- dovecot - dovecot.org

dovecot-2.4.2 lua5-1 build failure
by Eray Aslan 31 Oct '25

31 Oct '25

Hi, Building dovecot-2.4.2 fails to build against lua5-1: $ ./configure --with-lua [...] checking for lua5.1 >= 5.1 lua5.1 != 5.2... yes configure: using library lua5.1 checking for lua_newstate... yes checking for luaL_setfuncs... no checking for luaL_setmetatable... no checking for lua_isinteger... no checking for lua_resume... yes checking for lua_seti... no checking for lua_tointegerx... no checking for lua_yieldk... no [...] $ make [...] CC dlua-iostream.lo dlua-iostream.c:16:28: error: field 'stream' has incomplete type 16 | struct luaL_Stream stream; | ^~~~~~ dlua-iostream.c: In function 'dlua_o_write': dlua-iostream.c:68:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'luaL_tolstring'; did you mean 'lua_tolstring'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 68 | vec.iov_base = luaL_tolstring(L, 2, &vec.iov_len); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | lua_tolstring dlua-iostream.c:68:22: error: assignment to 'const void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 68 | vec.iov_base = luaL_tolstring(L, 2, &vec.iov_len); | ^ dlua-iostream.c:73:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'luaL_fileresult'; did you mean 'luaL_pushresult'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 73 | return luaL_fileresult(L, 0, o_stream_get_name(stream->os)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | luaL_pushresult make[3]: *** [Makefile:786: dlua-iostream.lo] Error 1 Same configure and make commands succeed when run against lua5-4. Not sure if this was intentional as we still check for >= lua5-1 != lua5-2 in m4/want_lua.m4 Thanks -- Eray

2 1

dovecot_config_version 2.4.2 -> error
by Genes Lists 30 Oct '25

30 Oct '25

Hi I would expect this to track the current version (i.e. 2.4.2) - would be good to accept 2.4.2 and later versions as they are released: doveconf line 9: Invalid dovecot_config_version: Currently supported versions are: 2.4.0 2.4.1 0.0.0 -- Gene

3 13

USER_PASSWORD environment variable
by Hendrik Friedel 30 Oct '25

30 Oct '25

Hello, can you tell me, where to find documentation on the USER_PASSWORD environment variable? I do not find how to specify more than one user. Thanks and best regards, Hendrik

2 1

lmtp server disconnects upon "RCPT TO" with internal error message
by rmfuhrer＠optonline.net 30 Oct '25

30 Oct '25

I've got a dovecot 2.4.1 instance (from the DockerHub official image) in a test Docker container on MacOS, running both IMAPS and LMTP. The IMAPS service is behaving normally, including the SSL negotiation, so I'm sure my cert (from LetsEncrypt) are kosher. I want to use fetchmail to deliver emails via LTMP, and fetchmail seems to connect to LMTP but doesn't succeed in delivering any emails. I tried the following experiment to manually craft an mail-delivery interaction with LMTP, but the connection suddenly closed right after the server sees the "RCPT TO", with an odd internal SSL error: $ openssl s_client -showcerts -connect 127.0.0.1:31024 ... <SSL negotiation diagnostics> ... Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported ... 220 104b6de64916 Dovecot ready. LHLO test.mydomain.net 250-104b6de64916 250-8BITMIME 250-CHUNKING 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250 SMTPUTF8 MAIL FROM:<someuser(a)somedomain.net> 250 2.1.0 OK RCPT TO:<myuser(a)mydomain.net> RENEGOTIATING 8204750656:error:1404C042:SSL routines:ST_OK:called a function you should not call:/AppleInternal/Library/BuildRoots/4ff29661-3588-11ef-9513-e2437461156c/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/libressl/libressl-3.3/ssl/ssl_lib.c:2435: $ Note that during SSL negotiation, the client notes that "Secure Renegotiation IS NOT supported". Not sure whether that's relevant, but I do see "RENEGOTIATING" just before the fatal (?) error. FWIW, the recipient "myuser(a)mydomain.net" really exists on the Dovecot server; I have a mail client that connects to the IMAP service and successfully authenticates as that user. The relevant LMTP portion of the Dovecot logs looks like this: Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Info: Connect from 192.168.65.1 Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x10, ret=1: before SSL initialization Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: before SSL initialization Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=-1: before SSL initialization Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: before SSL initialization Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS read client hello Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write server hello Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write change cipher spec Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: TLSv1.3 write encrypted extensions Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write certificate Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: TLSv1.3 write server certificate verify Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write finished Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=-1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=-1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=-1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=-1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: TLSv1.3 early data Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS read finished Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x20, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write session ticket Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write session ticket Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2001, ret=1: SSLv3/TLS write session ticket Oct 29 14:02:38 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL: where=0x2002, ret=1: SSL negotiation finished successfully Oct 29 14:03:14 lmtp(7270): Debug: lmtp-server: conn 192.168.65.1:36620 [1]: SSL alert: close notify Oct 29 14:03:14 lmtp(7270): Info: Disconnect from 192.168.65.1: Connection closed (state=MAIL FROM) I've searched around and not found anything useful (in fact, hardly anything at all) about the above-cited error. Clues, anyone?

