September 2018 - dovecot

Re: LMTP tcp listener with auth?
by Andreas Thienemann 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Hi Stephan, On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Stephan Bosch wrote: > LMTP currently does not support AUTH. Bummer. Thought so. > What is your use case? Most people hide LMTP behind a firewall, or don't > expose it through TCP/IP in the first place. The port is currently only available to a few trusted machines, but having auth available would have been a nice benefit in case the firewall gets misconfigured. Cyrus for example will expose the LMTP port via TCP if configured, but expects valid user credentials. The larger use-case is a migration from cyrus to dovecot. As it's not just the MDA but also the MTA installation that is being migrated I need a way to deliver mail from the old MTA to the new MDA. LMTP comes in handy. https://github.com/ixs/lmtp_proxy/blob/master/README.md#minmal-downtime-mig… has a rough invocation of the steps needed for that. As I said, LMTP auth isn't critical for this, but would have been a nice addition. cheers, Andreas

1 0

Letsencrypt certificate for repo.dovecot.org expired May 14th..
by B. Reino 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

Dear all, Just in case you've missed it, the certificate for repo.dovecot.org just expired yesterday. This causes errors in e.g. apt-get update. Thanks in advance for fixing it, -- B. Reino

2 6

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 12 Sep '18

12 Sep '18

I attempted as non-root user and got the exact same error. On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Have you attempted this as non-root user? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

2 2

Log sync error
by Jakobus Schürz 11 Sep '18

11 Sep '18

Hi there! I get a lot of errormessages. My dovecot is: dovecot-core 2:2.3.2.1-1~stretch from Debian stable. I found this: https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-July/091648.html So the bug came back... The Log is attached Thanks Jakob

