- dovecot - dovecot.org

How to temporarily make all mailboxes read-only for backup purposes?
by Matthias Nagel 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Dear all, I am using Dovecot sdbox format for mailboxes. Is there an option to temporarily make Dovecot read-only while the mailboxes are being backed-up such that a consistent state is backed-up? I am looking for some command which I can use as pre- and post-hook for Borgbackup. I am looking for a way such that Dovecot defers any mail coming in via LMTP from Postfix, denies modifying mails/mailboxes via IMAP while Dovecot still allows to browse mails read-only. Is that possible? Bests, Matthias

2 1

Ouath2 compatible mail clients
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hi, Are there any oauth2 compatible mail clients out there? For Mac/iOS? I see that Mail for Mac supports it, but just for Exchange. __ Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay Oslo, Norway Sent from a mobile device / Enviado a partir de dispositivo móvel Hi, Are there any oauth2 compatible mail clients out there? For Mac/iOS? I see that Mail for Mac supports it, but just for Exchange. __ Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay Oslo, Norway Sent from a mobile device / Enviado a partir de dispositivo móvel

1 0

[CFP] "Modern Email" Developer Room at FOSDEM '24
by Joris Baum 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hi, There will be a developer room that I think will be of particular interest for subscribers of this mailing list for "Modern Email" during FOSDEM '24. It will center around the current state of email, free/open source software projects related to email and current developments. FOSDEM is and event for free software and open source developers. The event encompasses two main streams: talks curated by organizers covering diverse topics and the developer rooms. Spread across multiple buildings at the venue, the developer rooms are focusing on specific concepts, technologies, and ideas. This is where the fun is. And most of the fun will obviously happen in the "Modern Email" room. The submission deadline for proposals is 1st December 2023. You can find more info on GitHub: https://github.com/modern-email/FOSDEM-24 . Regards, Joris Baum -- Joris Baum Tel: +49 721 170293 16 Fax: +49 721 170293 179 http://www.audriga.com | http://www.twitter.com/audriga -------------------------------------------------------------------------- audriga GmbH | Alter Schlachthof 57 | 76137 Karlsruhe Sitz der Gesellschaft: Karlsruhe - Amtsgericht Mannheim - HRB 713034 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Frank Dengler, Dr. Hans-Jörg Happel --------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 2

Anyone Watching Actvity from this network? Attempting Dovecot Buffer Overflows?
by Michael Peddemors 21 Nov '23

21 Nov '23

There is a network claiming to be a security company, however the activity appears to be a little more malicious, and appears to be attempting buffer overflows against POP-SSL services.. (and other attacks). https://www.abuseipdb.com/check/104.156.155.21 Just thought it would be worth mentioning, you might want to keep an eye out for traffic from this company... Might want to make up your own mind, or maybe someone has more information, but enough of a red flag, that thought it warranted posting on the list. Not sure yet if it is Dovecot, or the SSL libraries they are attempting to break, but using a variety of SSL/TLS methods and connections... Anyone with more information? NetRange: 104.156.155.0 - 104.156.155.255 CIDR: 104.156.155.0/24 NetName: ACDRESEARCH NetHandle: NET-104-156-155-0-1 Parent: NET104 (NET-104-0-0-0-0) NetType: Direct Allocation OriginAS: Organization: Academy of Internet Research Limited Liability Company (AIRLL) RegDate: 2022-01-07 Updated: 2022-01-07 Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/ip/104.156.155.0 OrgName: Academy of Internet Research Limited Liability Company OrgId: AIRLL Address: #A1- 5436 Address: 1110 Nuuanu Ave City: Honolulu StateProv: HI PostalCode: 96817 Country: US RegDate: 2021-10-15 Updated: 2022-11-06 Ref: https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/AIRLL -- "Catch the Magic of Linux..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc. Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca "LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

11 15

dovecot and oauth2 (with keycloak) not working
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

Hi, I successfully configured Roundcube to use keycloak for oauth2. However, I am having trouble to make it work with dovecot. My configuration is this: cat dovecot-oauth2.conf.ext tokeninfo_url = https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/myrealm/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo introspection_url = https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/myrealm/protocol/openid-connect/token/intr… introspection_mode = post username_attribute = postfixMailAddress debug = yes scope = openid Roundcube_email This is what I am getting from the logs: Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Error: ldap(francis(a)mydomain.com,10.10.40.30,<yskzUpAKb9EKCige>): ldap_bind() failed: Constraint violation Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: host auth.mydomain.com: Host created Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: host auth.mydomain.com: Host session created Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: host auth.mydomain.com: IPs have expired; need to refresh DNS lookup Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: host auth.mydomain.com: Performing asynchronous DNS lookup Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: request [Req1: GET https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/med-lo/protocol/openid-connect/userinfoeyJ…] Submitted (requests left=1) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: host auth.mydomain.com: DNS lookup successful; got 1 IPs Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: peer 10.10.100.10:443 (shared): Peer created Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Peer pool created Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Peer created Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443: Setting up connection to 10.10.100.10:443 (SSL=auth.mydomain.com) (1 requests pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Linked queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443 (1 queues linked) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443: Started new connection to 10.10.100.10:443 (SSL=auth.mydomain.com) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Creating 1 new connections to handle requests (already 0 usable, connecting to 0, closing 0) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Making new connection 1 of 1 (0 connections exist, 0 pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Connecting Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Waiting for connect (fd=23) to finish for max 0 msecs Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: HTTPS connection created (1 parallel connections exist) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Client connection failed (fd=23) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Connection failed (1 connections exist, 0 pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Failed to make connection (1 connections exist, 0 pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Failed to establish any connection within our peer pool: connect(10.10.100.10:443) failed: Connection refused (1 connections exist, 0 pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443: Failed to set up connection to 10.10.100.10:443 (SSL=auth.mydomain.com) connect(10.10.100.10:443) failed: Connection refused (1 peers pending, 1 requests pending) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: peer 10.10.100.10:443: Unlinked queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443 (0 queues linked) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443: Failed to set up any connection; failing all queued requests Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: request [Req1: GET https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/med-lo/protocol/openid-connect/userinfoeyJ…] Error: 9003 connect(10.10.100.10:443) failed: Connection refused Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: queue https://auth.mydomain.com:443: Dropping request [Req1: GET https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/med-lo/protocol/openid-connect/userinfoeyJ…] Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Error: oauth2(francis(a)mydomain.com,10.10.40.30,<yskzUpAKb9EKCige>): oauth2 failed: connect(10.10.100.10:443) failed: Connection refused Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: request [Req1: GET https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/med-lo/protocol/openid-connect/userinfoeyJ…] Destroy (requests left=1) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client[1]: request [Req1: GET https://auth.mydomain.com/realms/med-lo/protocol/openid-connect/userinfoeyJ…] Free (requests left=0) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Connection close Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Connection disconnect Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Disconnected: connect() failed: Connection refused (fd=23) Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Detached peer Nov 20 08:20:30 auth: Debug: http-client: conn 10.10.100.10:443 [1]: Connection destroy Nov 20 08:20:32 imap-login: Info: Disconnected (auth service reported temporary failure): user=<francis(a)mydomain.com>, method=XOAUTH2, rip=10.10.40.30, lip=172.18.0.10, TLS, session=<yskzUpAKb9EKCige> My dovecot version is 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b). I find it odd that it is sending the token as a parameter, when I chose “post” as the introspection mode. But I don’t know if that is the problem. best, Francis

3 6

Avoiding POODLE vulnerability
by Steve Litt 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

Hi all, Ten years after the fact I learned about POODLE (Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption) vulnerabilities, which enable a poorly configured server to force my client to downgrade to vulnerable encryption. My current conf.d/10-ssl.conf contains the following line: ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv3:!EXP:!aNULL I've read that I should change the preceding line to the following: ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 !SSLv2 Is this correct? For some reason I have the same ssl_cipher_list in dovecot.conf. Should I make the change there too? Is there anything else I need to change? The following is my current dovecot.conf: ================================================= # 2.3.13 (89f716dc2): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 5.10.12_1 x86_64 # Hostname: mydesk.domain.cxm mail_location = maildir:~/mail/Maildir:INBOX=~/mail/Maildir/.INBOX namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = prefix = } passdb { driver = pam args = %s } userdb { driver = passwd } protocols = imap service imap-login { inet_listener imap { #port = 143 port = 0 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 #port = 0 ssl = yes #ssl = no } } ssl = required #ssl = yes ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecot_certs/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv3:!EXP:!aNULL ssl_key = </etc/ssl/dovecot_certs/private/dovecot.pem ================================================= By the way, does the preceding dovecot.conf even use the files in directories off conf.d ? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt Autumn 2023 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21

3 8

passdb doesn't support credential lookups
by Michael Grant 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

I'm having trouble authenticating certain users. I see this in the logs: Nov 19 16:26:40 auth: Debug: pam(jane,192.168.2.83,<...>): Performing passdb lookup Nov 19 16:26:40 auth: Debug: pam(jane,192.168.2.83,<...>): passdb doesn't support credential lookups Nov 19 16:26:40 auth: Debug: pam(jane,192.168.2.83,<...>): Finished passdb lookup at the command line, if I run this: % doveadm auth login jane Password: passdb: jane auth succeeded Oddly, I have a handfull of users that are failing and others that are not and I don't see the difference.

