- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] first crack at auto-trash plugin
by David Powers 25 Mar '06

25 Mar '06

I have written an alpha version of an auto trash plugin for dovecot. When compiled in any mail expunged from a non-Trash folder is moved to a folder named Trash. As of yet the folder is not created if it doesn't exist (the process fails before expunge). I would appreciate feedback of any sort. In addition, I am currently getting an error I haven't been able to puzzle out in the logs when it runs: Mar 21 15:22:01 david dovecot: imap(david(a)grayskies.net): Timeout leak: 0x807fad0 I see that it seems to relate to transactions somehow, but my few hours of playing with dovecot haven't given me the answer - so ideas/patches to the code would also be nice. You can grab it here: http://wrath.grayskies.net/tarballs/auto-trash.tar.gz -David

6 5

[Dovecot] Dovecot LDA + Fedora destribution = no go?
by Charlie Davis 25 Mar '06

25 Mar '06

Anyone know of a way to get the LDA to work on the fedora distribution available on yum? I'm a big fan of the whole yum-auto-updating thing but if this isn't possible, I'll go tarball. -Charlie

2 1

[Dovecot] Method of archiving mail?
by Stephen Allen 24 Mar '06

24 Mar '06

Hello I have a situation in which a number of users have 10,000+ messages in the maildir, going back a few years. I'm not a fan of this many files lying around so I'd like to set up some kind of archiving, but one that will allow user's access to the old mails should they wish to see them. I thought of a cron job trying to sift through messages pulling those what were older than x days, then writing some script to process a request from a user (date/time/from/to/subject/body text) and copy matching messages to a "query" folder in the maildir. However, a) I'm not good at this kind of thing, and b) I have a feeling it's already been done before. Can anyone point me in the right direction please... is their software around to do this already? Many thanks, Steve :)

3 3

[Dovecot] Imap Timeouts
by Neil Wilson 24 Mar '06

24 Mar '06

Hi guys, I've got a client running 1.0.beta3 on SuSe 9.3 Everything has been running perfectly since it was installed about 6 months ago, but lately they've had issues with email clients not being able to connect to the IMAP server, until they close their clients(Thunderbird & Outlook) and then re-open them. They have roughly 70 users on their network, so it sounds like it could be too many active sessions at once, but I've tried changing a few things in the config, and so far nothing has resolved this. Any help would be appreciated. Regards. Neil Wilson Powered by Linux, driven by passion! -- This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.dcdata.co.za/emaildisclaimer.html

6 9

[Dovecot] Can Dovecot 'slurp' into the INBOX from a mail spool file?
by Daniel Watts 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

Hi guys, I have a system whereby I am forced to deal with mbox files of /var/spool/mail/user1 (mbox text file) /var/spool/mail/user2 (mbox text file) etc Their mail homes are maildir format in: /home/user1/Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} /home/user2/Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} etc I can set things up so that the mbox inbox is shown using namespaces: namespace private { separator = / prefix = location = maildir:/home/virtual/%d/home/%n/Maildir/ } namespace private { separator = / prefix = mail/ inbox = yes hidden = no location = mbox:/home/virtual/%d/home/%n/mail/:INBOX=/home/virtual/%d/var/spool/mail/%n } This gives a rather odd folder structure as follows: INBOX Sent Drafts Trash mail/ --- INBOX myfolder1 myfolder2 Both of those INBOXes are actually the same folder. I'd ideally like to hide the mbox namespace entirely so that the user does not see any mbox folders. UW IMAP, with it's mbx format, allows you to just drop in a file called INBOX in mbx format and it will 'slurp' the /var/spool/mail/usersmbox file into the mbx INBOX. Has/could Dovecot have a similar feature whereby you specify a spool folder which is then 'slurped' into the local maildir INBOX? Not sure if I'm being clear enough here - do let me know if not! Much thanks, Daniel

1 0

[Dovecot] spam filtering with amavis
by Bas van den Dikkenberg 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

I'm filtering that is being deliverd to postfix mail server with amavisd-new . I want spam with spam f level 1 - 8 to ad a tag any everything above to be delete is this posebol? If yes how? Met vriendelijk groet, Bas van Dikkenberg GISkit bv BFVD1-RIPE Tel: +3130-6340430 Fax: +3130-6342433 Prive Tel: +3130-6372769 Mob: +316-52384841

2 1

[Dovecot] dovecot customflags/keywords
by sezai.karatoz 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

4 3

[Dovecot] Losing messages
by Stian Jordet 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

