- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] FTS/squat search indexes built when?
by Jay Levitt 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

I know that a given search index doesn't get built the first time until you do an actual search on it from an IMAP client. I don't much care about that; I'm the only user, and I don't create new folders too often. At worst, I could create a script to go search every folder once. But what I'm not clear about: Does it then get updated on every delivery by LDA? Or does the index also need to get updated when I do a search, assuming there's been at least one message delivered since the last search? Jay Levitt

5 11

[Dovecot] doveot reporting "No space left on device" - yet df show plenty of space / inodes.
by Tom Brownlie 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

Hi, I am running dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a Suse Linux server. The server has approx 200+ mailboxes. Last week the filesystem (/dev/mapper/datavg/dat2lv) ran out of space - causing it to do into read-only mode. When I realised this I allocated some more space and re-booted the machine... Strangely it seems that dovecot is still having problems... It's like dovecot doesn't realise that there is enough space on the file system. Also - it only is happening to a few users at this stage - not all users are having problems sending/receiving emails... The dovecotstderr.log file contains: dovecot: Aug 05 09:47:38 Error: IMAP(rebecca): file_dotlock_open(/data/mail/rebecca/dovecot-uidlist) failed: No space left on device When I do a df -h mail:/var/log # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda4 9.0G 5.7G 3.3G 64% / tmpfs 491M 8.0K 491M 1% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/datavg-dat2lv 300G 130G 171G 44% /data When I do a df -i mail:/var/log # df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/sda4 0 0 0 - / tmpfs 125505 5 125500 1% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/datavg-dat2lv 357753312 1030354 356722958 1% /data I manually created a file in /data/mail/rebecca - which worked fine, and didn't cause any problems. HELP!!! I am stumped.... I can't understand why Dovecot is complaining.. I have manually stopped postfix and dovecot, and then re-started them.. But to no avail. HELP - I am desperate.... My previously very reliable email server seems to be sick.. _________________________________________________________________ Meet singles near you. Try ninemsn dating now! http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fdating%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau…

3 7

[Dovecot] sieve multiple redirects
by Anil 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

I got a sieve script like this: redirect "user(a)gmail.com"; redirect "someuser(a)hotmail.com"; keep; It seems to redirect the mail to the 1st user but not the 2nd. Any idea? From what I can tell, that is a valid sieve script. I am using an earlier RC version of dovecot - 1.1.rc4, going to be upgrading soon. There are also a few errors. I assume /home/orders is not needed? Also, does Dovecot go through Global Sieve script and then per-user script? It appears that the global script is not even used if the per-user script exists - anyway to change that so both are parsed in order? Aug 4 16:36:48 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 223526 mail.info] cmusieve: Using sieve path: /apps/mail/domain.com/orders/.dovecot.sieve Aug 4 16:36:48 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 507699 mail.info] cmusieve: Executing script /apps/mail/domain.com/orders/.dovecot.sievec Aug 4 16:36:48 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 698705 mail.error] file_dotlock_create(/home/orders/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory Aug 4 16:36:48 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 104220 mail.info] Sending a forward to <user(a)gmail.com> with return path <<user(a)testing.net>> Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net sendmail[20139]: [ID 801593 mail.info] m74NamS4020139: from=<user(a)testing.net>, size=1119, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<4897927F.5010104(a)testing.net>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v4, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net sendmail[20138]: [ID 801593 mail.info] m74Namh1020138: to=user(a)gmail.com, ctladdr=<user(a)testing.net> (1000/1000), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=relay, pri=30850, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (m74NamS4020139 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 260232 mail.error] Sendmail process terminated abnormally, exit status 70 Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 344163 mail.info] sieve runtime error: Redirect: Error sending mail Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 368532 mail.error] sieve_execute_bytecode(/apps/mail/domain.com/orders/.dovecot.sievec) failed Aug 4 16:36:49 the.testing.net deliver(orders(a)domain.com): [ID 702911 mail.info] msgid=<4897927F.5010104(a)testing.net>: saved mail to INBOX

1 0

[Dovecot] RFE: Disallow DELETE of non-empty MBOX
by Kenneth Porter 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

It looks like this is already the rule for maildir, where one can't remove the folder if any files or subdirectories are present. I'd like to get this option for mbox folders, as I'd like to prevent "accidents" where users accidentally delete large folders by clicking the wrong thing and then too-quickly approving the confirmation dialog that pops up. (Impatient upper level management tends to do this. ;)) BTW, I'm using Mulberry for my client, and it unfortunately puts "Mark contents seen" right next to "Delete folder" on the context menu. I'm aware of the issue so I tend to be extra careful when I finish with the folder associated with a busy mailing list and mark all the uninteresting messages seen.

