- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] failed: Cannot allocate memory
by Philipp Snizek 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

Hi when I try to index messages using squat on a 26'000 emails mailbox I get the below errors at the point dovecot says "* OK Mailbox indexing finished". 2010-01-30 08:12:50 sleipnir local7.err dovecot IMAP(spam(a)dom.com): read(/var/tmp/dovecot/spam/indexes/.INBOX_score20/dovecot.index.search.uids) failed: Cannot allocate memory 2010-01-30 08:12:50 sleipnir local7.err dovecot IMAP(spam(a)dom.com): mremap_anon(44609536) failed: Invalid argument 2010-01-30 08:12:50 sleipnir local7.err dovecot IMAP(spam(a)dom.com): read(/var/tmp/dovecot/spam/indexes/.INBOX_score20/dovecot.index.search.uids) failed: Invalid argument 2010-01-30 08:17:32 sleipnir local7.err dovecot IMAP(spam(a)dom.com): munmap_anon() failed: Invalid argument This is the configuration I use for squat: fts = squat fts_squat = partial=4 full=10 Dovecot version is 1.2.10, patched with sieve. Thanks for any answers, best, Philippp

3 3

[Dovecot] Pigeon hole sieve binaries and dovecot header install
by Mark Washenberger 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

Stephan, I've recently been playing around with packaging dovecot 2.0 and dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole, as well as the --enable-header-install configure options of both. This lead me to the following question. Should pigeonhole's sieve binaries rely on static libstorage / other dovecot libraries? It seems like they should instead use shared libraries, but I couldn't find a configure option to make this happen. That way, I could break my packages up like so: dovecot dovecot-devel libdovecot dovecot-pigeonhole dovecot-pigeonhole-devel And while pigeonhole/sieve might require libdovecot to run, it shouldn't require it to compile. Thoughts? I can provide a lot more detail about my compilation errors if you think its necessary.

1 0

[Dovecot] Does anyone know a good Dovecot hoster in europe?
by Johannes 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

Hi, though I am not sure this is the right place to ask, but I just try. I am looking for a better e-mail hoster providing me with a dovecot server (I don't want to do all the admin stuff and backup myself, if possible). I already googled a bit, searched the archives and had a look at dovecot.org but could not find an answer to this question. Since dovecot seems to get a fair amount of funding from finnish companies I thought there should be a good hoster among them. Any hints? Thanks Johannes

3 2

[Dovecot] Authentication failure (password mismatch?)
by Wade Smart 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

I setup dovecot on my laptop to practice on. I was following some of the information on this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PostfixVirtualMailBoxClamSmtpHowto#Testing Your Setup I created the in this format: user:{plain}pass:1000:1000::/home/user::userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir for userdb passwd-file. I used smart for the user and wade for the password (its just for testing) and then attempted to log into the system. Im getting these errors: auth-worker(default): pam(smart,127.0.1.1): lookup service=dovecot auth-worker(default): pam(smart,127.0.1.1): #1/1 style=1 msg=Password; auth-worker(default): pam(smart,127.0.1.1): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure( password mismatch?) auth-worker(default): passwd-file /etc/dovecot/passwd.dovecot: Read 1 users auth-worker(default): passwd-file(smart,127.0.1.1): lookup: user=smart file=/etc/dovecot/passwd.dovecot Its reading the file but the password is incorrect. Im not understanding that part. Wade Smart -- Registered Linux User: #480675 Registered Linux Machine: #408606 Linux since June 2005

1 0

[Dovecot] How do I make dovecot not use sslv2 for pop?
by Patrick Horgan 30 Jan '10

30 Jan '10

From nmap: 995/tcp open ssl/pop3 Dovecot pop3d |_ sslv2: server still supports SSLv2 |_ pop3-capabilities: USER CAPA UIDL PIPELINING RESP-CODES TOP SASL(PLAIN LOGIN) pop3 allows SSLv2, imap doesn't. In my dovecot.conf I have: ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2 at the global level. Do I need to put it inside the protocol pop3{} section? Patrick

3 4

[Dovecot] Dovecot SSL issues
by Spyros Tsiolis 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

