- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] misconception in uid and gid
by Felix Rubio Dalmau 02 Aug '13

02 Aug '13

Hi, I'm using a SQL database to store the usernames and passwords of my users. However, I have found that I must explicitly return the uid and gid with every query, even though all virtual users use the same uid and gid. The query, that works, is: user_query = SELECT mail, 'vmail' AS uid, 'vmail' AS gid, home, CONCAT('*:storage=', quota_MB*1024) AS quota_rule \ FROM virtual_users AS V LEFT JOIN virtual_domains AS D ON V.domain_id=D.id WHERE V.user='%n' AND D.name='%d' Nevertheless, if I remove the segments "'vmail' AS uid, 'vmail' AS gid" and modify the file conf.d/10-mail.conf to show mail_uid = vmail mail_gid = vmail I get this error: dovecot: auth: Error: userdb(<mail>): client doesn't have lookup permissions for this user: userdb reply doesn't contain uid (change userdb socket permissions) Does anybody know what is wrong in my set-up? Regards, Felix

3 4

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 124, Issue 4
by Felix Rubio Dalmau 02 Aug '13

02 Aug '13

Hello Axel, but then I don't get it: I thought that "uid" and "gid" in the user_query where used to access the local FS, whereas the "unix_listener auth-userdb" are used to indicate under which owner/group must be auth-userdb run... although maybe I'm wrong :-S :-) What I'm looking forward to is to eliminate the need for returning these two fixed items, as long as all the virtual_users will be using the same uid and gid. Does anybody know how can I do it?? Regards, and thank you! Felix > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:50:33 +0200 > From: Axel Luttgens <AxelLuttgens(a)swing.be> > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] misconception in uid and gid > Message-ID: <89AC3212-EFE6-41E5-A22D-97DC8E771218(a)swing.be> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Le 1 ao?t 2013 ? 15:43, Felix Rubio Dalmau a ?crit : > > > [...] > > > > Nevertheless, if I remove the segments "'vmail' AS uid, 'vmail' AS gid" and modify the file conf.d/10-mail.conf to show > > > > mail_uid = vmail > > mail_gid = vmail > > > > I get this error: > > > > dovecot: auth: Error: userdb(<mail>): client doesn't have lookup permissions for this user: userdb reply doesn't contain uid (change userdb socket permissions) > > > > Does anybody know what is wrong in my set-up? > > Hello Felix, > > Yes and no... > This still remains a bit unclear to me, but you could try something like this: > > service auth { > > unix_listener auth-userdb { > > # default: user = $default_internal_user > group = vmail # default: group = > mode = 0660 # default: mode = 0666 > } > } > > The code has some provisions to avoid the auth-userdb to be too widely open, in spite of that default mode 0666. Changing that mode short-circuits those provisions, and the above is the most secure setting I could think of in the case of a single uid/gid setup. > > HTH, > Axel

2 1

[Dovecot] Wrong remote IP (rip) in mail.log using IMAP login
by tyli 02 Aug '13

02 Aug '13

Dear list users While trying to secure our dovecot server with fail2ban I came across the following problem: We use dovecot (1.2.9, ubuntu package) behind a NAT, and failed login attempts are logged with our firewall as the remote ip. Example: Apr 15 08:36:26 mail dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 6 attempts): user=<xy>, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.0.1, lip=192.168.0.3 Therefore I would ban 192.168.0.1 which means that I ban EVERY user. Funny thing is that POP3 login attempts are logged correctly: Apr 13 11:05:50 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=<sgvyniwx>, method=PLAIN, rip=217.81.27.55, lip=192.168.0.3 Any ideas how to change this? Thanks in advance tyli

