- dovecot - dovecot.org

New Backup Issue
by Doug Hardie 11 Jun '26

11 Jun '26

I have dovecot using maildir storage on the mail machine. I have an external drive directly connected to use a backup for the mailboxes. Doveadm backup works perfectly for this setup. I also have two external backup servers. Backup to those tends to fail with a variety of errors. I deleted the Maildir directory on the backup servers and created the original backups with doveadm backup. No issues were reported. However, the next backup generates errors: dsync-remote(jeanne)<HV6JE+i/KWo0NwAAq6l46g>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'INBOX': UID=11166 GUID=1712570780.M604032P10319.mail,S=99689,W=101000 is missing locally dsync-remote(jeanne)<HV6JE+i/KWo0NwAAq6l46g>: Error: Couldn't delete mailbox INBOX: INBOX can't be deleted. dsync-local(jeanne)<HqU9Aei/KWoBMAAAZU03Dg>: Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh sermons doveadm dsync-server -ujeanne -U dsync-remote(beneke)<eARRAem/KWpdNwAAq6l46g>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'INBOX': UID=232 GUID=1641564460.M859673P8687.mail,S=5917,W=6035 is missing locally dsync-remote(beneke)<eARRAem/KWpdNwAAq6l46g>: Error: Couldn't delete mailbox INBOX: INBOX can't be deleted. dsync-local(beneke)<mw5bM+i/KWoJMAAAZU03Dg>: Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh sermons doveadm dsync-server -ubeneke -U dsync-remote(doug)<6gmSJ+m/KWp7NwAAq6l46g>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'INBOX': UID=92440 GUID=1465118975.V4eI7cfa32M232845.mail is missing locally dsync-remote(doug)<6gmSJ+m/KWp7NwAAq6l46g>: Error: Couldn't delete mailbox INBOX: INBOX can't be deleted. dsync-local(doug)<hwsCH+m/KWoNMAAAZU03Dg>: Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh sermons doveadm dsync-server -udoug -U There is always one error per user, but they are different between the two backup machine. With the first error, I found the message 1712570780.M604032P10319.mail,S=99689,W=101000 in the mail server cur directory and deleted it. That messge did not exist in the backup server. I ran backup again and no issues. However, the next backup produced the following error: dsync-remote(jeanne)<dNWXGZbUKWoaOgAAq6l46g>: Warning: Deleting mailbox 'INBOX': UID=11167 GUID=1712574432.M425061P11306.mail,S=45149,W=45775 is missing locally dsync-remote(jeanne)<dNWXGZbUKWoaOgAAq6l46g>: Error: Couldn't delete mailbox INBOX: INBOX can't be deleted. dsync-local(jeanne)<Jg3tCZbUKWp5NQAAZU03Dg>: Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh sermons doveadm dsync-server -ujeanne -U That message is in the cur directory on the mail server. It is not in the backup server. I don't understand the message that those files are missing locally (primary mail server I presume) when they are actually there and missing on the remote server. I don't know why they didn't get copied originally. The first email was recieved on Mon, 8 Apr 2024 so it can't be a timming issue. -- Doug

2 1

Replication performance question and environment variables sanitization
by Jesus Cea 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

Hi, there. I am using dovecot 2.3.21.1. I am experimenting with replication, currently doing it manually, using this: doveadm -Dv sync -u jcea ssh email doveadm dsync-server -u prueba_backup; echo $? It works fine so far, but I have a few hundreds of mailboxes in my imap4 account and an "empty" (no changes) sync takes 30 seconds, since apparently it compare every mailbox (according to the debug info printed). I am using "mdbox" storage in both sides. I would expect an event replication, where time is proportional to the volume of changes, not to the total data volume or number of mailboxes. Am I doing anything wrong?. It would be faster to use "replicator" + "mail_replica". Can I improve this in some way? Replication must be both ways, because in one server new emails are arriving and in the other imapserver I am doing my mail work. I want new email appearing in my work imapserver (living my own laptop) and my email processing to be replicated back to the server for backup/disaster recovery (lost laptop, broken HD) and access from a different laptop, phone, etc. Thanks. PS: By default dovecot sanitizes the environment and doesn't allow "SSH_AUTH_SOCK" for ssh-agent. Why?. That is very inconvenient. I am using this environment variable to overcome that: DOVECOT_PRESERVE_ENVS="HOME USER SSH_AUTH_SOCK SSH_AGENT_PID LOG_STDERR_TIMESTAMP TZ CORE_OUTOFMEM CORE_ERROR" Is this the right way to do this? -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea(a)jcea.es - https://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz

2 3

Announcement: wormhole plugin, replication for Dovecot 2.4
by Patrick Cernko 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

Hello List, I am proud to announce my project "wormhole". This is an extension for Dovecot 2.4.1. It allows to continue the use of the replication feature of Dovecot that was removed with the 2.4 release. History: I started this project by forking the replication code of Dovecot 2.3.21.1 and porting it to 2.4. The first result was a patch for Dovecot 2.4.1. While working with the code, I realized that it is possible to provide the feature as a plugin / extension. In the first release of the plugin, I tried to integrate it with the existing dsync commands for doveadm. This required an API for access to the dsync commands, which I proposed to the Dovecot developers in https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/249 . Unfortunately, my pull request was rejected, though I can understand the reasons for that. Without the required API, I had to switch to another approach: I forked the dsync code from doveadm to provide a new set of commands: "repl" and "repl-server". These commands work similar to "sync" and "dsync-server" but use additional functions required by the replication feature. This approach was released as version 0.3 of the plugin. With version 0.4 I renamed the project to wormhole. Before that it was just called dovecot-replication (see https://codeberg.org/errror/dovecot-replication) I thought that the project should have a more unique name. Currently I'm working on designing a test suite for wormhole. Doing unit tests of the components is not sufficient IMHO. The test suite should check the whole replication feature using two running dovecot instances that replicate the users' mailboxes. Having a sophisticated test suite will help in future development and bug tracking. The code can be found on my codeberg site at: https://codeberg.org/errror/wormhole There is also a web page on my personal homepage at: https://people.mpi-klsb.mpg.de/~pcernko/wormhole.shtml The project is still missing documentation. For the moment, configuration is similar to the existing Dovecot 2.3 documentation. Upgrading from 2.3: When using the included patch for Dovecot, the plugin should be 100% compatible with existing Dovecot 2.3 servers. This compatibility should allow uninterrupted upgrades of the service by replacing Dovecot on one server and then the other one. After the upgrade, the plugin can be reconfigured to work without the patch for Dovecot. Upgrading without the patch is also possible. During the upgrade (aka "while one server still runs 2.3") some aspects of the replication will not work or lack performance. Upgrading is not yet tested very well and missing documentation also. I will work on that soon. I hope to get some feedback, pull requests or bug reports via mail or at codeberg (preferred). -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Scientific IT and Technical Service Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik & Softwaresysteme

4 3

crash in sieve-filter with 2.4.4
by Noah Meyerhans 08 Jun '26

08 Jun '26

Forwarded from https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1139275 A certain poison pill message seems to crash sieve-filter. A reproducer script, email message, and sieve script are at https://salsa.debian.org/noahm/dovecot/-/tree/sieve-crash/debian/tests/siev… The problem is not reproducible with 2.4.1, so it seems to be a regression introduced since then. Coredump details follow: root@dovecot-test:/home/noahm/dovecot# coredumpctl info | cat PID: 110911 (sieve-filter) TID: 110911 (sieve-filter) UID: 65534 (nobody) GID: 65534 (nogroup) Signal: 6 (ABRT) Timestamp: Mon 2026-06-08 19:16:37 UTC (29s ago) Command Line: sieve-filter -u dep8 -e -W -D -C -v /srv/dovecot-dep8/test.sieve INBOX Executable: /usr/bin/sieve-filter Control Group: /user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-5.scope Unit: session-5.scope Slice: user-1000.slice Session: 5 Owner UID: 1000 (noahm) Boot ID: 46469969e01043559d913ef8ab625856 Machine ID: a497a098bd094c1c8f7c8ed02aa21853 Hostname: dovecot-test Storage: /var/lib/systemd/coredump/core.sieve-filter.65534.46469969e01043559d913ef8ab625856.110911.1780946197000000.zst (present) Size on Disk: 253.5K Message: Process 110911 (sieve-filter) of user 65534 dumped core. Module libgcc_s.so.1 from deb gcc-16-16.1.0-1.amd64 Module libstdc++.so.6 from deb gcc-16-16.1.0-1.amd64 Stack trace of thread 110911: #0 0x00007fe06b09fcfc n/a (libc.so.6 + 0x97cfc) #1 0x00007fe06b048d02 raise (libc.so.6 + 0x40d02) #2 0x00007fe06b0304b2 abort (libc.so.6 + 0x284b2) #3 0x00007fe06b26ed45 n/a (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x6ed45) #4 0x00007fe06b357597 default_fatal_handler (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x157597) #5 0x00007fe06b26ec72 i_panic (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x6ec72) #6 0x00007fe06b273b90 n/a (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x73b90) #7 0x00007fe06b3498fb n/a (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x1498fb) #8 0x00007fe06b34a784 n/a (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x14a784) #9 0x00007fe06b34a93b buffer_append (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x14a93b) #10 0x00007fe06b344cc6 dregex_code_match_groups (libdovecot.so.0 + 0x144cc6) #11 0x00007fe06b806a27 n/a (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x6da27) #12 0x00007fe06b806cd0 n/a (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x6dcd0) #13 0x00007fe06b7ee411 sieve_match_value (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x55411) #14 0x00007fe06b7ee711 sieve_match (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x55711) #15 0x00007fe06b7f5862 n/a (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x5c862) #16 0x00007fe06b7eccde sieve_interpreter_continue (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x53cde) #17 0x00007fe06b7fbfbe sieve_execute (libdovecot-sieve.so.0 + 0x62fbe) #18 0x00005638c0022fcf main (sieve-filter + 0x3fcf) #19 0x00007fe06b031f77 n/a (libc.so.6 + 0x29f77) #20 0x00007fe06b032027 __libc_start_main (libc.so.6 + 0x2a027) #21 0x00005638c0023791 _start (sieve-filter + 0x4791) ELF object binary architecture: AMD x86-64