2 2

2.4.2: "make check" fails without json & lpeg Lua modules
by Thomas Zajic 29 Oct '25

29 Oct '25

Hi, Basically $SUBJECT. If you run "make check" after a successful build, it will fail unless you have the Lua modules "json" and "lpeg" installed. Not a huge problem, I got them from https://github.com/harningt/luajson and https://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/lpeg/, but as this sees to be a new thing with 2.4.2 I thought I'd give you a heads-up. HAND Thomas

1 0

Native ext4 fs quotas
by aris fesarlis 29 Oct '25

29 Oct '25

It seems that quota mechanism in newer linux (eg alma10) has changed. Now there are no quota files (aquota.user), but instead quotas must be enabled (ext4) using tune2fs. It seems that dovecot (in my case) cannot recognise this and still looks for quota files: error: Failed to get quota resource STORAGE: quota-fs: quotactl(Q_GETQUOTA, /dev/sda1) failed: No such file or directory Any way to overcome this? Have no time to change backends at the moment.

1 0

2.4.2 build failure in src/lib-regex
by Thomas Zajic 29 Oct '25

29 Oct '25

Hi, Building 2.4.2 fails due to a strange Makefile dependency regarding libpcre-32: > [zlatko@airframe:~/usrlocal/src/dovecot-2.4.2/src/lib-regex]$ make > make: *** No rule to make target '-L/usr/local/lib64', needed by 'test-regex'. Stop. > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > CCLD libdregex.la This is because for some reason, $(test_regex_DEPENDENCIES) is part of the targets that need to be made before making test-regex$(EXEEXT): > test-regex$(EXEEXT): $(test_regex_OBJECTS) $(test_regex_DEPENDENCIES) $(EXTRA_test_regex_DEPENDENCIES). > @rm -f test-regex$(EXEEXT) > $(AM_V_CCLD)$(LINK) $(test_regex_OBJECTS) $(test_regex_LDADD) $(LIBS) And $(test_regex_DEPENDENCIES) contains, among other things, $(LIBPCRE_LIBS), which in turn is the output of `pkg-config --libs "libpcre2-32"`: > [zlatko@airframe:~/usrlocal/src/dovecot-2.4.2/src/lib-regex]$ pkg-config --libs "libpcre2-32" > -L/usr/local/lib64 -lpcre2-32 So, `make` thinks it needs to create two files "-L/usr/local/lib64" and "-lpcre2-32" before it can make `test-regex`, but of course it doesn't know *how* to make them, and stops. The fix is trivial, of course, just remove the incorrect requirements/targets part "$(test_regex_DEPENDENCIES) $(EXTRA_test_regex_DEPENDENCIES)" from the recipe for test-regex$(EXEEXT) so that it reads ... > test-regex$(EXEEXT): $(test_regex_OBJECTS) > @rm -f test-regex$(EXEEXT) > $(AM_V_CCLD)$(LINK) $(test_regex_OBJECTS) $(test_regex_LDADD) $(LIBS) ..., but of course the Makefile should already be generated properly in the first place. HAND Thomas

1 0

CVE-2025-30189 notification
by Aki Tuomi 29 Oct '25

29 Oct '25

Affected product: Dovecot IMAP Server Internal reference: DOV-7830 Vulnerability type: CWE-1250 (Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State) Vulnerable version: 2.4.0, 2.4.1 Vulnerable component: auth Report confidence: Confirmed Solution status: Fixed in 2.4.2 Researcher credits: Erik <erik(a)broadlux.com> Vendor notification: 2025-07-25 CVE reference: CVE-2025-30189 CVSS: 7.4 (CVSS3.1:AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) Vulnerability Details: Using auth caching with oauth2 passdb, passwd passdb or userdb, or passwd userdb, causes the first lookup to be cached for all the lookups. This is because the cache key is "%u" which no longer actually expands to same as "%{user}". Workaround: Disabling auth cache will prevent the issue. Fix Install non-vulnerable version of Dovecot. Patch can be found at https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/a70ce7d3e2f983979e971414c5892c4e301…

