- dovecot - dovecot.org

dovecot 2.4 Restricting Access - journal/log differences for failed login?
by David C Rankin 21 May '26

21 May '26

All, I have restricted access for several users using the Restring Access documentation https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.0/howto/restrict_access.html This was to cut down on the brute-force attempts against dovecot for certain users whose usernames/e-mails are routinely used. I have a very simply passdb config: passdb passwd-file { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/deny.%{protocol} deny = yes } passdb pam { driver = pam } userdb pam { driver = passwd } I created the /etc/dovecot/deny.imap file with one username per-line. But what confuses me is the server logs the exact same failure for unsuccessful login after restricting access as it did before restricting access. E.g. 2026-05-20T07:22:43.039585-05:00 valkyrie auth[28618]: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=janice(a)mydomain.com rhost=70.186.179.37 2026-05-20T07:22:51.578711-05:00 valkyrie auth[28618]: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=janice(a)mydomain.com rhost=70.186.179.37 May 20 07:25:36 valkyrie dovecot[1015]: imap-login: Login aborted: Inactivity (auth failed, 2 attempts in 177 secs) (auth_failed): user=<janice(a)mydomain.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=70.186.179.37, lip=192.168.6.14, TLS, session=<ouXP2T5SJpZGurMl> Is this normal, or should dovecot respond to restricted users in some way that differs from a normal login failure? All could be working fine, I'm just not certain about the log entries. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

1 0

"imap" command not usable in dovecot 2.4
by Mark Hills 20 May '26

20 May '26

Since upgrading to 2.4 (from 2.3) the "imap" command no longer works: $ /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS BINARY MOVE REPLACE SNIPPET=FUZZY PREVIEW=FUZZY PREVIEW SPECIAL-USE STATUS=SIZE SAVEDATE COMPRESS=DEFLATE INPROGRESS NOTIFY LITERAL+] Logged in as mark imap(mark)<6109><5GlNEEHaDWrdFwAABxE9Dg>: Fatal: Namespace inbox: mail_storage settings: Failed to parse configuration: Invalid setting mail_path=~/Maildir: mail_path setting used home directory (~/) but there is no mail_home and userdb didn't return it Whereas I would expect an authenticated IMAP session. Removing the offending /etc/dovecot.conf line temporarily: dovecot_config_version = 2.4.1 dovecot_storage_version = 2.4.0 protocols = imap lmtp sieve mail_driver = maildir #mail_path = ~/Maildir passdb passwd-file { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/passwd } userdb passwd { } [...] And re-testing suggests the cause runs deeper: $ /usr/lib/exec/dovecot/imap [...] imap(mark)<6364><tetIC6/aDWrcGAAABxE9Dg>: Fatal: Namespace inbox: mail_storage settings: Failed to parse configuration: Failed to expand mail_path setting variables: Setting used home directory (%h) but there is no mail_home and userdb didn't return it Attempts to hard-wire it seem to suggest that usedb is not involved. I imagine this may be not consulted, because the process is pre-authenticated and running as a local UID: userdb passwd { fields_import_all = no fields { mail_home = /home/mark mail_path = /home/mark/Maildir } } $ /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap [...] imap(mark)<6656><qPqUB17cDWoAGgAABxE9Dg>: Fatal: Namespace inbox: mail_storage settings: Failed to parse configuration: Failed to expand mail_path setting variables: Setting used home directory (%h) but there is no mail_home and userdb didn't return it It seems like 2.3 looked up these fields from the user invoking it, but no longer is this the case? Running "imap" like this is very useful, especially when a client like Pine/Alpine can access over SSH. To get to here I had to workaround the missing "shadow" passdb module, which is also useful as Alpine Linux 3.23 neither uses PAM extensively nor provides dovecot built with PAM. -- Mark

1 0

undocumented changed behavior of 2.4.3 (possible bug report)
by Patrick Cernko 20 May '26