1 0

dovecot 2.4 and Outlook
by Jochen Bern 08 Jun '26

08 Jun '26

Since I don't remember seeing *this* mentioned here so far, but *do* remember people asking about Outlook-dovecot compatibility issues every now and then, here's a potential cause for seeing more of those in the immediate future: https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-43-upgrade-revealed-20-years-old-outlook-… Kind regards, -- Jochen Bern Systemingenieur Binect GmbH

2 3

Using 2 LDAP sources for passdb
by Tom 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

I can't seem to find documentation that shows how to set up 2 LDAP passdb blocks. I can get each of them working properly, but only the second of the two works at any given time. I can't figure out the syntax needed to get both to work, even though I've been all over the Dovecot 2.4x official documentation. The docs seem to suggest settings that the server rejects. Anyone have any experience doing this, or know the correct syntax? Thanks in advance! passdb ldap { # works when standalone; fails when combined with 2nd block below #passdb_name = ldap1 #driver = ldap ldap_version = 3 bind = yes bind_userdn = %{user|username} ldap_auth_dn = cn=dovecot,ou=apps,dc=example,dc=com ldap_auth_dn_password = D0vec0t ldap_base = ou=apps,dc=foscore,dc=com ldap_uris = ldapi://%2Frun%2Fldapi filter = (&(objectClass=applicationProcess)(cn=%{user})) passdb_ldap_bind = yes passdb_ldap_bind_userdn = cn=%{user},ou=apps,dc=example,dc=com result_success = return-ok } passdb ldap { #driver = ldap #name = ldap_users ldap_version = 3 bind = yes bind_userdn = %{user|username} ldap_auth_dn = cn=dovecot,ou=apps,dc=example,dc=com ldap_auth_dn_password = D0vec0t ldap_base = ou=people,dc=example,dc=com ldap_uris = ldapi://%2Frun%2Fldapi filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%{user|username})(memberOf=cn=mail,ou=%{user|domain},ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com)) passdb_ldap_bind = yes passdb_ldap_bind_userdn = uid=%{user|username},ou=people,dc=example,dc=com result_success = return-ok }

2 7

Building on FreeBSD 14.4
by Frank Volf 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