1 0

duplicates
by Kevin Kretz 27 Oct '25

27 Oct '25

Hi, We use Dovecot and Postfix for internal emails and keep aliases in an LDAP table. We have multiple sites, with some user mailboxes local to each. If user A and B are both in alias OurGroup, and a message is sent to [ mailto:ourgroup@domain.com | ourgroup(a)domain.com ] [ mailto:a@domain.com | a(a)domain.com ] and [ mailto:b@domain.com, | b(a)domain.com, ] a and b will receive two copies of the message. Should this be addressed with Postfix or Dovecot? thanks Hi, We use Dovecot and Postfix for internal emails and keep aliases in an LDAP table. We have multiple sites, with some user mailboxes local to each. If user A and B are both in alias OurGroup, and a message is sent to [1]ourgroup(a)domain.com [2]a(a)domain.com and [3]b(a)domain.com, a and b will receive two copies of the message. Should this be addressed with Postfix or Dovecot? thanks References Visible links 1. mailto:ourgroup@domain.com 2. mailto:a@domain.com 3. mailto:b@domain.com,

2 1

Can dovecot sieve query a database file?
by Hadmut Danisch 27 Oct '25

27 Oct '25

Hi, can dovecot sieve query any external database ( berkeley database file, rest api, whatever) to determine the target folder by sender address? Background: I have to migrate a mailbox from an old ubuntu system running with mailfilter as a local delivery agent, and dovecot just as an IMAP server. Since recent ubuntu versions do not have mailfilter anymore (abandoned for a decade) I need to substitute the mailfilter file with dovecot sieve. The old mailfilter script contained something like if (gdbmopen(".mailfilter.gdbm", "R") == 0) { if ( (box=gdbmfetch(tolower($FROM),"D")) ne "" ) to $box if ( /^From: .*<(.*)>/ ) { if ( (box=gdbmfetch(tolower($MATCH1),"D")) ne "" ) to $box } gdbmclose } which allowed to sort mails into mailboxes depending on the sender for hundreds of sender addresses in a fast end efficient way. It wouldn't make sense and be too slow to translate this into a sieve script with a thousand if header :matches ... elsif header :matches ... Is there a way to do this efficently in dovecot's sieve? regards Hadmut

5 7

No Sent Items folder created
by ville＠datsuncherry.com 27 Oct '25

27 Oct '25

Hello, before paying any effort, what could be the reason that in Postfix, Dovecot, Thunderbird client setup no Sent Items folder is created on the server as a first mail is sent on the newly created account. The mail is sent, but Thunderbird saves it instead in local sent items. Also when checking account settings the 'save copy setting' has changed from server to local and when setting it back to server same happens when a new mail is sent. For comparison the Apple Mail client creates a 'Sent Items' folder on the server, which afterwards can be selected manually in Thunderbird from that point on to store sent mails. Received mails are stored under /var/mail/vhosts/domain/user in either case. This issue appeared as I configured an existing server to use another domain name. and thought replacing the host names under /etc/postfix and /etc/dovecot would suffice, besides of course replacing the mail addresses in the mysql table. Any idea what causes this. As the mail is however sent correctly, what could make creating the sent items folder 'fail' as it somehow appears. Would logging the IMAP communication from the client to the server help finding the reason if it is at all possible or otherwise I would need to compile the code with printf's. Server is Ubuntu 22.

3 5

dsync between 2 instances on same machine (but different versions and different DNS hostnames) fails with "doveadm server sent invalid handshake"
by rmfuhrer＠optonline.net 25 Oct '25

25 Oct '25

I'm trying to use dsync to upgrade from an existing 2.3 server running native on MacOS to a 2.4.1 server running inside a Docker container on the same machine, using the official Dovecot 2.4.1 Docker image from DockerHub. For testing, I decided to set up a new hostname (CNAME) record in DNS pointing to the same IP, since both Dovecot instances are running on the same host. The new 2.4.1 Docker-containerized instance is working fine so far, which is to say I can connect to it from a mail client (the Mac Mail app) using TLS/SSL, and I'm able to move mail messages in, delete them, create folders, etc. For the next phase of testing, I want to migrate a single folder of a single user's email from the 2.3 instance to the new 2.4.1 Docker instance. I recently found out about dsync and thought I'd give it a try. The test Dockerized instance exposes its IMAPS port to a different port than the legacy instance (of course). I found that dsync seems to behave differently than the IMAP service wrt the certficate chain: Whereas the Mail client was able to negotiate the encrypted connection with the LetsEncrypt server cert alone in the dovecot cert file, with dsync, the 2.3 server seemed to require the entire cert chain to reside in the file. (?) After resolving that, the source dsync could at least get past the certificate validation phase, but then complained thusly: Oct 19 21:52:11 doveadm(myuser(a)mydomain.net): Error: doveadm server sent invalid handshake: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SASL-IR LITERAL+ AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready. Oct 19 21:52:11 doveadm(myuser(a)mydomain.net): Error: Disconnected from remote: EOF Oct 19 21:52:11 doveadm(myuser(a)mydomain.net): Debug: auth-master: conn unix:/usr/local/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (uid=0): Disconnected: Connection closed (fd=8) I can't tell from that error message what the source dsync doesn't like about the destination dsync, or for that matter, whether it might be the destination dsync that doesn't like what the source dsync is saying?? Anyway, I'm invoking dsync like this, to sync just a single folder: $ sudo doveadm -D -v backup -u myuser(a)mydomain.net -m FolderName tcps:testserver.mydomain.net:31993 ALSO: I confess that I also don't understand how dsync can work without asking for user account passwords, if it's indeed running over the IMAPS service. How can the destination service trust the incoming dsync connection? I assume it's running over a normal IMAPS connection, since that's the only port that I've given to the source dsync command, but maybe that's not the case? The docs are pretty unclear about this aspect, but I'm no expert, so maybe this is just obvious to others. (?)

