- dovecot - dovecot.org

attachement disappeared
by Sergey Schwartz 23 Mar '16

23 Mar '16

Gentelmen, Is it possible for the attachment to dissappear? I've got an important email with a file attached and today the attachement is absent. -- Best regards, Sergey Schwartz Senior System Administrator Biblio Globus Tour Operator www.bgoperator.ru T: +7 495 5042500 ext 1532 E: sergey.schwartz(a)bgoperator.com

2 2

Dovecot 2.2.21 change imap logout format (and broke my log parsing)
by Alessio Cecchi 23 Mar '16

23 Mar '16

Hi, after upgrade to dovecot-2.2.21 the log of "imap logout" format changed from: Mar 1 03:40:44 pop01 dovecot: imap(info(a)domain.com): Connection closed in=111 out=1522 session=<lusrsfMsXNVf79ju> to: Mar 3 03:48:11 pop01 dovecot: imap(info(a)domain.com): Connection closed (IDLE running for 0.001 + waiting input for 2088.878 secs, 2 B in + 10+0 B out, state=wait-input) in=224 out=2834 session=<6XTzihst3uUFqB6m> Can "(IDLE running for 0.001 + waiting input for 2088.878 secs, 2 B in + 10+0 B out, state=wait-input)" removed from the log? My imap_logout_format is: imap_logout_format = in=%i out=%o session=<%{session}> Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster @ http://www.qboxmail.it https://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice

2 1

plugin can't be loaded in imap proxy mode
by Zhong, Xun 23 Mar '16

23 Mar '16

When dovecot v2.2.21 work in IMAP proxy mode, plugin can not be loaded and work, so my question is: plugins do not work in proxy mode? Anyone can help me ? Thanks a lot.

1 0

Allowing for multiple recipient_delimiter characters?
by Aaron Lindsay 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Postfix allows the recipient_delimiter configuration parameter to contain multiple characters, splitting on the first such character it encounters. For example, if using 'recipient_delimiter=+-' both aaron+foo(a)example.com and aaron-bar(a)example.com would be delivered to aaron(a)example.com. Is anyone opposed to changing dovecot's handling of recipient_delimiter so that it's the same as that of postfix? If not, I am willing to rebase/merge/address review comments on Lennart Weller's patch[1] to get this functionality upstream. While I think aligning with postfix' behaviour would be convenient for those of us who run a server using both dovecot and postfix, would this break any other common use cases I'm not aware of? Thanks! -Aaron [1] - http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2015-February/099660.html (I've talked with Lennart off-list, and he's OK with me working to get his patch merged, as long as I attribute his work to him, but doesn't have the time to work on it himself right now)

2 2

protocols.d/ dir empty?
by Kieran 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

(I hope I'm doing this right) Hey there. I have a problem with the dovecot protocols. When I do /telnet 127.0.0.1 143/ it gives me a connection refused error. I looked in the wiki and then after trying /doveconf protocols listen /I realized that I don't have any protocols.//I went in //usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/ and it's empty. How can I fix that?

3 3

multiple imapc settings in different namespaces
by abi＠oleane.net 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

hello all i assume this question must have already been asked, but i'm looking for a way to circumvent which might work specifically on my system. the version can be any available version between 2.2.9 and 2.2.22 (i'm testing with both of the above and no other ) i'm using imapc in 2 different namespaces. in both cases, the imapc_host is local, and a custom passdb program is expected to handle proxying to different servers. one of the case should proxy to a different legacy platform, and the other is used for shared mailboxes. is there any way at all to be able to tell which is which in passdb ? i don't care about the password, i can use a login prefix or suffix, different ports, different master passwords, ssl, maybe a different protocol name or auth method... somehow i've seen in the source code there is a namespace "owner" but did not manage to change this parameter. i guess it is used internally. anything else ? thanks a lot for any help you can provide best regards @abi