1 0

Re: DMARC Failures for Mailing List
by dovecot＠x9p.org 18 Nov '23

18 Nov '23

On 11/17/23 10:38, Nick Lockheart wrote: > The DKIM check is also failing. I think the list software may be re-writing the > message bodies. I believe one of the reasons for the DKIM failure is this addition/configuration by mailman in the footer of every message (the unsubscribe stuff): >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list --dovecot(a)dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email todovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org >>>>>>>> --x9p On 11/17/23 10:38, Nick Lockheart wrote: The DKIM check is also failing. I think the list software may be re- writing the message bodies. I believe one of the reasons for the DKIM failure is this addition/ configuration by mailman in the footer of every message (the unsubscribe stuff): >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org >>>>>>>> --x9p

1 0

DMARC Failures for Mailing List
by Nick Lockheart 18 Nov '23

18 Nov '23

Now that we've got our new mail server going and the DMARC reports are coming in, I'm finding a lot of DMARC failures for messages that I'm sending to this list. It seems that when I send a message to this list, the list software forwards it to other people on my behalf, but uses my email address in the header_from. This results in an SPF failure, because SPF only allows our MX to send mail for our domain. The DKIM check is also failing. I think the list software may be re- writing the message bodies. Another user that I replied to on this list a day ago said my list mail went to spam on his gmail. 1. Will our domain reputation be harmed by having a lot of copies of the same messages going to a bunch of different people on different ISPs and all of them failing DMARC? It seems that some places are using databases that look for duplicate content sent to multiple recipients to identify bulk mail and spam. 2. Is there any way to mitigate DMARC issues for mailing lists? It seems like the mailing list software should be sending out the emails as itself, not as the user that submitted the message. Now that we've got our new mail server going and the DMARC reports are coming in, I'm finding a lot of DMARC failures for messages that I'm sending to this list. It seems that when I send a message to this list, the list software forwards it to other people on my behalf, but uses my email address in the header_from. This results in an SPF failure, because SPF only allows our MX to send mail for our domain. The DKIM check is also failing. I think the list software may be re-writing the message bodies. Another user that I replied to on this list a day ago said my list mail went to spam on his gmail. 1. Will our domain reputation be harmed by having a lot of copies of the same messages going to a bunch of different people on different ISPs and all of them failing DMARC? It seems that some places are using databases that look for duplicate content sent to multiple recipients to identify bulk mail and spam. 2. Is there any way to mitigate DMARC issues for mailing lists? It seems like the mailing list software should be sending out the emails as itself, not as the user that submitted the message.

4 3

how to filter in doevecot/lmtp with sieve according to postfix orig_to value
by TSHIMANGA Minkoka 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Dear All, I am managing an email infrastructure running with the below. Rocky Linux 8.7 (Green Obsidian) 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 postfix-3.5.8-4.el8.x86_64 dovecot-2.3.16-3.el8.x86_64 dovecot-pigeonhole-2.3.16-3.el8.x86_64 In reality there are more packages installed and configured. But I limited my enumeration above to what I think is relevant. I will be happy to provide more details if needed and/or requested. Here is my problem, or at least on what I need help/guidance/assistance. I have a virtual alias that forward emails to support(a)example.com to my inbox tshimanga.minkoka(a)example.com. That works fine as I can see those emails in my INBOX. And I want those emails to be moved in INBOX/support with a local sieve rule. For that I have the below that works. # rule:[support] if allof (header :is "to" "support(a)example.com") { fileinto :create "INBOX/support"; } The problem is that the above sieve rule seems not enough to catch email where support(a)example.com is not the "To" fields, as with cases of "Cc:" or "Bcc:". In the log of postfix, I can see lines with "... postfix/lmtp ... orig_to=<support(a)example.com> ...". The problem I am facing is that "orig_to" is not part of the headers postfix/lmtp (in reality dovecot/lmtp process) can see in order to apply on it a sieve rule. Any suggestions on how I can also sieve filter those emails ? Regards, Tshimanga

2 2

auth service over tls
by ibra 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Hi, I'm trying running tls connections for both auth and lmtp services. For lmtp it is ok, for auth service I couldnt make it. I configure dovecot with the next configuration in file "conf.d/10-myconfig.conf": service auth { inet_listener { name = dovecot_auth address = 127.0.0.1 port = 12345 ssl = yes } user = mail # I've also tried with different users and without set it as well. } service lmtp { inet_listener { name = dovecot_lmtp address = 127.0.0.1 port = 24 ssl = yes } } Is something else I'm missing? Hi, I'm trying running tls connections for both auth and lmtp services. For lmtp it is ok, for auth service I couldnt make it. I configure dovecot with the next configuration in file "conf.d/10-myconfig.conf": service auth { inet_listener { name = dovecot_auth address = 127.0.0.1 port = 12345 ssl = yes } user = mail # I've also tried with different users and without set it as well. } service lmtp { inet_listener { name = dovecot_lmtp address = 127.0.0.1 port = 24 ssl = yes } } Is something else I'm missing?

4 5

Re: Anyone Watching Actvity from this network? Attempting Dovecot Buffer Overflows?
by Joseph Tam 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, 23:25 Michael Peddemors, <michael(a)linuxmagic.com> wrote: > Not sure yet if it is Dovecot, or the SSL libraries they are > attempting > to break, but using a variety of SSL/TLS methods and connections... > > They are not interested in dovecot per se. They scan for TLS vulnerabilities, > mostly. They're running comprehensive port scans, so they're targeting more than just SSL services. > OrgName: Academy of Internet Research Limited Liability > Company > OrgId: AIRLL > Address: #A1- 5436 > Address: 1110 Nuuanu Ave > City: Honolulu > StateProv: HI > PostalCode: 96817 > Country: US Out of business virtual offices, naturally. AIRLL also operating out of 195.96.137.0/24. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 2

Re: auth service over tls
by ibra 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

I was testing a bit this setup of putting them in different servers, since these options are implemented. What I was not sure was if they support TLS as well. So Postfix-Dovecot SASL AUTH is not supported. Is TLS LMTP supported between Postfix and Dovecot? I see that Dovecot LMTP supports a TLS connection, but not sure if Postfix can make the TLS initial request. I just could exchange data over LMTP in plain (no TLS) between Postfix and Dovecot. Regards, Ibra On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 12:28, Nick Lockheart <forum(a)ageofdream.com> wrote: > > Are Postfix and Dovecot running on the same server? If so, you might be > better served by connecting with a UNIX socket rather than TCP. > > I'm not sure there is much security benefit to using TLS on the loopback > interface which is what was in your example from the previous email. > > And to clarify, Postfix supports TLS for authentication between an email > program like Thunderbird and the Postfix server, but does not support TLS > for the SASL AUTH *service* connection from Postfix to the AUTH provider > (Dovecot or Cyrus-SASL). > > Also, please use the group reply function so your email goes to the list, > this email only went to me. > > > On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:38 +0000, ibra wrote: > > Good Morning, > thank you for your fast response, and sorry to not answer before, I forgot > to check spam folder. Good to know that postfix does not support SASL AUTH > over TLS, because actually I was planning to use it. > I started with Dovecot to check if auth port support tls. For that I > launched tls handshake using openssl, like this command: > $ openssl s_client -servername mail.sample.com -connect localhost:12345 > > But I got an error. (In summary Dovecot ends the connection). > Anyway, it would be awesome that in the future both Postfix and Dovecot > could support it. > > > On LMTP port, tls handshake worked in Dovecot side, now I have to > configure Postfix to make the request to dovecot LMTP over tls. > > With Postfix I was able to send data to Dovecot LMTP port, but was not > over TLS. Do you know what settings should I enable in Postfix side? > > Regards > Ibra. > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:08, Nick Lockheart <nlockheart(a)ageofdream.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 10:00 +0000, ibra wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying running tls connections for both auth and lmtp services. For > lmtp it is ok, for auth service I couldnt make it. I configure dovecot with > the next configuration in file "conf.d/10-myconfig.conf": > > > Which MTA are you trying to connect from? Postfix does not support SASL > AUTH over TLS, for example. > > > I was testing a bit this setup of putting them in different servers, since these options are implemented. What I was not sure was if they support TLS as well. So Postfix-Dovecot SASL AUTH is not supported. Is TLS LMTP supported between Postfix and Dovecot? I see that Dovecot LMTP supports a TLS connection, but not sure if Postfix can make the TLS initial request. I just could exchange data over LMTP in plain (no TLS) between Postfix and Dovecot. Regards, Ibra On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 12:28, Nick Lockheart <forum(a)ageofdream.com> wrote: Are Postfix and Dovecot running on the same server? If so, you might be better served by connecting with a UNIX socket rather than TCP. I'm not sure there is much security benefit to using TLS on the loopback interface which is what was in your example from the previous email. And to clarify, Postfix supports TLS for authentication between an email program like Thunderbird and the Postfix server, but does not support TLS for the SASL AUTH *service* connection from Postfix to the AUTH provider (Dovecot or Cyrus-SASL). Also, please use the group reply function so your email goes to the list, this email only went to me. On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 09:38 +0000, ibra wrote: Good Morning, thank you for your fast response, and sorry to not answer before, I forgot to check spam folder. Good to know that postfix does not support SASL AUTH over TLS, because actually I was planning to use it. I started with Dovecot to check if auth port support tls. For that I launched tls handshake using openssl, like this command: $ openssl s_client -servername mail.sample.com -connect localhost:12345 But I got an error. (In summary Dovecot ends the connection). Anyway, it would be awesome that in the future both Postfix and Dovecot could support it. On LMTP port, tls handshake worked in Dovecot side, now I have to configure Postfix to make the request to dovecot LMTP over tls. With Postfix I was able to send data to Dovecot LMTP port, but was not over TLS. Do you know what settings should I enable in Postfix side? Regards Ibra. On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 11:08, Nick Lockheart <nlockheart(a)ageofdream.com> wrote: On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 10:00 +0000, ibra wrote: Hi, I'm trying running tls connections for both auth and lmtp services. For lmtp it is ok, for auth service I couldnt make it. I configure dovecot with the next configuration in file "conf.d/ 10-myconfig.conf": Which MTA are you trying to connect from? Postfix does not support SASL AUTH over TLS, for example.