Hi, I have been running dovecot cvs happily for.. well.. very, very long now. Don't remember when I switched from 0.99, but it was back in the test-days, long before the alpha's. Anyway, it seems to have been working very well all the time. But recently three of my clients have claimed to have lost mail when moving from Thunderbird. I even experienced it myself once. I'm using Evolution 99% of the time, and have never seen any problems with that - but that doesn't mean the problem only occurs with Thunderbird. When moving mail from one folder to another, everything seems fine, except that the mail isn't in any folder anymore. It _seems_ related to this: Mar 14 14:46:53 buick dovecot: imap(larsmj): Fixed index file /home/larsmj/Maildir/.Junk/dovecot.index: first_recent_uid_lowwater 40 -> 36 Mar 14 14:46:53 buick dovecot: imap(larsmj): Corrupted index file /home/larsmj/Maildir/.Junk/dovecot.index: Duplicate header extension keywords But I'm not sure. Either way I get these lines rather often for some users. What does it mean? Anyone seen anything like it? I really don't like the idea of losing clients mail... I hope someone can shed some light on this. Best regards, Stian

4 7

RE: [Dovecot] Shared namespaces - solved
by Mark Lidstone 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

Hi Steffen, I'm using procmail as my LDA and postfix as my MTA. Also, in my case I need all email to any email address at my domain starting with "pr" then some numbers to go into these folders. The reason for this is I'm trying to setup an open-source replacement for our mail-enabled Exchange Public Folders at the moment (can you believe you can't search sub-folders in Exchange Public Folders?!). First I created a fake user with it's own group: adduser public_folders Next, I added all the relevant users to that group: usermod -G public_folders john_smith usermod -G public_folders jon_doe Next, in /home/public_user/.procmailrc I put the following: MAILDIR=/home/public_folders/Maildir # If any mail gets through to this account without having a project number address, # put it in an "Unfiled" folder. DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/.Unfiled/new * # This line just gets me the project number (also makes sure the preceding letters * # are uppercase - otherwise we could end up with separate folders for pr123, Pr123, * # pR123 and PR123. * PROJECT_NUM=`formail -xTo: | egrep -o [pP][rR][0-9]+ | tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]'` # This is not absolutely necessary, but I prefer to keep logs so I can see where # emails have been stored if anything goes missing. LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log # This UMASK setting is basically what you're looking for, Steffen. The mail files # on the disk are stored with mode 660. UMASK=007 # Because these are public folders receiving a lot of mail, I've put in a big message # ID cache. :0 Wh: msgid.log |formail -D 2097152 $MAILDIR/msgid.cache * # Notice that regexps in .procmailrc are case insensitive unless you specify otherwise * :0 H * * ^To: .*PR[0-9]+(a)mydomain\.tld * { * PROJECT_FOLDER=$MAILDIR/.Projects.${PROJECT_NUM} * * # Here I basically check if the folder exists. If not it's created with mode * # 770 - this is also important. * :0 Wic: * * ? test ! -d ${PROJECT_FOLDER} * # Make all the subfolders, or they will be made by dovecot when the first user * # tries to look in there messing up the permissions on that folder. * |mkdir -m 770 -p ${PROJECT_FOLDER}/new;\ * mkdir -m 770 ${PROJECT_FOLDER}/cur;\ * mkdir -m 770 ${PROJECT_FOLDER}/tmp * * # And here I finally store the email * :0: * ${PROJECT_FOLDER} * } Make sure the file has mode 0600 public_folders:public_folders or procmail will ignore it. Next, I had to set the following permission on the public_folders home folder: chmod 770 /home/public_folders Next, I put the following namespace into /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf: namespace public { separator = / prefix = Public/ location = maildir:/home/public_folders/Maildir:INDEX=%h/Maildir/public_folders/indexes:CONTROL=%h/Maildir/public_folders/control inbox = no hidden = no } Next, I made sure the relevant folder structure existed with the right permissions (I cheated and did this as root): cd /home/public_folders mkdir -p Maildir/new cd Maildir mkdir cur mkdir tmp mkdir -p .Unfiled/new mkdir .Unfiled/cur mkdir .Unfiled/tmp for file in `find`; do chown public_folders:public_folders $file if [ -d $file ]; then chmod 770 $file else chmod 660 $file fi done *Next, I made a file called /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre with the following content: * * /^[pP][rR][0-9]+(a)mydomain\.tld/ public_folders@localhost * *And finally I put the following into /etc/postfix/main.cf: * * virtual_alias_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre, hash:/etc/postfix/virtual Then I restarted postfix and away I went. Now when someone sends an email to "pr123(a)mydomain.tld" it gets put into the relevant project folder under the "public _folders" maildir. If you don't need the automated project filing, ignore the lines with a * at the start. I hope someone finds this helpful. Many thanks, Mark Lidstone IT Administrator BMT Nigel Gee & Associates Ltd Floors 1-3, Building 14, Shamrock Quay, William Street, Southampton SO14 5QL UK Tel: 023 8022 6655 Fax: 023 8022 8855 Visit Our Website: <http://www.ngal.co.uk> -----Original Message----- From: dovecot-bounces(a)dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org]On Behalf Of Steffen Kaiser Sent: 23 March 2006 08:29 To: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: RE: [Dovecot] Shared namespaces - solved On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Mark Lidstone wrote: How do you get the permissions of the mails the right way? Bye, -- Steffen Kaiser CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It is intended only for the named addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute the contents to any other person other than the intended addressee(s). VIRUSES The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your own computer system. While BMT Nigel Gee and Associates Ltd has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the attachment.

