- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] auth process(es)
by Thomas Hummel 16 Jun '07

16 Jun '07

Hello Timo, I've got some questions about dovecot-auth processes which I cannot answer just by reading the doc : [ Note : my problem is that I often see dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Connection refused and I'm looking for a way to tweak dovecot.conf parameters to allow more login <-> auth connections ] - I'm not sure I get the auth worker process concept right : is there a master dovecot-auth which listens to new incoming connections from login processes and fork/exec the real job of authenticating against the pass/userdbs to a child, called an auth worker ? - is it safe to increment the number of auth processes (the 'count' parameter in the auth block (auth_default { ...} for instance) ? - my understanding is that login processes communicate with auth processes through a unix type socket (named 'default') : can I create a second auth block in dovecot.conf (for instance 'aut extra {...}') in addition to the existing 'auth default {...}' one ? would it create an second unix socket and thus allowing a heavier login processes load ? what would be the difference between that and, say, changing the 'count' parameter to '2' in the 'auth default' section ? thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel(a)pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau

2 5

[Dovecot] different configurations for individual user
by Joshua C.S. Chen 16 Jun '07

16 Jun '07

Hi everyone, I am planning to upgrade my current uw-imap to dovecot. I am using Linux (Redhat EL 4). The main purpose is to use maildir instead of mbox. For some reason, I don't want to upgrade all users' mail boxes all at a time, but I want to change the imap server first (to dovecot), while keeping all mbox files, then convert them to maildir user by user (one user at a time). My question is: Is it possible that dovecot can setup individual user's own configuration? so that some users can setup mail_location = mbox but others = maildir. Thanks in advance Joshua

2 1

[Dovecot] LDAP subtree search on AD
by Bruno Puga 16 Jun '07

16 Jun '07

Hello people! I'm new to the list and to dovecot too. In advance I'd like to thank everybody who could help me, and I'll be very glad if a could help somebody here. I'm working in a project to integrate dovecot and active directory authentication for 2 weeks without total success. I've tried so many waysto solve my problem, but no one gave me the right answer. I'll appreciate if someone could help me. First off all let me show some needed data. Distro: Debian Etch dovecot --version 1.0.0 dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ log_path: /var/log/dovecot-imapd.log log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: imap disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot//login login_executable: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap-login mail_debug: yes imap_client_workarounds: outlook-idle delay-newmail auth default: verbose: yes debug: yes debug_passwords: yes passdb: driver: pam args: dovecot userdb: driver: ldap args: /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf socket: type: listen client: master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 384 user: vmail group: vmail /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf hosts = 192.168.0.11 dn = cn=dovecot,cn=Users,dc=tecnicopias01,dc=com,dc=br dnpass = password ldap_version = 3 auth_bind = yes base = DC=tecnicopias01,DC=com,DC=br deref = never scope = subtree user_attrs = info=mail user_filter = (&(objectClass=organizationalPerson)(sAMAccountName=%u)) user_global_uid = 5000 user_global_gid = 5000 I can authenticate using pam+krb5 with success, but when I try to make a userdb search to get maillocation for the authenticated user, I get in trouble. The ldap_search doesn't make subtree search, making only onelevel search. So, if I point the base directive (/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf) to where the user that is authenticating in that moment is, I can perfect login and get the maillocation. My question is: Why dovecot doesn't make ldap subtree search? Or, am I missing anything? Thanks Bruno.

2 5

[Dovecot] Looking for plugin docs
by Rajkumar S 16 Jun '07

16 Jun '07

Hello all, I had gone through the wiki, but could not find any page about writing new plugins. Any pointers towards plugin api/docs will be very helpful. with warm regards, raj

3 14

Re: [Dovecot] auth process(es)
by Kenny Dail 15 Jun '07

15 Jun '07

> > - is it safe to increment the number of auth processes (the 'count' > > parameter in the auth block (auth_default { ...} for instance) ? > > Should be. > > > - my understanding is that login processes communicate with auth > > processes through a unix type socket (named 'default') : > > > > can I create a second auth block in dovecot.conf (for instance > > 'aut extra {...}') in addition to the existing 'auth default {...}' > > one ? would it create an second unix socket and thus allowing a heavier > > login processes load ? > > > > what would be the difference between that and, say, changing the > > 'count' parameter to '2' in the 'auth default' section ? > > Increasing count allows heavier load, because there are then more > processes listening for incoming connections in the same socket. Actually increasing the count doesn't work. At least not for me on 1.0.0: Jun 14 12:28:39 mail5 dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.0 starting up Jun 14 12:28:39 mail5 dovecot: Auth process died too early - shutting down Jun 14 12:28:39 mail5 dovecot: child 19080 (auth) returned error 89 Jun 14 12:28:39 mail5 dovecot: auth(default): Socket already exists: /var/run/dovecot/auth-client -- Kenny Dail <kend(a)amigo.net>

3 2

[Dovecot] shared folders
by T. Horsnell 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

A number of our users would greatly benefit from truly shareable mail folders. I know we can bodge this with symlinks, but mailbox corruptions seem to occur when simultaneous updates are made, but this may be a client issue I guess. So I wonder if true shareability is creeping up the agenda. By true shareability, I mean such that if two users have the same folder open and one of them makes a modification to it, the display of that folder on the other user's screen immediately reflects that change. I guess this may well require a co-operating client... Cheers, Terry --

2 1

[Dovecot] postfix+dovecot delivering to wrong (/var/mail/%u) place
by Tom Lobato 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