1 0

Fwd: dovecot submission max line length
by Kees van Vloten 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

Op 14-11-2023 om 14:35 schreef Aki Tuomi: >> On 14/11/2023 14:59 EET Kees van Vloten <keesvanvloten(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> After upgrading Debian Bullseye (Dovecot 2.3.13) to Bookworm (Dovcecot >> 2.3.19), submission-login returns an error on Kerberos authentication: >> "Client sent invalid command: Command line is too long". >> >> When I initially set this up on Bullseye I have seen the same issue, but >> adding "imap_max_line_length = 2M" solved it. >> >> Now with 2.3.19 kerberos authentication still works (with this setting) >> for imap connections but it stopped working for submission. >> >> Is there a new config setting for submission-login that I missed? Or is >> this a bug in 2.3.19? >> >> >> - Kees. >> >> > You are probably running into a client-side issue. SMTP RFC says that > all commands, including sasl ir, must be at most 998 bytes. Can you > check if the client is sending AUTH KERBEROS which is longer than 998 > lines? > > After AUTH KERBEROS you can send longer lines. The client has not changed. I have just upgraded the server from Bullseye to Bookworm, without configuration changes to Dovecot. The only change is version 2.3.13 to 2.3.19, that is why my first suspicion is that something changed in dovecot submission-login. The client is Thunderbird 102 and that has not changed for a long time (a year or so). Is there a way to create debug logs that show the client communication to submission-login? I had enabled "auth_debug" and "auth_verbose" in Dovecot but that seems to log the server side communication only (see below). And even with that information, would it be possible to convince Thunderbird to send 'AUTH KERBEROS' if it does not do that already? I logging I have is this: Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sent: 220 mailserver.example.com Dovecot ready. Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sending replies Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: No more commands pending Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Received new command: EHLO [192.168.1.106] Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: New command Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Execute command Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Pipeline blocked Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: 250 reply: Submitted Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Replied Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Ready to reply Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Trigger output Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Next to reply Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sending replies Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Next to reply Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Completed Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Pipeline unblocked Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Connection state reset Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: 250 reply: Sent: 250-mailserver.example.com 8BITMIME AUTH GSSAPI GSS-SPNEGO PLAIN BURL imap CHUNKING ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES SIZE PIPELINING Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Finished Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: Destroy Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command EHLO: 250 reply: Destroy Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Trigger output Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: No more commands pending Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sending replies Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: No more commands pending Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Client sent invalid command: Command line is too long Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Invalid command Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: 500 reply: Submitted Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Replied Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Ready to reply Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Trigger output Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sending replies Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Next to reply Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Completed Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: 500 reply: Sent: 500 5.5.2 Line too long Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Finished Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: Destroy Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: command [unknown]: 500 reply: Destroy Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Trigger output Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: No more commands pending Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Sending replies Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: No more commands pending Nov 14 13:44:37 mailserver dovecot: submission-login: Debug: smtp-server: Remote closed connection: Connection closed Do note that I redacted a column with the server ipaddress to make the lines a bit shorter and more readable. - Kees > > Aki

1 0

MySQL connection keepalive for pass/auth db
by dvuoud＠at.encryp.ch 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

Hello, Is it possible to configure SQL connection keepalive for Dovecot? Probably what I have to do is "Note that the SQL backend must be used via Proxy", however I was unsucsessful in figuring out how can I setup this to get use of connection pool at Dovecot. Thanks. > $ dovecot --version > 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d) > $ dovecot -n > # 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.5.20 (149edcf2) > # OS: Linux 6.1.57 x86_64 Gentoo Base System release 2.14 > # Hostname: flopster > import_environment = TZ CORE_OUTOFMEM CORE_ERROR TZ=:/etc/localtime > lmtp_add_received_header = no > mail_gid = vmail > mail_location = maildir:~/.maildir > mail_server_admin = mailto:me@at.encryp.ch > mail_uid = vmail > managesieve_notify_capability = mailto > managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext editheader > metric auth_failures { > filter = event=auth_request_finished AND NOT success=yes > } > metric auth_success { > filter = event=auth_request_finished AND success=yes > } > metric imap_command { > filter = event=imap_command_finished > group_by = cmd_name tagged_reply_state > } > metric mail_delivery { > filter = event=mail_delivery_finished > group_by = duration:exponential:1:5:10 > } > metric smtp_command { > filter = event=smtp_server_command_finished > group_by = cmd_name status_code duration:exponential:1:5:10 > } > namespace inbox { > inbox = yes > location = > mailbox Drafts { > special_use = \Drafts > } > mailbox Junk { > special_use = \Junk > } > mailbox Sent { > special_use = \Sent > } > mailbox "Sent Messages" { > special_use = \Sent > } > mailbox Trash { > special_use = \Trash > } > prefix = > } > passdb { > args = * > driver = pam > } > passdb { > args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext > driver = sql > } > plugin { > sieve = file:~/sieve;active=~/.dovecot.sieve > sieve_extensions = +editheader > } > protocols = imap lmtp sieve > service auth { > unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { > group = postfix > mode = 0660 > user = postfix > } > vsz_limit = 2 G > } > service dict { > unix_listener dict-passdb { > mode = 0600 > user = vmail > } > unix_listener dict-userdb { > mode = 0600 > user = vmail > } > } > service lmtp { > unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp { > group = postfix > mode = 0600 > user = postfix > } > } > service managesieve-login { > inet_listener sieve { > port = 4190 > } > } > service stats { > inet_listener http { > address = [::] > port = 9900 > } > } > ssl = required > ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecot/server.crt > ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it > ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it > userdb { > driver = passwd > } > userdb { > args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext > driver = sql > } > protocol lmtp { > mail_plugins = " sieve" > postmaster_address = postmaster(a)at.encryp.ch > } > protocol lda { > mail_plugins = sieve > } > local_name flopster.at.encryp.ch { > ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/domains/flopster.at.encryp.ch/fullchain > ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it > }

1 0

ldap passdb, userdb imap auth sasl and lmtp
by bd730c5053df9efb 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

Hi! I'm trying to setup dovecot 2.3.17 such that it authenticates users against a samba4 ad dc when they connect through imap. I would also need dovecot to authenticate the same users through sasl so that postfix can relay mails based on the user's auth and finally I would also need for an lmtp service that maps email addresses into AD users. I've been tinkering with dovecot-ldap.conf.ext using auth_bind = yes and no, with all sorts of pass_filters, user_filter, pass_attr and user_attr and I just can't figure out how it works. I assume that for the auth part (both imap and sasl) I would rather benefit with using auth_bind = yes and auth_bind_userdn = %u and I seem to be able to authenticate the user but I can't get the passdb to prefetch the userdb attributes. I also assume that for lmtp to be able to fetch the ad information it would be necessary for dovecot to be able to bind to the ad ldap server with a "service account" to be able to query the ldap server and I haven't been able to figure out how to have both kinds of auth schemas. Does anyone know of some documentation that could clarify some of this issues, I have been searching the web for days to no avail. I'm sorry I can't show what I have tried for I have tried so many things with more or less the same lack of success that I wouldn't know where to start. Thanks in advance. Best regards, Dave.

2 1

More information on dict proxy
by Steve 09 Nov '23

09 Nov '23

Hello, I'm working on an implementation of a dict server. I've looked through all your documentation but can't seem to find how I can create the proper URI to direct the quota plugin to use a TCP socket instead of a UNIX socket. I'd appreciate any insight you can provide. Steve

2 1

file dotlock create
by The Doctor 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

I am seeing errors in our log as follows Nov 07 14:20:06 POP3(user937):Error: Mailbox INBOX: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/user937) failed: Permission denied (euid=937(user937) egid=100(user) missing +w perm: /var/mail, we're not in group 6(mail), dir owned by 0:6 mode=0775) (set mail_privileged_group=mail) Nov 07 14:21:03 IMAP(user3094):Error: Mailbox INBOX: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/user3094) failed: Permission denied (euid=3094(user3094) egid=100(user) missing +w perm: /var/mail, we're not in group 6(mail), dir owned by 0:6 mode=0775) (set mail_privileged_group=mail) Nov 07 14:21:03 IMAP(user3094):Error: Mailbox INBOX: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/user3094) failed: Permission denied (euid=3094(user3094) egid=100(user) missing +w perm: /var/mail, we're not in group 6(mail), dir owned by 0:6 mode=0775) (set mail_privileged_group=mail) Nov 07 14:21:03 IMAP(user3094):Error: Mailbox INBOX: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/user3094) failed: Permission denied (euid=3094(user3094) egid=100(user) missing +w perm: /var/mail, we're not in group 6(mail), dir owned by 0:6 mode=0775) (set mail_privileged_group=mail) /var/mail is set to 1775 Running FreeBSD 14.0-RC4 -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor(a)nk.ca Ici doctor(a)nk.ca Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen Suffering will continue until we stop believing lies. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

1 0

mail boxes on net mounted filesystem with multiple Dovecots
by lejeczek 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

