- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] 1.1.7: quota problem, unable to delete mails when quota exceeded
by Arkadiusz Miskiewicz 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Hi, When user exceeds it's quota then dovecot can't create it's files and it's showing zero mails :( This also means that user is unable to delete it's own mails. Sounds like kind-of bug, right? Dec 15 08:28:37 mbox1 dovecot: IMAP(xxx): open(/var/mail/xxx/dovecot-uidlist.lock) failed: Disk quota exceeded Dec 15 08:28:37 mbox1 dovecot: IMAP(kdudus): file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/xxx/dovecot-uidlist) failed: Disk quota exceeded This sometimes ends with: Dec 15 08:36:43 mbox1 dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Disconnected: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2008-12-15 08:36:43] bytes=409/896 -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

2 6

[Dovecot] Firewalls are [essentially] free - WAS: Re: Source patches from Apple
by Charles Marcus 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

On 12/13/2008, Dave McGuire (mcguire(a)neurotica.com) wrote: > My network security is handled elsewhere. I too believe in layered > security, but my desire to use the right tool for the job is much > stronger. My mail server is busy serving mail; my network security > is handled by equipment built and optimized for that job. Firewalls don't add any (perceptible) extra work or overhead for most any system, even old systems with old processors and not much RAM... Unless, of course, you have an insane number of rules... >> It's not like it costs anything extra.... :) > Well...that's the attitude that got us operating systems that need a > gigabyte of memory just to boot, and processors clocked at 3GHz that > give me the same useful performance as my 4MHz Z80 twenty years ago. > ;) Nothing is free. Your argument is bogus - see above... again, a basic, properly configured firewall has negligible impact on pretty much any systems resources, even ancient ones... So, yeah, enabling a firewall on a mail server is essentially free, whether talking impact on system resources, or dollar cost. -- Best regards, Charles

4 8

[Dovecot] Performance issue about maildir path.
by Zhang Huangbin 15 Dec '08

15 Dec '08

Hi, all. Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir', will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 10000 users, which maildir path style will improve performance? Thanks very much. :) -- Best regards. Zhang Huangbin - Open Source Mail Server Solution for RHEL/CentOS 5.x: http://code.google.com/p/iredmail/

3 2

[Dovecot] Toltec
by schmerold1＠gmail.com 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Has anyone used Toltec to connect Outlook to Dovecot hosted message stores? Primary advantage over Bynari is price - $14 per client. I have used it with Kolab and been very happy.

1 0

[Dovecot] Autocreate plugin for 1.1 - not compile in FreeBSD (gcc problem?)
by Proskurin Kirill 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Hello all. I try to compile Autocreate plugin for 1.1 in FreeBSD 7.0-p6. gcc version: # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] But it gives me a: mx# sh -x patch.sh + export DOVECOT=/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7 + gcc -fPIC -shared -g -Wall -I/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7 -I/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib -I/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib-storage -I/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib-mail -I/usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib-imap -DHAVE_CONFIG_H autocreate-plugin.c -o autocreate_plugin.so In file included from /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib/lib.h:24, from autocreate-plugin.c:22: /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.1.7/src/lib/compat.h:55:29: error: sys/sysmacros.h: No such file or directory + cp autocreate_plugin.so /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/autocreate_plugin.so cp: autocreate_plugin.so: No such file or directory mx# I try do this at Debian Etch and all work well. gcc version: # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --with-tune=i686 --enable-checking=release i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21) How can I compile it on FreeBSD? autocreate_plugin.so from Debian not working at FreeBSD. -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill

3 10

[Dovecot] trash plugin
by Ivars Strazdiņš 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Hi there, are there more trash plugin related updates since v1.1.4 ? I'm trying to use the plugin with dovecot+mysql according to documentation and get frequent segfaults Dec 4 13:58:21 mail kernel: [1605631.688946] imap[16662]: segfault at 95 ip b7f51a1e sp bfd36190 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7f50000+2000] Dec 4 13:58:22 mail kernel: [1605632.366633] imap[16765]: segfault at 14 ip b7edda21 sp bfdc1a10 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7edc000+2000] Dec 4 13:58:23 mail kernel: [1605633.063495] imap[16767]: segfault at 14 ip b7fd4a21 sp bfebab10 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7fd3000+2000] Dec 4 13:58:40 mail kernel: [1605650.013144] imap[16772]: segfault at 355 ip b7e41a1e sp bff27b80 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7e40000+2000] Dec 4 14:14:09 mail kernel: [1606578.801269] imap[15665]: segfault at 48d ip b7f3ca1e sp bfc22840 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7f3b000+2000] In changelog I see that there are updates for trash plugin going from v1.1.3 to v.1.1.4 Using v1.1.4 pre-build for Ubuntu server and lazy enough to do manual compilation... thanks for your time, Ivars

2 2

[Dovecot] can deliver filter through spamc?
by Neal Becker 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

I'm using maildrop to filter mail like: xfilter "/usr/bin/spamc" xfilter "/usr/bin/bogofilter -ep" I want to change to deliver (so I can use sieve) but can deliver do this?

4 4

[Dovecot] confused about deliver
by Neal Becker 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

I have dovecot serving a maildir in ~/Mail.imap. In Mail.imap I have cur/ new/ tmp/ .maillist1/ .maillist1/cur .maillist1/new .maillist1/tmp ... I made a sieve script, which looks like: require "fileinto"; if header :is "Subject" "test" { fileinto "test"; } ... with no final else clase. When mail is delivered to a maillist, caught by my sieve script, it goes into the correct subdir of maildir. But, when not caught by the script, I get: Dec 14 11:53:27 localhost deliver(nbecker): msgid=<d9f848520812140850q190f104fva5f586e43fa03994(a)mail.gmail.com>: saved mail to INBOX I can't find this mail saved to INBOX. There are no modified directories under maildir that I can find. Where did this mail go? I wanted it to go into the toplevel cur/, which is where my client finds them.

2 2

[Dovecot] SIEVE resources ?
by Xavier Maillard 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Hi, Do you any good SIEVE resources for a poor beginnner ? I'd to translate some of my current procmail rules into SIEVE. I have, for example, a "generic" rule that is able to sort almost any message from/to a mailing-list into a dedicated folder -i.e one rule for almost all my lists. Any recomendation ? Thank you

4 3

[Dovecot] Source patches from Apple
by Mike Abbott 14 Dec '08

14 Dec '08

Hello Dovecot developers, Apple has made and tested significant changes to Dovecot v1.1 and now is ready to contribute them back to your open source project. The changes include: Scalability and performance: allow pop/imap mail processes to handle multiple clients larger listen queues Stability and maintenance: fix to allow cross-compilation workarounds for Mac OS X bugs a couple general bug fixes symbol conflict resolution Features: Open Directory integration back off after failed auth attempts Mac OS X-specific handle dynamic host name changes I could contribute these as one giant patch or as a sequence of discrete patches. How would you prefer to receive them?

13 19