Hi, I'm trying to build dovecot-2.4.4 on FreeBSD 14.4 and I get a strange error message. What I did is download and extract dovecot-2.4.4.tar.gz and then run ./configure without any arguments. After typing make the build started without any problems until this point: .... Making all in auth CC test_auth_cache-auth-cache.o CC test_auth_cache-test-auth-cache.o CC auth-main.o CC auth-auth.o CC auth-auth-cache.o CC auth-auth-client-connection.o CC auth-auth-master-connection.o CC auth-auth-policy.o CC auth-auth-penalty.o CC auth-auth-request.o CC auth-auth-request-fields.o CC auth-auth-request-handler.o CC auth-auth-request-var-expand.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-apop.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-dovecot-token.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-oauth2.o CC auth-auth-sasl.o CC auth-auth-settings.o CC auth-auth-fields.o CC auth-auth-token.o CC auth-auth-worker-connection.o CC auth-auth-worker-server.o CC auth-db-oauth2.o CC auth-db-sql.o CC auth-db-passwd-file.o CC auth-passdb.o CC auth-passdb-blocking.o CC auth-passdb-bsdauth.o CC auth-passdb-cache.o CC auth-passdb-oauth2.o CC auth-passdb-passwd.o CC auth-passdb-passwd-file.o CC auth-passdb-pam.o CC auth-passdb-sql.o CC auth-passdb-static.o CC auth-userdb.o CC auth-userdb-blocking.o CC auth-userdb-passwd.o CC auth-userdb-passwd-file.o CC auth-userdb-prefetch.o CC auth-userdb-static.o CC auth-userdb-sql.o CC auth-db-ldap.o CC auth-db-ldap-sasl.o CC auth-db-ldap-settings.o CC auth-passdb-ldap.o CC auth-userdb-ldap.o CC auth-db-lua.o CC auth-passdb-lua.o CC auth-userdb-lua.o make[3]: don't know how to make -L/usr/local/lib. Stop make[3]: stopped making "all" in /home/volf/dovecot-2.4.4/src/auth *** Error code 1 So, apparently make is confused and thinks that the compiler/linker commandline option is an item to build. I'm at loss how to solve this. I would appreciate it, if somebody could give me a hint how to solve this. Kind regards, Frank Hi, I'm trying to build dovecot-2.4.4 on FreeBSD 14.4 and I get a strange error message. What I did is download and extract dovecot-2.4.4.tar.gz and then run ./configure without any arguments. After typing make the build started without any problems until this point: .... Making all in auth CC test_auth_cache-auth-cache.o CC test_auth_cache-test-auth-cache.o CC auth-main.o CC auth-auth.o CC auth-auth-cache.o CC auth-auth-client-connection.o CC auth-auth-master-connection.o CC auth-auth-policy.o CC auth-auth-penalty.o CC auth-auth-request.o CC auth-auth-request-fields.o CC auth-auth-request-handler.o CC auth-auth-request-var-expand.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-apop.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-dovecot-token.o CC auth-auth-sasl-mech-oauth2.o CC auth-auth-sasl.o CC auth-auth-settings.o CC auth-auth-fields.o CC auth-auth-token.o CC auth-auth-worker-connection.o CC auth-auth-worker-server.o CC auth-db-oauth2.o CC auth-db-sql.o CC auth-db-passwd-file.o CC auth-passdb.o CC auth-passdb-blocking.o CC auth-passdb-bsdauth.o CC auth-passdb-cache.o CC auth-passdb-oauth2.o CC auth-passdb-passwd.o CC auth-passdb-passwd-file.o CC auth-passdb-pam.o CC auth-passdb-sql.o CC auth-passdb-static.o CC auth-userdb.o CC auth-userdb-blocking.o CC auth-userdb-passwd.o CC auth-userdb-passwd-file.o CC auth-userdb-prefetch.o CC auth-userdb-static.o CC auth-userdb-sql.o CC auth-db-ldap.o CC auth-db-ldap-sasl.o CC auth-db-ldap-settings.o CC auth-passdb-ldap.o CC auth-userdb-ldap.o CC auth-db-lua.o CC auth-passdb-lua.o CC auth-userdb-lua.o make[3]: don't know how to make -L/usr/local/lib. Stop make[3]: stopped making "all" in /home/volf/dovecot-2.4.4/src/auth *** Error code 1 So, apparently make is confused and thinks that the compiler/linker commandline option is an item to build. I'm at loss how to solve this. I would appreciate it, if somebody could give me a hint how to solve this. Kind regards, Frank