Hi guys. I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes. ... lmtp(minemail(a)lemko.xyz)<2674357><uATxGqbaSGW1zigAn4O9eQ>: Error: lmtp-server: conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail(a)my.private: Mailbox INBOX: Corrupted transaction log file /VMAIL/my.private/minemail/dovecot.index.log seq 4: ext intro: name_size too large (sync_offset=6368) ... Above happened if the same one user was having mail delivered on two Postfix+Dovecot servers at the same time. I hope experts who know Dovecot's internals better can tell... having such multiple node/server Dovecots "talking" to that same network mount-point but!.. only one Dovecot being active - having Postfix using it and other, however many, Dovecots only "idling" - not having Postifx using it (+ no client connections is a goal too) Would that make such multi-Dovecot setup safe & free from errors as above & any storage related ones? Or perhaps there are other ways to have many Dovecots with the same user-base, using same networked storage simultaneously? many thanks, L. Hi guys. I see that with mailboxes stored on a network mount-point and more than one box with Dovecot using such a mailbox, Dovecots step on each others toes. ... lmtp(minemail(a)lemko.xyz)<2674357><uATxGqbaSGW1zigAn4O9eQ>: Error: lmtp-server: conn unix:pid=2600068,uid=89 [2]: rcpt minemail(a)my.private: Mailbox INBOX: Corrupted transaction log file /VMAIL/my.private/minemail/dovecot.index.log seq 4: ext intro: name_size too large (sync_offset=6368) ... Above happened if the same one user was having mail delivered on two Postfix+Dovecot servers at the same time. I hope experts who know Dovecot's internals better can tell... having such multiple node/server Dovecots "talking" to that same network mount- point but!.. only one Dovecot being active - having Postfix using it and other, however many, Dovecots only "idling" - not having Postifx using it (+ no client connections is a goal too) Would that make such multi-Dovecot setup safe & free from errors as above & any storage related ones? Or perhaps there are other ways to have many Dovecots with the same user-base, using same networked storage simultaneously? many thanks, L.

4 3

Can Dovecot Use Wildcard TLS Certificates?
by duluxoz 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

Hi All, Quick Q: Can dovecot use wildcard TLS Certificates? I'm having issues with a new dovecot/postfix stack set-up and I can't get mutt on the local box to connect via imap - its coming back with an SSL error, and as I'm using a wildcard cert for the domain I was wondering if that was my issue. If dovecot can use wildcard certs then I'll look elsewhere in my troubleshooting. Thanks in advance Cheers Dulux-Oz

8 7

Minimum configuration for Dovecot SASL only?
by Nick Lockheart 06 Nov '23

06 Nov '23

I have a Dovecot IMAP server and a Postfix server on separate machines. The user information is stored in a MariaDB database that is replicated on both servers. Postfix needs to authenticate outgoing mail against our valid user database. I believe this requires us to install a "dummy" Dovecot on the Postfix server so that Dovecot SASL can provide authentication to Postfix from the database. I think Cyrus had a standalone Cyrus-SASL package, but Dovecot doesn't? If I wanted to setup a Dovecot instance on the Postfix server just for the purposes of SMTP authentication, and not use it to handle any mail, what is the minimum configuration required to make that work? Is the dovecot-common package (Debian) enough? Or do I need the full dovecot-imap package? What protocols go in the protocols directive? Can you just make it "protocols = auth" to disable IMAP connections?

5 9

with GlusterFS - permissions for vmail ?
by lejeczek 05 Nov '23

05 Nov '23

Hi guys. I must be missing, having something misconfigured. I have: -> $ gluster volume info VMAIL Volume Name: VMAIL Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 462a1850-a31a-4a17-934d-26f3996dc9b8 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 10.1.1.100:/devs/00.GLUSTERs/VMAIL Brick2: 10.1.1.101:/devs/00.GLUSTERs/VMAIL Options Reconfigured: storage.owner-gid: 2000 storage.owner-uid: 2000 cluster.granular-entry-heal: on storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on transport.address-family: inet nfs.disable: on performance.client-io-threads: off and my _dovecot_ errors out with: ... imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: mkdir(/VMAIL/test.web/ja_discourse) failed: Permission denied (euid=2000(vmail) egid=2000(vmail) missing +w perm: /VMAIL, UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)) imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: mkdir(/VMAIL/test.web/ja_discourse) failed: Permission denied (euid=2000(vmail) egid=2000(vmail) missing +w perm: /VMAIL, UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)) imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: Failed to autocreate mailbox: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2023-11-05 12:08:25] ... What might I have incorrect or wrong? many thanks, L Hi guys. I must be missing, having something misconfigured. I have: -> $ gluster volume info VMAIL Volume Name: VMAIL Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 462a1850-a31a-4a17-934d-26f3996dc9b8 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: 10.1.1.100:/devs/00.GLUSTERs/VMAIL Brick2: 10.1.1.101:/devs/00.GLUSTERs/VMAIL Options Reconfigured: storage.owner-gid: 2000 storage.owner-uid: 2000 cluster.granular-entry-heal: on storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on transport.address-family: inet nfs.disable: on performance.client-io-threads: off and my _dovecot_ errors out with: ... imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: mkdir(/VMAIL/ test.web/ja_discourse) failed: Permission denied (euid=2000(vmail) egid=2000 (vmail) missing +w perm: /VMAIL, UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)) imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: mkdir(/VMAIL/ test.web/ja_discourse) failed: Permission denied (euid=2000(vmail) egid=2000 (vmail) missing +w perm: /VMAIL, UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)) imap(ja_discourse(a)test.web)<92447><w3ygwWUJUNddviSg>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: Failed to autocreate mailbox: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2023-11-05 12:08:25] ... What might I have incorrect or wrong? many thanks, L

2 3

install/compile dovecot-pigeonhole
by joe a 03 Nov '23

03 Nov '23

Working dovecot 2.3, wish to be able to implement "server side" filtering. My understanding is that is done with "sieve". My further understanding is that "dovecot-pigeonhole" and be used to manage "sieve" in some fashion. Attempting to compile dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.21 proves problematic due to its inability to find dovecot-config. Which is not astonishing as, on my system dovecot-config does not exist, dovecot having been installed as a vendor configure package. Sadly, no vendor package or binary is provided for dovecot-pigeonhole. At least that I am aware of. OS is opensuse LEAP 15.5. Any helpful commentary is welcome. Honest.

1 1

Too many auth errors
by DeJa Wu 03 Nov '23

03 Nov '23

I've got too many errors on my mail server like this: Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2965 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2966 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2967 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2084 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 1972 And my users say that login to the mail server is too long. In some cases I've got an error connection problem. How do I fix this? BR, DeJa I've got too many errors on my mail server like this: Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2965 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2966 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2967 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 2084 Nov 3 12:03:13 mail01 dovecot[5562]: imap-login: Error: auth-client: conn unix:login (pid=5553,uid=0): Authentication server sent unknown id 1972 And my users say that login to the mail server is too long. In some cases I've got an error connection problem. How do I fix this? BR, DeJa

1 0

Sieve/Pigeonhole
by joe a 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

For dovecot, I see there is a "sieve" download at dovecot downloads and separately there is a pigeonhole download. Are these parallel projects, distinct and separate?

1 1

Setting up a new server
by James Cloos 30 Oct '23

30 Oct '23

I'm in the process of switching to dovecot for my lan imap and have a couple of questions. I want to keep the folder names unchanged. For mailing lists I use the posting address (eg foo(a)bar.co) for others I use / as the separator. If I use mdbox, will those choices cause any issues? My impression is not, but I'd like to be sure. Also I'd like to use imap-specific passwds for each user. My tests so far have used the login passwds for each user. Not necessarily virtual users, just imap-specific passwds. There is already a pgsql server handy; I take it that would be the way to go for passdb and userdb lookups, yes? Thanks, -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos(a)jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

2 1

Two-way TLS and other security for LMTP over the internet?
by forum＠ageofdream.com 29 Oct '23

29 Oct '23

Dovecot version 2.3.19.1 (9b53102964) Postfix version 3.5.18 We have a Postfix server that runs on a VPS with a hosting company and a Dovecot IMAP server that runs at the office. We want Postfix to push the mail it receives to the Dovecot IMAP server, using the least amount of intermediate software. This transfer occurs over the open internet. LMTP over TCP seems like a great solution, *if* it can be secured. But I'm not finding documentation on how to actually setup something like two-way TLS over LMTP. 1. Is there any setting in Dovecot where I can set a remote IP address (or hostname) that will be the only address that Dovecot's LMTP accepts connections from? 2. My current configuration options for LMTP in Dovecot look like: protocol lmtp { ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/imap/imap.crt ssl_key = </etc/ssl/imap/imap.key ssl_ca = </etc/ssl/imap/authority.crt ssl_verify_client_cert = yes auth_ssl_require_client_cert = yes } service lmtp { user = vmail inet_listener lmtp { address = * :: port = 24 } } With these settings, I can telnet from the Postfix server to the Dovecot server with LMTP, and I'm not convinced there is any encryption actually enabled or any TLS verification going on. Is there any reasonable security that can be setup to make this safe (within Dovecot and Postfix settings, not using VPNs and SSH tunnels)? If so, how?

