wasya/mdbox/storage/m.4372 trailer) failed: Stream is larger than expected (38 > 37, eof=0) (FETCH BODY[]). This error breaks getting email in MS Outlook and breaks viewing attachment in the problem email. Please help me to debug and to fix this issue. -- Best regards Oleg

1 0

Re: Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,>, case-sensitive?
by Klaus Steinberger 20 Sep '19

20 Sep '19

Hi, >> I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! > > Every Unix/Linux system (I?d say that represents the majority of mail systems) has a case sensitive local part. Most mail admins have set their systems up to normalize all users on lowercase names, but that is not and has not always been the case. at least in every large installation LDAP User Backend's (or AD or similar) are used, and they are definitly case insensitive for the CN or UID attributes. Really nobody who cares about his systems and users uses mailboxnames which just differ in case (too much danger of confusion!) At least sieve must reflect the same settings as the MDA, so if the MDA is set to downcase (which in my opionion is the only valuable setting) sieve must also downcase. Sincerly, Klaus

1 0

fts_solr: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'
by Fabian 20 Sep '19

20 Sep '19

Hi, we are trying to add full text search functionality with Solr to our Doveoct setup. Our Versions: OS: Debian 9 Tried versions: - Dovecot 2.2.7 with Solr 3.6 - Dovecot 2.3.4 with Solr 8.2 (2.2.7 from offical Debian repository, 2.3.4 from backports) Search is working mostly of the time perfrectly smooth. But sometimes following message appears in mail.err: dovecot: imap(username)<16189><UxYWLVuSYMasEQoK>: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid '0' If this error occurs our webmail frontend delivers most of the time a timeout. Sometimes the search only takes really long. Are there any ideas why this error occurs? We are not able to reproduce the error in such a way that it would always be reproducible. However, we can reproduce the behavior in some form over and over again - but we do not know exactly what is decisive. If you need any further information please ask - thanks! :-) dovecont -n: 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 () # OS: Linux 4.9.0-11-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.11 ext4 # Hostname: localhost auth_master_user_separator = * auth_username_format = %Ln default_client_limit = 5000 default_process_limit = 1000 default_vsz_limit = 256M dict { sqlquota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 480 imap_capability = +XDOVECOT lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes mail_attribute_dict = file:/var/spool/dovecot/user/%n/Maildir/dovecot-attributes mail_gid = vmail mail_location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/user/%d/%n/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs mail_plugins = " listescape mail_log notify quota acl fts fts_solr virtual" mail_privileged_group = vmail mail_uid = vmail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext namespace { hidden = yes inbox = yes list = no location = prefix = separator = / subscriptions = yes } namespace { list = yes location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEXPVT=~/shared/%%u:LAYOUT=fs prefix = shared/%%n/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = shared } namespace Public { list = children location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/public:INDEXPVT=~/public:LAYOUT=fs prefix = Public/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = public } namespace Virtual { hidden = no list = yes location = virtual:/etc/dovecot/virtual:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/user/%u/virtual prefix = Virtual/ separator = / subscriptions = no } namespace inbox { inbox = no location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = INBOX/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = private } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/masteruser.%s driver = passwd-file master = yes } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext driver = ldap } passdb { args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users driver = passwd-file } plugin { acl = vfile acl_anyone = allow acl_shared_dict = file:/var/spool/dovecot/public/shared-mailboxes.db fts = solr fts_autoindex = yes fts_solr = url=<a href="http://172.17.10.12:8983/solr/dovecot/" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">172.17.10.12:8983/solr/dovecot/</a> quota = dict:User quota::no-unset:proxy::sqlquota quota_rule = *:storage=10G sieve = file:~/sieve;active=~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_before = /var/spool/dovecot/globalsieve/duplicate.sieve sieve_duplicate_default_period = 1h sieve_duplicate_max_period = 1d } protocols = " imap lmtp sieve pop3" service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } } service decode2text { executable = script /usr/lib/dovecot/<a href="http://decode2text.sh" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">decode2text.sh</a> unix_listener decode2text { mode = 0666 } user = dovecot } service dict { unix_listener dict { group = vmail user = vmail } } service lmtp { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { group = postfix mode = 0600 user = postfix } } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } ssl = no userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/mysql-userdb.conf.ext driver = sql } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins = " listescape mail_log notify quota acl fts fts_solr virtual acl quota sieve notify" quota_full_tempfail = yes } protocol imap { imap_capability = +XDOVECOT mail_max_userip_connections = 100 mail_plugins = " listescape mail_log notify quota acl fts fts_solr virtual imap_acl imap_quota" } remote <a href="http://172.17.10.10" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">172.17.10.10</a> { protocol imap { imap_metadata = yes } }