6 14

dsync does not like sieve
by Stéphane Veyret 31 May '26

31 May '26

Hi, I’m using Dovecot for many years. My installation is configured to manage spam using sieve. In the same time, I have a backup server, connecting to the main server every night in order to backup emails (note that the main server is not pushing its data, but the backup server is pulling them). Dovecot v2.4 made me re-write the configuration files, so maybe I missed something, but since then, I cannot make both these service work in the same time. With my current configuration, the backup server is terminating in error with the following logs: dsync-remote(example(a)example.com)<HbkSGoKQG2o8+gEAGKlOPA>: Error: brain S: Exporting mailbox INBOX failed: Mailbox attribute iteration failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2026-05-31 03:36:03] (and there are no more logs anywhere). Because this message <https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/MGCGR…> was suggesting there could be a problem with sieve, I tried to modify the configuration. And indeed, when changing sieve configuration, the backup is working again. But then, my spam filter isn’t anymore. Here are the relevant parts of the configuration for managing sieve. Can someone help me saying what could be wrong? protocols { sieve = yes imap = yes lmtp = yes } sieve_extensions { fileinto = yes reject = yes envelope = yes encoded-character = yes vacation = yes subaddress = yes comparator-i;ascii-numeric = yes relational = yes regex = yes imap4flags = yes copy = yes include = yes body = yes variables = yes enotify = yes environment = yes mailbox = yes date = yes index = yes ihave = yes duplicate = yes mime = yes foreverypart = yes extracttext = yes vnd.dovecot.pipe = yes vnd.dovecot.environment = yes } sieve_pipe_bin_dir = /etc/dovecot/sieve sieve_pipe_socket_dir = sieve-pipe sieve_plugins { sieve_imapsieve = yes sieve_extprograms = yes } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } sieve_script personal { } sieve_script default { path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/spam.sieve } protocol imap { mail_plugins { acl = yes quota = yes imap_acl = yes imap_quota = yes imap_sieve = yes } } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins { acl = yes quota = yes sieve = yes } } namespace user { inbox = yes prefix = separator = / type = private mailbox * { sieve_script reportspam { cause = flag path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve type = before } } } Thank you. Stéphane -- Bien cordialement, / Plej kore, Stéphane Veyret Hi, I'm using Dovecot for many years. My installation is configured to manage spam using sieve. In the same time, I have a backup server, connecting to the main server every night in order to backup emails (note that the main server is not pushing its data, but the backup server is pulling them). Dovecot v2.4 made me re-write the configuration files, so maybe I missed something, but since then, I cannot make both these service work in the same time. With my current configuration, the backup server is terminating in error with the following logs: dsync-remote([1]example(a)example.com)<HbkSGoKQG2o8+gEAGKlOPA>: Error: brain S: Exporting mailbox INBOX failed: Mailbox attribute iteration failed: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2026-05-31 03:36:03] (and there are no more logs anywhere). Because [2]this message was suggesting there could be a problem with sieve, I tried to modify the configuration. And indeed, when changing sieve configuration, the backup is working again. But then, my spam filter isn't anymore. Here are the relevant parts of the configuration for managing sieve. Can someone help me saying what could be wrong? protocols { sieve = yes imap = yes lmtp = yes } sieve_extensions { fileinto = yes reject = yes envelope = yes encoded-character = yes vacation = yes subaddress = yes comparator-i;ascii-numeric = yes relational = yes regex = yes imap4flags = yes copy = yes include = yes body = yes variables = yes enotify = yes environment = yes mailbox = yes date = yes index = yes ihave = yes duplicate = yes mime = yes foreverypart = yes extracttext = yes vnd.dovecot.pipe = yes vnd.dovecot.environment = yes } sieve_pipe_bin_dir = /etc/dovecot/sieve sieve_pipe_socket_dir = sieve-pipe sieve_plugins { sieve_imapsieve = yes sieve_extprograms = yes } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } } sieve_script personal { } sieve_script default { path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/spam.sieve } protocol imap { mail_plugins { acl = yes quota = yes imap_acl = yes imap_quota = yes imap_sieve = yes } } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins { acl = yes quota = yes sieve = yes } } namespace user { inbox = yes prefix = separator = / type = private mailbox * { sieve_script reportspam { cause = flag path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve type = before } } } Thank you. Stephane -- Bien cordialement, / Plej kore, Stephane Veyret References Visible links 1. mailto:example@example.com 2. https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/MGCGR…