3 2

{ldap:objectGUID} returns binary data when used for user_attrs
by Andreas Haerter 26 Oct '23

26 Oct '23

Hi, there is an environment in which I have to use MS Active Directory for authentication and mail server user database, and I've run into a problem. I. The problem I want to retrieve the objectGUID attribute for the homedir path of the users. This attribute does never change, even when the username does or the account gets moved to another AD domain. However, the objectGUID is returned as binary gibberish when using the following setting: > user_attrs = \ > =home=/var/vmail/example.com/%LT{ldap:objectGUID}, \ It results in > # doveadm user uTesting > field value > user utesting > home /var/vmail/example.com/d ��n�aa_ o�� > mail maildir:~/mail Can someone reproduce this or offer a workaround? The only idea I had was hashing the value using =%M{ldap:objectGUID}. However, this approach would become problematic if the behavior changes and a proper string representation is returned, as expected, instead of the binary data. Therefore, I'm hesitant to use this method for now. A better approach would be encoding it as Base64, but I was unsuccessful to identify a fitting modifier at <https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/config_file/config_variables/#…>. Any ideas? II. Additional info Using other attributes for LDAP/Active Directory works as expected. E.g. > =home=/var/vmail/example.com/%LT{ldap:sAMAccountName} results in > # doveadm user uTesting > field value > user utesting > home /var/vmail/example.com/utesting > mail maildir:~/mail The objectGUID is indeed binary data, but IHMO, it should be handled differently when returned. E.g. there is a defined string representation, [MS-DTYP] section 2.3.4.3: <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-dtyp/222af…> which links to: > curly braced GUID string: The string representation of a 128-bit > globally unique identifier (GUID) using the form > {XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX}, where X denotes a hexadecimal > digit. The string representation between the enclosing braces is the > standard representation of a GUID as described in [RFC4122] section 3. > Unlike a GUIDString, a curly braced GUID string includes enclosing braces. Some libs simply decide to return the data Base64 encoded (which would be OK, too). E.g. openldap-clients / ldapsearch does so with objectGUID and objectSid: > $ ldapsearch [...] > [...] > # uTesting, common, user, managed, example.com > dn: CN=uTesting,OU=common,OU=user,OU=managed,DC=example,DC=com > [...] > name: uTesting > objectGUID:: RCDirQPvGU6KQUFfIE/i2Q== > [...] > objectSid:: AQUAAAAAAAUVAAAALenCqsullBUfFoubWQQAAA== > [...] > sAMAccountName: uTesting > [...] Other software had comparable bugs or behavior , e.g. sssd ("Properly handle AD's binary objectGUID"): <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205382> <https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/3629> owncloud ("ensure that objectguid or guid really return binary data before converting it"): <https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/8317> III. Software versions, config I can reproduce the issue on Fedora Server 38 > # cat /etc/redhat-release > Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight) > # uname -r > 6.4.15-200.fc38.x86_64 > # dovecot --version > 2.3.20 (80a5ac675d) and CentOS 9 Stream: > # cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Stream release 9 > # uname -r > 5.14.0-364.el9.x86_64 > # dovecot --version > 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a) I did not try a Debian-based distro yet. The config itself works fine, relevant settings just for reference (as there are not many examples on the internet, maybe useful for somebody): > auth_username_format = %Lu > > passdb { > driver = ldap > args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext > } > userdb { > driver = ldap > args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext > } with the following options to exclude inactive accounts, search smtp proxy addresses and having a mandatory group membership in SERVICE_EmailUsers: > base = OU=common,OU=user,OU=managed,DC=example,DC=com > scope = subtree > > user_filter = \ > (& \ > (objectClass=user) \ > (objectCategory=Person) \ > (|(sAMAccountName=%{username})(mail=%{username})(proxyAddresses=smtp:%{username}@%{domain})) \ > (!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)) \ > (memberOf:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:=SERVICE_EmailUsers) \ > ) > pass_filter = \ > (& \ > (objectClass=user) \ > (objectCategory=Person) \ > (|(sAMAccountName=%{username})(mail=%{username})(proxyAddresses=smtp:%{username}@%{domain})) \ > (!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)) \ > (memberOf:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:=SERVICE_EmailUsers) \ > ) I will blog about the config in more detail at https://foundata.com/en/blog/ soon, especially when the objectGUID is solved (maybe hashing it really the way to go). :-) Regards, Andreas -- foundata GmbH Steinhäuserstr. 20 76135 Karlsruhe Sitz der Gesellschaft: Karlsruhe Registergericht: Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 714807 Geschäftsführer: Andreas Haerter USt-IdNr.: DE284122682

1 1

Correct sizing of CPU and RAM
by DeJa Wu 26 Oct '23

26 Oct '23

How to correctly calculate the number of CPUs and memory required for 1000 client mailboxes and beyond? Given that 30-50% of users will be constantly connected via IMAP. I looked for information and did not find any sizing in the documentation anywhere. Is there a way to calculate my required resources? BR, DeJa How to correctly calculate the number of CPUs and memory required for 1000 client mailboxes and beyond? Given that 30-50% of users will be constantly connected via IMAP. I looked for information and did not find any sizing in the documentation anywhere. Is there a way to calculate my required resources? BR, DeJa

2 1

OAUTH2 tokeninfo is doing a GET instead of a POST request
by Alexander Leidinger 26 Oct '23

26 Oct '23

Hi, I try to setup oauth2 authentication with dovecot 2.3.21. The debug log of dovecot shows that it tries to do a HTTP GET request to the tokeninfo url with the token appended to the end of the URL. This gives a 404 error. The openidconnect server I use (keycloak) tells that this API endpoint conforms to https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#TokenEndpoint which specifies that the request has to be a HTTP POST request. So dovecot is trying do to something (GET request) which the OIDC specification does not agree with (shall be POST request). Here is the dovecot debug log of it: ---snip--- Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: http-client[1]: request [Req1: GET https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/tokeneyJhb…<rest_omitted>...: Submitted (requests left=1) [...] Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: oauth2.domain.tld: SSL: where=0x1001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: oauth2.domain.tld: where=0x1002, ret=1: SSL negotiation finished successfully Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: oauth2.domain.tld: SSL: where=0x1001, ret=1: SSL negotiation finished successfully Oct 17 12:11:19 imap syslogd: last message repeated 1 times Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: oauth2.domain.tld: SSL: where=0x1001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS read server session ticket Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: oauth2.domain.tld: SSL: where=0x1002, ret=1: SSL negotiation finished successfully Oct 17 12:11:19 imap dovecot[81589]: auth: Debug: http-client: conn <IP>:443 [1]: Got 404 response for request [Req1: GET https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/tokeneyJhb…<rest_omitted> ---snip--- My passdb config (only showing the oauth part): ---snip--- passdb { driver = oauth2 mechanisms = oauthbearer xoauth2 args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/auth-oauth2.token.conf.ext } passdb { driver = oauth2 mechanisms = plain args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/auth-oauth2.plain.conf.ext } ---snip--- auth-oauth2.token.conf.ext: ---snip--- openid_configuration_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/.well-known/openid-configuration tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token introspection_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token/intr… introspection_mode = post active_attribute = active active_value = true client_id = myid client_secret = mysecret use_grant_password = no debug = yes username_attribute = email pass_attrs = pass=%{oauth2:access_token} ---snip--- auth-oauth2.plain.conf.ext: ---snip--- openid_configuration_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/.well-known/openid-configuration #tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token introspection_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token/intr… introspection_mode = post active_attribute = active active_value = true client_id = myid client_secret = mysecret use_grant_password = yes debug = yes username_attribute = email pass_attrs = host=<IP of webmail> proxy=y proxy_mech=xoauth2 pass=%{oauth2:access_token} ---snip--- On https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/oauth2/ I can not find any way to tell that the tokeninfo url shall do a POST request instead of a GET request. I found something on reddit how to make it work with keycloak, but this seems to be a workaround, and not a proper fix... The first comment at https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/omwb2j/any_one_get_dovecot_key… makes this work for me. The working but not really up to the OIDC spec dovecot config is: auth-oauth2.token.conf.ext: ---snip--- openid_configuration_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/.well-known/openid-configuration #tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/Leidinger/protocol/openid-connect/… tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo?t… introspection_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token/intr… introspection_mode = auth #active_attribute = active #active_value = true client_id = myid client_secret = mysecret use_grant_password = no #debug = yes username_attribute = email pass_attrs = pass=%{oauth2:access_token} ---snip--- auth-oauth2.plain.conf.ext: ---snip--- openid_configuration_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/.well-known/openid-configuration #tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token tokeninfo_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo?t… introspection_url = https://oauth2.domain.tld/realms/MyRealm/protocol/openid-connect/token/intr… introspection_mode = auth #active_attribute = active #active_value = true client_id = myid client_secret = mysecret use_grant_password = yes #debug = yes username_attribute = email pass_attrs = host=<IP of webmail> proxy=y proxy_mech=xoauth2 pass=%{oauth2:access_token} ---snip--- Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander(a)Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild(a)FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF

2 8

Is it possible to show different mechanism according to client IP ?
by Philippe MARASSE 26 Oct '23

26 Oct '23

Hello, Say I'm wondering if it's possible to show 3 mechanisms for clients in private network (XOAUTH2 / PLAIN / EXTERNAL) and only 2 to others (only OAUTH / EXTERNAL) ? I've seen allow_nets extra field for args, but it seems that's not working with ldap passdb. Regards. -- Philippe MARASSE Responsable pôle Infrastructures - DSIO Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit CS 10587 - 370 avenue Jacques Cœur 86021 Poitiers Cedex Tel : 05.49.44.57.19 Hello, Say I'm wondering if it's possible to show 3 mechanisms for clients in private network (XOAUTH2 / PLAIN / EXTERNAL) and only 2 to others (only OAUTH / EXTERNAL) ? I've seen allow_nets extra field for args, but it seems that's not working with ldap passdb. Regards. -- Philippe MARASSE Responsable pôle Infrastructures - DSIO Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit CS 10587 - 370 avenue Jacques Cœur 86021 Poitiers Cedex Tel : 05.49.44.57.19

