- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] doveadm altmove fails to pack messages?
by Lauri Alanko 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hello again. When I use doveadm altmove, I notice that it may result in some very small storage files in either the primary or the alternate storage location. I'm not quite sure, but it almost seems like every storage file that contains messages to be moved is simply split into two parts, even if a part might only contain a single message. This seems quite curious, since the idea of mdbox is after all to store as many messages in a single file as fits in mdbox_rotate_size, and dovecot-lda can quite successfully append messages to existing storage files. So why can't doveadm altmove? Is this the expected behavior, or is there something wrong with my setup? Thanks again, Lauri

2 1

[Dovecot] force-resync fails to recover all messages in mdbox
by Lauri Alanko 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

To my understanding, when using mdbox, doveadm force-resync should be able to recover all the messages from the storage files alone, though of course losing all metadata except the initial delivery folder. However, this does not seem to be the case. For me, force-resync creates only partial indices that lose messages. The message contents are of course still in the storage files, but dovecot just doesn't seem to be aware of some of them after recreating the indices. Here is an example. I created a test mdbox by syncing a mailing list folder from a mbox location: $ dsync -m haskell-cafe backup mdbox:~/dbox Then I switched the location to the new mdbox: $ /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 x86_64 Debian wheezy/sid mail_fsync = never mail_location = mdbox:~/dbox mail_plugins = zlib passdb { driver = pam } plugin { sieve = ~/etc/sieve/dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/etc/sieve zlib_save = bz2 zlib_save_level = 9 } protocols = " imap" ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } protocol lda { mail_plugins = zlib sieve } Then I checked the number of messages we had in the new location: $ doveadm search all | wc 93236 186472 3625098 This was indeed the correct number, so the sync was fine: $ grep -c '^From .*..:..:.. ....$' ../mbox/haskell-cafe 93237 Then I removed all the indices and rebuilt them: $ mkdir bak $ mv mailboxes bak $ mv storage/dovecot.map.index* bak/ $ doveadm force-resync inbox doveadm(la): Warning: mdbox /home/la/dbox/storage: rebuilding indexes And what have we now: $ doveadm search all | wc 43864 87728 1699590 Somehow dovecot lost over half of the messages! This is really worrisome. It should always be possible to extract the plain mail content out from the storage, but currently it only _looks_ like it is possible: you get a problem in the indices, rebuild them, and then later migrate somewhere else. If you don't notice that you are missing mails, you may then eventually destroy the original mdbox storage files, thinking that their content is now safely elsewhere, when it really isn't. Lauri

2 3

[Dovecot] Fedora 16 configuration
by Cliff Hayes 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hello, I am trying to get dovecot to work on a fedora 16 install with sendmail. I have been able to get it to work in the past with dovecot.conf but not with the new conf.d directory and associated config files. I keep seeing this in maillog: Feb 7 14:28:59 sendmail dovecot: pop3-login: Aborted login (no auth attempts): rip=x.x.x.x, lip=x.x.x.x And the mail client comes back with username or password invalid. Is there instructions somewhere regarding fedora 16 installs? I found this one and tried it to no avail: http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=Fedora_16&p=mail&f=2 Thanks in advance, Cliff

2 1

[Dovecot] openbsd and dovecot
by User Max 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

I'm setting up dovecot in OpenBSD OS. The problem is that I can't set up dovecot to use kerberos authentication via bsdauth which is "similar to pam" I try to test dovecot via telnet: telnet localhost pop3 user test +OK pass password -ERR [IN-USE] Temporary authentication failure and some strings from logs Feb 3 15:02:37 srv-mx-00 dovecot: auth: Error: bsdauth(rodin.m,127.0.0.1): getpwnam() failed: Operation not permitted Feb 3 15:02:46 srv-mx-00 dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=<rodin.m>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured Feb 3 15:29:13 srv-mx-00 dovecot: auth: Error: bsdauth(test,127.0.0.1): getpwnam() failed: Operation not permitted What am I doing wrong? Here is the output of dovecot -n auth_krb5_keytab = /etc/kerberosV/krb5.keytab auth_mechanisms = plain login default_internal_user = _dovecot default_login_user = _dovenull disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_gid = 2000 first_valid_uid = 2000 last_valid_gid = 2000 last_valid_uid = 2000 mail_gid = vmail mail_location = maildir:/var/vmail/%u%Ud/Maildir mail_uid = vmail mbox_write_locks = fcntl mmap_disable = yes passdb { driver = bsdauth } service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = _postfix mode = 0666 user = _postfix } } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/dovecotcert.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } userdb { args = uid=2000 gid=2000 home=/var/mail/%Lu driver = static } protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep tb-lsub-flags } protocol pop3 { pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh pop3_uidl_format = %08Xu%08Xv }