3 11

mdbox: double forward-slash in mail_path
by Edmund Lodewijks 23 Oct '25

23 Oct '25

Hello List! I am testing mdbox on Dovecot 2.4.1 (currently using Maildir, but thinking of converting). I created a test server with a test domain. Installed relevant software from default repos on Debian 13: - Postfix - Dovecot 2.4.1 - PostfixAdmin - MariaDB After I had created an email address, I checked the settings as follows: ``` # doveadm user mail@$REDACTED field value uid 5000 gid 5000 home /vhosts/$REDACTED/mail/ mail_path /vhosts/$REDACTED/mail//mdbox quota_rule *:bytes=1048576000 ``` As you can see, there is a double forward-slash in the mail_path line. From /etc/dovecot/local.d/10-mail.conf: ``` mail_driver = mdbox mail_path = ~/mdbox ``` This is based on the official Dovecot docs page (see at the very bottom): https://doc.dovecot.org/2.4.1/core/config/mailbox_formats/dbox.html Is this harmful, or just "cosmetic"? Have I made a mistake somewhere? I presume the mail_path line is not even required, as it is the default for that mail_driver. Thank you for your time and reply. Kind regards, Edmund Lodewijks -- Edmund Lodewijks <edmund(a)proteamail.com> TZ: UCT+2 / GMT+2