2 3

Second private namespace
by André Rodier 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hello, I have Dovecot working, with a private namespace only. I would like to know if the following is feasible. - Add a second private namespace, in another directory scheme, for instance /mnt/backup/homebox/<user>/Mails/... - This namespace would be read-only. Perhaps the index and flags should be stored in a different folder with r/w access (e.g. /var, or even /tmp, it's not important) Now, as a matter of fact, this folder would be mounted on demand, via systemd-automount and fuse and is likely to be remote. This might implies some flags or caching on Dovecot performance. Thanks for your insights, André

1 0

Recent Dovecot on old operating system
by geho781＠justmail.de 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hi, sorry for the dumb question and please ignore this post if you think it's far beyond; i know it's not the way to go, but for reasons ... Has anyone running a self compiled recent dovecot (2.2.36.4) on Debian-7 and does it work? Or thinks it should work. Surprisingly it actually compiles flawlessly on Debian-7, but i wonder wether it will become a complete mess replacingthe existing dovecot (2.1.7) with the new one, serving a few dozens users and any kind of mail clients. Libraries of the compiled Dovecot: $ ldd ./src/master/.libs/dovecot linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffeacfb1000) libdovecot.so.0 => /usr/local/00-DBAI/dovecot/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 (0x00007f557b2a9000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f557af1c000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f557ad18000) librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f557ab10000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f557b5dc000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f557a8f4000) libc6 versions: Debian-7: 2.13-38 Debian-9: 2.24-11 thanks so far, gerald

2 1

Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
by Domenico Pastore 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hi, i have a problem with libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4. I See segfault error to messages log, when dovecot store mail to INBOX. set 12 13:41:21 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[20285]: segfault at 38 ip 00007f575b68fc42 sp 00007ffc0272e750 error 4 in libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4[7f575b569000+188000] set 12 13:41:22 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[18871]: segfault at 38 ip 00007f9bea6d2c42 sp 00007fff47bceae0 error 4 in libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4[7f9bea5ac000+188000] In the dovecot logs: 2019-09-12 13:45:09 auth: Debug: ldap(test4444client(a)newsvilXXXX,10.0.8.128<mailto:test4444client@newsvilXXXX,10.0.8.128>): Finished userdb lookup 2019-09-12 13:45:09 auth: Debug: userdb out: USER 1 test4444client@newsvilXXXX home=/pec_store/pec_mailbox/pec_mailbox_devel01/4/5/6/7/1/45671_18231 quota_rule=*:bytes=1048576000 mail_plugins+= 2019-09-12 13:45:10 SKENO8Uvel0gbAAA5ZKy4w doveadm(test4444client@newsvilXXXX): Fatal: master: service(doveadm): child 27680 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) 2019-09-12 13:45:10 auth: Debug: master in: USER 1 test4444client@newsvilXXXX service=doveadm lip=192.160.10.3 lport=924 rip=10.0.8.128 rport=36760 2019-09-12 13:45:10 auth: Debug: ldap(test4444client@newsvilXXXX 10.0.8.128): Performing userdb lookup I have attach the coredump of error and dovecot.conf Thanks for support. Br, Domenico ------------------- info: ------------------- # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /pec/config/dovecot/dovecot-devel01/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.7.2 (7372921a) # OS: Linux 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) # Hostname: box02