3 3

[Dovecot] Slightly more intelligent way of handling issues in sdbox?
by Mark Zealey 09 Feb '12

09 Feb '12

Hi there, I was doing some testing on sdbox yesterday. Basically I did the following procedure: 1) Create new sdbox; deliver 2 messages into it (u.1, u.2) 2) Create a copy of the index file (no cache file created yet) 3) deliver another message to the mailbox (u.3) 4) copy back index file from stage (2) 5) deliver new mail Then the message delivered in stage 3 ie u.3 gets replaced with the message delivered in (5) also called u.3. Is it possible to try an open/access call on the mail file before overwriting it with the new message in case we have an issue where an older version of the index file is present (eg due to nfs latencies) ? I notice when you are expunging files you very carefully open them and read the header contents to make sure the guid is the same as in the index - any reason that this is not done when delivering? This is with lmtp on dovecot 2.0.16. I also noticed that index corruption in sdbox does not get automatically repaired. I know this is because the flags are stored in the index files so you'd get some loss of flags, but in many situations for us this auto-repair with flag loss would be better than having the mailbox locked out until we manually do a force-resync on it. (speaking of which, it would be great if force-resync also rebuilt the cache files if there are valid cache files around, rather than just doing away with them) Thanks, Mark

3 4

[Dovecot] user login on behalf of another user
by rog7993＠web.de 08 Feb '12

08 Feb '12

Hello, we are searching for a possibility to configure a user login on behalf of another user with a PAM backend. This reminds to the behavior of a master user. But a master user can access the mailboxes of all users. We need this more restricted. Example: User "user1" and "user2" shall get access to the mailbox "info". We define the accounts "info~user1" and "info~user2" with the same home directory like "info". Until now, we use a passwd-file backend. With this setup we can simply copy the password hash from "user1" to "info~user1" and from "user2" to "info~user2". But we intend to change the passdb backend from a flat file to PAM for authentication against Active Directory. This seems to be simple with pam_krb5. But then we can't simply copy password hashes anymore. Is their another possibility for configuring this? Surely the preferable alternative would be the use of ACLs to give acccess to other users mailboxes. But we started this setup with Dovecot 1.0 or 1.1. And with these versions, ACLs weren't available. And now we have too much accounts and clients, which are configured this way and can't change this for the short term. The passdb/userdb file from the above example looks like this: info:!:501:501:Info:/home/mail01/info:: info~user1:PASSWORD_USER1:501:501:Info:/home/mail01/info:: \ userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir: \ INDEX=/srv/dovecot/index/info: \ CONTROL=/srv/dovecot/control/info info~user2:PASSWORD_USER2:501:501:Info:/home/mail01/info:: \ userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir: \ INDEX=/srv/dovecot/index/info: \ CONTROL=/srv/dovecot/control/info user1:PASSWORD_USER1:501:501:Info:/home/mail01/user1:: user2:PASSWORD_USER2:501:501:Info:/home/mail01/user2:: Ingo Rogalsky

4 5

[Dovecot] Multiple userdb possible?
by Nikolaos Milas 07 Feb '12

07 Feb '12

Hello, I am running v2.0.13. In my dovecot.conf I have: userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-passdb-ldap.conf driver = ldap } Is it legitimate to include multiple ldap userdb's, like: userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap1.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-passdb-ldap1.conf driver = ldap } userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-usrdb-ldap2.conf driver = ldap } passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-passdb-ldap2.conf driver = ldap } If it is legitimate (in case configuration is different, please correct me), in which sequence userdb's are evaluated? Thanks, Nick

