- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Dovecot upgrade
by Jos Chrispijn 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

Can someone tell me how I can upgrade from Dovecot 1.x to 2.x best? thanks for your reply, Jos Chrispijn

3 2

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail
by Joseph Tam 22 Apr '12

22 Apr '12

> i installed new version 2.0.20. but its the same problem > > args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users ... > > Apr 21 17:47:16 host1 sendmail[32561]: q3LElF79032559: to=<jamal(a)example.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)host1.bigmama.com> (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120292, relay=dovecot, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: dovecot mailer (/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda) exited with EX_TEMPFAIL Any logs for dovecot? Same sendmail configs as before or did you try the extra flag I suggested? Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

1 0

[Dovecot] Configuration advices for a 50000 mailboxes server(s)
by Frank Bonnet 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

Hello I need some feedbacks advices of experienced admins I will have to setup in few monthes an email system for approx 50K "intensives" users. The only mandatory thing will be I must use HP proliant servers The operating system will be FreeBSD or Linux Thank you for any advices

5 11

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot LDA with sendmail
by Joseph Tam 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

Hadi Salem <almarzuki2001(a)hotmail.com> writes: > Im configuring sendmail with dovecot for virtual users using > password file and file for user name. on centos. > > dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 Maybe I can beat Charles Marcus to the punch and recommend you upgrade to the latest version, otherwise you'll run into bugs that have already been fixed. > Mdovecot, > P=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver, F=DFMPhnu9,S=EnvFromSMTP/HdrFromSMTP, > R=EnvToSMTP/HdrFromSMTP,T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,A=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > $u > ... > Apr 19 20:52:13 host1 sendmail[22311]: q3JHqDAR022309: > to=<jamal(a)example.com>, ctladdr=<root(a)host1.bigmama.com> (0/0), > delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=dovecot, pri=120292, relay=dovecot, > dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: dovecot mailer (/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver) exited > with EX_TEMPFAIL Is there any logs from deliver? If not, look at this page to configure logging http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA That's your best chance at finding out the problem. I don't have virtual users, so I can't venture to say whether this is part of the problem. I know I had to fiddle with the mailer flags (you have "DFMPhnu9") to get my setup working, but I don't remember what I did or why. Try adding the "S" flag and see if that helps. Joseph Tam <jtam.home(a)gmail.com>

3 2

[Dovecot] migrate 15K users to new domain name
by Jan-Frode Myklebust 21 Apr '12

21 Apr '12

I need to migrate 15K users to a new domain name, and plan to use "dsync mirror" in the transition phase. Could someone confirm that this should work: Before giving users access to new-domain do a first sync to get all the stale data over: for user in $old-domain; do dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain done Configure sieve vacation filter to forward all messages from $user@old-domain to $user@new-domain, and notify sender of changed address. Give users access to both new-domain and old-domain, and do a final sync. for user in $old-domain; do dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain dsync mirror $user@old-domain $user@new-domain # twice in case the first was slow drop all messages for $user@old-domain Leave notice message for $user@old-domain saying he should use new-domain done Wait a few weeks/months, and then drop all users@old-domain. Does this look sensible? -jf

3 6

[Dovecot] mbox folders on-disc layout
by John Robinson 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

I'd like to change the on-disk layout for my mboxes from being ~/mail/foo/bar to ~/mail/foo.bar so that I can have folders containing both messages and subfolders, without having subfolders beginning with . and then having to do all the other fiddling with locations of index files etc. that goes along with LAYOUT=maildir++, and also leaving the filesystem layout looking sensible so my users see their mailboxes instead of the index and control files. Is this possible or do I need to patch something? (CentOS 6, dovecot 2.0.9) Cheers, John.