2 5

fts-elastic plugin
by Filip Hanes 19 Sep '19

19 Sep '19

Hi all, I have recently worked on fts plugin for ElasticSearch. https://github.com/filiphanes/fts-elastic It is forked from fts-elasticsearch as you can see in PR https://github.com/atkinsj/fts-elasticsearch/pull/21 with following changes (maybe some more) - no duplicate json keys in indexed documents, so compatible with ES 7.x - 1 elastic index for all users with routing by username - _id field similar to fts-solr (uid/box_guid/user) - better json response parsing - no need to use _source - added rawlog_dir to config and some more - renamed all elasticsearch to elastic for shorter names - fixed http_client leaks - fixed some compile warnings I would appreciate if someone with better experience in c and dovecot code would review my code and suggest/push changes. In my opinion fts-elastic is now functionally on level as currently recommended FTS plugin: fts-solr. I would like to implement proper rescan inspired by fts-lucene so it would become the most complete fts plugin for dovecot. -- Filip Hanes

3 2

Imaptest stall
by Marc Roos 18 Sep '19

18 Sep '19

I have been testing with imaptest and getting 'stalls', I tried even building from source and static. Even running it on the same host. Anyone knows what I could doing wrong? [@~]# ./imaptest - append=100,0 logout=0 host=192.168.10.44 port=143 user=test2 pass=xxxxxxxx seed=100 secs=240 clients=1 mbox=64kb.mbox box=INBOX/test Logi Sele Appe 100% 100% 100% 1 1 5 1/ 1 0 0 9 1/ 1 0 0 13 1/ 1 0 0 5 1/ 1

3 7

Namespace overlap
by Daniel Miller 17 Sep '19

17 Sep '19

Given an existing default namespace: namespace inbox { type = private separator = / prefix = location = sdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/sdbox inbox = yes hidden = no list = yes subscriptions = yes } And mailboxes like: INBOX INBOX/Archives INBOX/Archives/2018 if I then define a new namespace: namespace archives { type = private separator = / prefix = Archives/ location = mdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/Archives/mdbox subscriptions = no list = children } What will happen to the previous existing mailboxes & mails? Will they simply be "masked" by the new namespace and remain pending other operations? Or would they be moved/deleted? If they remain - is it possible to refer to the old mailboxes via either IMAP or doveadm? -- Daniel

1 0

CVE-2019-11500 and LMTP error
by Gabriele Nencioni 16 Sep '19

16 Sep '19

Hi all, does the dovecot fixed version: 2.3.7.2, 2.2.36.4 (as the CVE-2019-11500 says) fix the LMTP error "Got unexpected reply" as well? The LMTP error "Got unexpected reply" is described here: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112562.html https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112666.html Thanks in advance Regards, -- Gabriele Nencioni

2 1

Repo for Debian-Buster
by slater.ch 16 Sep '19

16 Sep '19

Hi, is there already a release date for Debian Buster packages? kind regards Christian

3 2

corrupted mdbox
by sch tel 16 Sep '19

16 Sep '19

Hello list, i run into another problem. It seems there are some null bytes in the middle of an compressed mdbox, if i look into it with hexdump after run doveadm dump. With mdbox-recover.pl i could recover ~2k messages. What should i do to recover this broken mdbox file and dsync can finish? Sep 06 18:47:28 doveadm: Error: zlib.read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770): unexpected EOF at 7947710 Sep 06 18:47:28 doveadm: Error: dsync(server1): read(zlib(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770)) failed: read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770) failed: zlib.read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770): unexpected EOF at 7947710 (last sent=mail, last recv=mail_request (EOL)) Sep 06 18:47:29 dsync-local(<user>)<+mJrOaCNcl2eZwAA0H466A>: Error: zlib.read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770): unexpected EOF at 7947710 Sep 06 18:47:29 dsync-local(<user>)<+mJrOaCNcl2eZwAA0H466A>: Error: dsync(server1): read(zlib(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770)) failed: read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770) failed: zlib.read(/var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/m.770): unexpected EOF at 7947710 (last sent=mail, last recv=mail_request (EOL))