2 1

Unclear output from force-resync.
by Justin Wheeler 25 Oct '23

25 Oct '23

Hi, After a hard drive issue from my VPS provider, one of my customers' mailboxes has been corrupted, and has been complaining about index sync issues. So I am attempting a force-resync. The command I used was: doveadm -v force-resync -u user(a)mailbox.com '*' The output it's been giving doesn't look anything like a 'progress counter', so I have no idea if it's just losing its mind, or if it's actually achieving anything. The mailbox is 20G, so theoretically it's just working its way through it, but I can't tell. The output looks like: doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: fscking index file /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: mdbox /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage: rebuilding indexes doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: Transaction log file /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index.log was locked for 90 seconds (mdbox storage rebuild) doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: fscking index file /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: fscking index file /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: mdbox /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage: rebuilding indexes doveadm(user(a)mailbox.com): Warning: Transaction log file /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index.log was locked for 90 seconds (mdbox storage rebuild) It's just this over and over and over and over. Does this mean it's working, or that something else is going on? fuser /home/mail/mailbox.com/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index.log shows only the PID of the force-resync, and ls -l /proc/pid/fd shows it has a bunch of index and index.log and index.cache files open, as well as scrolling through mdbox/storage/m.{digits} a bunch, and strace -fp on the process shows a boatload of pread64 on those m.{digits} files, so I *think* it's working, but I can't tell if it's just restarting after the above messages and doing the same thing over and over again. I've locked the mailbox so there's no mail delivery being attempted on it, and changed its password and kicked out any logged in users on the mailbox, so the only process anywhere near that entire directory structure is the force-resync. Thanks, Justin

1 0

dovecot lmtp and smtputf8
by Kamil Jońca 25 Oct '23

25 Oct '23

Does dovecot handle smtputf8? Last articles regarding this are several years old. Anything changed? KJ

2 2

dovecot 2.0 supports EC private key?
by Marc 24 Oct '23

24 Oct '23

Does dovecot 2.0 supports EC private key?

2 1

Question: ETA OpenSSL 3.0 Support
by Niklas Meyer 23 Oct '23

23 Oct '23

Hello everyone, i stumbled across some serious problems with decrypting of e-mails if you use a Dovecot installation with OpenSSL 3.X so i started digging. It turns out that Dovecot is not OpenSSL 3.X ready yet, at least if you compile it yourself. The Debian Project adapted a OpenSSL 3.X patch to their repo version of Dovecot to make it run with Debian 12. Alpine Linux has not added a Workaround Patch for Dovecot yet. This is actually really bad if you want to Upgrade your Dovecot Server to a Distro which has OpenSSL 3.X as the new standard and you are not using their patched Repo Versions but instead compiling dovecot by yourself or install it from your package repos (which are not Debian 12 compatible also, which is probably because of OpenSSL 3.X i presume?) However though i think that this compatibility should be added soon as more and more Distros are using OpenSSL 3.X. So: Is there a approx. ETA when the OpenSSL Compatibility the devs worked/are working on is coming? Thank you for your answers. Kind regards from Germany Niklas Meyer aka. DerLinkman

2 3

Confusing documentation for 'address/listen' setting
by Bruno Victal 21 Oct '23

21 Oct '23

Hi, The 'address' setting in the “Service configuration” of the Configuration Manual [1] says: Space separated list of IP addresses / host names to listen on. […] Defaults to listen setting. I'm finding this part confusing as it seems that by “listen setting” it is referring to the 'listen' setting in the “Dovecot Core Manual” [2] which is described as: A comma-separated list of IP addresses or […] which leads me to suspect that either “listen setting” refers to something else (what?) or there's some inconsistency with the documentation or perhaps a bug/foot-gun here. [1]: <https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/service_configuration/#address> [2]: <https://doc.dovecot.org/settings/core/#core_setting-listen> Regards, -- Bruno.

1 0

Re: Dovecot behind Reverse Proxy and IP families
by Arnaud Cordier 20 Oct '23

20 Oct '23

On 10/13/23 06:55, Arnaud Cordier wrote: > Hi Justas, > > Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I already have a dual stack > cluster with an IPv6 assigned to the pod: > > 3: eth0@if22: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP,M-DOWN> mtu 1430 qdisc > noqueue state UP qlen 1000 > link/ether c6:90:d2:cf:b8:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 10.42.4.52/32 scope global eth0 > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fd23:23:42:0:251d:192a:bb7f:a1f4/128 scope global > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > inet6 fe80::c490:d2ff:fecf:b877/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > Any additional idea? > > --- > Arnaud Cordier > --------------- > CryptID > Freelance cybersecurity engineer - Pentester - Red teamer > Tel: +33 (0)6 61 44 82 04 > On 10/12/23 22:54, Justas Umbrasas wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> >> we are running a similar setup without an issue (not on k8s). I >> believe the reason is that the remote dovecot pod is only binding on >> IPv4 and has no IPv6 configured. This is kind of a hack, however you >> could try binding the pod to both IPv4 and IPv6 and see if it works. >> >> >> Best, >> >> Justas Umbrasas >> >> >> On 2023-10-12 20:25, Arnaud Cordier via dovecot wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I am running Dovecot 2.3.20 in a Kubernetes cluster. The Dovecot >>> container is exposed behind a Traefik load-balancer, which acts just >>> like HAProxy would, using the Proxy Protocol in order to allow >>> Dovecot to be aware of the real source IP of the client, as follows: >>> >>> Internet <-> Traefik load-balancer <---- Proxy protocol ----> Dovecot >>> >>> My setup works well over IPv4. >>> >>> Oct 12 19:11:33 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<arnaud@xxx>, >>> method=PLAIN, rip=<my_ipv4_public_address> lip=10.42.4.21, >>> mpid=1369531, session=<xxxx> >>> >>> Howevever, if the client originates from an IPv6 address, Dovecot >>> does not seem to take the real IPv6 origin into account and fails. >>> >>> Oct 12 19:09:04 imap-login: Error: haproxy(v1): Client disconnected: >>> Proxied local address is invalid (address=`10.42.4.21', rip=10.42.4.21) >>> >>> A network capture shows that the proxy protocol indeed sends the >>> real IPv6 IP, that should be taken into account by dovecot: >>> >>> ......&.PROXY TCP6 2001:<rest_of_my_public_ip> 10.42.4.21 20200 993 >>> >>> The error seems to be raised in >>> "core/src/lib-master/master-service-haproxy.c" line 553: >>> >>> 551 if (net_addr2ip(*fields, &local_ip) < 0 || >>> 552 local_ip.family != family) { >>> 553 e_error(hpconn->event, "Client disconnected: " >>> 554 "Proxied local address >>> is invalid " >>> 555 "(address=`%s', >>> rip=%s)", str_sanitize(*fields, 64), >>> 556 net_ip2addr(real_remote_ip)); >>> 557 return -1; >>> 558 } >>> 559 fields++; >>> >>> I suppose that the issue is related to the fact that the client >>> originates from an IPv6 then the reverse proxy forwards the >>> connection to Dovecot over IPv4, which results in the >>> "local_ip.family != family" condition to be true. >>> >>> Why is such a restriction implemented ? >>> >>> It is to be noted that I implemented the exact same load-balancer >>> architecture for postfix, which successfully handles an IPv6 real IP >>> over an IPv4 connection. >>> >>> I temporarily fixed the issue by setting an IPv4 only DNS record for >>> my imaps domain name, however, do you think that a fix could be >>> implemented in Dovecot? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org >> >> On 10/13/23 06:55, Arnaud Cordier wrote: Hi Justas, Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, I already have a dual stack cluster with an IPv6 assigned to the pod: 3: eth0@if22: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP,M-DOWN> mtu 1430 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000 link/ether c6:90:d2:cf:b8:77 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.42.4.52/32 scope global eth0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fd23:23:42:0:251d:192a:bb7f:a1f4/128 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::c490:d2ff:fecf:b877/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever Any additional idea? --- Arnaud Cordier --------------- CryptID Freelance cybersecurity engineer - Pentester - Red teamer Tel: +33 (0)6 61 44 82 04 On 10/12/23 22:54, Justas Umbrasas wrote: Hey, we are running a similar setup without an issue (not on k8s). I believe the reason is that the remote dovecot pod is only binding on IPv4 and has no IPv6 configured. This is kind of a hack, however you could try binding the pod to both IPv4 and IPv6 and see if it works. Best, Justas Umbrasas On 2023-10-12 20:25, Arnaud Cordier via dovecot wrote: Dear all, I am running Dovecot 2.3.20 in a Kubernetes cluster. The Dovecot container is exposed behind a Traefik load-balancer, which acts just like HAProxy would, using the Proxy Protocol in order to allow Dovecot to be aware of the real source IP of the client, as follows: Internet <-> Traefik load-balancer <---- Proxy protocol ----> Dovecot My setup works well over IPv4. Oct 12 19:11:33 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<arnaud@xxx>, method=PLAIN, rip=<my_ipv4_public_address> lip=10.42.4.21, mpid=1369531, session=<xxxx> Howevever, if the client originates from an IPv6 address, Dovecot does not seem to take the real IPv6 origin into account and fails. Oct 12 19:09:04 imap-login: Error: haproxy(v1): Client disconnected: Proxied local address is invalid (address=`10.42.4.21', rip=10.42.4.21) A network capture shows that the proxy protocol indeed sends the real IPv6 IP, that should be taken into account by dovecot: ......&.PROXY TCP6 2001:<rest_of_my_public_ip> 10.42.4.21 20200 993 The error seems to be raised in "core/src/lib-master/master-service- haproxy.c" line 553: 551 if (net_addr2ip(*fields, &local_ip) < 0 || 552 local_ip.family != family) { 553 e_error(hpconn->event, "Client disconnected: " 554 "Proxied local address is invalid " 555 "(address=`%s', rip=%s)", str_sanitize(*fields, 64), 556 net_ip2addr(real_remote_ip)); 557 return -1; 558 } 559 fields++; I suppose that the issue is related to the fact that the client originates from an IPv6 then the reverse proxy forwards the connection to Dovecot over IPv4, which results in the "local_ip.family != family" condition to be true. Why is such a restriction implemented ? It is to be noted that I implemented the exact same load-balancer architecture for postfix, which successfully handles an IPv6 real IP over an IPv4 connection. I temporarily fixed the issue by setting an IPv4 only DNS record for my imaps domain name, however, do you think that a fix could be implemented in Dovecot? Kind regards, _______________________________________________ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org