2 3

[Dovecot] Error in logs indicating broken files
by Steve Campbell 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Still new to dovecot, I'm seeing a couple of errors in my log file indicating corruption of index files. Error: Corrupted index cache file/home/xxxxxx/mail/.imap/sent-mail/dovecot.index.cache: Broken virtual size for mail UID 67: 1 Time(s) Error: FETCH [] for mailbox ~/mail/sent-mail UID 67 got too little data: 6203 vs 7478: 1 Time(s) This account is used by multiple users, but it is not a shared account (haven't set any of those up yet - still new to me), so I would expect corruption possibilities when multiple users modify the account folders in some manner. Until I get some experience under my belt and make this a truly "shared" account, is there any way to resolve the corruption of the files mentioned above? Maybe just delete them? thanks steve campbell

2 1

[Dovecot] array code issue ?
by Tim Ruehsen 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Hi, I just took a look into the dovecot 2.1 sources and just saw a possible issue in array.h. This code snippet as an example: #static inline void * #array_get_modifiable_i(struct array *array, unsigned int *count_r) #{ # *count_r = array->buffer->used / array->element_size; # return buffer_get_modifiable_data(array->buffer, NULL); #} array->buffer->used and array->element_size are of type 'size_t' which is 64bit on amd64 and others while 'count_r' is a 32bit value. At least, I see ugly warnings with -Wconversion (which I personally like to use). I know, it is unlikely that 'array->buffer->used / array->element_size' exceeds 32bit range. But then, dovecot's source is so well written, that the above code seems to disturb dovecot's code aesthetics. And who knows... in a few years (when we have THz and TBytes on our desktops) emails (and array sizes) might exceed everything that we think of today. Tim

2 1

[Dovecot] dbox vs. mdbox
by Douglas Mortensen 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

What are the pros and cons of both? Especially in regards to performance, stability, management & maintenance? I really appreciate feedback. We're on a time-crunch to migrate from a debian 5 box w/ dovecot 1.1 to a debian 6 box w/ dovecot 2.0.9 (built from source). Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