4 8

Connecting to multiple ldaps AD from Dovecot 2.4.1
by Grepl Zbynek 23 Oct '25

23 Oct '25

Hello List! I am testing auth-ldap.conf.ext on Dovecot 2.4.1 Debian 13 (trixie) Postfix 3.10.4 Dovecot 2.4.1-4 (7d8c0e5759) Everything works fine when I use only one ldap AD for authentication. I need to connect multiple ADs of our organizations which have separate ADs. The problem is that it always takes the last ldap_uris as working even if I put them in separate files. *configuration - auth-ldap.conf.ext* *### AD - ORG_ONE* ldap_uris = ldap://XX.YY.ZZ.CZ ldap_auth_dn = CN=ReaderAD,CN=Users,DC=domain1,DC=local ldap_auth_dn_password = secret_password_1 ldap_base = OU=ALFA,dc=domain1,dc=local ldap_version = 3 *### domena subdomain1.domain1.cz* passdb ldap { ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) ldap_bind = yes result_internalfail = return-fail } userdb ldap { driver = ldap ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) fields { mail_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{ldap:mail}/Maildir mail_inbox_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{ldap:mail}/Maildir/ } } *### AD - ORG_SECOND * ldap_uris = ldap://AXX.AYY.AZZ.ACZ ldap://BXX.BYY.BZZ.BCZ ldap_auth_dn = CN=ReaderAD,OU=ServiceAccount,OU=DELTA,OU=GAMA,OU=ALFA,OU=BETA,DC=domain2,DC=cz ldap_auth_dn_password = secret_password_2 ldap_base = OU=BETA,dc=domain2,dc=cz ldap_version = 3 *### domena subdomain2.domain1.cz* passdb ldap { ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) ldap_bind = yes result_internalfail = return-fail } userdb ldap { driver = ldap ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) fields { mail_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{ldap:mail}/Maildir mail_inbox_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{ldap:mail}/Maildir/ } } *--- doveadm auth test ---* root@SERVER:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveadm auth test name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz Password: passdb: name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain1.cz*auth succeeded* extra fields: user=name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain1.cz root@SERVER:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveadm auth test name.surname(a)subdomain1.domain1.cz Password: passdb: name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz*auth failed* extra fields: user=name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz ----- I couldn't find any solution in the 2.4.1 documentation or on the Internet. AI didn't help. Thank you for your time and reply. Kind regards, Zbynek Grepl Hello List! I am testing auth-ldap.conf.ext on Dovecot 2.4.1 Debian 13 (trixie) Postfix 3.10.4 Dovecot 2.4.1-4 (7d8c0e5759) Everything works fine when I use only one ldap AD for authentication. I need to connect multiple ADs of our organizations which have separate ADs. The problem is that it always takes the last ldap_uris as working even if I put them in separate files. configuration - auth-ldap.conf.ext ### AD - ORG_ONE ldap_uris = [1]ldap://XX.YY.ZZ.CZ ldap_auth_dn = CN=ReaderAD,CN=Users,DC=domain1,DC=local ldap_auth_dn_password = secret_password_1 ldap_base = OU=ALFA,dc=domain1,dc=local ldap_version = 3 ### domena subdomain1.domain1.cz passdb ldap { ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) ldap_bind = yes result_internalfail = return-fail } userdb ldap { driver = ldap ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) fields { mail_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{[2]ldap:mail}/Maildir mail_inbox_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{[3]ldap:mail}/Maildir/ } } ### AD - ORG_SECOND ldap_uris = [4]ldap://AXX.AYY.AZZ.ACZ [5]ldap://BXX.BYY.BZZ.BCZ ldap_auth_dn = CN=ReaderAD,OU=ServiceAccount,OU=DELTA,OU=GAMA,OU=ALFA,OU=BETA,DC=domain2,DC=cz ldap_auth_dn_password = secret_password_2 ldap_base = OU=BETA,dc=domain2,dc=cz ldap_version = 3 ### domena subdomain2.domain1.cz passdb ldap { ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) ldap_bind = yes result_internalfail = return-fail } userdb ldap { driver = ldap ldap_filter = (&(objectClass=user)(mail=%{user|username}@%{user|domain})) fields { mail_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{[6]ldap:mail}/Maildir mail_inbox_path=/home/vmail/%{user|domain}/%{[7]ldap:mail}/Maildir/ } } --- doveadm auth test --- [8]root@SERVER:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveadm auth test [9]name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz Password: passdb: [10]name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain1.cz auth succeeded extra fields: [11]user=name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain1.cz [12]root@SERVER:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveadm auth test [13]name.surname(a)subdomain1.domain1.cz Password: passdb: [14]name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz auth failed extra fields: [15]user=name.surname(a)subdomain2.domain2.cz ----- I couldn't find any solution in the 2.4.1 documentation or on the Internet. AI didn't help. Thank you for your time and reply. Kind regards, Zbynek Grepl References Visible links 1. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:/XX.YY.ZZ.CZ 2. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:mail 3. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:mail 4. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:/AXX.AYY.AZZ.ACZ 5. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:/BXX.BYY.BZZ.BCZ 6. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:mail 7. file:///tmp/tmpy9tgc9z4/ldap:mail 8. mailto:root@server/etc/dovecot/conf.d# 9. mailto:name.surname@subdomain2.domain2.cz 10. mailto:name.surname@subdomain2.domain1.cz 11. mailto:user=name.surname@subdomain2.domain1.cz 12. mailto:root@server/etc/dovecot/conf.d# 13. mailto:name.surname@subdomain1.domain1.cz 14. mailto:name.surname@subdomain2.domain2.cz 15. mailto:user=name.surname@subdomain2.domain2.cz