5 5

[Dovecot] Dovecot v2.2.4 (ebbe00999da8) doveadm crash
by e-frog 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Hello, Current Dovecot v2.2 HG crashes using the following command: $ doveadm mailbox status -A -t unseen 'virtual/unread' Please see backtrace below and dovecot -n output attached. Thanks, e-frog gdb /usr/bin/doveadm 24023 GNU gdb (GDB) 7.5.91.20130417-cvs-ubuntu Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /usr/bin/doveadm...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/doveadm...done. done. Attaching to program: /usr/bin/doveadm, process 24023 warning: unable to open /proc file '/proc/24023/status' warning: unable to open /proc file '/proc/24023/status' ptrace: No such process. [New LWP 24023] warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `doveadm mailbox status -A -t unseen virtual/unread'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 i_stream_next_line (stream=0x0) at istream.c:382 382 istream.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt full #0 i_stream_next_line (stream=0x0) at istream.c:382 _stream = <optimized out> pos = <optimized out> #1 0xb754656b in auth_master_user_list_next (ctx=0xb91bfbd8) at auth-master.c:689 line = <optimized out> #2 0xb7634a0b in mail_storage_service_all_next (ctx=0xb91c4ba8, username_r=username_r@entry=0xbf8e6630) at mail-storage-service.c:1260 __FUNCTION__ = "mail_storage_service_all_next" #3 0xb7752d46 in doveadm_mail_cmd_get_next_user (ctx=0xb91be478, username_r=0xbf8e6630) at doveadm-mail.c:416 No locals. #4 0xb7753e95 in doveadm_mail_all_users (wildcard_user=0x0, argv=0xb91ba1ec, ctx=0xb91be478) at doveadm-mail.c:368 ret = <optimized out> input = {module = 0x0, service = 0xb77918f3 "doveadm", username = 0xb91bf8a0 "test1(a)local.lan", session_id = 0x0, local_ip = {family = 0, u = { ip6 = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 = { s_addr = 0}}}, remote_ip = {family = 0, u = {ip6 = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 = {s_addr = 0}}}, local_port = 0, remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add = (unknown: 0), flags_override_remove = (unknown: 0), no_userdb_lookup = 0} user_idx = 0 user = 0xb91bf8a0 "test1(a)local.lan" error = 0x10 <Address 0x10 out of bounds> #5 doveadm_mail_cmd (argv=0xb91ba1ec, argc=-1189371412, cmd=0xbf8e668c) at doveadm-mail.c:523 ctx = 0xb91be478 getopt_args = <optimized out> ret = <optimized out> c = <optimized out> wildcard_user = 0x0 error = <optimized out> #6 doveadm_mail_try_run (cmd_name=cmd_name@entry=0xb91ba200 "mailbox", argc=5, argc@entry=6, argv=argv@entry=0xb91ba1dc) at doveadm-mail.c:608 cmd = 0xbf8e668c #7 0xb7752903 in main (argc=6, argv=0xb91ba1dc) at doveadm.c:398 cmd_name = 0xb91ba200 "mailbox" i = <optimized out> quick_init = false c = <optimized out> (gdb)

2 4

[Dovecot] [PATCH] quota-status: remove unnecessary newlines
by Ulrich Zehl 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Here's a trivial patch for quota-status.c that removes unecessary newlines present in the default overquota message. It applies to 2.2 and 2.1. Ulrich --- a/src/plugins/quota/quota-status.c 2013-08-01 14:35:35.000000000 +0200 +++ b/src/plugins/quota/quota-status.c 2013-08-01 17:58:26.000000000 +0200 @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ /* over quota */ value = mail_user_plugin_getenv(user, "quota_status_overquota"); if (value == NULL) - value = t_strdup_printf("554 5.2.2 %s\n\n", error); + value = t_strdup_printf("554 5.2.2 %s", error); } value = t_strdup(value); /* user's pool is being freed */ mail_user_unref(&user);

1 0

[Dovecot] trouble with setting individual quota values for multiple namespaces
by Andreas Oster 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Hello all please apologize that I repost this problem again. I tried to get some help several times on the list but did not find/get a solution. I am still struggling to setup different quotas for namespaces. In addition to the default "INBOX" namespace I have created a namespace called "MailArchive" which should have its own quota value of 5G per user. At first I configured quota2 like this: quota2 = maildir:MailArchive quota:ns=MailArchive/ quota2_rule = *:storage=5G and this seemd to work quite well. Users, accessing the MailArchive namespace can see the 5G limit in their mail client, unfortunately in the mail.err log file, errors like these repeatedly appear: Jul 29 11:40:24 mailserver dovecot: imap(testuser): Error: quota: Unknown namespace: MailArchive/ Jul 29 11:41:43 dovecot: last message repeated 47 times In the WIKI I have read, that in order to have quota for different namespaces, one would have to use different quota backends so I changed the quota config for the MailArchive namespace to SQL. namespace inbox { disabled = no hidden = no ignore_on_failure = no inbox = yes list = yes location = mailbox Drafts { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Drafts } mailbox Junk { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Junk } mailbox Sent { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Sent } mailbox "Sent Messages" { auto = no driver = special_use = \Sent } mailbox Trash { auto = subscribe driver = special_use = \Trash } prefix = separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } namespace { disabled = no hidden = no ignore_on_failure = no inbox = no list = yes location = maildir:/var/vmail/archive/%Ln/Maildir mailbox "Archived Mails" { auto = subscribe driver = } prefix = MailArchive/ separator = / subscriptions = yes type = private } plugin { quota = maildir:User quota:ns= quota2 = dict:Archive Quota:%u.mailarchive:ns=MailArchive/:proxy::sqlquota quota2_rule = *:storage=5G quota_rule = *:storage=1G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+200M } dict { sqlquota = mysql:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext } Unfortunately this did not change anything. Quota is working like expected but I still get the same errors in mail.err. I am currently using dovecot version 2.2.4. Thank you for your kind help best regards Andreas