1 0

LMTP proxy does not pass RCPT TO: ... 5xx response back
by Heiko Schlittermann 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup. On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of the backends. The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at RCPT TO time. Here is what I typed, connected to the director Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded! 220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. LHLO mailhub1.rz.hs-example.de 250-director1.rz.hs-example.de 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING MAIL FROM:<hs(a)schlittermann.de> 250 2.1.0 OK RCPT TO:<heiko(a)hs-example.de> 250 2.1.5 OK And here is, what TCPDUMP sees (cut for clarity): 00:22:23.029251 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [S], 00:22:23.029376 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [S.], 00:22:23.029660 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 00:22:23.051436 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], .7i`.7jN220 backend1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. 00:22:23.051805 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 00:22:23.052017 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], .7jT.7i`LHLO director1.rz.hs-example.de 00:22:23.052034 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [.], 00:22:23.052114 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], .7ia.7jT250-backend1.rz.hs-example.de 250-XCLIENT ADDR PORT TTL TIMEOUT 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING 00:22:23.052476 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0EH....d...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... .7jT.7iaXCLIENT ADDR=2001:638:914:f33::7:1 PORT=60574 TTL=4 TIMEOUT=30 00:22:23.052540 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0EH...E....~e.....3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ia.7jT220 backend1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot (Ubuntu) ready. 00:22:23.052815 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0E.....s...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ....E .7jT.7iaLHLO director1.rz.hs-example.de 00:22:23.052870 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0E....h....~......3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ia.7jT250-backend1.rz.hs-example.de 250-8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 PIPELINING 00:22:23.053120 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [P.], 0E.....qJ..... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ....h .7jT.7iaMAIL FROM:<hs(a)schlittermann.de> RCPT TO:<heiko(a)hs-example.de> 00:22:23.091824 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [.], 0E.........~,.....3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J .7ik.7jT 00:22:23.119918 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466: Flags [P.], 0E.........~......3........ ..8 ..3........ ..J * .7ir.7jT250 2.1.0 OK * 552 5.2.2 <heiko(a)hs-example.de> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full) 00:22:23.158836 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [.], 0F4....j...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... .7jo.7ir 00:27:23.029008 IP6 2001:638:914:f33::5:1.59466 > 2001:638:914:f33::5:ff.2525: Flags [F.], 0F4....E...... ..3........ ..8 ..3.........J ..... It looks as if the backend tells the director/proxy about the full mailbox (552 5.2.2 <heiko(a)hs-example.de> Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)) already before the DATA phase starts, right as the response to the RCPT TO. But the proxy seems to ignore it… Any suggestion? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE - ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -

2 3

sieve - editheader - edit in place
by Hajo Locke 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hello, i do some tests with sieve editheader extensions. deleteheader and addheader are working, but i noticed that new headerlines are always prepended to current header. So new lines can be found always on top. I am looking for a possibility to edit a headerline in place, without moving the new line to top of stack(replaceheader?). It is not looking good if a Subject-Line suddenly moves to top of header. Is there a possibility for me? Thanks, Hajo

3 3

[BUG] Dovecot 2.2.22 lmtp child killed with signal 11
by Andreas Jobs 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

Hello, after upgrading to 2.2.22 the lmtp service is crashing (segfault) a few times per hours. >From the logs: Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(redacted(a)ruhr-uni-bochum.de): Info: ohZXLe1x7VaUeQAAEc+Mrg: sieve: msgid=<redacted(a)async.facebook.com>: discarding vacation response to mailinglist recipient <redacted(a)facebookmail.com> Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(31124): Info: Disconnect from 134.147.42.228: Successful quit Mar 19 16:37:29 lmtp(31124): Fatal: master: service(lmtp): child 31124 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) All those crashes have either a "send vacation response" or a "discarnding vacation response" in common. I'll attach a backtrace and the current configuration. --Andreas -- ! Andreas Jobs Network Operation Center ! ! Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum ! ! One Day I Will Find This Peer Guy and Then I Will Reset HIS Connection !

2 2

Index corruption in 2.2.18
by Anton Chevychalov 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

We are using dbox with lz4 compression and dovecot-lda + sieve for delivery. Mail recieved: Mar 16 06:27:55 mail2 dovecot: lda(svs(a)example.com): sieve: msgid=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>: stored mail into mailbox 'INBOX' Around 08:14:00 user start his thunderbird with local filters. He found one mail without headers. Around that time user do repair folder in thunderbird: Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139) failed: Cached message size larger than expected (1572 > 980, box=Logs/Backup, UID=9763, cached Message-Id=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>) Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken physical size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139) failed: Cached message size larger than expected (1572 > 980, box=Logs/Backup, UID=9763, cached Message-Id=<20160316032754.4C89D2C4(a)rdbms.oldstable.office.example.com>) (FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763) Mar 16 10:14:44 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH read() failed in=14812 out=1077049 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139): FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763 got too little data: 1008 vs 1613 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 10:14:45 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH failed in=837 out=641651 And still in a same state: Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: read(/mail/boxes/example.com/svs/storage/m.139): FETCH BODY[] for mailbox Logs/Backup UID 9763 got too little data: 1008 vs 1613 Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Error: Corrupted index cache file /mail/boxes/example.com/svs/mailboxes/Logs/Backup/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 9763 Mar 16 11:42:51 mail2 dovecot: imap(svs(a)example.com): Disconnected: FETCH failed in=12462 out=984043 In thunderbird we see raw lz4 data. I have today backup (duplicate mail on exim to per day mbox). So I can restore that message, but I found older problems in other mailboxes and I can't restore it due to tapes rotation I see a lot of fixes in 2.2.19? Was it fixed after 2.2.18? -- Anton Chevychalov

3 2