1 0

Re: make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

I did so as non-root user and got the same error. On 9/10/2018 9:10 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Have you attempted this as non-root user? > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Eric Broch <ebroch(a)whitehorsetc.com> > Date: 10/09/2018 18:03 (GMT+02:00) > To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Subject: Re: make check (pigeonhole) > > Dovecot list, > > 1) I downloaded latest dovecot and pigeonhole tar balls and extracted on > latest updated CentOS 7 : dovecot-2.3.2.1.tar.gz and > dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2.tar.gz > > 2) I moved pigeonhole (dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2) directory into > dovecot (dovecot-2.3.2.1) directory > > 3) built dovecot with following config and paramerters: > > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-2.0-defaultconfig.patch > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-1.0.beta2-mkcert-permissions.patch > patch -p1 < ../../SOURCES/dovecot-2.2.27-mkcert-paths.patch > > sed -i '/DEFAULT_INCLUDES *=/s|$| '"$(pkg-config --cflags > libclucene-core)|" src/plugins/fts-lucene/Makefile.in > > #export CFLAGS="-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions > -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches > -fno-strict-aliasing" > #export LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,relro" > aclocal --install -I m4 > autoreconf -I . -fiv > > ./configure \ > INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p -m644" \ > --docdir=/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.3.2.1 \ > --disable-static \ > --disable-rpath \ > --with-nss \ > --with-shadow \ > --with-pam \ > --with-gssapi=plugin \ > --with-ldap=plugin \ > --with-sql=plugin \ > --with-lua=plugin \ > --with-pgsql \ > --with-mysql \ > --with-sqlite \ > --with-vpopmail=/etc/libvpopmail \ > --with-zlib \ > --with-libcap \ > --with-libwrap \ > --with-lucene \ > --with-ssl=openssl \ > --with-ssldir=/etc/pki/dovecot \ > --with-solr \ > --with-systemdsystemunitdir=/usr/lib/systemd/system \ > --with-docs > > sed -i 's|/etc/ssl|/etc/pki/dovecot|' doc/mkcert.sh > doc/example-config/conf.d/10-ssl.conf > > make -j3 > > 4) built pigeon hole with the following paramters: > > # required for snapshot > [ -f configure ] || autoreconf -fiv > [ -f ChangeLog ] || echo "Pigeonhole ChangeLog is not available, yet" > >ChangeLog > > ./configure \ > INSTALL_DATA="install -c -p -m644" \ > --disable-static \ > --with-dovecot=../ \ > --with-ldap=plugin \ > --without-unfinished-features > > make -j3 > > 5) during 'make check' of pigeonhole got the following error: > > make[3]: Entering directory > `/root/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dovecot-2.3.2.1/dovecot-2.3-pigeonhole-0.5.2/src/lib-sieve/util' > for bin in test-edit-mail; do \ > if ! /bin/sh ../../../run-test.sh ../../.. ./$bin; then exit 1; fi; \ > done > test-edit-header(root): Error: Cannot lookup test user: Mail access for > users with UID 89 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid > from mail_uid setting). > ../../../run-test.sh: line 27: 29930 Segmentation fault (core > dumped) valgrind -q --trace-children=yes --leak-check=full > --log-file=test.out.$$ $noundef $* > ==29930== Invalid read of size 8 > ==29930== at 0x404699: mail_raw_user_create (mail-raw.c:142) > ==29930== by 0x40325B: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:105) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== Address 0xb8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd > ==29930== > ==29930== > ==29930== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) > ==29930== Access not within mapped region at address 0xB8 > ==29930== at 0x404699: mail_raw_user_create (mail-raw.c:142) > ==29930== by 0x40325B: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:105) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack > ==29930== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but > ==29930== possible), you can try to increase the size of the > ==29930== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. > ==29930== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608. > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 35 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F377C: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:215) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 36 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 37 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D2FD: hash_table_create (hash.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 128 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 48 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x403159: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:101) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 52 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x528A74E: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x528A74E: p_strdup_vprintf (strfuncs.c:167) > ==29930== by 0x528A833: p_strdup_printf (strfuncs.c:111) > ==29930== by 0x40318E: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:52) > ==29930== by 0x40318E: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 53 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x5272941: event_create (lib-event.c:54) > ==29930== by 0x4E8797C: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1334) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 512 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 56 of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x5272952: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x5272952: event_create (lib-event.c:56) > ==29930== by 0x4E8797C: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1334) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 59 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F3741: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:204) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 60 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F2D14: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1924) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 61 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51F2D14: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1924) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 62 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x5250ED5: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x5250ED5: buffer_alloc (buffer.c:34) > ==29930== by 0x525110C: buffer_create_dynamic (buffer.c:143) > ==29930== by 0x5272805: array_create_i (array.h:129) > ==29930== by 0x5272805: event_get_field (lib-event.c:383) > ==29930== by 0x5273283: event_add_str (lib-event.c:400) > ==29930== by 0x5273437: event_add_fields (lib-event.c:438) > ==29930== by 0x4E879FD: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1335) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 67 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F377C: settings_parser_init_list > (settings-parser.c:215) > ==29930== by 0x51ED102: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:595) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 68 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: cache_add (master-service-settings-cache.c:291) > ==29930== by 0x51EE844: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:409) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > ==29930== 1,608 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 69 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277AB5: pool_system_malloc (mempool-system.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x525D33D: hash_table_create (hash.c:79) > ==29930== by 0x51F2EA3: settings_parser_dup (settings-parser.c:1957) > ==29930== by 0x4E8792F: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1324) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 70 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E8C454: mailbox_attributes_init > (mailbox-attribute.c:17) > ==29930== by 0x4E7F2F5: mail_storage_init (mail-storage.c:70) > ==29930== by 0x4E87139: mail_storage_service_init > (mail-storage-service.c:975) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:66) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 71 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E8714A: mail_storage_service_init > (mail-storage-service.c:977) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:66) > ==29930== by 0x403205: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 2,048 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 72 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527751D: pool_alloconly_malloc (mempool-alloconly.c:283) > ==29930== by 0x528AA66: p_malloc (mempool.h:99) > ==29930== by 0x528AA66: p_strconcat (strfuncs.c:223) > ==29930== by 0x51F40ED: settings_parse_keyvalue (settings-parser.c:845) > ==29930== by 0x51F50E0: settings_parse_environ (settings-parser.c:1103) > ==29930== by 0x51ED247: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:648) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== > ==29930== 6,144 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 74 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x4E876FA: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1238) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 12,288 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 75 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51EDD31: master_service_settings_cache_init > (master-service-settings-cache.c:75) > ==29930== by 0x4E87541: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1073) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== by 0x402FE5: main (test-edit-mail.c:765) > ==29930== > ==29930== 16,384 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 76 > of 77 > ==29930== at 0x4C2B9B5: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711) > ==29930== by 0x5277456: block_alloc.isra.1 (mempool-alloconly.c:254) > ==29930== by 0x527768C: pool_alloconly_create (mempool-alloconly.c:138) > ==29930== by 0x51ED84C: master_service_settings_read > (master-service-settings.c:580) > ==29930== by 0x51EE3A9: master_service_settings_cache_read > (master-service-settings-cache.c:387) > ==29930== by 0x4E874BF: mail_storage_service_read_settings > (mail-storage-service.c:1085) > ==29930== by 0x4E87745: mail_storage_service_lookup_real > (mail-storage-service.c:1249) > ==29930== by 0x4E88795: mail_storage_service_lookup > (mail-storage-service.c:1441) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init_mail_user (test-edit-mail.c:71) > ==29930== by 0x403223: test_init (test-edit-mail.c:103) > ==29930== by 0x4036DA: test_edit_mail_concatenated > (test-edit-mail.c:187) > ==29930== by 0x524D8B1: test_run_funcs (test-common.c:244) > ==29930== by 0x524E280: test_run (test-common.c:315) > ==29930== > Failed to run: ./test-edit-mail > > *Note: Previous versions of pigeonhole did a 'make check' successfully > even the first version of 2.3 (CE). Pigeonhole v0.5.1 and v0.5.2 fail on > CentOS 7 > > Help would be appreciated. > > > On 9/9/2018 3:11 PM, Eric Broch wrote: > > Anyone? > > > > > > On 9/8/2018 7:36 PM, Eric Broch wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> During the 'make check' (pigeonhole) portion of a building (rpmbuild) > >> a dovecot.spec file I'm getting the following error: > >> > >> testsuite(root): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID > >> (see mail_uid setting) > >> > >> I'm not sure how to resolve this, and any help would be appreciated > >> to help me finish the creating the rpm > >> > > > > -- > Eric Broch > White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC) > -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