2 4

[Dovecot] SSL warning messages
by Anand Kumria 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Hi, I've had the following appear in my logfile, and am just wondering what the warning means? dovecot: managesieve-login: Warning: SSL alert: where=0x4008, ret=256: warning close notify [a.b.c.d] dovecot: imap-login: Warning: SSL alert: where=0x4004, ret=256: warning close notify [w.x.y.z] Should I be worrying about these kinds of messages? Dovecot 2.2.4 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS if it is important. Thanks, Anand

2 1

Re: [Dovecot] Maildir permissions and Solr re-indexing
by Joseph Tam 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

Michael Welsh Duggan writes: > All the files in my Maildir are owned by md5i:mail (I am md5i), and have > 660 permissions. All directories have the same user:group permissions, > and 770 with the setguid bit set. (That last may not be necessary, but > ... > > doveadm(md5i): Error: fchown(/home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test/dovecot.index.log.newlock, group=8(mail)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1000(md5i), group based on /home/md5i/Maildir/.mail.test - see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm) > > After this, each directory has a dovecot.index.log with md5i:md5i 600 > permissions. I think the cause is clear enough: you (user=md5i/uid=1000) are not part of group mail (gid=8), so the dovecot user process doing things on your behalf cannot create index files that are anlogous to the mailbox it's indexing. You can either 1) add "md5i" to group mail 2) remove g+w permission on your mail files (making group membership irrelevant) 3) fiddle with "mail_privileged_group = mail", but I'm a little hazy on all the ramifications of this. I don't know your particular circumstances, so I don't know which is best. If (big if) nothing on your system (particularly the MTA) requires access to your mail spool files by running as group=mail, probably 2) is your best option. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

2 1

[Dovecot] LMTP: userdb lookup - user-filter with variables
by Burckhard Schmidt 31 Jul '13

31 Jul '13

I tried to use dovcots lmtp instead of dovecot-lda. postfix has in master.cf ... dovecot-lda -f ... -d ${user} to separate the user part from user(a)hostname.domain. So lookup of "user" succeeds in userdb (LDAP) done by dovecot-lda. I have always local addresses like to=<user(a)hostname.domain> postfix/lmtp[6579]: [ID 197553 mail.info] B3CDA66A16: to=<h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de> With lmtp the userpart must be separated also. I tried user_filter (LDAP) with %n, %Ln, %8n without success: userdb lookup: user(a)hostname.domain doesn't exist) dovecot-2.1.17 I used "doveadm user h0094slk" and "doveadm user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de" for my tests. userdb { driver = ldap args = /usr/dovecot/etc/ldapuser.conf } and ldapuser.conf with ... user_filter = (&(uid=%n) (objectClass=cmsAccount)) user_attrs = homeDirectory=home I modified user_filter like uid=%Ln or uid=%8u success for doveadm user h0094slk (because nothing to split) userdb: h0094slk home : /home/p0094/h0094slk but no success for doveadm user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de userdb lookup: user h0094slk(a)mailstore4.hu-berlin.de doesn't exist It looks for me like user_filter do not use variables at this point? What I'm missing? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen --- Burckhard Schmidt Abteilung Systemsoftware und Kommunikation ZE Computer- und Medienservice der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Postanschrift: Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin Standort: Rudower Chaussee 26; 12489 Berlin Tel.: +49-30-2093-70058 Fax: +49-30-2093-2959 Mail: bschmidt(a)cms.hu-berlin.de

1 1

Re: [Dovecot] LDA vs. LMTP
by Joseph Tam 31 Jul '13

31 Jul '13

Martin Burgraf writes: > > I don't know why you would consider a background process inferior to a > > run-on-demand executable. > > Well, the background process is hogging CPU and RAM while it basically > does nothing. "Hogging" CPU and memory is putting it strongly, as it is basically suspended while blocked on waiting for a connection, and if left for a long time in an idle state, might be swapped out to disk and not consuming (real) memory, or consuming real memory that isn't in use otherwise. As I stated before, the resource usage is small compared with all the other stuff going on, so if you don't have a busy mail server, I don't think you should sweat the difference. The benefits of LMTP should increase with load, as having LMTP resident will save you the overhead of repeatedly loading/unloading LDA, and I'm sure the CPU and memory usage of servicing that overhead will be non-trivial. If you have oodles of memory, then it's no problem keeping a LMTP resident. If you don't have enough memory and are VM disk thrashing, you'll have other problems and LDA/LMTP is the least of your worries. > And when it's running as root there is always the danger > of privilege escalation. LDA only runs when it's needed and since it > uses only user rights it shoudbe more harmless. I didn't contest the privilege separation aspect, as it a necessary design trade-off that one daemon doing things for all user will need overriding access. However, if this is a concern, you can virtualize all your users. LMTP can theoretically be subverted, but at least won't be as root. (I'm assuming LMTP stays as root, and not spawning off user processes to do the real work.) Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 2