- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] lmtpd configuration
by paolo.brocchi12 27 Mar '14

27 Mar '14

Hi all, i have my home.conf : mydatabase XXXX myuser XXXX mypasswd XXXX myhosts be1XX be2XX [lmtpd] where mail conditions status = 0 user name passwd 'passwd' home home quota quota_limit_bytes uid 497 gid 497 table UTENTI on mysql database the home is home: /data/mail/BE01/........ i would like to have home:/data/mail/DRBE01 How can i change my home.conf? Thanks you Paolo -- View this message in context: http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/lmtpd-configuration-tp47284.html Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

[Dovecot] %{orig_user} missing in checkpassword-Script
by dovecot.pkoch＠dfgh.net 27 Mar '14

27 Mar '14

Hi everybody, I'm using SSL client certificates or checkpassword scripts to authenticate our users. If a user sent a client certificate from his smartcard my checkpasswort will ignore the password, if he does not sent a client certificate but uses his OTP-token then my checkwassword script will check wether the password is a correct one time password. My problem is: the AUTH_USER variable will either contain the username that was configured in the mailclient (if auth_ssl_username_from_cert=false) or the username from the certificate (if auth_ssl_username_from_cert=true). I would like to compare both values, i.e. the %{user} Dovecot-variable and the %{orig_user} Dovecot-variable. But the environment of a checkpassword-script has only one of them. Any ideas? I tried to change the source and found the routine where all the AUTH_xxx environment variables are created. But the %{orig_user] variable was empty at that point, so no AUTH_ORIG_USER variable is created. I'm afraight that whenever the %{user}-Variable is replaced by the UID from the client certificate (due to auth_ssl_username_from_cert=true), the original value of %{user} is NOT copied into %{orig_user} Can someone more familiar with the dovecot source check this please or give me a hint where to look further Kind regards Peter Koch

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] Trying to get Centos5 set up with dovecot
by Joseph Tam 27 Mar '14

27 Mar '14

DCA <dovecotadmin(a)silverservers.com> writes: > I am trying to set up dovecot to replace an older POP3 server in an existing set up. > Currently the server uses sendmail to handle incoming mail. users are in /etc/mail and their incoming eMail lands in the /var/mail/username > in /var/mail the username file is owned by username:mail > > I have dovecot configured to create the imap folders in /home/username/mail/ > on existing accounts login attempts fail with errors such as: > chown /home/username/mail/.imap/INBOX failed: Operation not permitted egid=500(username), group based on /var/mail/username > mkdir /home/username/mail/imap/INBOX failed: Operation not permitted. > > Everything seems to work as expected but only if I add "username" into the "mail" group OR if I have all mailboxes chowned to username:username > Is there any way to tell dovecot to ignore the group ownership of /var/mail/username and focus instead on using username:username for everything in /home/username ? > > If I have to add every user to the mail group I can but this seems messy. Geez, I must have answered the same query 3 or 4 times. I need to write an entry in wiki somewhere: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-August/092299.html Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

2 2

[Dovecot] Auth service panic
by Piotr Rotter 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Hello, I have dovecot director on one server and today I notice 146 times the same problem. Log below. I try restart dovecot and mysql (auth-db backend) but with no effect. Please help. If any other information is needed I send it. My dovecot version is 2.1.15. 2014-03-26T16:15:28+01:00 r1 dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 9883 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled) 2014-03-26T16:15:43+01:00 r1 dovecot: auth: Panic: file passdb-blocking.c: line 124 (passdb_blocking_lookup_credentials): assertion failed: (auth_stream_is_empty(request->extra_fields) || request->master_user != NULL) 2014-03-26T16:15:43+01:00 r1 dovecot: auth: Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x4469a) [0x7fdb06e1469a] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x446de) [0x7fdb06e146de] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x1c0ea) [0x7fdb06dec0ea] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb](passdb_blocking_verify_plain+0) [0x41f593] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb](auth_request_lookup_credentials+0x104) [0x413c41] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb]() [0x41c202] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb]() [0x4139e6] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb](auth_request_lookup_credentials_callback+0x6a) [0x413abb] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb](passdb_handle_credentials+0x50) [0x41f389] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb]() [0x41f82e] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb]() [0x41798f] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x27) [0x7fdb06e1f68c] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x9e) [0x7fdb06e204ee] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x27) [0x7fdb06e1f645] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7fdb06e0d348] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb](main+0x380) [0x41a396] -> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd) [0x7fdb062ced2d] -> dovecot/auth [34 wait, 1 passdb, 0 userdb]() [0x40ced9] 2014-03-26T16:15:43+01:00 r1 dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 18546 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled)

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP proxy with master user and CRAM-MD5 auth mechanism
by ML mail 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Hi Trent, Thanks for your exhaustive explanation now it is clear. What was unclear to me was the fact that the IMAP proxy server has to take care of the authentication in this case of using a master user and therefore it needs access to the passwords (in my case stored in the mailbox table in PostgreSQL). I still have two open questions: 1) Do I really need the userdb on my IMAP proxy config as you mention in your mail? In my understanding the passdb should be enough (which in my case will use a SQL query joining the result of my proxy and mailbox tables). 2) Is this correct that the IMAP backend (the mailbox server) in this case scenario has to use PLAIN authentication and can NOT use CRAM-MD5? Regards,ML