1 0

Pay Someone to Take My Online Course?
by xotawa2329＠hapincy.com 23 Oct '25

23 Oct '25

Pay Someone to Take My Online Course? Different understudies who battle with reworking school, work, and family obligations select online class tutors to assist them with finishing their tests and complete their coursework. In any case, some solicitation the ethicality of this planning. While <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4040-assessment-4-attempt-1-inform…">NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4</a>  has every one of the reserves of being enticing, it goes with two or three serious dangers. This article will examine a piece of the things you ought to remember going before enlisting an online class help association. It's clearly a fact that online classes can be truly troublesome, particularly for working professionals who have a clamoring plan. Oftentimes they are searching for someone to take a whole course or individual tasks for them, to assist with managing their grades and moderate their strain. Nonetheless, be wary of affiliations that guarantee too wonderful to be authentic. They could charge you enormous totals for their associations and end up not conveying. The best technique for guaranteeing that you are getting anything that would be fair is to use an online class tutor who offers an inadequate responsibility. Additionally, review that different schools consider paying someone to take an online class to swindle. Therefore, whenever got, you could go facing silly outcomes like besieging the course, scholarly suspension or even send off. To this end picking a fair relationship with a showed history is crucial. The association is clear: present your mentioning and survey offers from qualified educated authorities. Then enlist the one that is reasonable for yourself and store maintains in <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4050-assessment-1-attempt-3-prelim…">NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 1</a>  scrow until your assignment is finished. Online classes are eminent among understudies who need to save time on education and spotlight more on work or other private issues. These merge understudies who are taking courses while working and attempting to change family and profession responsibilities, military understudies on sending, and understudies with genuine inadequacies or sickness that make it pursuing for them to go to classes. Unfortunately, there are many tricks that confirmation to take online courses for you. These affiliations charge ridiculous totals and don't complete their obligations. They may also hand you over to your school. Tolerating that they do, you could be killed from your underwriting project or even suspended or removed from school. This isn't the very thing that you truly need for your business and future. Therefore, you genuinely need to track down serious areas of strength for a that offers a fair cost and mind blowing results. To this end you ought to search for a <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4050-assessment-2-attempt-1-ethica…">NURS FPX 4050 Assessment 2</a>  affiliation that has an inadequate responsibility and splendid customer association. Various individuals decide to use a professional to take their online class since they need the opportunity to go to it very close. They could be working the whole day, supervising family issues, or fighting disease and disappointments that log jam their review tendencies. These professionals can assist you with fulfilling time necessities, stay away from imaginative theft, and set free your nights to zero in on work or other unwinding works out. They may comparatively have the decision to help you with beating any learning handicaps you have. Copyright infringement suggests utilizing someone else's words and thoughts without their endorsement. It is viewed as a kind of cheating and can accomplish a delicate grade or even send off from school. It is difficult to ensure that a used professional won't phony. This is on the grounds that educational foundations don't have <a href="https://onlineclassservices.com/nurs-fpx-4900-assessment-1-assessing-the-pr…">NURS FPX 4900 Assessment 1 Assessing the Problem</a>  assets for check whether understudies are authentic or not. This truly expects that tolerant you are gotten, you will probably lose the cash you paid to have someone take your class. There's no veritable strategy for remaining caution assuming the solitary you enroll to take your online course will tell the truth and dependable. They probably won't be in a tantamount state as you. Moreover, they apparently won't be as dedicated to finishing the class for you as you are. They may very well be doing the base extent of work expected to get reviewed and a brief time frame later vanish. MORE <a href="https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/website/-/issues/35#note_211778">Facebook is a powerful tool for business</a> <a href="https://xtremepape.rs/members/horridhenry7860.397211/about">Mobile Application Development Services</a> <a href="https://xtremepape.rs/members/samfarrid4563.397213/about">best digital marketing agencies</a>

5 5

doveadm search SENTSINCE and SENTBEFORE with timezone
by Philip Bondi 19 Oct '25

19 Oct '25

Hello to all: Would someone be able to comment on the correct method to specify timezone? [243] $ doveadm search -u user(a)domain.ca MAILBOX hover/INBOX-hover.mbx SENTSINCE "2024-01-01" SENTBEFORE "01-Jan-2025" fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4092 fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4093 fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4094 fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4095 fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4096 fa6bc10562ee846855141f00d09efc50 4097 [244] $ doveadm search -u user(a)domain.ca MAILBOX hover/INBOX-hover.mbx SENTSINCE "2024-01-01" SENTBEFORE "01-Jan-2025 00:00:00 -0400" Fatal: Invalid search date parameter: 01-Jan-2025 00:00:00 -0400

3 3

Missing imapc plugin
by scrivici＠winnbroker.it 17 Oct '25

17 Oct '25

Hi all, I have an installation (experimental, for now) of Dovecot CE 2.3.21 on Ubuntu and I'm trying to sync messages with an external IMAP server using doveadm sync, but I get the message "Plugin 'imapc' not found." It looks like the plugin isn't included in the version I'm using. Is that the case? Should I use a different version or download the plugin separately? Thank in advance for your help

2 7

Dovecot 2.4: dirsize removed - alternative for physical size quotas?
by jarland＠mxroute.com 16 Oct '25

16 Oct '25

We're upgrading our servers from Dovecot 2.3 to 2.4 and hit an issue with the dirsize driver removal. In 2.3, we switched from "maildir" to "dirsize" quota driver because maildir counts virtual (RFC822) sizes. This caused mailboxes to appear full before reaching actual disk limits - base64-encoded attachments make the virtual size larger than physical disk usage. For example, 8GB actual usage could show as 10GB+ in quota calculations. The dirsize driver solved this by calculating quota from actual file sizes on disk. In 2.4, dirsize is removed with the note "use quota-count instead." However, the count driver requires quota_vsizes=yes, which uses virtual sizes - the same problem we had with maildir. What's the intended solution in 2.4 for tracking quota based on physical disk usage rather than virtual message sizes? The available drivers seem to be: - count: requires virtual sizes - maildir: also uses virtual sizes via maildirsize - fs: requires OS-level per-user filesystem quotas Is there a way to configure count for physical sizes? Appreciate any guidance.

