- dovecot - dovecot.org

recipient bcc and dovecot
by ＠lbutlr 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

I have a recipient_bcc_maps which contains a bcc map that is updated everyday: rbcc.pcre: if !/backup.*@/ /^([^+_]*).*(a)([^.]*)/ backup+071.${1}-${2}(a)adomain.tld endif the 071 portion is changed each day to the current day of the year. Everything works, but I get an error from dovecot on every message: lda(backup(a)adomain.tld): Error: User initialization failed: Namespace '': Ambiguous mail location setting, don't know what to do with it: /usr/local/virtual/backup(a)adomain.tld (try prefixing it with mbox: or maildir:) The mail is delivered two the right directory anyway, but after a temporary failure. I'd like to eliminate the error. the backup user is not a 'real' user (it is not in the lookup map) so should I bypass dovecot entirely in delivering these messages? (and if so, how) If not, where/how would I add the prefix maildir: Is there something I can add to dovecot to specifically deal with messages coming in to backup(a)adomain.tld and add the maildir: specification there? (Still on dovecot 2.2.35) -- And sometimes there's a short cut. A door or a gate. Some standing stones. A tree cleft by lightning, a filing cabinet. Maybe just a spot on some moorland somewhere... A place where THERE is very nearly HERE... If some people knew where such a spot was, if they had experience of what happens when here and there become entangled, then they might - if they knew how - mark such a spot with certain stones. In the hope that enough daft buggers would take it as a warning and keep away. (Lords and Ladies)

2 3

sieve vacation to an alias group
by Monis Monther 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hi, We have an alias group named xyz(a)example.com, this alias group has 3 actual users a(a)example.com, b(a)example.com and c(a)example.com We set vacation rule on the generic sieve rule, the problem is that 3 responses are sent to the original sender. (obviously because the rule is being executed with each user in the alias group) Is it possible to set auto response only once, we tried the ( :days 1) option but still all 3 respond back. How can such a setup be achieved. (Single auto response to an alias group) CentOS 7.5 dovecot-pigeonhole-2.3.4.1-1.x86_64 dovecot-2.3.4.1-1.x86_64 postfix 2.10-1 -- Best Regards Monis

4 14

Delayed flags changes over IDLE
by Kostya Vasilyev 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hello, I'm experiencing slow flags changes over IMAP IDLE: - If I start an IDLE session / command - Change the flags of some messages via another email app - Dovecot can take a minute or more to notify the IDLE connection about flags changes If I use another email app to add or remove a message, Dovecot sends that (EXISTS / EXPUNGE) instantly and also flushes the (so far delayed) flags changes. So it does "know" already. The system is Debian Testing, 64 bit, file system is ext4. Dovecot is 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4) - I believe from Debian repos (I had Dovecot's own repo added at some point, disabled now). My mail is stored under ~/mail/.imap (not sure what this format is called), I mean not "single file mbox". I have not changed any IDLE related config settings: doveconf | grep -i idle default_idle_kill = 1 mins director_ping_idle_timeout = 30 secs imap_idle_notify_interval = 2 mins imapc_max_idle_time = 29 mins mailbox_idle_check_interval = 30 secs What can I do to make Dovecot notify IDLE clients about flags changes - more quickly? Preferably near-instant? -- Kostya Vasilyev kman(a)fastmail.com

3 9

“doveadm mailbox” command fails with UTF-8 mailboxes
by Felipe Gasper 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hello, I’ve got a strange misconfiguration where the following command: doveadm -f pager mailbox status -u spamutf8 'messages vsize guid' INBOX 'INBOX.*' … fails with error code 68, saying that it can’t find one of the mailboxes. (It lists the user’s other mailboxes.) The name of the mailbox in question is saved to disk in UTF-8 rather than mUTF-7, but strace shows that doveadm is stat()ing the mUTF-7 path; the failure of that stat() is, assumedly, what causes doveadm to report the error status. I’ve tried to paw through the source code to see what might be causing this but haven’t made much headway. Can someone here point out where the misconfiguration might be that is causing doveadm to stat() the mUTF-7 path rather than UTF-8? Or perhaps offer any tips as to how I might diagnose what’s going on? What causes doveadm to stat() one path or the other? Thank you! -Felipe Gasper Mississauga, ON