2 2

[Dovecot] Configuration problem?
by Anne Wilson 07 Feb '12

07 Feb '12

I have a new Scientific Linux 6.1 mail server (dovecot -n below) and am seeing the following in the logs, with no idea what is happening: --------------------- Dovecot Begin ------------------------ Dovecot was killed, and not restarted afterwards. **Unmatched Entries** dovecot: imap(anne): Connection closed bytes=205614/894243: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=24296/89310: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=24526/76772: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=26254/75778: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=27948/134120: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=29304/116087: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=34802/914087: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=4457/11719: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=5322/184434: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=61388/106618: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=6164/21347: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap(anne): Disconnected: Logged out bytes=7914/89868: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=1309821/4473013: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=14215/97371: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=1459/9382: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=1688/26161: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=1705/5038: 1 Time(s) dovecot: imap: Server shutting down. bytes=3146/79269: 1 Time(s) dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.0.9 starting up (core dumps disabled): 1 Time(s) ---------------------- Dovecot End ------------------------- dovecot -n # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64 x86_64 Scientific Linux release 6.1 (Carbon) mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir/ mbox_write_locks = fcntl passdb { driver = pam } protocols = imap ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem userdb { driver = passwd } /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: - everything being defaults, as far as I can see, apart from these lines: # Protocols we want to be serving. protocols = imap listen = *, :: mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir/ maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = yes Is it really expecting an mbox file? I'm completely bogged down with this - my previous setup was fine, but the old config file doesn't work with this system. Any help and/or pointers would be greatly appreciated. Anne

2 4

[Dovecot] dsync error Mailbox has children, delete them first
by Jürgen Obermann 07 Feb '12

07 Feb '12

Hi, I use dsync to backup mailboxes from mbox format to mdbox on a remote system. The first run for a user with dsync is OK, but during the second there are lots of the following errors: dsync-remote(user): Error: Can't delete mailbox directory Example: Mailbox has children, delete them first I see no way how I could influence the order dsync deletes mailboxes. This happens with dovecot version 2.0.16 Thank you, Juergen Obermann

1 1

[Dovecot] ENVELOPE mishandling of Subject lines with quote(s)?
by Dinh Le 07 Feb '12

07 Feb '12

Hi, I am running dovecot version 1.2.9 on a Ubuntu 10.04 server. To obtain the message's header info from this dovecot imap server, I run the following imap command on a client side's imap session: . fetch 88:90 (envelope) which returns (in this case) ------------------------------------------------------------- * 88 FETCH (ENVELOPE ("Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:45:35 -0500" "Linear Actuators Bring Flexibility to Packaging" (("Design World" NIL "subscription" "designworldonline.com")) (("Design World" NIL "subscription" "designworldonline.com")) (("Design World" NIL "subscription" "designworldonline.com")) ((NIL NIL "dinh" "flic.net")) NIL NIL NIL "<490779CF.00000E7D(a)ak119.mta.exacttarget.com>")) * 89 FETCH (ENVELOPE ("29 Oct 2008 15:44:03 -0500" {65} 2nd Edition of Brennesholtz/Stupp "Projection Displays" Available (("Insight Media" NIL "administrator" "insightmedia.info")) (("Insight Media" NIL "administrator" "insightmedia.info")) (("Insight Media" NIL "administrator" "insightmedia.info")) ((NIL NIL "dinh" "flic.net")) NIL NIL NIL "<20081029154358.0C359AE169595F1B(a)insightmedia.info>")) * 90 FETCH (ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:24:31 +0800 (SGT)" "6 new products Now Online!" (("Global Sources Product Alert" NIL "paservices" "globalsources.com")) (("Global Sources Product Alert" NIL "paservices" "globalsources.com")) (("Global Sources Product Alert" NIL "paservices" "globalsources.com")) (("Dinh Le" NIL "dinh" "flic.net")) NIL NIL NIL "<352725277.1225311871753.JavaMail.web(a)fuchsia3.globalsources.com>")) . OK Fetch completed. -------------------------------------------------------------- Notice that message 89's Subject line Subject: 2nd Edition of Brennesholtz/Stupp "Projection Displays" Available has quotes and this dovecot's ENVELOPE response failed to get parsed by a popular Perl module (Mail::IMAPClient::BodyStructure::Envelope). I have a hunch that this is dovecot's fault but I could be wrong. How should dovecot (or any imap server) deal with Subject lines with quotes inside ENVELOPE? ENVELOPE seems to encapsulate most of the important information and its format can be parsed cleanly and quickly. I prefer to fetch ENVELOP, at this point, rather than the other alternatives. Thanks for your help, Dinh

4 7