3 6

Re: [Dovecot] Problem: delivery with mode 600 into shared folder
by seriv＠parkheights.dyndns.org 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

Hi Timo, ----- "Timo Sirainen" <tss(a)iki.fi> wrote: > On Jul 23, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Sergey Ivanov wrote: > > >[skip] > > > > at Thunderbird restart, but after restart all messages in shared > > folder appear as new. Even without restart, when go to another > > folder and then return to one where I've marked messages as "Read" > > > before, they are new! > > Dovecot configs are in my previous message, I think I should not > > post them once more. > > Sounds like the mailbox is read-only for the user. It doesn't have > write-permissions to it the directories? you are right, directories with mail are only readable by users, they have each their own dirs for storing CONTROL and INDEX. --- mail_location: maildir:/home/vmail/listuser/Maildir:CONTROL=/home/vmail/%u/Maildir/control:INDEX=/home/vmail/%u/Maildir/index --- your change b5388b21c4c2 fixed the problem, thank you! -- Sergey ivanov.

1 0

[Dovecot] v1.1.2 released
by Timo Sirainen 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.2.tar.gz.sig Development of new features in this release and the upcoming multi-master replication are sponsored by Directi (www.directi.com) Lucene indexing is currently deprecated in favor of the new Solr indexing. I'm even considering removing the Lucene C++ library support, so if you're interested in keeping it send me a mail. Note that the current fts-lucene is somewhat broken as well as non-optimal. Anyone interested in using zlib plugin with Maildir should read http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib. I'm hoping to get the first v1.2 betas out in a couple of weeks and an eventual v1.2.0 release in a couple of months. + Added full text search indexing support for Apache Lucene Solr server: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr + IMAP SORT: Added X-SCORE sort key for use with Solr searches. + zlib plugin supports now bzip2 also. + quota: All backends now take noenforcing parameter. + Maildir: Add ,S=<size> to maildir filename whenever quota plugin is loaded, even when not using Maildir++ quota. + deliver: Allow lda section to override plugin settings. + deliver: Giving a -m <namespace prefix> parameter now silently saves the mail to INBOX. This is useful for e.g. -m INBOX/${extension} + Added a new maildirlock utility for write-locking Dovecot Maildir. + dict-sql: Support non-MySQL databases by assuming they implement the "INSERT .. ON DUPLICATE KEY" using an INSERT trigger. - SORT: Fixed several crashes/errors with sort indexing. - IMAP: BODYSTRUCTURE is finally RFC 3501 compliant. Earlier versions didn't include Content-Location support. - IMAP: Fixed bugs with listing INBOX. - Maildir: maildirfolder file wasn't created when dovecot-shared file existed on the root directory - deliver didn't expand %variables in namespace location settings. - zlib: Copying non-compressed messages resulted in empty mails (except when hardlink-copying between maildirs). - mbox-snarf plugin was somewhat broken - deliver + Maildir: If uidlist couldn't be locked while saving, we might have assert-crashed - mbox: Fixed an assert-crash with \Recent flag handling

5 8

[Dovecot] Help with auto vacation replies
by CJ Keist 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm testing out dovecot with postfix. I'm running postfix 2.5.2 with dovecot version 1.1.1 with dovecot sieve plugin version 1.1.5. I have everything compiled and working except for the sieve plugin. I'm now trying to test out the sieve plugin and having no luck in getting a simple auto vacation reply to work. Here is my .dovecot.sieve script: require ["fileinto", "vacation"]; # BEGIN VACATION vacation :days 30 :subject "Out of Office Reply" :addresses ["cj.keist(a)colostate.edu"] "OUT OF THE OFFICE"; I know the dovecot delivery program is reading my script as the .dovecot.sievec file is being created and there is no .dovecot.sieve.err file. Permissions of the files are in my ownership. The files are located in my home directory as well. The log files simply show delivery of the message and nothing else: Aug 4 09:06:28 mail2.engr.colostate.edu postfix/local[7480]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 622BB59EFA: to=<cjay(a)engr2.colostate.edu>, relay=local, delay=0.89, delays=0 .18/0.08/0/0.64, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver) Aug 4 09:06:28 mail2.engr.colostate.edu postfix/qmgr[4666]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 622BB59EFA: removed Any help as to why it is not sending any replies? Dovecot -n follows: # 1.1.1: /userM/mail-services/dovecot/etc/dovecot.conf Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1500). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s ssl_cert_file: /userM/mail-services/dovecot/etc/ssl/dovecot.pem ssl_key_file: /userM/mail-services/dovecot/etc/ssl/privkey.pem ssl_parameters_regenerate: 0 ssl_cipher_list: MEDIUM:!LOW disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot//login login_executable(default): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_greeting: Cyrus ready. login_max_processes_count: 500 max_mail_processes: 500 mail_location: mbox:~/:INBOX=/userM/mail/%u mmap_disable: yes mail_nfs_index: yes mail_executable(default): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir(default): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /userM/mail-services/dovecot/lib/dovecot/pop3 auth default: mechanisms: plain login verbose: yes debug: yes passdb: driver: pam passdb: driver: passwd args: blocking=yes userdb: driver: passwd args: blocking=yes socket: type: listen client: path: /userM/mail-services/postfix/var/private/auth mode: 432 user: postfix group: postfix - -- C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist(a)colostate.edu UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630 Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-5569 College of Engineering, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301 All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIlyB8A29OFr7C6jcRAt5lAKCiP5Zh1WIMrg+QWPprcxi9Gp5Z3QCgxhbj A6ivJ6XeA8MuoA19y2xEFjI= =uT1j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