2 1

question about Mailcrypt plugin
by Daniel Niewerth 14 Sep '19

14 Sep '19

Hi everybody, I have a question about the Dovecot Mailcrypt Plugin. I'm trying to understand what the security of this plugin is based on. The encryption with private and public key and elliptic curves is basically a good thing. But the keys are in the file system together with the encrypted mails. The passwords for the private keys are in the user database. I guess the passwords have to be in plaintext for it to work. Is that true, or did I misunderstand something? Then the encryption would make no sense at all, right? For what purpose was the plugin developed? Can anyone explain this to me? Best regards Daniel

2 2

New to dovecot admin, question about using LDAP for user-specific values
by Gerben Wierda 13 Sep '19

13 Sep '19

I am new to dovecot administration. I’ve read the Wiki but that hasn’t given me the understanding I need. When I query my LDAP (on macOS) on a value for user ‘gerben’, I can get that: dumbledore:~ gerben$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 -read /users/gerben GeneratedUID GeneratedUID: 780D870E-6B00-478E-AB70-3D3307215A82 I would like to use that value in dovecot settings, e.g. something like user_attrs = \ =mail=maildir://Library/Server/Mail/Data/mail/%{ldap:GeneratedUID} Is this possible and if so what do I exactly need to do to get this working? Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book/> Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book-edition-iii/> Architecture for Real Enterprises <https://www.infoworld.com/blog/architecture-for-real-enterprises/> at InfoWorld On Slippery Ice <https://eapj.org/on-slippery-ice/> at EAPJ

2 4

Multiple certificate option
by remo＠Mattei.org 13 Sep '19

13 Sep '19

What is the best way to adopt multiple certs? Thanks.

8 9

keywords lost when moving a message in a folder
by wouldsmina 13 Sep '19

13 Sep '19

Hi, I migrate my dovecot server from Debian 9 to Debian 10 (Dovecot 2.3.4.1), since when I move a message in a folder, keywords systematically disappear. I'm using Thunderbird 60.8. Would an option have escaped me? or is there a bug on this version of dovecot? Dovecot 2.3.4.1 OS : Debian 10.0 x64 FS : Ext4 dovecot -n result : # 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.4 () # OS: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 x86_64 Debian 10.0 # Hostname: suzuki.domain.tld auth_cache_size = 1 k auth_failure_delay = 3 secs base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ default_vsz_limit = 4 G first_valid_uid = 100 lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes login_greeting = mail system ready. login_trusted_networks = 172.16.0.0/12 192.168.0.0/16 mail_fsync = always mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_prefetch_count = 20 mail_privileged_group = mail mailbox_idle_check_interval = 1 mins mmap_disable = yes namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = maildir:~/Maildir mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = INBOX. separator = . subscriptions = yes type = private } passdb { driver = pam } plugin { acl_shared_dict = file:/var/lib/dovecot/shared-mailboxes sieve = ~/sieve/.dovecot.sieve sieve_after = /etc/dovecot/sieve.after sieve_before = /etc/dovecot/sieve.before sieve_before2 = ~/sieve/.dovecot.vacation.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_editheader_forbid_add = X-Verified sieve_editheader_forbid_delete = X-Verified X-Seen sieve_editheader_max_header_size = 1k sieve_extensions = +editheader sieve_max_script_size = 2M } postmaster_address = postmaster(a)domain.tld protocols = " imap lmtp pop3" service auth-worker { process_min_avail = 6 service_count = 0 } service imap-login { process_min_avail = 10 service_count = 0 vsz_limit = 4 G } service imap { process_limit = 4096 vsz_limit = 4 G } service pop3 { process_limit = 1024 } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/suzuki.crt ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it userdb { driver = passwd } verbose_proctitle = yes protocol imap { mail_max_userip_connections = 25 } thanks.