1 0

make check (pigeonhole)
by Eric Broch 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Hello list, During the 'make check' (pigeonhole) portion of a building (rpmbuild) a dovecot.spec file I'm getting the following error: testsuite(root): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID (see mail_uid setting) I'm not sure how to resolve this, and any help would be appreciated to help me finish the creating the rpm -- Eric Broch White Horse Technical Consulting (WHTC)

2 4

dsync mail from a remote server
by Kai Schaetzl 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

I would like to transfer mail for some users from an old dovecot (with no doveadm) to a modern dovecot (2.3.2). I've read up on https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/Sync https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync and I'm not sure if I can use doveadm for this purpose. I need doveadm to login to the remote server (source) with a username/password via IMAP, fetch all mail and deliver it to a local user (target), preferrably with the same folder structure that exists on the source account. Is this possible? I don't understand this page completely: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync For some testing (that's why I used pop3, to keep it simple) I put a file for pop3c in conf.d (mostly identical with the file shown on that page) and restarted dovecot. Then I tried a command line like this: doveadm -o pop3c_user=user -o pop3c_password=password backup -R -u user@domain pop3c: This creates an error: dsync(user@domain): Error: Mail locations must use the same virtual mailbox hierarchy separator (specify separator for the default namespace) I'm not sure what this exactly means. Does it refer to the account naming structure of user@domain? The source server does not have such usernames, only the target server I run the command on. Or does it refer to structure within the mailbox? (which can't really be the case as it doesn't login to the source and can't know the structure yet). So, if it indeed refers to the user naming structure, can I tell it to use the "simple" account names on the source machine? Am I correct in assuming that I can override any pop3c_ setting in the conf file with -o? For instance also using -o pop3c_host= and that if there is -o pop3c_user=user on the command line I don't need a pop3c_user in the conf file? (no master-user). Thanks for any help on this. (If it doesn't work I can use fetchmail, but that is much less preferrable as it "delivers" all mail, so it's all "new" and in the INBOX. Kai

