- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] migrating users
by Pete McEvoy 02 Aug '07

02 Aug '07

Hi. I've been migrating users from mbox to maildir on a new server running dovecot 1.0 - is there any method I can employ to prevent my pop3 users having to redownload mails after I move them? Thanks -- Pete

1 1

[Dovecot] Shared mailboxes v1.0.3
by Bruce Bodger 02 Aug '07

02 Aug '07

On Jul 28, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Sergey A. Kobzar wrote: > > BTW /home/mail/public/ is not a mailbox and must not contain cur new > and tmp folders. As Timo said this bug was fixed in 1.1. > Just for the record, and I realize it's not scheduled to be fixed until v1.1, this is still "broken" in v 1.0.3. Dovecot still creates cur, tmp, and new in /home/mail/public (or applicable, as configured). Doesn't hurt anything but just wanted to make the point. > http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes B. Bodger

1 0

Re: [Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.
by Bill Boebel 02 Aug '07

02 Aug '07

On Wed, August 1, 2007 8:36 pm, Tan Shao Yi <tansy(a)pacific.net.sg> said: > Will it be possible to make this available in the 1.0 branch? UW-IMAP > seems to continue to process e-mails without the MIME-Version, so long as > it has the Content-Type or -Encoding header. It's an easy patch if you want to apply it to your installation. Probably something like this, although I haven't tried it... src/lib-mail/message-parser.c @225: - if (!hdr->eoh && strcasecmp(hdr->name, "Mime-Version") == 0) { + //if (!hdr->eoh && strcasecmp(hdr->name, "Mime-Version") == 0) { /* it's MIME. Content-* headers are valid */ part->flags |= MESSAGE_PART_FLAG_IS_MIME; - }

1 0

[Dovecot] mbox inbox default
by bhayden＠umn.edu 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

HI Timo & all. We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for deliver. I'd assumed that if the /var/mail/$USER file doesn't exist, dovecot would create it, but we've discovered from experience (and I verified it in mbox-storage.c) that if access(path, R_OK|W_OK) fails--as it does if the file doesn't exist--that dovecot defaults then to delivering in root_dir/inbox. I'm curious why this is. It seems like if the configured INBOX file doesn't exist, dovecot should create it if possible; it's a different case than if, say, the user doesn't have write access to that directory, in which case it of course would be appropriate to fall back to some other location rather than rejecting mail. Is there something I'm missing that makes my idea wrong? Thanks, -Brian Hayden OIT Internet Services University of MN # ./dovecot -n # /etc/opt/dovecot/dovecot.conf syslog_facility: local6 protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s listen(default): *:143 listen(imap): *:143 listen(pop3): *:110 ssl_listen(default): *:993 ssl_listen(imap): *:993 ssl_listen(pop3): *:995 ssl_cert_file: /etc/opt/openssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/opt/openssl/private/dovecot.pem shutdown_clients: no login_dir: /var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_log_format_elements: user=<%u> pid=<%p> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l %c login_processes_count: 32 login_max_processes_count: 6000 max_mail_processes: 8192 first_valid_uid: 100 mail_location: mbox:~:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/ mail_debug: yes mbox_lazy_writes: no mail_executable(default): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/mail_path.sh mail_executable(imap): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/mail_path.sh mail_executable(pop3): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugins(default): acl mail_plugins(imap): acl mail_plugins(pop3): mail_plugin_dir(default): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/pop3 mail_log_prefix: [%p] %Us(%u): mail_log_max_lines_per_sec: 0 imap_client_workarounds(default): delay-newmail outlook-idle tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_client_workarounds(imap): delay-newmail outlook-idle tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_client_workarounds(pop3): outlook-idle pop3_uidl_format(default): pop3_uidl_format(imap): pop3_uidl_format(pop3): %08Xu%08Xv namespace: type: private separator: / location: mbox:~:INBOX=/var/mail/%u:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/ inbox: yes namespace: type: private separator: / prefix: mail/ location: mbox:~/mail/:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/ hidden: yes namespace: type: private separator: / prefix: ~/mail/ location: mbox:~/mail/:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/ hidden: yes namespace: type: private separator: / prefix: ~%u/mail/ location: mbox:~/mail/:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/ hidden: yes namespace: type: private separator: / prefix: Shared/ location: maildir:~/Maildir/Shared/:INDEX=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/shared:CONTROL=/var/mail/.dovecot-index/%1u/%u/shared-control auth default: username_format: %Lu passdb: driver: pam args: session=yes * userdb: driver: passwd plugin: acl: vfile:

2 2

[Dovecot] High cpu usage OpenSolaris
by Gary Gendel 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

All, Nevermind... I discovered the problem. It was in the Solaris Sun Studio 12 compiler. I created a debug version to begin testing, but that version worked without sucking up the cpu. So it looks like the optimizer messed up. If I used the -fast optimization, it sucks up cpu, but with -xO5 all is well. Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I've built 64-bit dovecot 1.0.2 on Opensolaris to replace version 1.0.0rc10. It functions fine, but when I connect, it eats up all available cpu. My guess is that the poll thread is running continuously. Any ideas on what I should do to verify this or does anyone know of a fix? Thanks, Gary

4 4

[Dovecot] RFE: please include quota waning patch
by Farkas Levente 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

hi, it'd be very useful to include the quota warning patch in official release. without it the quota support is not really useful since mail simple dropped when quota is over. and most enduser never know what happend, they just recognize mails are not coming:-( thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

4 5

[Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.
by Tan Shao Yi 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

Hi, I notice that in src/lib-mail/message-parser.c, there is a section of code that checks for the presence of MIME-Version before allowing processing of the Content-* headers. Is there a possibility of relaxing this rule? There are some broken mailers, in particular newsletter mailers that do not seem to honour the MIME-Version header, though they do send the Content-Type. Cheers.