2 2

Outlook 2019 and IMAP
by John Regan 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

Hi, We've just upgraded a few of our desktops to use Outlook 2019, and the configuration is different from previous versions. There doesn't appear to be any ability to specify a username in addition to the user's email address. The username is different than the username specified in the email address. I had read about setting auth_username_format, but the user login name is "user" while the email address is user.name(a)company.com. I've included below my dovecot -n config. # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.7.2 (7372921a) # OS: Linux 5.1.16-300.fc30.x86_64 x86_64 Fedora release 30 (Thirty) # Hostname: orion.inside.example.com mail_gid = mail mail_home = mail/ mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u mail_max_userip_connections = 500 mail_plugins = " listescape" mail_privileged_group = mail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational rege x imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext mbox_write_locks = fcntl namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { driver = pam } passdb { driver = pam } protocols = imap pop3 service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } } service imap-login { inet_listener imap { port = 0 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 } process_min_avail = 6 service_count = 0 vsz_limit = 512 M } service pop3-login { inet_listener pop3 { port = 0 } inet_listener pop3s { address = 192.168.1.100 port = 995 } } ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/fullchain.pem ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!EXP:!aNULL:!RC4::!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!PSK:!SRP:!DSS ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes userdb { driver = passwd } userdb { driver = passwd }

2 1

Re: Gnu sieve vs Dovecot sieve-filter - sieve-filter extremely slow at lda (writing emails to local mbox files)
by Zenaan Harkness 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