20 May '26

Hello Dovecot-Devs, hello list, while upgrading my Dovecot 2.4.2 setup to 2.4.3 I observed two instances of changed behavior. I could not find notes about those issues in the corresponding documentation (https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.3/installation/upgrade/2.4-to-2.4.x.html) or release notes: 1. I had to change userdb_ldap_iterate_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)%{if(protocol,"eq","pop3","(istIsMemberOf=POP3-users)","")}) to userdb_ldap_iterate_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)%{if(protocol,"eq","pop3","(istIsMemberOf=POP3-users)","")|safe) otherwise the characters '()=' in the "true"-case of the condition got somehow "quoted" with escaped ASCII codes, which led to a broken LDAP filter string. Maybe you could add some documentation (in "Upgrading" as well as "Settings Variables") about that? 2. The behavior of sieve matches using ":matches" has changed: Example email (only the relevant header): List-Id: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot.dovecot.org> Example Sieve script: if header :matches "List-Id" "*<dovecot*.dovecot.org>" { fileinto "dovecot"; } In 2.4.2 (and earlier) the example email matched the condition and got stored in the dovecot folder, while in 2.4.3 the condition does NOT match. As a workaround I added a '*' at the end of the match ("*<dovecot*.dovecot.org>*") to get my mails stored correctly again. Is this changed behavior for Sieve intentional or a bug? In case of a bug, could you please provide a fix? In case of intentional behavior: * Could you please explain the intention? Why was it necessary? * What would be the correct fix for the sieve example to match a List-Id header that ENDS WITH ".dovecot.org>"? * I assume, that other users on my servers will run into similar problems once I upgrade their servers. Is it possible to detect such problematic matches in Sieve scripts? E.g. "all matches without a trailing '*' are affected", ... This would give me a chance, to inform my users or even fix their scripts in advance. Best regards, -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Scientific IT and Technical Service Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik & Softwaresysteme

2 3

flatcurve index size (10x larger than lucene)
by Jean-Daniel Beaubien 18 May '26

18 May '26

Hi everyone, I am currently trying to update from an old dovecot 2.3 setup with fts-lucene to 2.4.2 with fts-flatcurve. However, I am seeing a giant jump in the size of the indexes. For an email account that takes 12GB of storage, I get the following index sizes: - lucene: 270 MB - flatcurve: 2400 MB That is almost a 10x increase in the index size (with flatcurve the indexes represent 20% of the size of the mailbox). Considering I have a mailbox that takes 270GB, I can't imagine the size of the indexes. *Am I doing something wrong with flatcurve? How can the indexes be so much larger than lucene?* I took the default flatcurve configuration from the Ubuntu 26.04 install: mail_plugins { fts = yes fts_flatcurve = yes } fts_autoindex = yes language_filters = normalizer-icu snowball stopwords language_tokenizers = generic email-address language_tokenizer_generic_algorithm = simple language en { default = yes filters = lowercase snowball english-possessive stopwords } fts flatcurve { # All of these are optional, and indicate the default values. # They are listed here for documentation purposes; most people should not # need to define/override in their config. # commit_limit = 500 # max_term_size = 30 # min_term_size = 2 # optimize_limit = 10 # rotate_count = 5000 # rotate_time = 5000 substring_search = yes } *Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated.* Best regards, -J Hi everyone, I am currently trying to update from an old dovecot 2.3 setup with fts-lucene to 2.4.2 with fts-flatcurve. However, I am seeing a giant jump in the size of the indexes. For an email account that takes 12GB of storage, I get the following index sizes: o lucene: 270 MB o flatcurve: 2400 MB That is almost a 10x increase in the index size (with flatcurve the indexes represent 20% of the size of the mailbox). Considering I have a mailbox that takes 270GB, I can't imagine the size of the indexes. Am I doing something wrong with flatcurve? How can the indexes be so much larger than lucene? I took the default flatcurve configuration from the Ubuntu 26.04 install: mail_plugins { fts = yes fts_flatcurve = yes } fts_autoindex = yes language_filters = normalizer-icu snowball stopwords language_tokenizers = generic email-address language_tokenizer_generic_algorithm = simple language en { default = yes filters = lowercase snowball english-possessive stopwords } fts flatcurve { # All of these are optional, and indicate the default values. # They are listed here for documentation purposes; most people should not # need to define/override in their config. # commit_limit = 500 # max_term_size = 30 # min_term_size = 2 # optimize_limit = 10 # rotate_count = 5000 # rotate_time = 5000 substring_search = yes } Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, -J

3 3

[Dovecot] batch convert mbox to maildir
by Netlink Tech 18 May '26

18 May '26

Hello, I have used mb2md for an individual user like this: su ~username cd ~ ./mb2md -m This converted /var/spool/mail/username mbox to /home/users/username/Maildir just as I expected. To convert 100s of users the same way would be a chore (su as each user for permissions, etc.). Is there a way to batch process all /var/spool/mail/$USER to /home/users/$USER/Maildir with the correct permissions/file owners for each user?

