- dovecot - dovecot.org

Dovecot 2.4: dirsize removed - alternative for physical size quotas?
by jarland＠mxroute.com 16 Oct '25

16 Oct '25

We're upgrading our servers from Dovecot 2.3 to 2.4 and hit an issue with the dirsize driver removal. In 2.3, we switched from "maildir" to "dirsize" quota driver because maildir counts virtual (RFC822) sizes. This caused mailboxes to appear full before reaching actual disk limits - base64-encoded attachments make the virtual size larger than physical disk usage. For example, 8GB actual usage could show as 10GB+ in quota calculations. The dirsize driver solved this by calculating quota from actual file sizes on disk. In 2.4, dirsize is removed with the note "use quota-count instead." However, the count driver requires quota_vsizes=yes, which uses virtual sizes - the same problem we had with maildir. What's the intended solution in 2.4 for tracking quota based on physical disk usage rather than virtual message sizes? The available drivers seem to be: - count: requires virtual sizes - maildir: also uses virtual sizes via maildirsize - fs: requires OS-level per-user filesystem quotas Is there a way to configure count for physical sizes? Appreciate any guidance.

1 0

Feature request: allow Settings variables to be used in ldap_auth_dn
by Kristian 16 Oct '25

16 Oct '25

Hi, with the migration to 2.4 my setup for LDAP authentication stopped working. I used to have different LDAP config files for every virtual domain. Each domain has an domain-specific service user with read access, that is used by dovecot. There is no service user with access across domains. With the current 2.4 configuration I only see the possibility to configure one user in the variables ldap_auth_dn ldap_auth_dn_password In ldap_base I am able to use settings variables ldap_base = ou=people,dc=%{user | domain | ldap_dn} which allows me to select the right LDAP tree depending on the domain of the user. I would need this also in ldap_auth_dn to keep my current setup. I can see, that this is specific to my setup without an service user with access to all domains, and that this ignores the problem of having different passwords for different domain users, but it would at least keep some compatibility to working 2.3 setups. Kind regards Kristian

1 0

auth_cache_ttl and sieve_enabled
by Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz 14 Oct '25

14 Oct '25

Hi, auth_cache_ttl docs https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/config/auth/caching.html say: " # We also try to handle password changes automatically: If user's previous # authentication was successful, but this one wasn't, the cache isn't used. " but seems that this doesn't work in such way for sieve_enabled flag changes. So changing sieve_enabled from 0 to 1 means user still has to wait until cache expires and new value is noticed by dovecot... which is not desired. Could sieve_enabled be also treated in similar way as incorrect authentication? -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

1 0

Ssl_cert keyword ?
by MellorCH 10 Oct '25

10 Oct '25

> V2.4.1 what’s the latest syntax for this please? Ssl_cert V2.4.1 what's the latest syntax for this please? Ssl_cert

3 2

SSL initialization error - Dovecot 2.4.1, Fedora 43 beta
by Jason J.G. White 09 Oct '25

09 Oct '25

I'm trying Dovecot 2.4.1 under Fedora 43 beta with all packages up to date. I've encountered several issues after attempting to update my configuration. The main problem is this: whenever a client attempts to connect, I get the following error Error: Failed to initialize SSL connection: Couldn't initialize SSL server context: Can't load SSL certificate (ssl_server_cert_file setting): error:0A00018F:SSL routines::ee key too small: I'm using a SECP384R1 key issued by letsencrypt.org, which should satisfy security checks. My Web searches have not identified a relevant bug report. Have others encountered this issue? If it's distribution-specific, I can visit the relevant bug tracker. Thank you for your consideration.

5 8

Does ldap_auth_sasl_mechanisms support GSSAPI?
by Fredrik Falk 08 Oct '25

08 Oct '25

I'm attempting to authenticate dovecot against an OpenLDAP server using GSSAPI. Setting `ldap_auth_sasl_mechanisms = gssapi` causes the server to fail to boot with the error `ldap_auth_sasl_mechanism set, but no SASL support compiled in`. I'm wondering if there's a dependency that I'm missing, or if there's no support for it with the deb packages provided at https://repo.dovecot.org/. For reference, I'm running Ubuntu 24.04 with the dovecot apt repository added. `dovecot --version` outputs `2.4.1-4+ubuntu24.04 (7d8c0e5759)`. `dovecot --build-options` yields ``` Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify openssl io_block_size=8192 SQL driver plugins: mysql postgresql sqlite Passdb: ldap pam passwd passwd-file sql Userdb: ldap(plugin) passwd prefetch passwd-file sql ``` Do I need to compile my own version, or is there something I'm missing? The documentation doesn't provide a lot of answers unfortunately. Med vänlig hälsning, Fredrik Falk -- Fredrik Falk <freddo(a)ludd.ltu.se> Luleå Universitets Datorförening /LUDD/