I am wondering why sieve-filter is so slow compared to gnu sieve. I run mpop (like getmail) to download from a pop3 server to a local mbox file: ~/mail/email-incoming-unsorted This step is very fast. The next step, I throw the email-incoming-unsorted mbox file at a sieve processor, to sort the emails from that mbox, into other mboxes, according to the sieve rules file. Up until a couple days ago I was using Gnu sieve. Gnu sieve balks on emails which have no x-message-id (?? something like this) header field, so after a few years, I finally decided to switch "up" to Dovecot/Pigeonhole's "sieve-filter" command. Using Gnu sieve, this mbox sorting step was even faster than mpop (/ getmail) - and mpop and getmail are really fast (compared with fetchmail), since they pipeline the email downloads. Even with 100s of emails, Gnu sieve would take only 10 to 20 seconds at most. Super fast. Using sieve-filter, all emails are being processed - including those without "message id header". This is good. But also, using sieve filter, is really slower - slower than the download step by an order of magnitude or two. See below for details, any ideas appreciated. To add to the below, I added: mbox_very_dirty_syncs = yes to the sieve-filter config, which slightly improves performance, but not by much (in comparison with Gnu sieve). TIA, ----- Forwarded message from Zenaan Harkness <zenaan(a)freedbms.net> ----- From: Zenaan Harkness <zenaan(a)freedbms.net> To: debian-user(a)lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:06:12 +1000 Subject: Re: Gnu sieve vs Dovecot sieve-filter - sieve-filter extremely slow at lda (writing emails to local mbox files) On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:55:23AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Why is Gnu sieve so extremely fast to batch process an mbox file, but > while Dovecot's sieve-filter is an order of magnitude slower? > > Sequence: > > - mpop or getmail to pipeline download emails into temp mbox file > - filter that file > > Gnu sieve just flies through a local mbox file and saving emails to > other local mbox files. > > Gnu sieve rejects too many emails with "malformed" errors, so after a > few years I bit the bullet and upgraded to Dovecot's sieve-filter. > > Dovecot's sieve-filter, at present, is an order of magnitude slower. > > Here's my filter command (one line): > > /usr/bin/sieve-filter -veW -c $HOME/etc/email/sieve-dovecot-config.conf -o mail_location=mbox:~/mail:INBOX=~/mail/Inbox:INDEX=:UTF-8:VOLATILEDIR=/tmp/dovecot-volatile/%2.256Nu/%u:SUBSCRIPTIONS=dovecot_subscriptions ~/etc/email/sieve.rc email-incoming-unsorted > > The sieve script is fine now that I have the correct "require" > clauses (hint: "capability strings"). > > File ~/etc/email/sieve-dovecot-config.conf: > > protocols = pop > lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes > lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes > mail_fsync = never > > There's no re-sending of emails into my local Postfix SMTP server - I > checked the system logs and confirmed this (journalctl -f). > > I suspect that Gnu sieve was directly writing each email to the > appropriate sieve-determined mbox file (perhaps with only a sync at > the end of a single batch process - what I've attempted to achieve > above with sieve-filter), and that sieve-filter is instead passing > each email through some (dovecot) lda? > > Here's the output for a sieve-filter batch processing of 11 emails: > > $ /usr/bin/sieve-filter -veW -c /home/zen/etc/email/sieve-dovecot-config.conf -o mail_location=mbox:/home/zen/mail:INBOX=/home/zen/mail/Inbox:INDEX=:UTF-8:VOLATILEDIR=/tmp/dovecot-volatile/%2.256Nu/%u:SUBSCRIPTIONS=dovecot_subscriptions /home/zen/etc/email/sieve.rc email-incoming-unsorted > # PS0 Timestamp: 20190912@07:02:23 > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 05:17:16 -0500; 10240 bytes] `Re: VentureBeat: The death of disk? H...'. > info: msgid=<CAMjeLr91T9R7APsuxQVuM3WbqDsxAfwn4=OYDeDX4FMcoRdGdQ(a)mail.gmail.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/cp/cp'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:29:53 -0400; 12968 bytes] `[zfs-devel] xattr naming format in Zo...'. > info: msgid=<15675101930.d5ba2E.12322(a)composer.zfsonlinux.topicbox.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/z/zdev'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:29:09 +0300; 20461 bytes] `Re: [zfs-devel] xattr naming format i...'. > info: msgid=<23955051567513749(a)sas1-02732547ccc0.qloud-c.yandex.net>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/z/zdev'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 18:20:42 +0530; 18065 bytes] `Re: [Gluster-users] Issues with Geo-r...'. > info: msgid=<CADmkyZMxrfOANrAP+_URAHJcMqCqh=iGdajTSzkfQ5PCZsUfyg(a)mail.gmail.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/gl/user'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:34:20 -0400; 13342 bytes] `Re: tasksel'. > info: msgid=<20190903133420.GS6166(a)eeg.ccf.org>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/deb/user'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:56:07 -0700 (PDT); 12390 bytes] `[awx-project] Re: AWX on Kubernetes m...'. > info: msgid=<0715adb7-540f-4cff-9282-e1252c53c2e8(a)googlegroups.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/ansible/awx'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:01:27 -0700 (PDT); 12220 bytes] `[awx-project] Re: AWX on Kubernetes m...'. > info: msgid=<949b2c17-4254-49f1-83b4-cd54d15aa17d(a)googlegroups.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/ansible/awx'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:14:58 -0400; 25313 bytes] `Re: [zfs-devel] xattr naming format i...'. > info: msgid=<CAB5c7xpHCdFx1w3yA9FyRL-KQ8BUiCr4JbiDQRuFJj9nOgKxTg(a)mail.gmail.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/z/zdev'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:10:22 +0200; 7567 bytes] `Re: [asterisk-users] Playing MP3's in...'. > info: msgid=<20190903151022.354xpe6ds2vglher(a)red.localdomain>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/as/users'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Wed, 4 Sep 2019 01:04:49 +0900; 14858 bytes] `Re: [Hyperledger Fabric] a primitive ...'. > info: msgid=<160901d8-b903-9e9a-91ac-267571b0e24d(a)gmx.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/hl/fabric'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > info: filtering: [Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:55:22 -0700 (PDT); 13337 bytes] `[awx-project] Re: AWX on Kubernetes m...'. > info: msgid=<f9bc4e6a-8445-4b34-927a-35f577ffcc07(a)googlegroups.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'l/ansible/awx'. > info: message expunged from source mailbox upon successful move. > 2 ▶︎️ zen@eye 20190912@07:02:30 ~ $ > > > So about 3/4 of a second is spent by dovecot's sieve-filter, on each > email that it processes - watching it is painful given how fast Gnu > sieve has been for the last few years - it's almost (but not quite) > as slow as my previous fetchmail email download per-email time. > > Attached is a -D debug run of sieve-filter on 20 emails - slightly > longer than the above, and took roughly 15 seconds to run. > > Any help appreciated... On another test run of ~600 emails, sieve-filter is consistently running ~100% of one CPU (for about 4 minutes) to process these emails, which leads to the conclusion that despite what looks like should be a batch process, sieve-filter is perhaps reloading the rules for every single email that it processes, even though I gave it a whole mbox, and not a single email, to process. Can sieve-filter work the way it should / the way I want it / batch process a whole mbox - without reloading the sieve rules for every email? ----- End forwarded message -----