1 0

[Dovecot] IMAP proxy with master user and CRAM-MD5 auth mechanism
by ML mail 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Hello, I would like to know if it possible to have a dovecot IMAP proxy frontend where CRAM-MD5 can be used as auth mechanism (assuming I would be using a master user/password on the dovecot IMAP backend/mailbox)? I have read a few times the following http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy page but somehow it is still unclear to me if the IMAP proxy then needs to have all the users and passwords in its proxy table in the database? Unfortunately there are no examples for that case. Also with this case scenario is it possible to store the users' passwords in CRAM-MD5 format? Any pointers or documentation to such a scenario would be great. Thanks and regards M.L.

1 0

[Dovecot] Trying to get Centos5 set up with dovecot
by DCA 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Greetings, It seems I'm having some trouble getting this message into the list. I have used this dovecot list before. I am trying to set up dovecot to replace an older POP3 server in an existing set up. Currently the server uses sendmail to handle incoming mail. users are in /etc/mail and their incoming eMail lands in the /var/mail/username in /var/mail the username file is owned by username:mail I have dovecot configured to create the imap folders in /home/username/mail/ on existing accounts login attempts fail with errors such as: chown /home/username/mail/.imap/INBOX failed: Operation not permitted egid=500(username), group based on /var/mail/username mkdir /home/username/mail/imap/INBOX failed: Operation not permitted. Everything seems to work as expected but only if I add "username" into the "mail" group OR if I have all mailboxes chowned to username:username Is there any way to tell dovecot to ignore the group ownership of /var/mail/username and focus instead on using username:username for everything in /home/username ? If I have to add every user to the mail group I can but this seems messy. Thanks!

2 1

[Dovecot] Direct groups of users to pairs of backend servers
by Murray Trainer 25 Mar '14

25 Mar '14

Hi All, I am using dovecot in the Director setup with multiple proxy and backend mailstores and user information stored in LDAP. I am aware users can be directed to a single backend server. It would be useful to be able to direct groups of users to pairs of backend servers to give some fault tolerance against NFS issues and make the whole thing more scalable. Otherwise each backend mailstore will need all the NFS mounts and the whole cluster will be affected if one NFS mount has an issue. I am not sure if this possible with the current dovecot implementation? If not it would be a great enhancement. Thanks Murray

2 3

Re: [Dovecot] Disconnected (auth failed, 1 attempts)
by Joseph Tam 25 Mar '14

25 Mar '14

ldaamandy <amandy_lda(a)outlook.com> writes: > {"username":"q1(a)t.com","password":"{CRYPT}$1$d5ef98b7$brWKOJiUiqII3DysGzsfl\/", ... Dovecot uses the uses the native crypt() which ought to recognize $1$ hashes, but maybe try changing it to "{MD5-CRYPT}". http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] pb with setting quota_rule=backend quota=fs for quota-warning
by marion 25 Mar '14

25 Mar '14

Hello my config is debian wheezy with dovecot v.2.1.17-2., plugin quota /imap_quota is ok : I can read the real filesystem user quota for each different user with - doveadmin quota get - thunderbird - SOGo my problem is to configure quota-warning message : 1) if no quota_rule is defined then my dovecot-debug.log looks like Mar 25 18:28:02 imap(testuser): Debug:Quota warning: bytes=0 (80%) messages=0 ... 2) As soon as I set quota_rule = *:storage=1G , quota root is correctly defined, and quota-warning messages are sent according to the ratio I defined (cf below 90-quota.conf) with THIS limit (1G) , the same for all users and that’s not what I expect when I set individual quota... 3)And If define something like: quota_rule = * : backend (or backend=%q or …) dovecot definitively hangs with a) doveadm quota get -u testuser doveadm(testuser): Error: user testuser: Initialization failed: Failed to initialize quota: Invalid quota root quota: Invalid rule *:backend: Unknown rule limit name: backend b) even my login in SOGo hangs /var/mail/mail.err Mar 25 21:56:22 biwa dovecot: imap(testuser): Error: user testuser: Initialization failed: Failed to initialize quota: Invalid quota root quota: Invalid rule *:backend: Unknown rule limit name: backend Is there a way ( a variable ?) to link the real filesystem quota limit with the quota_warning process ? … something like quota_rule = *:storage=%VAR ? 90-quota.conf ------------------- plugin { quota_warning = storage=80%% quota-warning 80 %u quota_warning2 = storage=90%% quota-warning 90 %u } plugin { quota =fs } service quota-warning { executable = script /etc/dovecot/myconfig/quota-warning.sh unix_listener quota-warning { mode =0666 } } Thank you in advance best regards, Philippe ______________ Philippe Marion

1 0