2 1

[Dovecot] Mount options and NFS: just checking...
by Mike Brudenell 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

Greetings - I'm now in the last couple of weeks before going live with Dovecot (v1.0.3) on our revamped IMAP service. I'd like to double-check about the best mount options to use; could someone advise, please? I have three separate directory trees for the message store, the control files and the index files. These are arranged as follows: Message Store Mounted over NFS from a NetApp filer; filestore quotas are ENABLED. Control Files Mounted over NFS from the NetApp filer; filestore quotas are DISABLED. Index Files Mounted on local disk; filestore quotas are DISABLED. We will have a pair of Solaris 10 servers on which Dovecot 1.0.3 is running. Users are normally directed to their "preferred" server but, if it is unavailable, will go via the other server. Q1. Am I right in thinking that for the Message Store and Control Files I should NFS-mount both of them with the "actimeo=0"? (Or would "noac" be better, which also turns off client write- caching as well as the attribute cache?) Q2. Should I NFS-mount either or both of the Message Store and Control Files with the "noxattr" option to turn off extended attributes? Q3. Which of the filestores should I mount with the "noatime" option? (I understand that for the filer-based NFS mounts this can be done on the filer, as the option isn't available with "mount" for NFS-monted filestores.) Q4. Any other options to use/miss out? Currently my understanding from the list and the NFS page at the Wiki is: A1. Use "actimeo=0" for both Message Store and Control Files. No idea about the need for/impact of using "noac". A2. No idea. A3. Safe to use "noatime" for all three filestores. (I understand Dovecot will use utime() when needed on such filestores, but am not sure if it will work on the NFS-mounted filestores from the filer if access times are turned off at the filer end.) Any thoughts, please? Cheers, Mike B-) -- The Computing Service, University of York, Heslington, York Yo10 5DD, UK Tel:+44-1904-433811 FAX:+44-1904-433740 * Unsolicited commercial e-mail is NOT welcome at this e-mail address. *

2 3

[Dovecot] mbox bug in 1.0.0
by bhayden＠umn.edu 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

Hi folks. We're moving users from rc24 and 27 to 1.0.0. On four mailboxes so far we've seen these errors after the move (quick and dirty anonymizing follows): Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.info] imap-login: Login: user=<USER>, pid=<9046>, method=PLAIN, rip=***.***.***.***, lip=***.***.***.***, TLS Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.error] [9073] IMAP(USER): mbox /var/mail/user: seq=1 uid=8808 uid_broken=0 originally needed 10 bytes, now needs 23 bytes Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.error] [9073] IMAP(USER): Raw backtrace: 0x7b800 -> 0x43434 -> 0x3e018 -> 0x3fc34 -> 0x40080 -> 0x6d3cc -> 0x29a88 -> 0x21324 -> 0x214c0 -> 0x22f48 -> 0x22ec0 -> 0x230c0 -> 0x81c18 -> 0x814e4 -> 0x2b5cc -> 0x1dc58 Points of interest: 1. I can't reproduce this. It still happens after the user's .imap directories are removed. If I make a copy of the mailbox on another machine running the same version of Dovecot with the same config, the problem doesn't occur. Weird. 2. So far, have only seen it on quite large mailboxes (close to or over 100MB). Most large boxes have not had the problem, but the ones that have are all large. Any thoughts? Dovecot -n output below. -Brian Hayden OIT Internet Services U of Minnesota # dovecot -n # /etc/opt/dovecot/dovecot.conf syslog_facility: local6 protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s listen(default): *:143 listen(imap): *:143 listen(pop3): *:110 ssl_listen(default): *:993 ssl_listen(imap): *:993 ssl_listen(pop3): *:995 ssl_cert_file: /etc/opt/openssl/certs/dovecot.pem ssl_key_file: /etc/opt/openssl/private/dovecot.pem shutdown_clients: no login_dir: /var/opt/dovecot/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_log_format_elements: user=<%u> pid=<%p> method=%m rip=%r lip=%l %c login_processes_count: 32 login_max_processes_count: 4096 max_mail_processes: 8192 first_valid_uid: 100 default_mail_env: mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_location: mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u mail_full_filesystem_access: yes mbox_lazy_writes: no mail_executable(default): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir(default): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /opt/dovecot/lib/dovecot/pop3 mail_log_prefix: [%p] %Us(%u): imap_client_workarounds(default): delay-newmail outlook-idle tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_client_workarounds(imap): delay-newmail outlook-idle tb-extra-mailbox-sep imap_client_workarounds(pop3): outlook-idle pop3_uidl_format(default): pop3_uidl_format(imap): pop3_uidl_format(pop3): %08Xu%08Xv namespace: type: private separator: / location: mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u inbox: yes hidden: yes auth default: username_format: %Lu verbose: yes debug: yes passdb: driver: pam args: session=yes * userdb: driver: passwd

2 4

[Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist locking
by Tony Tsang 01 Aug '07

01 Aug '07

Hi all, I've a dovecot server setup and occassionally clients cannot get mails from their inbox. When I inspect the maildir for that user, there is stale dovecot-uidlist.lock file, and imap process keeps waiting for release of the lock. Is there any other method to perform locking on dovecot-uidlist instead of using dotlock mechanism? It is creating maintenance problems if I need to remove those stale lock files everytime clients hit this problem Tony.

2 2