4 4

Lua authentication
by John Fawcett 18 May '26

18 May '26

Hi I'm finally getting round to taking up Aki's suggestion here to look into lua. The original requirement was to check the ip reputation giving an OK or KO before proceeding to the login. I'd be interested in any feedback on the dovecot.conf settings and lua script. Also I've encountered a strange caching issue. https://dovecot.org/mailman3/archives/list/dovecot@dovecot.org/thread/E5FLX… To do this I've added a new passdb before the existing sql passdb. I am assuming that I will need to reverse the defaults (in 2.3.21.1) for result_success and result_failure. passdb { driver = lua args = file=/etc/dovecot/passdb.lua blocking=yes result_success = continue result_failure = return-fail } This is my lua test script. function auth_passdb_lookup(req) dovecot.i_info("login request from " .. req.remote_ip .. " user=" .. req.user) if (req.user == "user_to_deny(a)example.com") then dovecot.i_info("deny login") return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_USER_UNKNOWN, "" end return dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_NEXT, "" end I am trying to get this working with this very simple logic before developing the real logic. But basically I am considering two responses from the lua script, one which is OK (returning dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_NEXT) in which case the next passdb should be consulted for the real password lookup. The other case is a KO (returning dovecot.auth.PASSDB_RESULT_USER_UNKNOWN) where this should be taken as an immediate failure without proceeding to password lookup in the next passd.I have passdb caching disabled. While testing the KO case which seems to be working, if I modify the script changing the user_to_deny(a)example.com so it no longer matches, the script still outputs "deny login". It's not a passdb caching issue since it is going through the "deny login" code despite the user not matching. Could it be that lua scripts are being cached by dovecot? John

1 0

Re: [EXT] Re: postfix/dovecot migration
by bcs＠nanomail.net 16 May '26

16 May '26

Was able to execute the process as root with "doveadm -D backup -Ru tst tcp:10.0.1.212:12354" after updating some destination side configuration options that do not appear to be documented in the link provided, but there are a few errors that I am unable to understand or correct. 1. Debug: open(/proc/self/io) failed: Permission denied - This file is read only for root and permissions cannot be modified. 2. Error: Mailbox INBOX sync: mailbox_delete failed: INBOX can't be deleted. - Not sure why a mailbox would need to be deleted other than the backup is using a delete and recreate to retain only current emails, assuming this is on the destination server. 3. All emails for tst account are deleted from the source server - This is a significant issue when only copies should be made for a backup. Full log is attached. Any additional insights would be greatly appreciated, Bryan May 15, 2026 10:01 AM, "Aki Tuomi" <aki.tuomi(a)open-xchange.com> wrote: > Yeah, you can do migration with dsync or imap between 2.3 and 2.4 > > Aki > >> On 15/05/2026 16:10 EEST Bryan Simmons <bcs(a)nanomail.net> wrote: >> >> Aki, >> >> Thank you for the guidance. Just to confirm, doveadm/imap based >> migration is the section under "Migrating Mailboxes from Another Dovecot >> Server" in the link referenced below since this migration will be >> between servers? >> >> Seems an upgrade from dovecot 2.3.21 (current version on source server) >> to 2.4.2 (installed version on the destination server) would be >> appropriate before migrating any user accounts based on information from >> some of the other posts regarding migration. >> >> Thanks , Bryan >> >> On 5/13/26 13:41, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: >> On 13/05/2026 20:31 EEST Bryan Simmons via dovecot <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> wrote: >> >> Moving postfix and dovecot to a new server including all current users >> and emails. There exists several dovecot files in each user mail directory: >> >> dovecot.index >> dovecot.index.cache >> dovecot.index.log >> dovecot-keywords >> dovecot.list.index.log >> dovecot.mailbox.log >> dovecot-uidlist >> dovecot-uidvalidity >> dovecot-uidvalidity.612d3d34 >> >> Should these files be migrated also or will dovecot recreate them as needed? >> >> Thank you, Bryan >> >> https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.4/core/admin/migration.html#migrating-mailboxes >> >> I would recommend seeing this. Depending on your mailbox format, it can be important that those >> files are copied, but I would suggest doveadm/imap based migration. >> >> Aki >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dovecot mailing list -- dovecot(a)dovecot.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-leave(a)dovecot.org

2 2

Panic: file charset-iconv.c: line 83 (charset_to_utf8_try): assertion failed: (srcleft <= CHARSET_MAX_PENDING_BUF_SIZE)
by Alex Rosenberg 15 May '26

15 May '26

Attached is an LLM-reduced reproduction of the crash in the title. My particular setup is dovecot 2.3.21.1 (d492236fa0) in a FreeBSD jail (13.5). I realize that this is an older release but there is no FreeBSD port/pkg for dovecot 2.4.x yet. The message in the attachment is reduced from an old (2017!) email to one of the LLVM compiler mailing lists. The original malformed email had this header: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.5 (3.22.5-1.fc25) The bug occurs when dovecot's FTS indexer processes a MIME part that: 1. Declares charset="UTF-7" 2. Contains base64-encoded content that, when decoded, has bare '+' characters 3. Causes UTF-7 decoder buffer overflow in charset-iconv.c:83 The base64 content decodes to C source code with expressions like: - argc + 4 - state++ - state-- These '+' characters in UTF-7 context cause the decoder's pending buffer to exceed CHARSET_MAX_PENDING_BUF_SIZE, triggering the assertion failure. Alex

4 5

Can't find unicode/ustring.h in test
by mr.thesaw＠gmail.com 14 May '26

14 May '26

I get this error during compilation: make[3]: Entering directory '/home/hacksaw/src/dovecot-2.4.4/src/lib-language' CC test-lang-icu.o In file included from test-lang-icu.c:8: lang-icu.h:4:10: fatal error: unicode/ustring.h: No such file or directory 4 | #include <unicode/ustring.h> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. I have unicode 66, at least as far as Ubuntu is concerned.