2 1

Re: User authentication for shared mailbox
by Stéphane Veyret 31 May '26

31 May '26

I managed to make it work. In case some other people want to do the same, the trick was to use the master user concept, as suggested by Aki Tuomi, with a lua script to check if user can be master. My configuration looks like this: passdb pam_master { driver = pam master = yes result_success = continue } passdb pam { } passdb lua { lua_file = /etc/dovecot/master-auth.lua result_failure = return-fail result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } passdb ldap { ldap_base = ou=Group,dc=example,dc=com fields { password = {SHA1}IQ== user = %{ldap:cn} } filter = (cn=%{user | username}) } and the lua script: function script_init() return 0 end function auth_passdb_lookup(req) if req.master_user then req:log_info("Looking for groups for " .. tostring(req.master_user)) handle = io.popen("/bin/groups " .. tostring(req.master_user)) output = handle:read("*a") req:log_debug("Searching " .. tostring(req.user) .. " in found groups " .. output) for group in output:gmatch("%w+") do if group == req.user then return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_OK, { password="!" } end end end return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_USER_UNKNOWN, "No such user" end -- Bien cordialement, / Plej kore, Stéphane Veyret I managed to make it work. In case some other people want to do the same, the trick was to use the master user concept, as suggested by Aki Tuomi, with a lua script to check if user can be master. My configuration looks like this: passdb pam_master { driver = pam master = yes result_success = continue } passdb pam { } passdb lua { lua_file = /etc/dovecot/master-auth.lua result_failure = return-fail result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } passdb ldap { ldap_base = ou=Group,dc=example,dc=com fields { password = {SHA1}IQ== user = %{ldap:cn} } filter = (cn=%{user | username}) } and the lua script: function script_init() return 0 end function auth_passdb_lookup(req) if req.master_user then req:log_info("Looking for groups for " .. tostring(req.master_user)) handle = io.popen("/bin/groups " .. tostring(req.master_user)) output = handle:read("*a") req:log_debug("Searching " .. tostring(req.user) .. " in found groups " .. output) for group in output:gmatch("%w+") do if group == req.user then return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_OK, { password="!" } end end end return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_USER_UNKNOWN, "No such user" end -- Bien cordialement, / Plej kore, Stephane Veyret

1 0

dsync between 2.3.16 and 2.4.2
by Jean-Daniel Beaubien 28 May '26

28 May '26

Hi, I currently have a doveadm backup running my prod and backup server. Both are currently running 2.3.16, and the following command runs fine: sudo doveadm -v backup -u XXXX -P remote:XXXX@192.168.111.XX I am in the process of updating my servers to ubuntu 26.04 which runs dovecot 2.4.2 and I am running into problems trying to run this command. For some reason, it tries to delete the INBOX on the destination and I get the following error: dsync-remote(XXXX)<7hkbKDl6F2rlxQAArPp36Q>: Error: brain S: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: The /private/specialuse attribute cannot be changed doveadm(228686): Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh -lXXXX 192.168.111.XX doveadm dsync-server -uXXXX I am not sure what/why this is happening. I read the docs and man page, but could not find a solution. Anyone knows what is happening, and how to solve this? Thanks, -JD ----- Addendum ----- Another thing that might help someone else: I had to add a line to the config file to avoid the -U problem: dsync_remote_cmd = "ssh -l%{login} %{host} doveadm dsync-server -u%{user}" This seems to already be solved ( https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/B3TQF…) but not yet in the ubuntu 26.04 release? Hi, I currently have a doveadm backup running my prod and backup server. Both are currently running 2.3.16, and the following command runs fine: sudo doveadm -v backup -u XXXX -P remote:XXXX@192.168.111.XX I am in the process of updating my servers to ubuntu 26.04 which runs dovecot 2.4.2 and I am running into problems trying to run this command. For some reason, it tries to delete the INBOX on the destination and I get the following error: dsync-remote(XXXX)<7hkbKDl6F2rlxQAArPp36Q>: Error: brain S: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: The /private/specialuse attribute cannot be changed doveadm(228686): Error: Remote command returned error 65: ssh -lXXXX 192.168.111.XX doveadm dsync-server -uXXXX I am not sure what/why this is happening. I read the docs and man page, but could not find a solution. Anyone knows what is happening, and how to solve this? Thanks, -JD ----- Addendum ----- Another thing that might help someone else: I had to add a line to the config file to avoid the -U problem: dsync_remote_cmd = "ssh -l%{login} %{host} doveadm dsync-server -u%{user}" This seems to already be solved ([1]https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/B3T…) but not yet in the ubuntu 26.04 release? References Visible links 1. https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/B3TQF…

2 1