2 1

submission server relay to localhost
by Michael Grant 20 Oct '23

20 Oct '23

I'm trying to set up dovecot-submission server which will listen on external ports 465 (SSL) and 587 (StartTLS) and relay mail to sendmail waiting on localhost port 587. I have dovecot submission listening on the external ports and sendmail listening on the localhost port. I want dovecot-submission doing the authentication on the external ports because sendmail doesn't use the /etc/dovecot/users file. I can authenticate to dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: CONT<hidden> auth: Debug: passwd-file(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org,217.35.29.56,<blablabla>): Performing passdb lookup auth: Debug: passwd-file(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org,217.35.29.56,<blablabla>): lookup: user=mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org file=/etc/dovecot/users auth: Debug: passwd-file(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org,217.35.29.56,<blablabla>): Finished passdb lookup auth: Debug: auth(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org,217.35.29.56,<blablabla>): Auth request finished auth: Debug: client passdb out: OK 1 user=mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org But in the sendmail logs, dovecot *is* trying to authenticate and it's trying to use a username that sendmail can't look up in the password file: top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 220 top.networkguild.org ESMTP Sendmail 8.17.2/8.17.2/Debian-1~bpo12+1; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 12:42:08 GMT; (No UCE/UBE) logging access from: localhost(OK)-localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1] top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: <-- EHLO top.networkguild.org top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-top.networkguild.org Hello localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1], pleased to meet you top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-PIPELINING top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-EXPN top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-VERB top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-8BITMIME top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-SIZE top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-STARTTLS top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250-DELIVERBY top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 250 HELP top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: <-- MAIL FROM:<mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org> AUTH=mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: --- 530 5.7.0 Authentication required top dovecot: submission(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org)<1012719><blablabla>: Error: Relay server requires authentication: 530 5.7.0 Authentication required top dovecot: submission(mgrant(a)top.networkguild.org)<1012719><blablabla>: Disconnected: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. (unfinished MAIL command) (state=MAIL FROM) in=41 out=121 top sm-mta[1012721]: 39KCg8h31012721: <-- QUIT How do I stop dovecot from proposing AUTH to the relay server? Once I am authenticated via dovecot, the relay which is only available on localhost, doesn't need to authenticate. It should be as if bin-mail is submitting to localhost. I tried setting up a user with a password but no shell and configure this into submission_relay_master_user and submission_relay_password but this leads to other problems. Dovecot wants to do PLAIN auth, so I then enable starttls, but then the ssl certificate doesn't match because I'm connecting to localhost, not top.networkguild.org. So it seems clear, the relay should a) not auth, and b) not do ssl. Note that this is not an open relay, it's only open on the loopback interface. Michael Grant

1 1

Extract body preview in lua notify script
by Filip Hanes 20 Oct '23

20 Oct '23

Hi, I am trying to extract short text preview from mail body in function dovecot_lua_notify_end_txn. I want to send notification about new email with perex included. How can it be done? Is it possible? thanks -- Filip Hanes

2 1

Replicator service in Dovecot 2.4 CE
by k v 18 Oct '23

18 Oct '23

On the documentation page for the upgrade to version 2.4 at https://doc.dovecot.org/3.0/installation_guide/upgrading/from-2.3-to-3.0/, it is mentioned that instead of the 'replicator' service (https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/replication/#replication-with-…) it is necessary to use an NFS cluster file system. Are you completely removing support for 'replication-with-dsync' starting from version 2.4? Are there any plans for built-in tools to implement an active/active or active/passive cluster in the community edition?

2 1

Debian package for bookworm
by Claudio Corvino 14 Oct '23

14 Oct '23

Hi guys, I updated to Debian 12 but I can't find repo for bookworm on https://repo.dovecot.org/. When it will be released? Thanks! -- Claudio

8 10

Dovecot behind Reverse Proxy and IP families
by Arnaud Cordier 12 Oct '23

12 Oct '23

Dear all, I am running Dovecot 2.3.20 in a Kubernetes cluster. The Dovecot container is exposed behind a Traefik load-balancer, which acts just like HAProxy would, using the Proxy Protocol in order to allow Dovecot to be aware of the real source IP of the client, as follows: Internet <-> Traefik load-balancer <---- Proxy protocol ----> Dovecot My setup works well over IPv4. Oct 12 19:11:33 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<arnaud@xxx>, method=PLAIN, rip=<my_ipv4_public_address> lip=10.42.4.21, mpid=1369531, session=<xxxx> Howevever, if the client originates from an IPv6 address, Dovecot does not seem to take the real IPv6 origin into account and fails. Oct 12 19:09:04 imap-login: Error: haproxy(v1): Client disconnected: Proxied local address is invalid (address=`10.42.4.21', rip=10.42.4.21) A network capture shows that the proxy protocol indeed sends the real IPv6 IP, that should be taken into account by dovecot: ......&.PROXY TCP6 2001:<rest_of_my_public_ip> 10.42.4.21 20200 993 The error seems to be raised in "core/src/lib-master/master-service-haproxy.c" line 553: 551 if (net_addr2ip(*fields, &local_ip) < 0 || 552 local_ip.family != family) { 553 e_error(hpconn->event, "Client disconnected: " 554 "Proxied local address is invalid " 555 "(address=`%s', rip=%s)", str_sanitize(*fields, 64), 556 net_ip2addr(real_remote_ip)); 557 return -1; 558 } 559 fields++; I suppose that the issue is related to the fact that the client originates from an IPv6 then the reverse proxy forwards the connection to Dovecot over IPv4, which results in the "local_ip.family != family" condition to be true. Why is such a restriction implemented ? It is to be noted that I implemented the exact same load-balancer architecture for postfix, which successfully handles an IPv6 real IP over an IPv4 connection. I temporarily fixed the issue by setting an IPv4 only DNS record for my imaps domain name, however, do you think that a fix could be implemented in Dovecot? Kind regards, -- --- Arnaud Cordier --------------- CryptID Freelance cybersecurity engineer - Pentester - Red teamer Tel: +33 (0)6 61 44 82 04

1 0

Create autoreply with http api
by cyril.leclerc＠mantiq.com 12 Oct '23

12 Oct '23

Hi, Is it possible to activate autoreply from http api : https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/doveadm_http_api/ on mailbox ? because on evolution client we could not activate out of office, autoreply, with http api and sieve commands, is it possible to achieve it fron our web application ? thank you

1 0

doveadm(user): Error purging namespace
by Taavi Ansper 10 Oct '23

10 Oct '23

Hi I have an issue with doveadm: doveadm(user): Warning: mdbox /home/user/mdbox/storage: Inconsistency in map index (227,40 != 227,56) doveadm(user): Warning: fscking index file /home/user/mdbox/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(user): Warning: mdbox /home/user/mdbox/storage: rebuilding indexes doveadm(user): Error: Purging namespace '' failed: BUG: Unknown internal error Why does this happen and how can it be resolved? User is using thunderbird as the mail client. -- Taavi Ansper taavi.ansper(a)cyber.ee

2 1

spool move/rename question
by Dave McGuire 09 Oct '23

09 Oct '23

Hi folks. Our mail server's spools are structured like this: /var/mail/<domain>/<user> We have an existing user with a lot of mail that we need to move from one domain to another. Our mail system is database-backed so changing the account is trivial, but can I just move the <user> directory from the structure above from one <domain> directory to another and expect everything to be ok? Or is there a better approach? (of course I'll do a backup first) Thanks, -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

2 3

qp and Invalid quoted-printable input trailer: '=' not followed by two hex digits
by Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 09 Oct '23

09 Oct '23

I have a mail (attached) for which dovecot reports: imap(test): pid=<32688> session=<UOVJ/0UHlM3B7y+g>, Error: Mailbox INBOX.test: UID=1: read(<binary stream of mailbox INBOX.test UID 1>) failed: read(/var/mail/test/.test/cur/1695887652.M710714P17846.mbox13:2,RS) failed: Invalid quoted-printable input trailer: '=' not followed by two hex digits and I fail to see why. There is = used at the end of lines as soft-line break. Also if you delete "przez system Spa=" it works. If you lave it and delete "<br>=" line it also works. Doesn't seem to be consistent. Is dovecot too restrictive here? dovecot 2.3.20 and 2.3.21 -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

1 0

bug report: lmtp fails on root-squashed NFS filesystem
by Anne Bennett 09 Oct '23