3 2

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only,> case-sensitive?
by Klaus Steinberger 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger -- Rechnerbetriebsgruppe / IT, Fakultät für Physik Klaus Steinberger FAX: +49 89 28914280 Tel: +49 89 28914287

6 5

WARNING: using attachment_dir with plugin zlib can corrupt mails
by Patrick Cernko 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

Hello list, hello Dovecot developers, this week, I discovered a serious bug in Dovecot, that lead to several broken mails on our servers. The bug corrupts the first few characters of the mail header during saving. On our setup, it was almost always only the very first line of text, that was corrupted. Depending on the IMAP client (they seem to request different header fields, ... during mail access), the bug causes the imap process to hang up the TCP connection and log errors like this: > imap(USERNAME)<4767><TeQP4ASOTK5/AAAB>: Error: Corrupted record in index cache file /IMAP/mail/mailboxes/USERNAME/mdbox/mailboxes/Trash/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: UID 489113: Broken fields in mailbox Trash: read(attachments-connector(zlib(/IMAP/mail/mailboxes/USERNAME/mdbox/storage/m.813))): FETCH BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (RETURN-PATH SUBJECT)] got too little data: 2 vs 122 In our case that finally grabbed my attention, the client was the users iphone that did not display any new messages but his Thunderbird did. The bug seems to be triggered by a bad "interaction" of attachment_dir option and zlib plugin. If you use both, you most likely are affected, too, except you only use zlib plugin for reading previously compressed stored mails. That's also the workaround we use now: zlib plugin only enabled in mail_plugins but no plugin/zlib_save set. The bug occurs on very specific mails. Due to privacy reasons I could not provide sample mails here. Storing such mails seems to trigger the bug reproducible. I attached a very minimal doveconf -n config, that can be used to trigger the bug. If one of the developers is interested, I can try to generate an "anonymized" version of such a specific mail that still causes the issue. I discovered the bug on our productive systems, running latest Dovecot 2.2 release, but the latest 2.3 I used during debugging is affected, too. During debugging, I also found one hint, that might help find the bug: If you store a problematic mail with zlib_save=gz (or zlib_save=bz2) and then disable the zlib plugin in mail_plugins, you can call doveadm fetch -u test hdr all | grep -v ^hdr: | gzip --decompress on test's mailbox with only that one broken mail. This will display the beginning of the rfc822 mail text until gzip terminates with "gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file", approximately after twice the length of the mail HEADER. This might indicate, that dovecot stores the uncompressed size of the header in it's data structures although the mail is stored compressed. I also found a very efficient way to find all affected mails in our setup: doveadm -f flow fetch -A 'user guid mailbox uid seq flags hdr' all | \ grep -a "^[^ ]+ user=" | \ grep -avF ' hdr=Return-path: ' | \ grep -av '.* hdr=[[:print:][:space:]]*$' (runtime for ~6M mails on our servers was 20-30min) This can be even more optimized if you have a powerful storage system with GNU parallel: > doveadm user '*' | parallel "doveadm -f flow fetch -u '{}' 'user guid mailbox uid seq flags hdr' all | grep -a '^user=' | grep -avF ' hdr=Return-path: ' | grep -av '.* hdr=[[:print:][:space:]]*$' || true" (runtime for ~6M mails on our servers was ~4min) The command will give you a list of mails that possibly are affected, check the full output of doveadm fetch -u USERNAME hdr guid GUID | less to verify that the header is really broken. On our systems I found 39 mails within ~12M mails. I was able to recover these mails "manually" by reconstructing the Return-Path header line, importing the fixed mails and expunging the corrupt ones. Before importing, I had to disable zlib_save option obviously. Best regards, -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Administration: Information Services and Technology Max-Planck-Institute fuer Informatik & Softwaresysteme

4 4

pigeonhole/lda accessing -m folder
by matthias lay 12 Sep '19

12 Sep '19

Hi all, anybody knows, if there is a way to acces the folder from a call like this deovecot-lda -m destfolder from within a sieve script? thx in advance matze

5 9