1 0

Feature request: allow Settings variables to be used in ldap_auth_dn
by Kristian 16 Oct '25

16 Oct '25

Hi, with the migration to 2.4 my setup for LDAP authentication stopped working. I used to have different LDAP config files for every virtual domain. Each domain has an domain-specific service user with read access, that is used by dovecot. There is no service user with access across domains. With the current 2.4 configuration I only see the possibility to configure one user in the variables ldap_auth_dn ldap_auth_dn_password In ldap_base I am able to use settings variables ldap_base = ou=people,dc=%{user | domain | ldap_dn} which allows me to select the right LDAP tree depending on the domain of the user. I would need this also in ldap_auth_dn to keep my current setup. I can see, that this is specific to my setup without an service user with access to all domains, and that this ignores the problem of having different passwords for different domain users, but it would at least keep some compatibility to working 2.3 setups. Kind regards Kristian

1 0

auth_cache_ttl and sieve_enabled
by Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 14 Oct '25

14 Oct '25

Hi, auth_cache_ttl docs https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/config/auth/caching.html say: " # We also try to handle password changes automatically: If user's previous # authentication was successful, but this one wasn't, the cache isn't used. " but seems that this doesn't work in such way for sieve_enabled flag changes. So changing sieve_enabled from 0 to 1 means user still has to wait until cache expires and new value is noticed by dovecot... which is not desired. Could sieve_enabled be also treated in similar way as incorrect authentication? -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

1 0

Ssl_cert keyword ?
by MellorCH 10 Oct '25

10 Oct '25

> V2.4.1 what’s the latest syntax for this please? Ssl_cert V2.4.1 what's the latest syntax for this please? Ssl_cert

3 2

SSL initialization error - Dovecot 2.4.1, Fedora 43 beta
by Jason J.G. White 09 Oct '25

09 Oct '25

I'm trying Dovecot 2.4.1 under Fedora 43 beta with all packages up to date. I've encountered several issues after attempting to update my configuration. The main problem is this: whenever a client attempts to connect, I get the following error Error: Failed to initialize SSL connection: Couldn't initialize SSL server context: Can't load SSL certificate (ssl_server_cert_file setting): error:0A00018F:SSL routines::ee key too small: I'm using a SECP384R1 key issued by letsencrypt.org, which should satisfy security checks. My Web searches have not identified a relevant bug report. Have others encountered this issue? If it's distribution-specific, I can visit the relevant bug tracker. Thank you for your consideration.

5 8

Does ldap_auth_sasl_mechanisms support GSSAPI?
by Fredrik Falk 08 Oct '25

08 Oct '25

I'm attempting to authenticate dovecot against an OpenLDAP server using GSSAPI. Setting `ldap_auth_sasl_mechanisms = gssapi` causes the server to fail to boot with the error `ldap_auth_sasl_mechanism set, but no SASL support compiled in`. I'm wondering if there's a dependency that I'm missing, or if there's no support for it with the deb packages provided at https://repo.dovecot.org/. For reference, I'm running Ubuntu 24.04 with the dovecot apt repository added. `dovecot --version` outputs `2.4.1-4+ubuntu24.04 (7d8c0e5759)`. `dovecot --build-options` yields ``` Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify openssl io_block_size=8192 SQL driver plugins: mysql postgresql sqlite Passdb: ldap pam passwd passwd-file sql Userdb: ldap(plugin) passwd prefetch passwd-file sql ``` Do I need to compile my own version, or is there something I'm missing? The documentation doesn't provide a lot of answers unfortunately. Med vänlig hälsning, Fredrik Falk -- Fredrik Falk <freddo(a)ludd.ltu.se> Luleå Universitets Datorförening /LUDD/

1 0

Announcement: wormhole plugin, replication for Dovecot 2.4
by Patrick Cernko 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Hello List, I am proud to announce my project "wormhole". This is an extension for Dovecot 2.4.1. It allows to continue the use of the replication feature of Dovecot that was removed with the 2.4 release. History: I started this project by forking the replication code of Dovecot 2.3.21.1 and porting it to 2.4. The first result was a patch for Dovecot 2.4.1. While working with the code, I realized that it is possible to provide the feature as a plugin / extension. In the first release of the plugin, I tried to integrate it with the existing dsync commands for doveadm. This required an API for access to the dsync commands, which I proposed to the Dovecot developers in https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/249 . Unfortunately, my pull request was rejected, though I can understand the reasons for that. Without the required API, I had to switch to another approach: I forked the dsync code from doveadm to provide a new set of commands: "repl" and "repl-server". These commands work similar to "sync" and "dsync-server" but use additional functions required by the replication feature. This approach was released as version 0.3 of the plugin. With version 0.4 I renamed the project to wormhole. Before that it was just called dovecot-replication (see https://codeberg.org/errror/dovecot-replication) I thought that the project should have a more unique name. Currently I'm working on designing a test suite for wormhole. Doing unit tests of the components is not sufficient IMHO. The test suite should check the whole replication feature using two running dovecot instances that replicate the users' mailboxes. Having a sophisticated test suite will help in future development and bug tracking. The code can be found on my codeberg site at: https://codeberg.org/errror/wormhole There is also a web page on my personal homepage at: https://people.mpi-klsb.mpg.de/~pcernko/wormhole.shtml The project is still missing documentation. For the moment, configuration is similar to the existing Dovecot 2.3 documentation. Upgrading from 2.3: When using the included patch for Dovecot, the plugin should be 100% compatible with existing Dovecot 2.3 servers. This compatibility should allow uninterrupted upgrades of the service by replacing Dovecot on one server and then the other one. After the upgrade, the plugin can be reconfigured to work without the patch for Dovecot. Upgrading without the patch is also possible. During the upgrade (aka "while one server still runs 2.3") some aspects of the replication will not work or lack performance. Upgrading is not yet tested very well and missing documentation also. I will work on that soon. I hope to get some feedback, pull requests or bug reports via mail or at codeberg (preferred). -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Scientific IT and Technical Service Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik & Softwaresysteme