5 9

Inbox quota usage doubled when mailbox_list_index enabled, under some circumstances
by Chris Dillon 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hello, I searched through the list archives for anything that appeared to be similar to this but I didn't find any good matches. I apologize if this has been brought up before. Beginning with Dovecot 2.2.34, reported quota usage of a user's inbox can be doubled when the following criteria are met: 1) quota plugin is enabled 2) mailbox_list_index=yes 3) A sub-folder of the inbox exists whose name also matches the prefix (for example, "INBOX.Test"), even if that folder has no contents. (Apparently, some mail clients such as K-9 Mail on Android can create these folders automatically) Downgrading to 2.2.33.2 allows this configuration to work normally. I looked through the changes in git between 2.2.33.2 and 2.2.34 and they appeared extensive, so unfortunately I wasn't able to pinpoint a specific change that caused this. Reproduced on a CentOS 7 server with Dovecot 2.2.34 built from git sources according to https://wiki2.dovecot.org/CompilingSource#Compiling_Dovecot_From_Git using the following minimal configuration: ========== root@centos7 [~]# dovecot -n # 2.2.34 (874deae): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-862.9.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) # Hostname: centos7.local mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_plugins = quota mailbox_list_index = yes namespace inbox { inbox = yes location = prefix = INBOX. separator = . } passdb { driver = pam } plugin { quota = maildir:Mailbox } userdb { driver = passwd } ========== With the system user "myuser" and a minimal Maildir setup containing 1 email in the inbox, and one sub-folder named "INBOX.Test": ========== root@centos7 [~]# ls -lAR /home/myuser/Maildir /home/myuser/Maildir: total 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 77 Jul 25 09:36 cur drwxr-xr-x. 5 myuser myuser 56 Jul 25 15:19 .INBOX.Test -rw-r--r--. 1 myuser myuser 14 Jul 25 15:19 maildirsize drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 6 Jul 25 09:36 new drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 6 Jul 25 09:36 tmp /home/myuser/Maildir/cur: total 12416 -rw-r--r--. 1 myuser myuser 12712627 Jul 25 09:07 1532529376.M543965P58007.centos7.local,S=12712627,W=12877782:2,S /home/myuser/Maildir/.INBOX.Test: total 0 drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 6 Jul 25 09:36 cur -rw-r--r--. 1 myuser myuser 0 Jul 25 09:36 maildirfolder drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 6 Jul 25 09:36 new drwxr-xr-x. 2 myuser myuser 6 Jul 25 09:36 tmp /home/myuser/Maildir/.INBOX.Test/cur: total 0 /home/myuser/Maildir/.INBOX.Test/new: total 0 /home/myuser/Maildir/.INBOX.Test/tmp: total 0 /home/myuser/Maildir/new: total 0 /home/myuser/Maildir/tmp: total 0 ========== Given this configuration, when "mailbox_list_index" is enabled, after quota recalculation, quota reports that there are 2 messages and that double the amount of storage is used: ========== root@centos7 [~]# doveadm quota recalc -u myuser; doveadm quota get -u myuser Quota name Type Value Limit % Mailbox STORAGE 24830 - 0 Mailbox MESSAGE 2 - 0 ========== When "mailbox_list_index" is disabled and quota is recalculated, it will report the message and storage counts correctly: ========== root@centos7 [~]# doveadm -o 'mailbox_list_index=no' quota recalc -u myuser; doveadm quota get -u myuser Quota name Type Value Limit % Mailbox STORAGE 12415 - 0 Mailbox MESSAGE 1 - 0 ========== I am hoping that someone with much more familiarity with the code path involved here could take a look at this issue and possibly submit a fix for it -- that would be greatly appreciated. Please let me know if you need any more details regarding the replication steps, though I hope that I didn't miss anything. Thank you! -- Chris Dillon Technical Analyst III Migrations Specialist cPanel, Inc.

2 3

Dovecot 2.3.4 crash
by azurit＠pobox.sk 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hi, is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded). Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Panic: file ostream-dot.c: line 208 (o_stream_dot_sendv): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == sent + added) Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd25e1) [0x7fa5f7b655e1] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xd2681) [0x7 fa5f7b65681] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7fa5f7acd093] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xbb97b) [0x7fa5f7b4e97b] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x fa4ae) [0x7fa5f7b8d4ae] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_sendv+0x2e) [0x7fa5f7b8da3e] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_stream_copy+0x52) [0x7fa5f7b8e512] -> /usr /lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_send_istream+0x58) [0x7fa5f7b8e008] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(smtp_client_command_send_more+0x1b1) [0x7fa5f7ad7351] -> /usr/lib/dov ecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x4a096) [0x7fa5f7add096] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xfd0c3) [0x7fa5f7b900c3] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x75) [0x7fa5f7b 7e5d5] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0x109) [0x7fa5f7b7ffd9] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x56) [0x7fa5f7b7e6e6] -> / usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x38) [0x7fa5f7b7e8f8] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7fa5f7af2d43] -> dovecot/lmtp [local DATA](main+ 0x240) [0x565287c30f70] -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf1) [0x7fa5f77142e1] -> dovecot/lmtp [local DATA](_start+0x2a) [0x565287c310ca] Nov 29 14:25:11 server00 dovecot: lmtp(16854): Fatal: master: service(lmtp): child 16854 killed with signal 6 (core dumps disabled - https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps) azur