[Dovecot] bugzilla or other similar bug tracking systems
by Diego Liziero 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

I was wondering if it could be useful to use such tools to keep track of users bugs. I find somehow harder to search the mailing list if a bug is known, if it's being worked on, if it needs more feedback, in witch release it has been eventually solved, and so on. Any thoughts? Regards, Diego.

3 3

Re: [Dovecot] how to store flags \Seen into read-only mailbox?
by seriv＠parkheights.dyndns.org 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

This problem is apparently about changeset http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/eec74a6ad62e. This change makes dovecot behaviour different from what is described in wiki, about sharing and making private /Seen flags, see http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes?highlight=(flags are shared or private) When I've tried to revert it, first time with my client it worked perfectly. But then clients were not able to open any mail folders, and imap processes were dying. -- Sergey Ivanov. ----- seriv(a)parkheights.dyndns.org wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to use dovecot for storing mailing lists and read-only > access for users. > The OS is Solaris, authentication for all readers of these lists are > from Ldap through PAM, and one local user "listuser" will receive all > mail and store them into it's folders (Maildirs). These maildirs are > readable (read-only) for all others and they are shared by setting > --- > mail_location: > maildir:/home/vmail/listuser/Maildir:CONTROL=/home/vmail/%u/Maildir/control:INDEX=/home/vmail/%u/Maildir/index > --- > Mail became readable because in each mail folder to be shared there is > dovecot-shared with mode 064, and all users included into his group. > > But this is the problem: how to have flag \Seen stored in read-only > mailbox? As recorded by rawlog, it is ignored now: > --- > bash-3.00# cat 20080724-103219-10616.in > 3 namespace > 4 lsub "" "*" > 5 list "" "INBOX" > 6 list "" "Trash" > 7 create "Trash" > 8 select "OmniTI.FreeLotto.Ops" > 9 UID fetch 1:* (FLAGS) > 10 uid store 1:3 +Flags (\Seen) > 11 IDLE > DONE > 12 close > 13 logout > bash-3.00# cat 20080724-103219-10616.out > * OK [RAWLOG TIMESTAMP] 2008-07-24 10:32:19 > * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL > 3 OK Namespace completed. > * LSUB () "." "OmniTI.FreeLotto.ODS" > * LSUB () "." "OmniTI.FreeLotto.Ops" > 4 OK Lsub completed. > * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX" > 5 OK List completed. > 6 OK List completed. > 7 NO Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more > information. [2008-07-24 10:32:19] > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox. > * 3 EXISTS > * 0 RECENT > * OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen. > * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1216906857] UIDs valid > * OK [UIDNEXT 4] Predicted next UID > 8 OK [READ-ONLY] Select completed. > * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS ()) > * 2 FETCH (UID 2 FLAGS ()) > * 3 FETCH (UID 3 FLAGS ()) > 9 OK Fetch completed. > 10 OK Store ignored with read-only mailbox. > + idling > 11 OK Idle completed. > 12 OK Close completed. > * BYE Logging out > 13 OK Logout completed. > --- > > -- > Sergey ivanov.

2 1

[Dovecot] plus addressing bug in dovecot 1.1.x?
by Jon Fullmer 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

I had recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.0.14 to 1.1.0, and then to 1.1.1. Ever since the upgrade to 1.1.0, I noticed that "plus addressing" has failed. In case I'm using a foreign phrase, this is the concept of sending an e-mail to "user+spam(a)domain.com", and having dovecot (dovecot LDA, specifically), deliver this to the "spam" submailbox to "user(a)domain.com". I've been using this successfully since 1.0.3. When I upgraded to 1.1.0, I noticed that e-mails were no longer being delivered to the submailboxes as they had been (though they would arrive in the central INBOX). I checked the "dovecot-deliver.log", and I noticed that, ever since I had brought up 1.1.0, I would see: save failed to spam: Unknown namespace ("spam" is the submailbox) After the upgrade to 1.1.1, I still would see these messages (and behavior). I have since installed 1.0.15. The plus addressing now works again, as it had been. With all of these "upgrades" and "downgrades", the config file has remained exactly the same. There have been no other changes to any components on the host system (i.e., new OS-es, new postfix, etc.). Thoughts? Is this a known issue? - Jon

4 7