2 8

Dovecot 2.4.4 - mail_crypt with per-user Global Keys from LDAP (not Folder Keys)
by luis.neapolis＠gmail.com 14 May '26

14 May '26

Hi everyone, I'm trying to configure Dovecot 2.4.4 with per-user encryption keys stored in LDAP, using Global Keys mode (NOT Folder Keys). My goal: Each user has their own public key and private key (encrypted with the user's login password) stored in LDAP attributes. 1) LMTP should use the public key to encrypt incoming emails. 2) IMAP should use the user's login password to decrypt the private key from LDAP, then decrypt the emails. I want to use Global Keys mode (where keys are provided via userdb), NOT Folder Keys (where Dovecot stores keys in dovecot-attributes files). What works: LMTP receives emails and encrypts them correctly using the user's public key from LDAP and the encrypted files are saved to disk. What doesn't work: IMAP can log in and see the email list (subject, from, date), but the email body never loads. Error: Decryption error: no private key available May 14 18:58:45 host dovecot[295725]: imap(test(a)example.com)<295760><SESSIONID>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 11: Opened mail because: prefetch May 14 18:58:45 host dovecot[295725]: imap(test(a)example.com)<295760><SESSIONID>: Debug: dict(file): Looking up 'priv/a82ea60599ba056ad47904003a5aeee9/vendor/vendor.dovecot/pvt/crypt/privkeys/aacbcb614fb59f81e9519186b12ac8862858d89fa3bcc1be5f25b886d3e95ee3' May 14 18:58:45 host dovecot[295725]: imap(test(a)example.com)<295760><SESSIONID>: Debug: dict(file): Lookup finished for 'priv/a82ea60599ba056ad47904003a5aeee9/vendor/vendor.dovecot/pvt/crypt/privkeys/aacbcb614fb59f81e9519186b12ac8862858d89fa3bcc1be5f25b886d3e95ee3': not found May 14 18:58:45 host dovecot[295725]: imap(test(a)example.com)<295760><SESSIONID>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: UID 11: read() failed: read(/mail/example.com/test/cur/1778773528.M279604P294174.host.example.com,… failed: Decryption error: no private key available (FETCH BODY[1]) The confusing part: IMAP has the user's password (the user authenticated successfully). The private key in LDAP is encrypted with that same password. So IMAP should be able to decrypt the private key, then decrypt the email. But Dovecot is not using the password it already has to unlock the private key. My configuration: dovecot_config_version = 2.4.4 mail_plugins { quota = yes } # Empty global key block (workaround for LMTP not to fail) crypt_global_private_key main { } passdb ldap { driver = ldap filter = (&(objectClass=Account) (mail=%{user})) fields { mail = %{ldap:mail} password = %{ldap:userPassword} userdb_home = %{ldap:homeDirectory} } } userdb ldap { driver = ldap filter = (&(objectClass=Account) (mail=%{user})) fields { home = %{ldap:homeDirectory} uid = %{ldap:uidNumber|default('500')} gid = %{ldap:gidNumber|default('500')} # Per-user keys from LDAP (Global Keys mode) crypt_global_public_key_file = inline:%{ldap:userPublicKey} crypt_global_private_key/main/crypt_private_key_file = inline:%{ldap:userPrivateKey} crypt_private_key_password = %{password} } } protocol imap { mail_plugins { imap_quota = yes mail_crypt = yes } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins { sieve = yes mail_crypt = yes } } Note: I do NOT have mail_attribute_dict configured. I do NOT want Dovecot to store keys in local files. I want everything to come from LDAP. What I've verified: 1) The private key is valid and decrypts correctly with the user's password using openssl pkey -passin pass:xxx. 2) doveadm user shows the keys are retrieved from LDAP. The error persists. The question: Since IMAP already has the user's password (from the successful login), how can I make Dovecot use that password to decrypt the private key from LDAP and then decrypt the emails? Is there a specific setting I'm missing? Does crypt_private_key_password = %{password} need to be placed somewhere else (e.g., inside the protocol imap block) to work correctly? Also, I see in the logs that Dovecot is still looking for dict(file) keys (Folder Keys mode). How can I completely disable Folder Keys behavior and force Dovecot to only use Global Keys from LDAP? Thank you! Dovecot version: 2.4.4-5 OS: AlmaLinux 9.7 Mail storage: Maildir

1 0