- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] LDAP schema for mailLocation?
by Jason Pepas 20 Dec '05

20 Dec '05

Hi, I would like to try implementing user specific default_mail_env's as described here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/MailLocation using the LDAP attribute 'mailLocation'. However, I have been unable to find any LDAP schema which contains mailLocation. What schema is this attribute part of? Thanks, Jason Pepas

5 4

[Dovecot] Feature Request - Different SQL queries to retrieve pop and imap auth tokens
by Max CtRiX 20 Dec '05

20 Dec '05

Hi! I world like to have different queries to let a user use pop only or imap only (webmail) accounts. It would really be very useful. I have not found any workaround get it working with dovecot. Could it be possible ? It should not be too difficult, I suppose. Max

2 1

[Dovecot] messages_count too large (2578 > 2566) Help!
by Rob Frohne 20 Dec '05

20 Dec '05

Hi, I'm having trouble as of about noon today. I noticed I wasn't getting any new messages in Thunderbird. I restarted it and still nothing. I looked at the log, and found nothing from dovecot for a long time (since perhaps noon today). I restarted dovecot, but still it didn't get me new mail. I finally removed dovecot.* in my Maildir folder and restarted dovecot. I'm using 1.0alpha4. Now I'm still not able to get the new mail, and I get the following messages: Nov 20 20:49:59 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<frohro>, method=plain, rip=172.17.128.191, lip=10.7.3.11 Nov 20 20:49:59 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Effective uid=501, gid=20 Nov 20 20:49:59 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): maildir: data=/Users/frohro/Maildir Nov 20 20:49:59 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): maildir: root=/Users/frohro/Maildir, index=/Users/frohro/Maildir, control=, inbox= Nov 20 20:50:00 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2578 > 2566) Nov 20 20:50:00 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2578 > 2566) Nov 20 20:50:08 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2588 > 2576) Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<frohro>, method=plain, rip=172.17.128.191, lip=10.7.3.11 Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Effective uid=501, gid=20 Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): maildir: data=/Users/frohro/Maildir Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): maildir: root=/Users/frohro/Maildir, index=/Users/frohro/Maildir, control=, inbox= Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2588 > 2576) Nov 20 20:50:25 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2588 > 2576) Nov 20 20:50:26 cubex-wwc-edu dovecot: imap(frohro): Corrupted index file /Users/frohro/Maildir/dovecot.index: messages_count too large (2588 > 2576) I guess I won't be able to read any answers to this in my mailbox, but I should be able to read the archive on the web. Please help! Thanks, Rob -- Rob Frohne, Ph.D., P.E. E.F. Cross School of Engineering Walla Walla College 100 SW 4th Street College Place, WA 99324 (509) 527-2075 http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro

3 3

[Dovecot] Auto-expunge
by John Newman 20 Dec '05

20 Dec '05

Hi, For some time we've been intermittently experiencing a problem whereby dovecot often automatically expunges "deleted" messages. This has happened across several mailboxes. The problem is proving difficult to isolate as it's seemingly non-deterministic in nature. One commonality, however, is that the "auto-expunge" seems to occur with greater frequency on mailboxes with a larger of deleted messages. First off, does this sound any alarm bells for anybody else? Perhaps others have encountered this in the past? I've trolled the mailing list (and web) but cannot find any references to this occurring elsewhere. Additional Information: We have experienced this "bug" in 1.0-alpha3 and alpha4. Underlying dovecot we have a maildir, populated via Perl's Mail::Box::Maildir module. Many thanks for any assistance that can be offered. John.

1 1

[Dovecot] dovecot as3
by Ammad Shah 19 Dec '05

19 Dec '05

i am using redhat as3, sendmail, xinetd ipop3 and imap, i installed dovecot and configured, when i stop xinetd and start dovecot , after successful startup , and using web to access it getting authenticaion errors, user/password unknown __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

[Dovecot] alpha5: assert and core
by Jeff A. Earickson 19 Dec '05

19 Dec '05

My setup: Solaris 9, dovecot built with gcc 4.0.2. Mailboxes on remote NFS file mount from another S9 box (mbox format), index files local disk. IMAP usage only. Dovecot build like so: VERSION=1.0.alpha5 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include \ LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot.$VERSION --with-ssl=openssl \ --with-ssldir=/opt/openssl/ssl > configure.out The assertion: Dec 16 14:59:54 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file message-body-search.c: line 414 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset == part->physical_pos + part->header_size.physical_size) Dec 16 14:59:58 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file message-body-search.c: line 414 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset == part->physical_pos + part->header_size.physical_size) (twice in four seconds). The gdb traceback and core dump analysis is attached. This is the only core from alpha5 in about a week's worth of production usage. Jeff Earickson Colby College

