- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Upgrade from 0.99 to 1.0
by Láďa 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hi, I have just noticed that one our box is still running ancient 0.99 version (shame on me). Is there anything what I have to take care about during update? I am completely aware about changes in configuration files so my question is mainly about existing maildirs. Láďa

2 2

[Dovecot] separate partition for index/uidlist
by Daniel 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hi! What's a safe place for the separate index and uidlist files? I am planning to configure Quota/FS. Can they reside under dovecot's basedir? Is this a good idea? Does it have any significance where I put those files? Thanks, Daniel

2 6

[Dovecot] in memory indexes?
by Daniel 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hi! > RCS file: /home/cvs/dovecot/src/lib-index/mail-index.c,v > Working file: src/lib-index/mail-index.c > revision 1.268 > date: 2007-03-11 16:10:42 +0000; author: tss; state: Exp; lines: > > +8 -5; commitid: yo3GJUvm1yKgLG9s; > If we run out of disk space, move to in-memory indexes. I just saw the commit. Is this a "solution" for the Quota/FS problem, the problem which occurs when the quota is full, and dovecot can not update it's index files? Daniel -- LeVA

2 3

[Dovecot] (no subject)
by Erdenebat Gantomor 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

In Postfix+Postfixadmin+Dovecot+SASL+MySQL case what is the best and compact MySQL database structure for storing all configuration? What will you suggest me guys? I've already installed postfixadmin and I'm confusing (actually my experience is not enough) extending and organizing my database for postfix+dovecot. Please give me some quick tips. -- Best regards, Erdenebat Guntomor/ /mailto:RkLogin@gmail.com

1 0

[Dovecot] FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE/kqueue high CPU load
by Taras Savchuk 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hi to ALL! I have dovecot-1.0r7 installed on FreeBSD 6.1, using kqueue and Maildir (<20 mailboxes, < 0,5 Gb size). Periodically CPU load of imap processes increasing up to 60-80%. Is it normall behavior or not? May be somebody had such kind of problems? -- С уважением, Савчук Тарас ООО "Элантек" : Аутсорсинг ИТ, WEB-разработка +7 (495) 589 68 81 +7 (926) 575 22 11 http://www.elantech.ru info(a)elantech.ru

8 32

[Dovecot] dovecot and pine tab-completion
by Kyle Wheeler 11 Mar '07

11 Mar '07

Hello, So, I'm migrating from Binc to Dovecot, and one of my users has run into an odd complaint/issue. I don't know that it's a Dovecot issue necessarily, but maybe the people here know a fix anyway... The problem is that pine tab-completion now appends a "." to the end of folders that have sub-folders. In other words, say the user has these folders: INBOX INBOX.foo INBOX.foo.bar When he types in INBOX.f and hits tab, for some reason Pine completes that to: INBOX.foo. Note the "." on the end. This is annoying, because then to get into foo he has to hit the delete key first. With the Binc server, the delimiter was /, and INBOX/foo/ was a perfectly legitimate folder name (so he could just hit return). Does anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this? ~Kyle -- There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -- Ed Howdershelt

2 3

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Stable Version
by Erdenebat Gantomor 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

First I'm not enough in English. Therefore sorry about that. I mean just asking about roadmap. I just don't wanna force anyone. Sorry again Timo if i was bugging you. Best regards, Erdenebat Guntomor/ /mailto:RkLogin@gmail.com Charles Marcus wrote: > Erdenebat Gantomor wrote: >> Dovecot is now in release candidate. When will release stable? Is it >> safe to use in production? I mean now the Dovecot is stable enough to >> use in production? > > <sigh> > > Please stop bugging Timo about this... he will release it when it is > ready. > > Seriously - if you want a release version, I'm sure Timo will gladly > accept your payment and provide one. >

2 1

[Dovecot] logging volumes
by Kyle Wheeler 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

Hello! I’m in the process of migrating from BincIMAP to Dovecot, and I have a minor question. One of the things that Binc does is logs how many bytes of data it has sent as part of logging the log-out. Is there a way to get Dovecot to do that, or to calculate something similar? ~Kyle -- Racism is man's greatest threat to man---the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason. -- Abraham Joshua Heschel