09 Oct '23

Hi, all. I'm trying to set up Postfix with dovecot LTMP delivery on a host where the user files (/var/spool/mail as well as home directories) are on NFS filesystems, which are exported root-squashed to the mail server. I definitely don't want to give the mail server root permissions on the user files. LMTP delivery fails with this logged message (e.g.): Nov 16 17:51:36 lust dovecot: lmtp(anne)<16830><mkkzEPg1lGG+QQAAs/mAJw>: msgid=<202111162229.1AGMTfAO024765(a)vindemiatrix.encs.concordia.ca>: save failed to INBOX: Read-only mbox I found this posting where someone else had a similar problem and traced it in some detail back in 2019: https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2019-February/114611.html but apparently no one answered the fellow. In order to check that this is indeed the same problem, I temporarily changed the INBOX definition to make it write into /var/tmp/ (on a local filesystem), and delivery worked. I then temporarily changed the INBOX definition to make it write into an NFS filesystem with root NOT squashed, and again it worked (after I chmodded the directory to 1777 to allow any user to create a file). I believe that the person who wrote the above posting is correct: at some point, file access is (incorrectly) checked as root instead of as the target user. This is a bit of a showstopper for me. Any plans to address this? I attach the output of "dovecot -n", fwiw, but I don't think that this is a configuration problem... Anne. -- Ms. Anne Bennett, Senior Sysadmin, ENCS, Concordia University, Montreal H3G 1M8 anne(a)encs.concordia.ca +1 514 848-2424 x2285

2 4

Dovecot services not starting
by Jose David Bravo A 08 Oct '23

08 Oct '23

Hi, I'm running dovecot 2.3.16 on Ubuntu 22.04.2. But when I start dovecot, I can only see that the services are failing to start. It don't show any additional error about why it's failing, may be because the log service is not running? Oct 06 15:19:00 master: Error: service(log): command startup failed, throttling for 2.000 secs Oct 06 15:19:45 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 2.000 secs Oct 06 15:19:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 2.000 secs Oct 06 15:21:45 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 4.000 secs Oct 06 15:21:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 4.000 secs Oct 06 15:23:45 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 8.000 secs Oct 06 15:23:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 8.000 secs Oct 06 15:25:45 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 16.000 secs Oct 06 15:25:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 16.000 secs Oct 06 15:27:45 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 32.000 secs Oct 06 15:27:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 32.000 secs Oct 06 15:28:23 master: Error: service(stats): command startup failed, throttling for 2.000 secs Oct 06 15:28:25 master: Error: service(stats): command startup failed, throttling for 4.000 secs Oct 06 15:29:44 master: Error: service(imap-login): command startup failed, throttling for 60.000 secs Oct 06 15:29:53 master: Error: service(pop3-login): command startup failed, throttling for 60.000 secs Is there any option that I can run those services manually so I can see what's going on and why those are not stating? or any other option to debug it? This is my current config: # 2.3.16 (7e2e900c1a): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.5.16 (09c29328) # OS: Linux 5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_2.x86_64 x86_64 Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS # Hostname: xxxxxx auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms = PLAIN LOGIN auth_verbose = yes base_dir = /var/run/dovecot default_client_limit = 4096 default_process_limit = 500 default_vsz_limit = 640 B deliver_log_format = from=%{from}, envelope_sender=%{from_envelope}, subject=%{subject}, msgid=%m, size=%{size}, delivery_time=%{delivery_time}ms, %$ dict { acl = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-share-folder.conf lastlogin = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-last-login.conf quotadict = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-used-quota.conf } first_valid_uid = 2000 imap_hibernate_timeout = 30 secs imap_max_line_length = 2 M last_valid_uid = 2000 listen = * login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l %c %k mail_attribute_dict = file:%Lh/dovecot-attributes mail_debug = yes mail_gid = 2000 mail_location = maildir:%Lh/Maildir/:INDEX=%Lh/Maildir/ mail_plugins = acl mail_log mailbox_alias notify quota mail_uid = 2000 mailbox_list_index_very_dirty_syncs = yes managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext imapsieve vnd.dovecot.imapsieve namespace { inbox = yes location = mailbox Archive { auto = no special_use = \Archive } mailbox Archives { auto = no special_use = \Archive } mailbox "Deleted Messages" { auto = no autoexpunge = 60 days special_use = \Trash } mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 60 days special_use = \Junk } mailbox "Junk E-mail" { auto = no autoexpunge = 60 days special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Items" { auto = no special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { auto = no special_use = \Sent } mailbox Spam { auto = no autoexpunge = 60 days special_use = \Junk } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe autoexpunge = 60 days special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / type = private } namespace { list = children location = maildir:%%Lh/Maildir/:INDEX=%%Lh/Maildir/Shared/%%Ld/%%Ln prefix = Shared/%%u/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = shared } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-master-users driver = passwd-file master = yes } passdb { args = /opt/iredmail/custom/dovecot/master-users driver = passwd-file master = yes } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf driver = sql } plugin { acl = vfile acl_shared_dict = proxy::acl imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/opt/iredmail/bin/dovecot/sieve/report_spam.sieve imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Junk imapsieve_mailbox2_before = file:/opt/iredmail/bin/dovecot/sieve/report_ham.sieve imapsieve_mailbox2_causes = COPY imapsieve_mailbox2_from = Junk imapsieve_mailbox2_name = * imapsieve_url = sieve://127.0.0.1:4190 last_login_dict = proxy::lastlogin last_login_key = # hidden, use -P to show it mail_log_events = delete undelete expunge copy save mailbox_create mailbox_delete mailbox_rename mail_log_fields = uid box msgid size from subject flags mailbox_alias_new = Sent Messages mailbox_alias_new2 = Sent Items mailbox_alias_old = Sent mailbox_alias_old2 = Sent quota = dict:user::proxy::quotadict quota_grace = 50M quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_status_nouser = DUNNO quota_status_overquota = 552 5.2.2 Mailbox is full quota_status_success = DUNNO quota_warning = storage=100%% quota-warning 100 %u quota_warning2 = storage=95%% quota-warning 95 %u quota_warning3 = storage=90%% quota-warning 90 %u quota_warning4 = storage=85%% quota-warning 85 %u sieve = ~/sieve/dovecot.sieve sieve_before = /var/vmail/sieve/dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_global_dir = /var/vmail/sieve sieve_global_extensions = +vnd.dovecot.pipe +vnd.dovecot.environment sieve_max_redirects = 30 sieve_pipe_bin_dir = /opt/iredmail/bin/dovecot/sieve sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve sieve_extprograms sieve_redirect_envelope_from = recipient sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes } protocols = pop3 imap sieve lmtp service anvil { process_limit = 1 unix_listener anvil-auth-penalty { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } service auth { client_limit = 4096 inet_listener { port = 12346 } process_limit = 1 unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-auth { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } unix_listener auth-master { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } unix_listener auth-userdb { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } service dict { unix_listener dict { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } service imap-hibernate { unix_listener imap-hibernate { group = vmail user = vmail } } service imap-login { client_limit = 0 inet_listener imap { port = 143 } inet_listener imaps { port = 993 ssl = yes } process_limit = 0 service_count = 0 } service imap { process_limit = 4096 unix_listener imap-master { group = vmail mode = 0666 user = vmail } } service lmtp { executable = lmtp -L inet_listener lmtp { port = 24 } process_min_avail = 5 user = vmail } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } service pop3-login { client_limit = 0 inet_listener pop3 { port = 110 } inet_listener pop3s { port = 995 ssl = yes } process_limit = 0 service_count = 0 } service pop3 { process_limit = 4096 } service quota-status { client_limit = 1000 executable = quota-status -p postfix inet_listener { port = 12340 } } service quota-warning { executable = script /opt/iredmail/bin/dovecot/quota_warning.sh unix_listener quota-warning { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } service stats { inet_listener stats { address = 0.0.0.0 port = 24242 } unix_listener stats-writer { group = vmail mode = 0660 user = vmail } } ssl = required ssl_cert = </opt/iredmail/ssl/cert.pem ssl_cipher_list = EECDH+CHACHA20:EECDH+AESGCM:EDH+AESGCM:AES256+EECDH ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = yes syslog_facility = local5 userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf driver = sql } protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_metadata = yes mail_max_userip_connections = 30 mail_plugins = acl mail_log mailbox_alias notify quota imap_quota imap_acl imap_sieve last_login zlib } protocol pop3 { mail_max_userip_connections = 30 mail_plugins = acl mail_log mailbox_alias notify quota last_login zlib pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv } protocol lda { lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes mail_plugins = acl mail_log mailbox_alias notify quota sieve last_login } protocol lmtp { lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes mail_plugins = acl mail_log mailbox_alias notify quota sieve last_login recipient_delimiter = + } Thank you! [ http://www.colombiahosting.com/ ] Jose Bravo

4 4

sieve processing - enable/disable per user?
by Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 07 Oct '23

07 Oct '23

Hi. I keep users in database and would like to enable/disable sieve for them per user. What's the approach for that? I'm looking at the sieve options and user_query setting but don't see anything that would make this possible. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

3 5

Shared mailboxes and indexes
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 06 Oct '23

06 Oct '23

Hi, I googled a bit to see if I understand it, but no, I haven’t got anything that explains this: What’s exactly the difference between INDEX and INDEXPVT for shared mailboxes? Why are they pointing to the same folder on Dovecot example (https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/shared_mailboxes/shared_mailbo… Best, Francis

1 0