2 1

RE: [Dovecot] Shared namespaces - solved
by Mark Lidstone 23 Mar '06

23 Mar '06

Heh heh heh. Whoops. I've spent a few hours digging around in the source and nearly posted a kludge of a patch I'd written to give a kind of half-baked attempt at getting group-usable subscriptions files. Then I came across something in the source........ In the config file, do something like the following: namespace public { separator = / prefix = Public/ location = maildir:/home/public/Maildir:CONTROL=%h/Maildir/Public inbox = no hidden = no } Notice the "CONTROL=" part of the location line. This tells dovecot where to store "control" files (of which the "subscriptions" file is one). As you can see I have told it to put the control files in each user's home space. This means not only are there going to be no permission problems, but each user can have separate subscriptions (because everyone is using their own "subscriptions" file). Of course I could also have set the CONTROL dir to be something like "/home/public/Maildir/control/%u" so they would all be stored in one place, but I prefer the idea of having it in the user's home folder. After searching the wiki I don't see the CONTROL option explained anywhere. Is there any chance someone could add that in somehow (a link from the SharedFolders page would be extremely useful also). Channing - you were very nearly right there. Many thanks everyone, Mark Lidstone IT Administrator BMT Nigel Gee & Associates Ltd Floors 1-3, Building 14, Shamrock Quay, William Street, Southampton SO14 5QL UK Tel: 023 8022 6655 Fax: 023 8022 8855 Visit Our Website: <http://www.ngal.co.uk> -----Original Message----- From: dovecot-bounces(a)dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org]On Behalf Of Mark Lidstone Sent: 22 March 2006 08:50 To: Curtis Maloney Cc: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: RE: [Dovecot] Shared namespaces Hi Curtis, Aye, I have read the wiki. I was pretty surprised this wasn't covered to be honest. Well, I've tried playing with the umask setting (thanks for the suggestion Channing) and changing the index locations (thanks Curtis), but no joy. I'm just about to start digging into the source to see if it's something I can sort out myself. Many thanks everyone, Mark Lidstone -----Original Message----- From: dovecot-bounces(a)dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-bounces@dovecot.org]On Behalf Of Curtis Maloney Sent: 19 March 2006 22:51 To: Mark Lidstone Cc: dovecot(a)dovecot.org Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Shared namespaces Mark Lidstone wrote: > Hi all, > > I logged with Thunderbird as user 1 and everything seems to work fine. However, when I logged in as user 2 I was getting all kinds of errors. On checking the permissions of /home/public/Maildir/subscriptions it was user1:user1 with mode 600. Just a thought, but have you tried setting the INDEX location in the default_mail_env ? I'm not certain, but I believe the subscriptions file is included in the INDEX set, and by setting its location elsewhere, you would prevent it from being inside the Maildir. This would prevent ownership hijacking, AND let everyone have their own subscriptions. I'm not certain of this, so either someone else can fill in the details, or you could check the source (and please report your findings:) > To be perfectly honest, I'd ideally like to give people separate subscription settings anyway. I thought about symlinking the folders in, but that makes it a manual process to add new folders to everyone's maildirs. Of course, I'm assuming you've read the Wiki (it looks like you have...) -- Curtis Maloney cmaloney(a)cardgate.net CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It is intended only for the named addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute the contents to any other person other than the intended addressee(s). VIRUSES The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your own computer system. While BMT Nigel Gee and Associates Ltd has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the attachment. CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It is intended only for the named addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute the contents to any other person other than the intended addressee(s). VIRUSES The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your own computer system. While BMT Nigel Gee and Associates Ltd has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the attachment.

2 1