1 0

[Dovecot] pam_authenticate() failed:
by Michael Peters 18 Dec '05

18 Dec '05

Obviously I have an account. This is Solaris 10. I have been tinkering with the /etc/pam.conf without success. Does anyone have a solution? I have this currently in the pam.conf. dovecot auth required pam_passwd_auth.so.1 try_first_pass dovecot account required pam_unix_account.so.1 I have tried: dovecot auth required pam_unix_account.so.1 nullok dovecot account required pam_unix_account.so.1 And this: dovecot auth required pam_unix_auth.so.1 nullok dovecot account required pam_unix_account.so.1 When trying an IMAP attempt at the command line, this is the log extract. dovecot: Dec 17 10:32:13 Info: Dovecot v1.0.alpha5 starting up dovecot: Dec 17 10:32:33 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=IMAP lip=172.16.0.41 rip=172.16.0.41 resp=AG1kcGV0ZXJzAEhhY2tlcmphYzY3QA== dovecot: Dec 17 10:32:33 Info: auth(default): pam(myname(a)mydomain.com,172.16.0.41): pam_authenticate() failed: No account present for user dovecot: Dec 17 10:32:35 Info: auth(default): client out: FAIL 1 user=myname(a)mydomain.com dovecot: Dec 17 10:32:39 Info: imap-login: Aborted login: user=<myname(a)mydomain.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=172.16.0.41, lip=172.16.0.41 -- Best regards, Michael

1 0

[Dovecot] Re: dovecot Digest, Vol 32, Issue 42
by Daniel 17 Dec '05

17 Dec '05

If its too hard for them to setup the pop3 catch all, we can probably put some mapping in place to smtp froward mail to their server. This is more complex on our part so would prefer not to do it that way, but its an option and will require not setup on their part other than make sure their server does not accept mail for anyone other than our server. dovecot-request(a)dovecot.org wrote: > Send dovecot mailing list submissions to > dovecot(a)dovecot.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://dovecot.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dovecot > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dovecot-request(a)dovecot.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dovecot-owner(a)dovecot.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of dovecot digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha? (Marc Perkel) > 2. Dovecot - struct dqblk' has no member named 'dqb_curblocks > (Bob Gustafson) > 3. Re: Dovecot - struct dqblk' has no member named > 'dqb_curblocks (Bob Gustafson) > 4. Re: Dovecot & pam_mkhomedir (Stroller) > 5. Re: Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha? (Andy Cravens) > 6. Re: LDAP schema for mailLocation? (Aiko Barz) > 7. Authentication trouble. (Michael Peters) > 8. Re: LDAP schema for mailLocation? (Karl Latiss) > 9. Re: Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha? > (Erik Petersen) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:26:11 -0800 > From: Marc Perkel <marc(a)perkel.com> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha? > To: "Jeff A. Earickson" <jaearick(a)colby.edu> > Cc: dovecot(a)dovecot.org > Message-ID: <43A2F8B3.8080405(a)perkel.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I'm sure some of my customers would also freak if they knew I was using > "Alpha" code. Besides, who expects a 1.0 version to be perfect? > > Jeff A. Earickson wrote: > >> For political reasons, I would like to see alphaX promoted to "1.0". >> My boss had a cow the other day when I told her we are running alpha >> code in production. My defense was "you hadn't noticed because it >> works." Or at least call alpha6 something like "beta1" instead. >> >> Jeff Earickson >> Colby College >> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Marc Perkel wrote: >> >>> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:42:09 -0800 >>> From: Marc Perkel <marc(a)perkel.com> >>> To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org >>> Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha? >>> >>> I'd like to make a suggestion. Let's drop the Alpha and come out with >>> an official version 1.0. >>> >>> Here's my reasons. The 0.9x version are obsolete and people should be >>> using the 1.0 Alpha versions which seem to me to do everything the >>> previous versions did and more. It's as full featured and stable as >>> all other IMAP servers and in my opinion is ready to be called 1.0. >>> >>> The "Alpha" label scares people off and with the 0.9x version being >>> obsolete I think it creates confusion for new users. It created >>> confusion for me when I converted to dovecot, and distros are less >>> ,ikely to include versions with the Alpha label. >>> >>> Once you go to 1.0 you can start a 1.1 alpha series and finish it up. >>> I know Timo has high standards but as a marketing issue I think that >>> the Alpha label needs to go to get people to accept and use 1.0 in >>> production. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -- >>> Marc Perkel - marc(a)perkel.com >>> >>> Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com >>> My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com >>> >

2 1

[Dovecot] Two-phase delete/expunge ?
by Jan-Piet Mens 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Is it possible to have messages which have been marked for deletion or which are to be expunged, moved into a "secret" directory on the IMAP server? The IMAP client would consider the message as deleted, but an administrator could easily restore single messages (without having to retrieve tapes) by moving the message back into inbox. I understand there are patches floating around somewhere enabling that for Cyrus, but I'd love to see Dovecot do that as well. Is anyone aware of such functionality? Thanks, -JP

2 1

[Dovecot] strange connection NG
by Yi Xuan 16 Dec '05

16 Dec '05

Dear all, I have a devocot server based on fedora core 3 in Japan. When my users are in Japan, there is no any problem reported.Devocot works very well. But when my users are in China, sometimes the following problem occured. Sometimes the user can not download mails, after that all connections attempt to server(e.g http/ssh) failed. the user has to close OutLook, and wait for about 10 minutes, then access the webmail to read mail. Maybe the POP NG is due to the network , but what is the possible reason of 10-minute other connection NG? Is there any solution? Because users in China share the same outside IP, when one user occures POP NG, all users occures server access NG, that is a big puzzle. Thanks in advance. Best regards,

3 2