- dovecot - dovecot.org

Re: [Dovecot] Crash on mail folder delete
by Daniel L. Miller 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

On 1/25/2012 3:43 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > On 1/25/2012 3:42 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 26.1.2012, at 1.37, Daniel L. Miller wrote: >> >>> Attempting to delete a folder from within the trash folder using >>> Thunderbird. I see the following in the log: >> Dovecot version? >> > 2.1.rc3. I'm compiling rc5 now... > Error still there on rc5. Jan 25 16:03:47 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) Jan 25 16:03:47 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3f1ba) [0x7f7c3f0331ba] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3f206) [0x7f7c3f033206] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x1804a) [0x7f7c3f00c04a] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0x47317) [0x7f7c3f2c0317] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(+0x6c71) [0x7f7c3dc48c71] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(+0x6d47) [0x7f7c3dc48d47] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(acl_mailbox_allocated+0x9e) [0x7f7c3dc4c61e] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(hook_mailbox_allocated+0x62) [0x7f7c3f2b4662] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_alloc+0xb2) [0x7f7c3f2b3482] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](cmd_delete+0x72) [0x409972] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](command_exec+0x3d) [0x4109fd] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x40f9ce] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x40faad] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](client_handle_input+0x135) [0x40fcd5] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](client_input+0x5f) [0x4105ff] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x36) [0x7f7c3f03f5d6] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x9f) [0x7f7c3f04065f] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x28) [0x7f7c3f03f578] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f7c3f02c593] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](main+0x2a5) [0x418a55] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe) [0x7f7c3ec8fd8e] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x408449] Jan 25 16:03:48 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Panic: file mailbox-list-fs.c: line 156 (fs_list_get_path): assertion failed: (mailbox_list_is_valid_pattern(_list, name)) Jan 25 16:03:48 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3f1ba) [0x7f9e52e211ba] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3f206) [0x7f9e52e21206] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x1804a) [0x7f9e52dfa04a] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0x47317) [0x7f9e530ae317] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(+0x6c71) [0x7f9e51a36c71] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(+0x6d47) [0x7f9e51a36d47] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib01_acl_plugin.so(acl_mailbox_allocated+0x9e) [0x7f9e51a3a61e] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(hook_mailbox_allocated+0x62) [0x7f9e530a2662] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_alloc+0xb2) [0x7f9e530a1482] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](cmd_delete+0x72) [0x409972] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](command_exec+0x3d) [0x4109fd] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x40f9ce] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x40faad] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](client_handle_input+0x135) [0x40fcd5] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](client_input+0x5f) [0x4105ff] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x36) [0x7f9e52e2d5d6] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x9f) [0x7f9e52e2e65f] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x28) [0x7f9e52e2d578] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f9e52e1a593] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete](main+0x2a5) [0x418a55] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe) [0x7f9e52a7dd8e] -> dovecot/imap [dmiller(a)amfes.com 192.168.0.91 delete]() [0x408449] Jan 25 16:03:48 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 3300 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled) Jan 25 16:03:48 bubba dovecot: imap(dmiller(a)amfes.com): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 3267 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled) -- Daniel

2 1

[Dovecot] BUG(?): Incorrect responses for ACL prohibited actions
by Michael M Slusarz 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE (i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following: 3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted 3 OK Store completed. (UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted) [...] 6 UID EXPUNGE 1:* 6 OK Expunge completed. (At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox) Shouldn't these commands be returning "NO" instead of "OK"? RFC 3501 [6.4.6] for STORE: NO - store error: can't store that data and RFC RFC 3501 [6.4.3] for EXPUNGE: NO - expunge failure: can't expunge (e.g., permission denied) Additionally, RFC 5530 [3] provides the NOPERM response code: NOPERM The access control system (e.g., Access Control List (ACL), see [RFC 4314]) does not permit this user to carry out an operation, such as selecting or creating a mailbox. C: f select "/archive/projects/experiment-iv" S: f NO [NOPERM] Access denied My reading of this is that NOPERM should be returned for ANY ACL prohibited action, not just for selecting or creating a mailbox. Dovecot 2.0.12 does not return NOPERM for DELETE/EXPUNGE actions (at a minimum) that are prohibited. Thoughts? michael

2 3

[Dovecot] [dovecot] Getting duplicates when using snarf plugin with mbox backend
by Jonathan SIegle 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Running dovecot version 2.0.11. To reproduce, open two imap sessions and issue a check command from each at the same time with new mail in the queue. 0 login testuser testpw 1 select inbox -- Deliver mail -- 2 check Thanks, Jonathan