3 5

Crash in director for secure lmtp proxy connections
by Marcus Fenner 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hi, After updating some of our director servers from 2.2.36 to 2.3.3 (dcead646b) we experience crashes in about 1/5000 mails in lmtp delivery: Nov 13 12:23:36 Fatal: lmtp(113620): master: service(lmtp): child 113620 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) Nov 13 12:23:36 Panic: lmtp(113623): file ostream-dot.c: line 208 (o_stream_dot_sendv): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == sent + added) Nov 13 12:23:36 Error: lmtp(113623): Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xe34fb) [0x7f31d89134fb] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xe3597) [0x7f31d8913597] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x51207) [0x7f31d8881207] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x4eeef) [0x7f31d887eeef] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x107cf8) [0x7f31d8937cf8] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_sendv+0x32) [0x7f31d89382c2] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_stream_copy+0x5a) [0x7f31d8938b6a] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_send_istream+0x53) [0x7f31d8938873] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(smtp_client_command_send_more+0x145) [0x7f31d8890805] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x660dd) [0x7f31d88960dd] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so(+0xa7e1) [0x7f31d864a7e1] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x10a558) [0x7f31d893a558] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x73) [0x7f31d892a203] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0x136) [0x7f31d892b8b6] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x50) [0x7f31d892a2b0] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x48) [0x7f31d892a418] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x17) [0x7f31d88a95a7] -> dovecot/lmtp(main+0x245) [0x555b8b59cea5] -> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3) [0x7f31d867c413] -> dovecot/lmtp(_start+0x2e) [0x555b8b59cfbe] Nov 13 12:23:36 Fatal: lmtp(113623): master: service(lmtp): child 113623 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) On the backend servers the only message is lmtp(9571): Disconnect from 192.168.1.56: Connection closed (in DATA) This happens for every server with this version every time postfix tries to resend the mail. After removing "starttls=y" from the static passdb entry, the mail is sent successfully. Starting with version 2.3.2 the lmtp proxy uses starttls as well, therefore the error seems to be there. I've not been able to figure out, if this has to do with the content of the mails, because they are from many different sources. Thanks! Marcus

3 2

lmtp 2.3.2.1 segfault with backtrace
by Tom Sommer 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

lmtp on Director crash with 2.3.2.1 # gdb /usr/libexec/dovecot/lmtp /var/core/60174 GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-92.el6) Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/lmtp...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/lmtp.debug...done. done. [New Thread 60174] Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-lda.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0.0.0.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib64/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib64/librt.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/librt.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib64/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib64/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Loaded symbols for /lib64/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so.debug...done. done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/dovecot/libssl_iostream_openssl.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 Reading symbols from /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10 Reading symbols from /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib64/libkrb5.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libkrb5.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib64/libcom_err.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib64/libz.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libz.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib64/libresolv.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libresolv.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib64/libselinux.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/libselinux.so.1 Core was generated by `dovecot/lmtp'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 smtp_client_command_set_replies (cmd=0x0, replies=1) at smtp-client-command.c:401 401 i_assert(cmd->replies_expected == 1 || Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.212.el6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-5.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-65.el6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-24.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-7.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-57.el6.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 (gdb) bt full #0 smtp_client_command_set_replies (cmd=0x0, replies=1) at smtp-client-command.c:401 __func__ = "smtp_client_command_set_replies" #1 0x00007f5d14f40f3f in smtp_client_transaction_data_cb (reply=0x7ffe5cd19650, trans=0x7f5d176ae2b8) at smtp-client-transaction.c:658 conn = 0x7f5d176ade80 rcpt = 0x7f5d176ae560 i = <value optimized out> count = 1 #2 0x00007f5d14f3e941 in smtp_client_command_fail_reply (_cmd=<value optimized out>, reply=0x7ffe5cd19650) at smtp-client-command.c:299 cmd = 0x7f5d17600d18 tmp_cmd = <value optimized out> conn = 0x7f5d176ade80 state = <value optimized out> callback = 0x7f5d14f40e80 <smtp_client_transaction_data_cb> #3 0x00007f5d14f4113f in smtp_client_transaction_fail_reply (trans=0x7f5d176ae2b8, reply=0x7ffe5cd19650) at smtp-client-transaction.c:365 conn = 0x7f5d176ade80 rcpts = <value optimized out> i = <value optimized out> count = <value optimized out> __func__ = "smtp_client_transaction_fail_reply" #4 0x00007f5d14f41442 in smtp_client_transaction_timeout (trans=0x7f5d176ae2b8) at smtp-client-transaction.c:419 reply = {status = 451, enhanced_code = {x = 4, y = 4, z = 0}, text_lines = 0x7f5d1759c090} #5 0x00007f5d14fdbe7b in io_loop_handle_timeouts_real (ioloop=0x7f5d175a4c80) at ioloop.c:641 timeout = 0x7f5d176299d0 tv = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} tv_call = {tv_sec = 1534202969, tv_usec = 770866} t_id = 3 item = 0x7f5d176299d0 #6 io_loop_handle_timeouts (ioloop=0x7f5d175a4c80) at ioloop.c:655 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 #7 0x00007f5d14fdd667 in io_loop_handler_run_internal (ioloop=0x7f5d175a4c80) at ioloop-epoll.c:195 ctx = 0x7f5d175af300 events = <value optimized out> event = <value optimized out> list = <value optimized out> io = <value optimized out> tv = {tv_sec = 34, tv_usec = 105308} events_count = <value optimized out> msecs = <value optimized out> ret = 0 i = <value optimized out> call = <value optimized out> __func__ = "io_loop_handler_run_internal" #8 0x00007f5d14fdb7c5 in io_loop_handler_run (ioloop=0x7f5d175a4c80) at ioloop.c:726 __func__ = "io_loop_handler_run" #9 0x00007f5d14fdb9e8 in io_loop_run (ioloop=0x7f5d175a4c80) at ioloop.c:699 __func__ = "io_loop_run" #10 0x00007f5d14f58963 in master_service_run (service=0x7f5d175a4b10, callback=<value optimized out>) at master-service.c:767 No locals. #11 0x00007f5d159eb584 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7f5d175a48a0) at main.c:158 set_roots = {0x7f5d15262e20, 0x7f5d157c2040, 0x7f5d15bf1540, 0x0} service_flags = <value optimized out> storage_service_flags = <value optimized out> tmp_base_dir = 0x7f5d1759c040 "erver not answering (transaction timed out while waiting for reply to DATA)" c = <value optimized out> error = <value optimized out> -- Tom