3 2

Quota plugin: "quota_storage_size" not recognized from userdb extra fields in dovecot 2.4.1
by Matthieu Schapranow 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Dear Dovecot experts, I am in the process of planning migration from dovecot 2.3 to 2.4.1+dfsg1-6 on Debian Trixie, but userdb extra fields for quota_storage_size are ignored. All settings proved to work in 2.3; following per-user quota manual as outlined in [1]. Issue Cannot override setting quota_storage_size using userdb_quota_storage_size, but userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage apparently work. Setup Configures multiple userdb using driver passwd combined for a) user information and b) user-specific extra fields; auth. via passdb using driver pam defined in auth-system.conf.ext included by 10-auth.conf Excerpt from doveconf -n: … passdb system_pam { driver = pam } userdb userdb_01_passwd { driver = passwd result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } userdb userdb_02_quota { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings driver = passwd-file result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue } … Excerpt from passwd file /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings holding userdb extra fields: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M Default quota config excerpt from doveconf -n: … quota user { storage_grace = 100M storage_size = 750M quota_warning warn-95 { quota_storage_percentage = 95 execute quota-warning { args = 95 %{user} } } quota_warning warn-85 { quota_storage_percentage = 85 execute quota-warning { args = 85 %{user} } } } … Result Userdb setting appear to work correctly as it combines both userdb files, see following output: # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_size 1200M However, querying the quota only shows the default value, but not the user-specific setting. # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 768000 104 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Expected behaviour Any user should report default user quota (here 750M), but user web1p1 having user-specific setting for userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M should report a higher quota limit overriding the default quota setting. I tried to specify user-specific values for userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage, which worked; probably, because there were no default value specified in the config, yet? Setting userdb_quota_storage_extra to 200M works: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_extra=200M … # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_extra 200M … # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 972800 82 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Quota is reported as correctly as 750M+200M=950M. Same approach works when setting userdb_quota_storage_percentage, e.g. to a value above 100. [1] https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota Many thanks for your support! Matthieu Dear Dovecot experts, I am in the process of planning migration from dovecot 2.3 to 2.4.1+dfsg1-6 on Debian Trixie, but userdb extra fields for quota_storage_size are ignored. All settings proved to work in 2.3; following per-user quota manual as outlined in [1]. Issue Cannot override setting quota_storage_size using userdb_quota_storage_size, but userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage apparently work. Setup Configures multiple userdb using driver passwd combined for a) user information and b) user-specific extra fields; auth. via passdb using driver pam defined in auth-system.conf.ext included by 10-auth.conf Excerpt from doveconf -n: ... passdb system_pam { driver = pam } userdb userdb_01_passwd { driver = passwd result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } userdb userdb_02_quota { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings driver = passwd-file result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue } ... Excerpt from passwd file /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings holding userdb extra fields: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M Default quota config excerpt from doveconf -n: ... quota user { storage_grace = 100M storage_size = 750M quota_warning warn-95 { quota_storage_percentage = 95 execute quota-warning { args = 95 %{user} } } quota_warning warn-85 { quota_storage_percentage = 85 execute quota-warning { args = 85 %{user} } } } ... Result Userdb setting appear to work correctly as it combines both userdb files, see following output: # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_size 1200M However, querying the quota only shows the default value, but not the user-specific setting. # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 768000 104 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Expected behaviour Any user should report default user quota (here 750M), but user web1p1 having user-specific setting for userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M should report a higher quota limit overriding the default quota setting. I tried to specify user-specific values for userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage, which worked; probably, because there were no default value specified in the config, yet? Setting userdb_quota_storage_extra to 200M works: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_extra=200M ... # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_extra 200M ... # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 972800 82 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Quota is reported as correctly as 750M+200M=950M. Same approach works when setting userdb_quota_storage_percentage, e.g. to a value above 100. [1] [1]https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota Many thanks for your support! Matthieu References Visible links 1. https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota

2 2