1 0

Announcement: wormhole plugin, replication for Dovecot 2.4
by Patrick Cernko 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Hello List, I am proud to announce my project "wormhole". This is an extension for Dovecot 2.4.1. It allows to continue the use of the replication feature of Dovecot that was removed with the 2.4 release. History: I started this project by forking the replication code of Dovecot 2.3.21.1 and porting it to 2.4. The first result was a patch for Dovecot 2.4.1. While working with the code, I realized that it is possible to provide the feature as a plugin / extension. In the first release of the plugin, I tried to integrate it with the existing dsync commands for doveadm. This required an API for access to the dsync commands, which I proposed to the Dovecot developers in https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/249 . Unfortunately, my pull request was rejected, though I can understand the reasons for that. Without the required API, I had to switch to another approach: I forked the dsync code from doveadm to provide a new set of commands: "repl" and "repl-server". These commands work similar to "sync" and "dsync-server" but use additional functions required by the replication feature. This approach was released as version 0.3 of the plugin. With version 0.4 I renamed the project to wormhole. Before that it was just called dovecot-replication (see https://codeberg.org/errror/dovecot-replication) I thought that the project should have a more unique name. Currently I'm working on designing a test suite for wormhole. Doing unit tests of the components is not sufficient IMHO. The test suite should check the whole replication feature using two running dovecot instances that replicate the users' mailboxes. Having a sophisticated test suite will help in future development and bug tracking. The code can be found on my codeberg site at: https://codeberg.org/errror/wormhole There is also a web page on my personal homepage at: https://people.mpi-klsb.mpg.de/~pcernko/wormhole.shtml The project is still missing documentation. For the moment, configuration is similar to the existing Dovecot 2.3 documentation. Upgrading from 2.3: When using the included patch for Dovecot, the plugin should be 100% compatible with existing Dovecot 2.3 servers. This compatibility should allow uninterrupted upgrades of the service by replacing Dovecot on one server and then the other one. After the upgrade, the plugin can be reconfigured to work without the patch for Dovecot. Upgrading without the patch is also possible. During the upgrade (aka "while one server still runs 2.3") some aspects of the replication will not work or lack performance. Upgrading is not yet tested very well and missing documentation also. I will work on that soon. I hope to get some feedback, pull requests or bug reports via mail or at codeberg (preferred). -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko(a)mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Scientific IT and Technical Service Max-Planck-Institute für Informatik & Softwaresysteme