1 0

Disconnects on Director
by Tom Sommer 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Hi I am seeing a lot of clients time out on my Director. I'm wondering if this is "normal" or there is some opportunity to tweak something? Log line: imap-login: Info: proxy(user(a)example.com): disconnecting 1.2.3.4 (Disconnected by client: read(size=433) failed: Connection timed out(37s idle, in=939, out=3083)): user=<user(a)example.com>, method=CRAM-MD5, rip=1.2.3.4, lip=172.0.0.0, TLS: read(size=433) failed: Connection timed out, session=<P2kq7H91H4dZF/2O> Any hints? Nothing is logged by the kernel. 2.3.2.1 -- Tom

2 1

Dovecot - being dropped
by Maurizio Caloro 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Hello Yesterday, I could not receive an email anymore when I looked in the logs found the following errors: * Sep 7 06:04:44 mail dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100) reached, client connections are being dropped * Sep 7 06:06:41 mail dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100) reached, client connections are being dropped If show the config i dont see any process_limits Dovecot 2.2.13 root@mail:/var/log# dovecot -n # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.16.0-6-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.11 auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_verbose = yes disable_plaintext_auth = no info_log_path = /var/log/mail.log log_timestamp = %b %d %H:%M:%S Dovecot/ mail_access_groups = vmail mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify vironment mailbox date ihave namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = mailbox Drafts { special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash } prefix = } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } plugin { sieve = ~/sieve/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve } postmaster_address = admin@ protocols = imap pop3 lmtp service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } unix_listener auth-client { mode = 0660 user = mail } } service lmtp { inet_listener lmtp { address = 127.0.0.1 port = 24 } } ssl_cert = </etc/dovecot/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext driver = sql } protocol lda { mail_plugins = " quota sieve" } protocol imap { mail_plugins = " quota imap_quota" } root@mail:/var/log#

3 3

Re: Dsync deleting mailboxes due to duplicate UIDs
by Andreas Thienemann 10 Sep '18

10 Sep '18

Hi Sami, On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Sami Ketola wrote: > Is it possible to get imapc rawlogs to analyze? create a directory that is > writeable and add -o imapc_rawlog_dir=/path/to/directory to command line. Tried that. Thanks for the suggestion, that is actually really helpful. If anyone wants to play along at home, the files in that directory are created with the permissions of mail_uid/mail_gid. The dir should be world-writable to make it easy. > Also with recent dovecot release you can tell dsync which header fields to > hash when matching mails. Add dsync_hashed_headers=Message-ID to config and > dovecot will only mach mails using Message-ID header fileld. I had seen that parameter but thought it would be prudent to not _just_ rely on the Message-ID but instead keep the default "Date Message-ID". I _think_ I might have found an issue when looking at the log: 1536525811.026071 * 39 FETCH (UID 39 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (Date Message-ID)] {159} 1536525811.026071 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207091925420.433-100000(a)trinity.knopfdruck.org> 1536525811.026071 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:26:04 +0200 (MEST) 1536525811.026071 Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:13 +0200 1536525811.026071 1536525811.026071 ) A duplicate Date header is certainly unexpected. Having a look at the original mail on disk on the Cyrus server shows the following Mail: >From [redacted] Tue Jul 9 19:26:04 2002 X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3 Return-Path: [redacted] Received: from bender.bawue.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79CE48CBC; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [redacted] Received: from [redacted] by bender.bawue.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA4848CAA for [redacted]; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:28:43 +0200 (CEST) From: [redacted] X-Sender: [redacted] To: [redacted] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207091925420.433-100000(a)trinity.knopfdruck.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: [redacted] Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:26:04 +0200 (MEST) Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 38 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:36:13 +0200 Subject: Gewinn [redacted] So it looks like the Cyrus imapd is incorrectly parsing the mail and returning the body content as a header. Comparing the content of UID 39 on the remote server will then hash differently than the UID 39 on the local dovecot server, which behaves better and only returns a single date header. Following the robustness principle it feels to me that it would make sense for dsync to disregard a duplicate header from a remote server and only use the first occurence. Would that be a good approach to the problem? Now that I understand the problem I am having, I can just workaround it but it seems to me that dsync should handle this case better. Anyway, thanks a lot for the imapc_rawlog_dir hint, that helped a lot. cheers, Andreas

1 0