(Dovecot 1.0.rc15) Hello I'm tring to configure postfix+dovecot on debian etch. In dovecot I use passdb pam and userdb passwd-file. I can connect pop3 clients and reveice mails and connect smtp clients and send mails, but it is delivered to /var/mail/%u instead the configured mailboxes in /var/local/dovecot/%u. I`ve configured postfix as say http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix. /etc/postfix/main.cf: ----------------------------------- smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) biff = no append_dot_mydomain = no myhostname = coan alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases mydestination = coan.com.br myorigin = /etc/mailname relayhost = mynetworks = 121.120.0.0/16 mailbox_size_limit = 0 inet_interfaces = all smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_destination virtual_transport = dovecot dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1 ----------------------------------- belong master.cf. Below the syslog when I send mail via smtp... /var/log/syslog: -------------------------------- postfix/smtpd[16656]: connect from 201-95-99-135.dsl.telesp.net.br[201.95.99.135] postfix/smtpd[16656]: C76F948E3D7: client=201-95-99-135.dsl.telesp.net.br[201.95.99.135] postfix/cleanup[16660]: C76F948E3D7: message-id=<1181769218.7844.6.camel@mobile> postfix/qmgr[16653]: C76F948E3D7: from=<tom(a)coan.com.br>, size=457, nrcpt=1 (queue active) postfix/local[16661]: C76F948E3D7: to=<tom(a)coan.com.br>, relay=local, delay=0.52, delays=0.45/0.01/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to mailbox) postfix/qmgr[16653]: C76F948E3D7: removed postfix/smtpd[16656]: disconnect from 201-95-99-135.dsl.telesp.net.br[201.95.99.135] ------------------------------- If I change 'virtual_transport = dovecot' to 'local_transport = dovecot', syslog output changes relay-local to relay=dovecot, but bounces the mail saying 'passwd-file(tom(a)coan.com.br): unknown user'. However I'm sure that the user is in the passwd-file and dovecot has permissions to read it. Can you give some hints about what can be happening? Dovecot conf: ----------------------- # /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocols: pop3 disable_plaintext_auth: no login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3-login mail_extra_groups: mail mailboxes mail_location: maildir:/var/local/dovecot/%u mail_executable: /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/pop3 pop3_uidl_format: %v.%u auth default: verbose: yes debug: yes debug_passwords: yes passdb: driver: pam userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /etc/mailsystem/userdb socket: type: listen client: master: path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mode: 438 ----------------------- Thank you Tom Lobato

1 1

[Dovecot] How do I test new code?
by Stewart Dean 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

I know how to run a second instance of the *base* code (to check different functionality/config) and documented it in http://wiki.dovecot.org/RunningDovecot What I realize I don't know how to do is to run an altogether different version or build of the code as that second instance, which would be good to have to check out upgrades before they go into production. While I could do a build in the regular fashion and put DC somewhere else or name it something else, so I could invoke this different code, presumably that different code will still look for the subsidiary executables in the usual place. Do I have to change the DESTDIR parm when doing the make install or some such? I do realize that, just as I did with running a second instance of the *same* code, I'd have to change the config file, have a separate /var/run directory...... -- ==== Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504 sdean(a)bard.edu voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-7035

2 1

[Dovecot] errors in dovecot-uidlist
by Erland Nylend 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

We have migrated a mailsystem to postfix/dovecot, using the courier migrate script, and we have run into a problem with dovecot-uidlist. The messages are not listed in the correct order .. This is an example dovecot-uidlist -file: 1 1177585200 49 22 1179084774.P7191Q0M321163.webmail1,S=8245:2,S 24 1179377823.P15932Q0M835219.smtp1,S=3462:2,S 25 1179668346.P23942Q0M941365.webmail1,S=4820357:2,S 31 1179864561.P22903Q0M433768.smtp2,S=3306:2,S 34 1180344355.P25491Q0M17232.smtp2,S=5111:2,S 35 1180454170.P14932Q0M841649.smtp2,S=2024:2, 36 1168867750.H82058P20971.smtp1:2,SR 37 1170339716.H537368P4032.smtp1:2,S 38 1171291025.H352867P8785.smtp2:2,SR 39 1171357049.H141820P2105.smtp1:2,SR 40 1171460195.H933928P14324.smtp1:2,SR 41 1171616121.H812220P27503.smtp2:2,SR 42 1171872919.H950768P16201.smtp1:2,S 43 1173694618.H330094P23347.smtp1:2,S 44 1175238705.H589518P693.smtp1:2,SR 45 1176800600.H716261P10514.smtp1:2,SR 46 1177615732.H355340P10418.webmail1:2,SR 47 1180471524.P30985Q0M109430.smtp2,S=16621 48 1180597849.P8169Q0M990486.smtp1,S=33326 As you can see, the unix timestamps are descending between uid 35 and uid 36 .. and this causes problems if we intend to make webmail access the messages through imap. (it expects to receive the messages sorted by when they were received) Is there any way I can sort the list accourding to the unix timestamps, and still make it transparent to the pop3/imap clients? I would prefer a solution that does not involve users downloading allready downloaded messages via pop3. -- Erland Nylend

2 3

[Dovecot] 1.0.1 release candidate 3
by Timo Sirainen 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2: + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to stderr and exit with EX_NOPERM instead of sending the rejection by executing sendmail. + dovecot --log-error logs now a warning, an error and a fatal - APPEND / SEARCH: If internaldate was outside valid value for time_t, we returned BAD error for APPEND and SEARCH never matched. With 64bit systems this shouldn't have happened. With 32bit systems the valid range is usually for years 1902..2037. See ChangeLog for more.

8 9