Hello all, successfully managed to make dovecot work with horde (http://www.horde.org) and another MTA (SMTP/POP3). I have this nagging issue with dovecot though (I suspect - it's dovecot and not the rest of the packages, please read on): There is this special page one goes, that check if everything is ok with all the relevant software running along Horde. It's a php file called "test.php". Now, this file shows almost everything that happens in the box. Here's a transcript of what shows when it comes to dovecot and SSL : --------------------------- * Trying protocol imap/ssl, Port 993: ERROR - The server returned the following error message: SECURITY PROBLEM: insecure server advertised AUTH=PLAINCertificate failure for localhost: self signed certificate: /C=GR/ST=Kerkyra/L=Kerkyra/O=The Company Name/OU=IMAP server/CN=webmail.thecompanyname.gr/emailAddress=postmaster(a)webmail.thecompanyname.gr --------------------------- From what I understand, it doesn't like the certificate. However, I've followed a howto document step-by-step and did what is documented. Does anyone have any pointers on how to make secure imap for dovecot ? E.G. on ThunderBird, the settings are the following : Tools -> Account Settings -> Server Settings : Server Name : (the server or its ip address) Username : (the username) Port : (I've manually entered "993", because by default goes to "143") Security Settings -> Connection Security : SSL/TLS (again manually entered) CHECK_ON : Use secure authentication Now, if I click on "Get Mail" button on top of the TB window, I get a pop-up window with the following message : ------ Server : Location : <Servers' IP Address>:993 Certificate Status : This site attempts to identify itself with invalid information. Wrong Site : Certificate belongs to a different site, which could indicate an identity theft. Unknown Identity : Certificate is not trusted, because it hasn't been verified by a recognized authority. ------ After that, the users accepts the above by pressing ok twice. However, there's a third pop-up window with a message shown below : ------ You cannot log in to <servers' ip address> because you have enabled secure authentication and this serer does not support it. To log in, turn off secure authentication for this account. ------ Any help would be appreciated.. Thank you all for your patience, S. Tsiolis

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot auth feature request
by Frank Cusack 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

On January 29, 2010 7:11:59 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss(a)iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:01 -0500, Frank Cusack wrote: >> when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just >> this configuration: >> >> protocols = none >> ssl = no > > I suppose you didn't mean to include "ssl=no" above? yes, sorry. that is the working config. > I guess the reason I'm telling you this is because I don't really want > to add something to v1.2 that'll just go away in v2.0. pretty trivial to just include that line in the config so no worries. -frank

1 0

[Dovecot] mdbox, dsync
by Timo Sirainen 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

I finally migrated my mails from mbox format to mdbox format using dsync: 1. Stop dovecot, wait a few seconds for processes to die 2. dsync convert mdbox:~/mdbox 3. Change mail_location to mdbox:~/mdbox 4. Check that no new mails arrived during conversion (alternatively I could have just run dsync again, but I decided not to test my luck) 5. Start dovecot After fixing a pretty bad bug in dsync and a couple of other unrelated bugs, everything seemed to work correctly and transparently. UIDs and everything was preserved as expected. I think I even feel my mail clients being faster than with mbox :) ~% du --exclude=.imap -bsh mail-old-mbox 707M mail-old-mbox ~% du -bsh mdbox/* 27M mdbox/mailboxes 704M mdbox/storage The reason why I'm giving -b is because without it, mdbox was a lot larger than mbox (734 MB vs. 710 MB). I guess this is because zfs internally decided to waste some space for the files. ~/mdbox/storage% ls -lS -rw------- 1 tss tss 13602413 2010-01-29 18:05 m.68 -rw------- 1 tss tss 10487382 2010-01-29 18:06 m.209 -rw------- 1 tss tss 7749964 2010-01-29 18:06 m.270 -rw------- 1 tss tss 7493010 2010-01-29 18:05 m.69 .. -rw------- 1 tss tss 2097246 2010-01-29 18:06 m.175 -rw------- 1 tss tss 2097213 2010-01-29 18:06 m.151 -rw------- 1 tss tss 2097173 2010-01-29 18:06 m.197 -rw------- 1 tss tss 2097163 2010-01-29 18:05 m.89 -rw------- 1 tss tss 1307164 2010-01-29 18:33 m.296 Total of 296 files. The reason why there are a few large files is because their last mail is huge. I guess in future mdbox should try to avoid doing that if it knows the mail's size beforehand. Actually I thought it already tried to do that.. Anyway, let's hope it doesn't now corrupt all my mails.

3 3

[Dovecot] dovecot auth feature request
by Frank Cusack 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

when i try to run dovecot for SASL support only, with literally just this configuration: protocols = none ssl = no auth default { mechanisms = plain login passdb passwd-file { args = /etc/dovecot/passwd } socket listen { client { path = /var/spool/postfix/private/auth mode = 0660 } } } I get this: Error: ssl_cert_file: Can't use /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory Since, in this configuration, SSL doesn't have meaning, dovecot shouldn't be looking for any cert file. Easily fixed with "ssl = no" but that shouldn't be required. -frank

2 1

[Dovecot] mailbox format w/ separate headers/data
by Frank Cusack 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

In the future, it would be cool if there were a mailbox format (dbox2?) where mail headers and each mime part were stored in separate files. This would enable the zfs dedup feature to be used to maximum benefit. In the zfs filesystem, there is a dedup feature which stores only 1 copy of duplicate blocks. In a normal mail file, the headers will be different for each recipient and the chances of the content of the message being able to be dedup'd are close to zero, because the differences in header length changes the block boundaries for the rest of the message. But if each mime part is stored in a separate file, you get massive compression "for free". -frank

5 16