2 1

[Dovecot] POP3 UIDLs with virtual INBOX and migration from maildir->mdbox
by Peter Mogensen 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hi, Considering the scenario, where you have some old account with a different POP3 UIDL format and you migrate them to dovecot. So these old UIDLs would be saved to dovecot-uidlist. At some later time you want to introduce a virtual POP3 INBOX like described on: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual So you decide to make the new UIDL format "%f" - to make them unique across folders. So far so good. But then you decide to migrate to mdbox with all your old UIDLs. The docs says that saving old UIDLs is only supported in Maildir and that %f is only supported in Maildir. So is this at all possible? Would pop3_uidl_format = %g solve this (except for the old legacy UIDL's) ? /Peter

2 1

[Dovecot] vsz_limit
by Héctor Moreno Blanco 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hello Timo and dovecot teamwork, We have dovecot 2.0.10 installed with this configuration: # dovecot -n # 2.0.10: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 x86_64 Scientific Linux SL release 5.2 (Boron) auth_cache_size = 500 k auth_cache_ttl = 1000 secs disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 501 lock_method = dotlock mail_fsync = always mail_gid = vmail mail_location = maildir:%h/Maildir mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_plugins = quota autocreate mail_uid = vmail managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date mmap_disable = yes namespace { inbox = yes location = prefix = separator = . type = private } namespace { hidden = yes inbox = no list = no location = prefix = INBOX. separator = . type = private } namespace { location = maildir:%h/Maildir/_backup prefix = _backup. separator = . type = private } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap } plugin/autocreate = Spam plugin/autosubscribe = Spam plugin/quota = maildir:_backup:ns= plugin/quota_warning = storage=75%% quota-warning 75 %u plugin/quota_warning2 = storage=90%% quota-warning 90 %u plugin/sieve = %h/.dovecot.sieve plugin/sieve_dir = %h/sieve protocols = imap pop3 sieve service anvil { client_limit = 5000 } service auth { client_limit = 9000 unix_listener auth-master { group = vmail mode = 0700 user = vmail } user = root vsz_limit = 2 G } service imap-login { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login inet_listener imap { address = * port = 143 } inet_listener imaps { address = * port = 993 } process_limit = 2048 process_min_avail = 20 user = vmail } service imap { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap process_limit = 2048 } service managesieve-login { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login inet_listener sieve { address = * port = 4190 } inet_listener sieve_deprecated { address = * port = 12000 } user = vmail } service managesieve { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/managesieve } service pop3-login { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login inet_listener pop3 { address = * port = 110 } inet_listener pop3s { address = * port = 995 } process_limit = 2048 process_min_avail = 20 user = vmail } service pop3 { executable = /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3 process_limit = 2048 } service quota-warning { executable = script /usr/local/dovecot/bin/quota-warning.sh unix_listener quota-warning { group = vmail mode = 0700 user = vmail } } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/correo_xxxx.crt ssl_key = </etc/ssl/correo_xxxx.pem syslog_facility = local3 userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap } valid_chroot_dirs = /buzones/ protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/dovecot/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = quota autocreate imap_quota } protocol pop3 { mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/dovecot/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = quota autocreate pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv } protocol lda { auth_socket_path = /usr/local/dovecot/var/run/dovecot/auth-master hostname = buzon.xxxx.es mail_plugin_dir = /usr/local/dovecot/lib/dovecot mail_plugins = quota autocreate sieve postmaster_address = postmaster(a)xxxx.es quota_full_tempfail = no rejection_reason = Su mensaje para <%t> fue rechazado automaticamente por nuestro sistema :%n%r rejection_subject = Rechazado: %s sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/exim } protocol sieve { managesieve_implementation_string = dovecot Pigeonhole managesieve_logout_format = bytes ( in=%i : out=%o ) managesieve_max_line_length = 65536 } The problem is at the moment of maximum load of the system. We can see many imap sessions but there are also many imap-login processes, which is weird. Has it something to do with any parameter of our configuration? We think is something with the vsz_limit parameter. How can we tune it? Thank you very much in advanced. Kind regards. ________________________________ [cid:image001.gif@01CCE647.65B8FB30] Héctor Moreno Blanco División de Seguridad e Infraestructuras / Security and Infrastructures Division GMV Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos E-28760 Madrid Tel. +34 91 807 21 00 Fax +34 91 807 21 99 www.gmv.com <http://www.gmv.com/> [cid:image002.gif@01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.gmv.com/b2_gmv> [cid:image003.gif@01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.facebook.com/infoGMV> [cid:image004.gif@01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.twitter.com/infoGMV_es> [cid:image005.gif@01CCE647.65B8FB30]<http://www.youtube.com/infoGMV> ______________________ This message including any attachments may contain confidential information, according to our Information Security Management System, and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it. ______________________ Este mensaje, y en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al mismo, puede contener informacion clasificada por su emisor como confidencial en el marco de su Sistema de Gestion de Seguridad de la Informacion siendo para uso exclusivo del destinatario, quedando prohibida su divulgacion copia o distribucion a terceros sin la autorizacion expresa del remitente. Si Vd. ha recibido este mensaje erroneamente, se ruega lo notifique al remitente y proceda a su borrado. Gracias por su colaboracion. ______________________

