- dovecot - dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults
by Joseph Tam 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Timo Sirainen writes: Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:59:54 +0200 > Could you send me those files? Would be the easiest and quickest way to > get it fixed :) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:02:25 +0200 > Okay, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/32ce915e046a Yes it is does, and it stops crashing for the other 5 sets of indices. A 2-hour turnaround, of which an hour was spent packing up the index files. Amazing. Thanks. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] mail_log_events seem to be broken in HG 2.2
by Thomas Leuxner 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

It seems along the way of 2.2alpha1 'mail_log_events' quietly stopped working. They don't log expunges etc. anymore. […] mail_log_events = expunge mailbox_delete Tested with latest HG. Regards Thomas

2 2

[Dovecot] Maildir hardlinks with sieve
by Benedetto Vassallo 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hi all, First of all, excuse me for my previous posts (Maildir hardlinks). Today I realized the following issue. Maildir hardlinks works OK on dovecot 2.1.10 without sieve. If set sieve plugin in dovecot-lmtp hardlinks stop working. Is there a way to have both sieve and hardlinks working? Thank you -- Benedetto Vassallo Sistema Informativo di Ateneo Settore Gestione Reti Hardware e Software U.O.B. Sviluppo e manutenzione dei sistemi Università degli studi di Palermo Phone: +3909123860056 Fax: +390916529124 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using the University of Palermo web mail interface.

3 6

[Dovecot] namespace subscription problem
by Holger Hegmanns 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hi all, my problem seems to be a cosmetic one (again). According to the docs: subscriptions: "yes" (default) if this namespace should handle its own subscriptions. If "no", then the first parent namespace with subscriptions=yes will handle it. Therefore is no way to create the following scenario: three namespaces (private, shared, public) the private namespace has to handle its own subscriptions the private namespace setup with "prefix = INBOX." the both shared and public namespace setup with "subscriptions = no" cause there is no so called "parent" namespace. Private namespace setup with "prefix = " works fine, but that's not what I want. namespace { type = public separator = . prefix = public. location = maildir:/var/spool/dovecot/vmail/public subscriptions = no } namespace inbox { type = private separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = yes } namespace { type = shared separator = . prefix = user.%%u. location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u subscriptions = no list = children } Any chance that the private namespace can subscribe to shared mailboxes with the principals above? ... Few hours later. Added a default namespace without any prefix: namespace { prefix = separator = . hidden = yes subscriptions = yes } Subscriptions works as expected, but when I telnet to dovecot now the LSUB command shows all boxes beneath the INBOX as well as without the prefix: b lsub "" * * LSUB () "." "Sent" * LSUB () "." "Templates" * LSUB () "." "Trash" * LSUB () "." "Drafts" * LSUB () "." "INBOX.Sent" * LSUB () "." "INBOX.Templates" * LSUB () "." "INBOX.Trash" * LSUB () "." "INBOX.Drafts" * LSUB () "." "INBOX.user.bar.Sent" * LSUB () "." "user.bar.Sent" b OK Lsub completed. Completely stuck Holgert

2 2

[Dovecot] migration to dovecot pop3
by Rajesh M 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

hi i am planning to migrate from qmail pop3 to dovecot pop3 the number of users on the server is large over 5000 also data volume is large - over 3.5 tb -- ie many users several 1000s of emails in their inbox email clients used are outlook / outlook express / windows mail, etc my questions 1) will the migration cause all the emails on the server to re-download 2) can dovecot be configured to allow only one download at a time - pop3 locking with time out setting that can be customized 3) can dovecot pop3 be configured so that it will allow download of emails only of the last say 15 days ie even if the same pop3 user is configure on another machine it will download only messages of the last 15 days 4) has anybody migrated from qmail pop3 to dovecot pop3 successfully without emails being downloaded again thankyou very much in advance rajesh