2 2

[Dovecot] Warning: I/O leak
by Steffen Kaiser 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, there is message from Jim Horner (16 November 2006 17:02:44) about this issue, too. For testing I start dovecot with dovecot -F, when I kill it via ^C sometimes there are log entries like this: dovecot: Mar 07 10:10:13 Warning: I/O leak: 0x804d890 (15) dovecot: Mar 07 10:10:13 Warning: I/O leak: 0x804d890 (26) (gdb) x 0x804d890 0x804d890 <login_process_input>: 0x81e58955 I guess it's not important because Dovecot is interrupted. Bye, - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEUAwUBRe6DsC9SORjhbDpvAQIqPAf3YHKm9L4IjUEx72yfdlV5P/aCfjrTDby/ HVWTBZeYjyld5I3thxfPNU/gV9eklZlozvHw03Z0LwKejcQsVWLc1g6jbJIYcnlC fNARkgtJj3Hy8Fn6QKhHr4keiAiedVTrf0gTq+NtcTmLGgVREhnJWBift8efx12s cnxH7YaL+Mj9+BwqdyQ5DcALCFwsHSI7IROHobP8ZnfqAkpgwAnCuo8140C31g+t XamPVuSVnsTnObXh6ki64TFuTk+FvhuyzH3NhroUXKS0Tl21l7E6+sMH2m39junI uS6p3Yweg193qtJwh4KmYutco9SBKp7V85gbpz6EpSDgYgG9rI5o =MgrB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Dovecot] Wish to improve logging
by Steffen Kaiser 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I had a problem in my test configuration, therefore I want to suggest to improvements for logging: 1) mail_log - add mailbox of operation dovecot: Mar 07 09:35:16 Info: IMAP(dvtest) [16829]: expunged: uid=886, msgid=<xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx(a)xxxxxxxx.xx-xxxx-xxxxx-xxxx.xx> dovecot: Mar 07 09:35:16 Info: IMAP(dvtest) [16829]: expunged: uid=887, msgid=<xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx(a)xx-xxxx-xxxxx-xxxx.xx> Please add, from which folder the mail is deleted/expunged, because uid is no unique throughout the mail storage and I do not find no tracking in which mailbox the operation happens. 2) Login - add which passdb / userdb the data was gathered from dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): ldap(dvtest,10.20.10.63): bind search: base=dc=fh-bonn-rhein-sieg,dc=de filter=(&(objectClass=fhMailAlias)(uid=dvtest)) dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): ldap(dvtest,10.20.10.63): result: uidNumber(userdb_uid)=1012 gidNumber(userdb_gid)=102 homeDirectory(userdb_home)=/home/dvtest uid(userdb_user)=dvtest mailLocationDovecot(userdb_mail)=maildir:/home/dvtestMAIL/MailDir:INDEX=/var/cache/dovecot/1012/index:CONTROL=/var/cache/dovecot/1012/index/control dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): ldap(dvtest,10.20.10.63): bind: dn=uid=dvtest,ou=staff,dc=fb02,dc=fh-bonn-rhein-sieg,dc=de dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): ldap(dvtest,10.20.10.63): invalid credentials dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): client out: OK 1 user=dvtest dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): master in: REQUEST 1 16810 1 dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): prefetch(dvtest,10.20.10.63): passdb didn't return userdb entries dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): ldap(dvtest,10.20.10.63): user search: base=dc=fh-bonn-rhein-sieg,dc=de scope=subtree filter=(&(objectClass=fhMailAlias)(uid=dvtest)) fields=homeDirectory,uidNumber,gidNumber,mailLocationDovecot,uid dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: auth(default): master out: USER 1 dvtest uid=1012 gid=102 home=/home/dvtest user=dvtest mail=maildir:/home/dvtestMAIL/MailDir:INDEX=/var/cache/dovecot/1012/index:CONTROL=/var/cache/dovecot/1012/index/control dovecot: Mar 07 09:34:03 Info: pop3-login: Login: 16810:, user=<dvtest>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.20.10.63, lip=10.20.10.166 First I didn't realized any problem at all ;) and assumed LDAP bind working. Dovecot successfully reads the LDAP attributes for the user dvtest, however, the LDAP bind fails with "invalid credentials", yet, dvtest was allowed to login. The reason is simple: When I was testing the LDAP bind stuff, I "commented out" the user dvtest in /etc/passwd, but not in "/etc/shadow" and intentionally used another password in LDAP. Dovecot is configured to consult userdb/passdb ldap, first, then pam. In my case, the LDAP bind failed, so Dovecot fall back to pam - just as configured. I would like suggest to log wich passdb / userdb Dovecot gathered the information from, because, at first, I interpreted the log file as if Dovecot allows an user to login, who is not authentificated. Bye, - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBRe6N+y9SORjhbDpvAQJITQf6AmueszP73MBoG5mPRzB0mEzKC9jmY+gb eepPjBZp7yqXnACt7hOjcI0ckLZpgmQd4TbwVmO1otJaaQa/UZvgy1pV7gXeMTVs RZnAT7qiT7j+RB54yg1nT65/W9VmP3ymp41pi+qlWfC3qaVwsFk9hgarQC1FzF/w tD92cT8vvLPzXXf22xO6bmeTW4xg6fsUWbC7BiL461qJTMXjHGZdMwU7jPbTrI3c iYAel2jKAMaspgTpz/sEg3Yjka2tafinItnah8Q9HIQGixzUlV750NULx/jR8Cop 1ufFZSigkVRY25XpxESgCAaKQg3LsB7rnZOVyG/hA3KDmyh2+nu9Yw== =WUyX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1