3 5

[Dovecot] fts (lucene): indexing of virtual mailboxes?
by Lutz Preßler 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hello, (recent 2.1alpha2 variant - my test setup known to Timo). No time to diagnose in depth at the moment, but I just noticed that SEARCHing in virtual mailboxes seems not to create lucene index content of its own but use those of referenced mailboxes? The problem is that no new indexing takes place. Example: with INBOX INBOX.in% all in dovecot-virtual, for a given query I only get matches from those mailboxes searched in previously. Regards, Lutz

2 2

Re: [Dovecot] Performance of Maildir vs sdbox/mdbox
by Lee Standen 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

On 18.01.2012 21:54, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 20:44 +0800, Lee Standen wrote: > >> I've been desperately trying to find some comparative performance >> information about the different mailbox formats supported by Dovecot >> in >> order to make an assessment on which format is right for our >> environment. > > Unfortunately there aren't really any. Everyone who seems to switch > to > sdbox/mdbox usually also change their hardware at the same time, so > there aren't really any before/after metrics. I've of course some > unrealistic synthetic benchmarks, but I don't think they are very > useful. > > So, I would also be very interested in seeing some before/after > graphs > of disk IO, CPU and memory usage of Maildir -> dbox switch in same > hardware. > > Maildir is anyway definitely worse performance then sdbox or mdbox. > mdbox also uses less NFS operations, but I don't know how much faster > (if any) it is with Netapps. We have bought new hardware for this project too, so we might not be able to help out massively on that front... we do have NFS operations monitored though so we should at least be able to compare that metric since the underlying storage operating system is the same. All NetApp hardware runs their Data ONTAP operating system, so the metrics are assured to be the same :) How about this... are there any tools available (that you know of) to capture real live customer POP3/IMAP traffic and replay it against a separate system? That might be a feasible option for doing a like-for-like comparison in our environment? We could probably get something in place to simulate the load if we can do something like that... >> * All mail storage presented via NFS over 10Gbps Ethernet (Jumbo >> Frames) >> >> * Postfix will feed new email to Dovecot via LMTP >> >> * Dovecot servers have been split based on their role >> >> - Dovecot LDA Servers (running LMTP protocol) >> >> - Dovecot POP/IMAP servers (running POP/IMAP protocols) > > You're going to run into NFS caching troubles with the above split > setup. I don't recommend it. You will see error messages about index > corruption with it, and with dbox it can cause metadata loss. > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director That might be the one thing (unfortunately) which prevents us from going with the dbox format. I understand the same issue can actually occur on Dovecot Maildir as well, but because Maildir works without these index files, we were willing to just go with it. I will raise it again, but there has been a lot of push back about introducing a single point of failure, even though this is a perceived one. The biggest challenge I have at the moment if I try to sell the dbox format is providing some kind of data on the expected gains from this. If it's only a 10% reduction in NFS operations for the typical user, then it's probably not worth our while. > >> - LDA & POP/IMAP servers are segmented into geographically split >> groups >> (so no server sees every single mailbox) >> >> - Nginx proxy used to terminate customer connections, connections >> are >> redirected to the appropriate geographic servers > > Can the same mailbox still be accessed via multiple geographic > servers? > I've had some plans for doing this kind of access/replication using > dsync.. No, we're using the nginx proxy layer to ensure that if a user in Sydney (for example) tries to access a Perth mailbox, their connection is redirected (by nginx) to the Perth POP/IMAP servers. Postfix configuration is handling the same thing on the LMTP side. The requirement here is for all users to have the same settings regardless of location, but still be able to locate the email servers and data close to the customer. > >> * Apache Lucene indexes will be used to accelerate IMAP search for >> users > > Dovecot's fts-solr or fts-lucene? fts-solr. I've been using Lucene/Solr interchangeably when discussing this project with my peers :) > >> Our closest current live configuration (Qmail SMTP, Courier IMAP, >> Maildir) >> has 600K mailboxes and pushes ~ 35,000 NFS operations per second at >> peak >> >> Some of the things I would like to know: >> >> * Are we likely to see a reduction in IOPS/User by using Maildir >> alone under >> Dovecot? > > If you have webmail type of clients, definitely. For > Outlook/Thunderbird > you should still see improvement, but not necessarily as much. > > You didn't mention POP3. That isn't Dovecot's strong point. Its > performance should be about the same as Courier-POP3, but could be > less > than QMail-POP3. Although if many of your POP3 users keep a lot of > mails > on server it > Our existing systems run with about 21K concurrent IMAP connections at any one point in time, not counting Webmail POP3 runs at about 3600 concurrent connections, but since those are not long lived it's not particularly indicative of customer numbers. Vague recollection is something like 25% IMAP, 55-60% POP3, rest < 20% Webmail. I'd have to go back and check the breakdown again. >> * If someone can give some technical reasoning behind why mdbox does >> less >> IOPS than Maildir? > > Maildir renames files a lot. From new/ -> to cur/ and then every time > message flag changes. That's why sdbox is faster. Why mdbox should be > faster than sdbox is because mdbox puts (or should put) more mail > data > physically closer in disks to make reading it faster. > >> I understand some of the reasons for the mdbox IOPS question, but I >> need >> some more information so we can discuss internally and make a >> decision as to >> whether we're comfortable going with mdbox from day one. We're very >> familiar with Maidlir, and there's just some uneasiness internally >> around >> going to a new mail storage format. > > It's at least safer to first switch to Dovecot+Maildir to make sure > that > any problems you might find aren't related to the mailbox format.. Yep, I'm considering that. The flip side is that it's actually going to be difficult for us to change mail format once we've migrated into this system, but we have an opportunity for (literally) a month long testing phase beginning in Feb/March which will let us test as many possibilities as we can.