3 2

Quota plugin: "quota_storage_size" not recognized from userdb extra fields in dovecot 2.4.1
by Matthieu Schapranow 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Dear Dovecot experts, I am in the process of planning migration from dovecot 2.3 to 2.4.1+dfsg1-6 on Debian Trixie, but userdb extra fields for quota_storage_size are ignored. All settings proved to work in 2.3; following per-user quota manual as outlined in [1]. Issue Cannot override setting quota_storage_size using userdb_quota_storage_size, but userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage apparently work. Setup Configures multiple userdb using driver passwd combined for a) user information and b) user-specific extra fields; auth. via passdb using driver pam defined in auth-system.conf.ext included by 10-auth.conf Excerpt from doveconf -n: … passdb system_pam { driver = pam } userdb userdb_01_passwd { driver = passwd result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } userdb userdb_02_quota { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings driver = passwd-file result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue } … Excerpt from passwd file /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings holding userdb extra fields: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M Default quota config excerpt from doveconf -n: … quota user { storage_grace = 100M storage_size = 750M quota_warning warn-95 { quota_storage_percentage = 95 execute quota-warning { args = 95 %{user} } } quota_warning warn-85 { quota_storage_percentage = 85 execute quota-warning { args = 85 %{user} } } } … Result Userdb setting appear to work correctly as it combines both userdb files, see following output: # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_size 1200M However, querying the quota only shows the default value, but not the user-specific setting. # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 768000 104 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Expected behaviour Any user should report default user quota (here 750M), but user web1p1 having user-specific setting for userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M should report a higher quota limit overriding the default quota setting. I tried to specify user-specific values for userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage, which worked; probably, because there were no default value specified in the config, yet? Setting userdb_quota_storage_extra to 200M works: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_extra=200M … # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_extra 200M … # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 972800 82 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Quota is reported as correctly as 750M+200M=950M. Same approach works when setting userdb_quota_storage_percentage, e.g. to a value above 100. [1] https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota Many thanks for your support! Matthieu Dear Dovecot experts, I am in the process of planning migration from dovecot 2.3 to 2.4.1+dfsg1-6 on Debian Trixie, but userdb extra fields for quota_storage_size are ignored. All settings proved to work in 2.3; following per-user quota manual as outlined in [1]. Issue Cannot override setting quota_storage_size using userdb_quota_storage_size, but userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage apparently work. Setup Configures multiple userdb using driver passwd combined for a) user information and b) user-specific extra fields; auth. via passdb using driver pam defined in auth-system.conf.ext included by 10-auth.conf Excerpt from doveconf -n: ... passdb system_pam { driver = pam } userdb userdb_01_passwd { driver = passwd result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue-ok } userdb userdb_02_quota { passwd_file_path = /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings driver = passwd-file result_internalfail = return-fail result_success = continue } ... Excerpt from passwd file /etc/dovecot/quota-user-settings holding userdb extra fields: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M Default quota config excerpt from doveconf -n: ... quota user { storage_grace = 100M storage_size = 750M quota_warning warn-95 { quota_storage_percentage = 95 execute quota-warning { args = 95 %{user} } } quota_warning warn-85 { quota_storage_percentage = 85 execute quota-warning { args = 85 %{user} } } } ... Result Userdb setting appear to work correctly as it combines both userdb files, see following output: # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_size 1200M However, querying the quota only shows the default value, but not the user-specific setting. # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 768000 104 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Expected behaviour Any user should report default user quota (here 750M), but user web1p1 having user-specific setting for userdb_quota_storage_size=1200M should report a higher quota limit overriding the default quota setting. I tried to specify user-specific values for userdb_quota_storage_extra and userdb_quota_storage_percentage, which worked; probably, because there were no default value specified in the config, yet? Setting userdb_quota_storage_extra to 200M works: web1p1:::::::userdb_quota_storage_extra=200M ... # doveadm user web1p1 field value uid 644 gid 105 home /home/pop/web1p1 mail_path /home/pop/web1p1/mail system_groups_user web1p1 quota_storage_extra 200M ... # doveadm quota get -u web1p1 Quota name Type Value Limit % user STORAGE 798830 972800 82 user MESSAGE 5617 - 0 Quota is reported as correctly as 750M+200M=950M. Same approach works when setting userdb_quota_storage_percentage, e.g. to a value above 100. [1] [1]https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota Many thanks for your support! Matthieu References Visible links 1. https://doc.dovecot.org/main/core/plugins/quota.html#per-user-quota

2 2

Confusion about ACL Files in Shared Mailboxes
by fc26wuqa＠studserv.uni-leipzig.de 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Hello, I have a shared mailbox which I want to set ACL permissions to. I already tried "doveadm acl set -u shared-user Shared/shared_mailbox group=somegroup lookup read write write-seen write-deleted insert post delete expunge create" My shared namespace is configured like this: "type = shared, prefix = Shared/%%u" I get "Error: Can't update acl object '': No local acl file path", "Error: Mailbox Shared/shared_mailbox: Failed to set ACL". When I do "* group=some_group kxeilprwts" in dovecot-acl in the shared Mailbox, all users in group some_group lose all access to their folders (shared and not shared) except INBOX. What am I doing wrong?

2 1

recipient_delimiter issue
by Benoit Panizzon 06 Oct '25

06 Oct '25

Hi Gang We use Postfix and Dovecot. To allow customers to use sub addressing we have configured postfix and dovecot with recipient_delimiter = + This allows email addresses of the form john+doe(a)example.com The way postfix processes the recipient_delimiter is by first looking up 'john+doe' and if this is not found, try again with 'john'. This allow both to work, email accounts which contain the + sign as part of the address and sub addressing. Collisions may happen! I am aware of this! The full email address with + wins. I recall dovecot also performed the same lookup in an earlier version but I might be wrong as now after some colleagues re-configured our email platform to use authentication caching and the dovecot proxy functionality, this does not work anymore. Dovecot takes + as hard delimiter and only performs a lookup for 'john' thus returns the account 'john' does not exist. Is there a way to configure dovecot to handle recipient_delimiter the same way postfix does by trying the full username first and only if that fails retry with the part in front of the delimiter? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 0