6 12

[Dovecot] Fwd: IMAP SSL incoming test need help !
by Dennis Chen 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: D Chen <dchenusa(a)yahoo.com> > Date: April 19, 2012 4:06:49 PM PDT > To: lists-dovecot <replies-lists-a1z2-dovecot(a)listmail.innovate.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP SSL incoming test need help ! > Reply-To: D Chen <dchenusa(a)yahoo.com> > > Thanks for nice pointing out in my mail.log! > > I could not find where is the procmail log located under /var/log ! > > As procmail is "suspicious", I recalled that I selected either use procmail or not use for local delivery while I re-configure the postfix. I ran "sudo dpkg-reconfigure postfix" again, and selected NOT use "Procmail" for local delivery, restart postfix and ran the tested again, it worked now ! examined the mail.log, it said "delivered to maildir" instead of procmail. > > why works NOT using procmail ? thx. > > From: lists-dovecot <replies-lists-a1z2-dovecot(a)listmail.innovate.net> > To: D Chen <dchenusa(a)yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 5:22 AM > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] IMAP SSL incoming test need help ! > > > > ------------ Original Message ------------ > > Date: Thursday, April 19, 2012 01:44:35 AM -0700 > > From: D Chen <dchenusa(a)yahoo.com> > > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot(a)dovecot.org> > > Subject: [Dovecot] IMAP SSL incoming test need help ! > > > > Ubuntu 11.10 server with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail configured. > > > > Outgoing SMTP server seemed worked fine, however, the incoming > > IMAP with SSL on port 993 doesn't seem to receive any mail at all > > !? Here is the mail.log during the test session from an external > > yahoo mail (dchenusa(a)yahoo.com) to the internal server > > testmail.biokeyinc.com (dchen(a)testmail.biokeyinc.com) The log did > > NOT show any error ! The sender showed sent mail! but no mail > > reach to the destination! Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Apr 19 01:20:02 testmail postfix/smtpd[4103]: connect from > > nm20-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[98.138.91.180] Apr 19 01:20:03 > > testmail postfix/smtpd[4103]: 091ED200973: > > client=nm20-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[98.138.91.180] Apr 19 > > 01:20:03 testmail postfix/cleanup[4108]: 091ED200973: > > message-id=<32C9C558-95DA-417D-8687-41ABE1296D61(a)yahoo.com> Apr 19 > > 01:20:03 testmail postfix/qmgr[2007]: 091ED200973: > > from=<dchenusa(a)yahoo.com>, size=2840, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr > > 19 01:20:03 testmail postfix/smtpd[4103]: disconnect from > > nm20-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[98.138.91.180] Apr 19 01:20:12 > > testmail postfix/smtpd[4113]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] > > Apr 19 01:20:12 testmail postfix/smtpd[4113]: 33AE9200AE9: > > client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Apr 19 01:20:12 testmail > > postfix/cleanup[4108]: 33AE9200AE9: > > message-id=<32C9C558-95DA-417D-8687-41ABE1296D61(a)yahoo.com> Apr 19 > > 01:20:12 testmail postfix/qmgr[2007]: 33AE9200AE9: > > from=<dchenusa(a)yahoo.com>, size=3536, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr > > 19 01:20:12 testmail postfix/smtpd[4113]: disconnect from > > localhost[127.0.0.1] Apr 19 01:20:12 testmail amavis[2042]: > > (02042-06) Passed CLEAN, [98.138.91.180] [98.138.87.4] > > <dchenusa(a)yahoo.com> -> <dchen(a)testmail.biokeyinc.com>, > > Message-ID: <32C9C558-95DA-417D-8687-41ABE1296D61(a)yahoo.com>, > > mail_id: rqyVZiQDwSsG, Hits: -0.109, size: 2837, queued_as: > > 33AE9200AE9, dkim_id=dchenusa@yahoo.com,@yahoo.com, 8647 ms Apr 19 > > 01:20:12 testmail postfix/smtp[4109]: 091ED200973: > > to=<dchen(a)testmail.biokeyinc.com>, > > relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=9.5, > > delays=0.87/0.01/0/8.6, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from > > MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 33AE9200AE9) Apr > > 19 01:20:12 testmail postfix/qmgr[2007]: 091ED200973: removed Apr > > 19 01:20:12 testmail postfix/local[4114]: 33AE9200AE9: > > to=<dchen(a)testmail.biokeyinc.com>, relay=local, delay=0.18, > > delays=0.1/0/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: > > procmail -a "$EXTENSION") Apr 19 01:20:12 testmail > > postfix/qmgr[2007]: 33AE9200AE9: removed Apr 19 01:21:30 testmail > > dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<dchen>, method=PLAIN, > > rip=63.195.90.22, lip=192.168.20.100, mpid=4122, TLS Apr 19 > > 01:23:13 testmail dovecot: imap(dchen): Disconnected: Disconnected > > in IDLE bytes=99/708 Apr 19 01:23:23 testmail postfix/anvil[4105]: > > statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for (smtp:98.138.91.180) at > > Apr 19 01:20:02 Apr 19 01:23:23 testmail postfix/anvil[4105]: > > statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtp:98.138.91.180) at Apr > > 19 01:20:02 Apr 19 01:23:23 testmail postfix/anvil[4105]: > > statistics: max cache size 1 at Apr 19 01:20:02 > > ------------ End Original Message ------------ > > > I'm going to bet that procmail is eating the inbound message: > > Apr 19 01:20:12 testmail postfix/local[4114]: 33AE9200AE9: > to=<dchen(a)testmail.biokeyinc.com>, relay=local, delay=0.18, > delays=0.1/0/0/0.07, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: > > procmail -a "$EXTENSION") > > and it's not getting to the user's inbox. If a message doesn't get > to the user's inbox then it's not dovecot's issue that it can't be > retrieved. > > fyi -- imap/dovecot have nothing to do your inbound delivery. > > > however, the incoming IMAP with SSL on port 993 doesn't > > seem to receive any mail > > that's handled by your MTA, which in your case is postfix, with > procmail in the mix. > > I would try looking at the procmail log to see what's happening > there. > > - Richard > > > > > > > > > > >

1 1