4 16

[Dovecot] [PATCH] Bad boundary check in client_find_namespace
by Christoph Bussenius 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hi, while trying to investigate the bug I reported last week, I found that there is a broken boundary check in client_find_namespace in src/imap/imap-commands-util.c. The code is: /* make sure two hierarchy separators aren't next to each others */ for (p = storage_name+1; *p != '\0'; p++) { if (p[0] == ns->real_sep && p[-1] == ns->real_sep) { client_send_tagline(cmd, "NO Invalid mailbox name."); return NULL; } } The loop iterates over the string storage_name starting from its second byte. However, the string may be "". This is the case if you select the root of a namespace, like in "SELECT shared" or "SELECT shared/user1". In that case, the code will read past the end of the buffer from random memory until it finds a zero byte or a duplicate separator. This would fix it: diff -ru dovecot-2.0.15.orig/src/imap/imap-commands-util.c dovecot-2.0.15/src/imap/imap-commands-util.c --- dovecot-2.0.15.orig/src/imap/imap-commands-util.c 2011-08-02 12:29:37.000000000 +0200 +++ dovecot-2.0.15/src/imap/imap-commands-util.c 2011-09-26 18:33:16.121917759 +0200 @@ -81,7 +81,9 @@ } /* make sure two hierarchy separators aren't next to each others */ - for (p = storage_name+1; *p != '\0'; p++) { + for (p = storage_name; *p != '\0'; p++) { + if (p == storage_name) + continue; if (p[0] == ns->real_sep && p[-1] == ns->real_sep) { client_send_tagline(cmd, "NO Invalid mailbox name."); return NULL; Cheers, Christoph Bußenius -- Christoph Bußenius Rechnerbetriebsgruppe der Fakultäten Informatik und Mathematik TU München +49 89-289-18519 <> Raum 00.05.055 <> Boltzmannstr. 3 <> Garching

3 2

[Dovecot] 2.0.14 doveadm proxy list segfault
by Tom Pawlowski 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hi Timo, Periodic segfaults with doveadm proxy list: root@director1:~) doveadm proxy list doveadm(root): Error: LIST failed: Disconnected Segmentation fault (core dumped) Sometimes it's just the 'LIST failed' error, other times it's the error with the segfault. Usually the first attempt to call it works, subsequent attempts fail. I've attached a strace log of it in action. -- Tom Pawlowski OIT-CSS System Administrator office: Hill 147 email: tompru(a)jla.rutgers.edu phone: (732) 445-2634

2 1

[Dovecot] Syncing shared mailboxes
by Knud Dombrowsky 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hi, while trying to sync the mailboxes of several users who use and share their mailboxes dsync prints this message: dsync-local(<user-who-uses-shared-mailbox>): Warning: Subscriptions file /home/<user-who-uses-shared-mailbox>/Maildir/subscriptions: Removing invalid entry: shared/<sharing-user>/<shared-folder> The problem is: Every user has to subscribe the shared folder again after each run of dsync... Is dsync capable of syncing shared mailboxes? Are there any preliminaries to do so? thanks in advance, Knud

2 1