1 0

[Dovecot] environment variables not set
by Nikolai Tsvetkov 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

hi, all! I try to use relay-ctrl with dovecot's imap, but with no luck. I think that the problem is with environment variables. Here are some information: dovecot --version 2.1.12 dovecot -n # 2.1.12: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.29-smp i686 Slackware 14.0 auth_mechanisms = plain login debug_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-debug.log disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 89 info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot-info.log listen = * log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir passdb { driver = shadow } protocols = imap service imap { executable = /usr/local/bin/envdir /etc/relay-ctrl /usr/local/bin/relay-ctrl-chdir /usr/local/bin/dovecot-settcpremoteip /usr/local/bin/relay-ctrl-allow /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap } ssl = no userdb { driver = passwd } /usr/local/bin/dovecot-settcpremoteip: #!/bin/sh # # Wrapper for relay-ctrl-allow that sets TCPREMOTEIP. TCPREMOTEIP="${IP}"; export TCPREMOTEIP exec "$@"

2 3

[Dovecot] Upload / migrate old mails: iPhone shows oldest mails first
by Denny Schierz 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

hi, I've got a very strange behavior: I uploaded old mails from a local folder (thunderbird / osx) to my Dovecot (Debian Squeeze) and now, the iphone (ios6) show the oldest mails first. The only thing I can imagine is, that Dovecot got from Thunderbird the newest mails first and last the old mails, so that in the last mdbox are the old one. So, if it is correct, how can I fix it? cu denny

2 1

[Dovecot] Path for fixing sequence lookup of newly created mails in transaction view
by Potapov Sergey 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hi! It seem that tview_lookup_seq_range works incorret, if I request uids from 3 to 3, and I have new uids 1,2,4,5 it will return seq for uid=4. Fixing patch is included as attach. ------ Sergey Potapov