3 3

2.3.3: Panic: file ostream-zlib.c: line 37 (o_stream_zlib_close): assertion failed
by Tom Sommer 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

I see this in my logs after 2.3.3: using zlib plugin, ofc. Oct 02 10:01:39 imap(user(a)example.com)<50643></2k4Sjp3vMqC496W>: Panic: file ostream-zlib.c: line 37 (o_stream_zlib_close): assertion failed: (zstream->ostream.finished || zstream->ostream.ostream.stream_errno != 0 || zstream->ostream.error_handling_disabled) Oct 02 10:01:39 imap(user(a)example.com)<50643></2k4Sjp3vMqC496W>: Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xce56a) [0x7f442487556a] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xce5b1) [0x7f44248755b1] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3d941) [0x7f44247e4941] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib20_zlib_plugin.so(+0x5cdf) [0x7f44233c4cdf] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0xf4b46) [0x7f442489bb46] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(o_stream_destroy+0x13) [0x7f442489be83] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(maildir_save_finish+0x173) [0x7f4424b93973] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(mailbox_save_cancel+0x36) [0x7f4424b68696] -> dovecot/imap [user(a)example.com X.X.X.X APPEND](+0xede9) [0x55a9d7e86de9] -> dovecot/imap [user(a)example.com X.X.X.X APPEND](command_exec+0x65) [0x55a9d7e956e5] -> dovecot/imap [user(a)example.com X.X.X.X APPEND](+0xf9e6) [0x55a9d7e879e6] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_call_io+0x55) [0x7f442488c275] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run_internal+0xbf) [0x7f442488e13f] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handler_run+0x55) [0x7f442488c365] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_run+0x38) [0x7f442488c588] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(master_service_run+0x13) [0x7f4424808053] -> dovecot/imap [user(a)example.com X.X.X.X APPEND](main+0x32d) [0x55a9d7ea20dd] -> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x100) [0x7f4424431d20] -> dovecot/imap [user(a)example.com X.X.X.X APPEND](+0xe419) [0x55a9d7e86419] No clue how to reproduce -- Tom

3 2

submission-login: Fatal: master: service(submission-login):
by Marcelo Coelho 13 Mar '19

13 Mar '19

Hi everyone! I’m using dovecot 2.3.5. submission-login is crashing many times in a day: Here is a sample error message: dovecot: submission-login: Fatal: master: service(submission-login): child 34247 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped - https://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps - set service submission-login { drop_priv_before_exec=yes }) After I added drop_priv_before_exec, I got these error messages: submission-login: Error: master-service: cannot get filters: net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: Permission denied dovecot: master: Error: service(submission-login): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs How to get submission core dumps properly? Thank you. — Marcelo Coelho

3 2