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults
by Joseph Tam 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Timo Sirainen writes: > Can you still reproduce this in any way? Yes, I have 6 sets of user INBOX index caches that will crash dovecot-lda. The actual content of the INBOX is irrelevant (crash probably happens before INBOX is opened). > I found two bugs, would be nice to know if they solve it: > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/2f848393f78e > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/bded819417d9 No, these patch don't help. It crashes in the same place with the same value of field_hdr. Here's the full backtrace: #0 0xff2a0474 in mail_cache_header_fields_read (cache=0x5c250) at mail-cache-fields.c:325 field_hdr = (const struct mail_cache_header_fields *) 0x20 field = {name = 0x402 <Address 0x402 out of bounds>, idx = 4282351288, type = MAIL_CACHE_FIELD_VARIABLE_SIZE, field_size = 4282335628, decision = MAIL_CACHE_DECISION_TEMP, last_used = -14558816} last_used = (const uint32_t *) 0x64584 sizes = (const uint32_t *) 0xc types = (const uint8_t *) 0x64888 "" decisions = (const uint8_t *) 0x64900 "" p = 0x24a38 "�\035\212@��" names = 0x0 end = 0x64a50 "" orig_key = (void *) 0xffbfee38 orig_value = (void *) 0x64550 fidx = 411784 new_fields_count = 4280126016 dec = MAIL_CACHE_DECISION_NO max_drop_time = 376804 offset = 32 i = 4282348464 #1 0xff29e8cc in mail_cache_compress_locked (cache=0x5c250, trans=0x645e0, unlock=0xffbfeeef) at mail-cache-compress.c:361 dotlock = (struct dotlock *) 0x2ea00 st = {st_dev = 235718347, st_pad1 = {874, 0, 0}, st_ino = 0, st_mode = 0, st_nlink = 0, st_uid = 0, st_gid = 0, st_rdev = 3720, st_pad2 = {0, 0}, st_size = 3720, st_atim = { tv_sec = 410816, tv_nsec = -12631336}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 514, tv_nsec = -12631336}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 65536, tv_nsec = 0}, st_blksize = 0, st_blocks = 1621028016851520, st_fstype = "\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\003\212\000\000\000\000\005�P", st_pad4 = {-4198784, -14028952, 39394339, 377424, 0, 16777216, 3, 4}} old_mask = 4282348464 file_seq = 4 old_offset = 4290768372 ext_offsets = {arr = {buffer = 0xffbfee10, element_size = 4280930288}, v = 0xffbfee10, v_modifiable = 0xffbfee10} offsets = (const uint32_t *) 0x0 data = (const void *) 0xff3f4380 i = 0 count = 1 fd = 0 ret = 377424 #2 0xff29efe0 in mail_cache_compress (cache=0x5c250, trans=0x645e0) at mail-cache-compress.c:489 unlock = false ret = 411764 __FUNCTION__ = "mail_cache_compress" #3 0xff2a3e28 in mail_cache_transaction_compress (ctx=0x5e3b8) at mail-cache-transaction.c:180 cache = (struct mail_cache *) 0x5c250 view = (struct mail_index_view *) 0x644c0 trans = (struct mail_index_transaction *) 0x645e0 ret = 2424 #4 0xff2a40b8 in mail_cache_transaction_open_if_needed (ctx=0x5e3b8) at mail-cache-transaction.c:241 cache = (struct mail_cache *) 0x5c250 ext = (const struct mail_index_ext *) 0x1e idx = 154968 i = 1 __FUNCTION__ = "mail_cache_transaction_open_if_needed" #5 0xff2a6e94 in mail_cache_field_want_add (ctx=0x5e3b8, seq=1, field_idx=12) at mail-cache-transaction.c:1048 decision = 153968 #6 0xff27e8e8 in index_mail_parse_header_register_all_wanted (mail=0x5efa8) at index-mail-headers.c:175 _mail = (struct mail *) 0x5efa8 all_cache_fields = (const struct mail_cache_field *) 0x25970 i = 12 count = 26 #7 0xff27ec90 in index_mail_parse_header_init (mail=0x5efa8, headers=0x0) at index-mail-headers.c:230 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 data = (struct index_mail_data *) 0x5f058 match = (const uint8_t *) 0x641a0 "" i = 0 field_idx = 4290769328 match_count = 2155905152 __FUNCTION__ = "index_mail_parse_header_init" #8 0xff27f5c8 in index_mail_cache_parse_init (_mail=0x5efa8, input=0x64058) at index-mail-headers.c:376 mail = (struct index_mail *) 0x5efa8 input2 = (struct istream *) 0x641a0 __FUNCTION__ = "index_mail_cache_parse_init" #9 0xff2299cc in mbox_save_get_input_stream (ctx=0x5e6e0, input=0x637c8) at mbox-save.c:411 filter = (struct istream *) 0x0 ret = (struct istream *) 0x5edd0 cache_input = (struct istream *) 0x25990 streams = {0x20202020, 0x2e938, 0xa202020} #10 0xff22a084 in mbox_save_begin (_ctx=0x5e6e0, input=0x637c8) at mbox-save.c:520 ctx = (struct mbox_save_context *) 0x5e6e0 t = (struct mbox_transaction_context *) 0x5de88 save_flags = MAIL_RECENT offset = 0 __FUNCTION__ = "mbox_save_begin" #11 0xff24e9c0 in mailbox_save_begin (ctx=0xffbff514, input=0x637c8) at mail-storage.c:1652 box = (struct mailbox *) 0x594e8 ret = 0 #12 0xff23f138 in mail_storage_try_copy (_ctx=0xffbff514, mail=0x54cd8) at mail-copy.c:68 ctx = (struct mail_save_context *) 0x5e6e0 pmail = (struct mail_private *) 0x54cd8 input = (struct istream *) 0x637c8 from_envelope = 0x13d90 "MAILER-DAEMON" guid = 0xff2f0ec0 "" received_date = -1 #13 0xff23f23c in mail_storage_copy (ctx=0x5e6e0, mail=0x54cd8) at mail-copy.c:93 No locals. #14 0xff24ec28 in mailbox_copy (_ctx=0xffbff670, mail=0x54cd8) at mail-storage.c:1721 ctx = (struct mail_save_context *) 0x5e6e0 box = (struct mailbox *) 0x594e8 keywords = (struct mail_keywords *) 0x0 ret = 389032 #15 0xff24ec98 in mailbox_save_using_mail (ctx=0xffbff670, mail=0x54cd8) at mail-storage.c:1730 No locals. #16 0xff388070 in mail_deliver_save (ctx=0xffbff8a8, mailbox=0x13fe8 "INBOX", flags=0, keywords=0x0, storage_r=0xffbff83c) at mail-deliver.c:317 open_ctx = {user = 0x3d3a8, lda_mailbox_autocreate = true, lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = false} box = (struct mailbox *) 0x594e8 trans_flags = MAILBOX_TRANSACTION_FLAG_EXTERNAL t = (struct mailbox_transaction_context *) 0x5de88 save_ctx = (struct mail_save_context *) 0x0 headers_ctx = (struct mailbox_header_lookup_ctx *) 0x0 kw = (struct mail_keywords *) 0x0 error = MAIL_ERROR_NONE mailbox_name = 0x13fe8 "INBOX" errstr = 0x0 guid = 0xff3f73b0 "" changes = {pool = 0x13e38, uid_validity = 0, saved_uids = {arr = {buffer = 0x13e28, element_size = 1}, v = 0x13e28, v_modifiable = 0x13e28}, ignored_modseq_changes = 4282350008, changed = false} range = (const struct seq_range *) 0xff1d3580 default_save = true ret = 0 __FUNCTION__ = "mail_deliver_save" #17 0xff38869c in mail_deliver (ctx=0xffbff8a8, storage_r=0xffbff83c) at mail-deliver.c:403 ret = -1 #18 0x00012d08 in main (argc=3, argv=0xffbff964) at main.c:434 set_roots = {0x24b48, 0x0} ctx = {pool = 0x2eaf0, set = 0x30440, session = 0x2eb00, dup_ctx = 0x0, session_id = 0x0, src_mail = 0x54cd8, src_envelope_sender = 0x0, dest_user = 0x3d3a8, dest_addr = 0x25828 "testuser@domain", final_dest_addr = 0x25828 "testuser@domain", dest_mailbox_name = 0x13fe8 "INBOX", dest_mail = 0x5efa8, var_expand_table = 0x0, tried_default_save = true, saved_mail = false, save_dest_mail = false, mailbox_full = false, dsn = false} service_flags = 1027 user = 0xffbffad0 "testuser" errstr = 0xff3f48e8 "" path = 0x0 storage_service = (struct mail_storage_service_ctx *) 0x2f650 service_user = (struct mail_storage_service_user *) 0x2fe88 service_input = {module = 0x13fd0 "lda", service = 0x13fd0 "lda", username = 0xffbffad0 "testuser", session_id = 0x0, local_ip = {family = 0, u = {ip6 = { _S6_un = {_S6_u8 = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, _S6_u32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}, __S6_align = 0}}, ip4 = {S_un = {S_un_b = {s_b1 = 0 '\0', s_b2 = 0 '\0', s_b3 = 0 '\0', s_b4 = 0 '\0'}, S_un_w = {s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}}}, remote_ip = {family = 0, u = {ip6 = { _S6_un = {_S6_u8 = '\0' <repeats 15 times>, _S6_u32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}, __S6_align = 0}}, ip4 = {S_un = {S_un_b = {s_b1 = 0 '\0', s_b2 = 0 '\0', s_b3 = 0 '\0', s_b4 = 0 '\0'}, S_un_w = {s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}}}, local_port = 0, remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add = 0, flags_override_remove = 0, no_userdb_lookup = 0} storage = (struct mail_storage *) 0x39330 user_source = 0x13f30 "" destaddr_source = 0x13f30 "" process_euid = 0 stderr_rejection = false ret = 1 c = -1 error = MAIL_ERROR_NONE Joseph Tam <tam(a)math.ubc.ca>

2 2

[Dovecot] Too many imap connections in state "idling"
by 3.listas＠adminlinux.com.br 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hi, I have a "Ubuntu12.04 + dovecot-2.0.19" configuration in my server. My mailbox server is shared by ~ 10k domains. It works fine with ~50k accounts. On average, my server has about 6K simultaneous imap connections during office hours. But I've noticed that this server has an average of approximately 4k connections in state "idling". On other Dovecot servers the average connections in state "idling" is only 10%. My doveconf -n: http://thiagoh.prv.digirati.com.br/doveconf-n.txt Can someone help me? Thanks -- Thiago Henrique adminlinux.com.br

4 5