- dovecot - dovecot.org

no shared cipher openssl
by Mike Schroeder 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

CentOS 7 Dovecot 2.2.36 Nov 14 07:13:08 mail dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=73.0.0.0, lip=192.64.118.242, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept() failed: error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no shared cipher, session=<> Was working fine for over a year, until the cert expired and I replaced it. I've tried the good cert I have for https and I used the Dovecot.org script to generate a self-signed certificate. 10-ssl.conf ## SSL settings #ssl = required ssl = yes #ssl = no ssl_cert = </etc/pki/dovecot/certs/mydomain.com.crt ssl_key = </etc/pki/dovecot/private/mydomain.com.key #ssl_ca = #ssl_require_crl = yes #ssl_client_ca_dir = #ssl_client_ca_file = #ssl_verify_client_cert = no #ssl_cert_username_field = commonName #ssl_dh_parameters_length = 1024 #ssl_protocols = !SSLv3 # SSL ciphers to use # ols values ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:!aNULL ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!kRSA:!SRP:!kDHd:!DSS:!aNULL:!eNULL:!EXPORT:!DES:!3DES:!MD5:!PSK: !RC4:!ADH:!LOW@STRENGTH # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no # Prefer the server's order of ciphers over client's. #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no # SSL crypto device to use, for valid values run "openssl engine" #ssl_crypto_device = # SSL extra options. Currently supported options are: # no_compression - Disable compression. # no_ticket - Disable SSL session tickets. #ssl_options = =========================== # openssl x509 -dates -in mydomain.com.crt notBefore=Nov 11 16:31:35 2020 GMT notAfter=Nov 11 16:31:35 2022 GMT -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- : =========================== # openssl pkey -in mydomain.com.key -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- : Thanks for taking a look. Any ideas on what I should do next to debug? Mike

2 1

imap dumping core in libdovecot-storage with assert "(block_count == 0 || block_idx+1 == block_count)"
by Renaud Métrich 15 Nov '20

15 Nov '20

Hi, I would like to report an issue which is 100% reproducible with a specific mail available in the reproducer attached to Red Hat's bugzilla <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894418> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1726535) -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- Return-Path: <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX> X-Original-To: XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX Delivered-To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXX.XX.XXX.XX Received: from XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXX.XX.XX (unknown [XX.XX.XXX.XXX]) by XXXXXX.XX.XXX.XX (Postfix) with ESMTP id XXXXXXXXXXX for <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:11:42 +0200 Subject: zoom Message-ID: <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXX.XXXXXXX.XXX> From: "XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX" <XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX> To: XXXXXXXXX(a)XXXXXXX.XXX.XX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- The email seems completely valid to me, but I'm no email expert. When performing a "FETCH <ID> (BINARY.SIZE[1] BINARY.PEEK[1])" operation, imap crashes with following backtrace: -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- (gdb) bt [...] #5 0x00007ffff7707a25 in i_panic ( format=format@entry=0x7ffff7b7b460 "file %s: line %d (%s): assertion failed: (%s)") at failures.c:523 #6 0x00007ffff7ab5de7 in blocks_count_lines (full_input=0x5555557f1230, ctx=0x7fffffffdb80) at index-mail-binary.c:357 #7 index_mail_read_binary_to_cache (_mail=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, reason=<optimized out>, binary_r=0x7fffffffdc16, converted_r=0x7fffffffdc17) at index-mail-binary.c:395 #8 0x00007ffff7b39c8b in index_mail_get_binary_size (lines_r=0x7fffffffdcc4, size_r=0x7fffffffdd20, include_hdr=false, part=0x5555557e4678, _mail=0x5555557e3b48) at index-mail-binary.c:497 #9 index_mail_get_binary_stream (_mail=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, size_r=0x7fffffffdd20, lines_r=0x7fffffffdcc4, binary_r=<optimized out>, stream_r=0x0) at index-mail-binary.c:557 #10 0x00007ffff7abd204 in mail_get_binary_size (mail=mail@entry=0x5555557e3b48, part=0x5555557e4678, include_hdr=<optimized out>, size_r=size_r@entry=0x7fffffffdd20, lines_r=lines_r@entry=0x7fffffffdcc4) at mail.c:342 #11 0x00007ffff7b7add8 in imap_msgpart_size (mail=0x5555557e3b48, msgpart=0x5555557e0748, size_r=size_r@entry=0x7fffffffdd20) at imap-msgpart.c:755 #12 0x000055555557917c in fetch_binary_size (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, mail=<optimized out>, body=0x5555557dfa20) at imap-fetch-body.c:212 #13 0x00005555555777e2 in imap_fetch_more_int (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, cancel=false) at imap-fetch.c:562 #14 0x00005555555788ed in imap_fetch_more (ctx=0x5555557c97b0, cmd=cmd@entry=0x5555557c95d8) at imap-fetch.c:617 #15 0x00005555555694b1 in cmd_fetch (cmd=0x5555557c95d8) at cmd-fetch.c:337 [...] #28 0x0000555555566405 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:523 -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- This happens on latest dovecot. Best regards, Renaud METRICH

2 3

dovecot fts-solr + solr 8.7.0 upgrade: "Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized" + "Transaction commit failed: FTS transaction commit failed: backend deinit" ?
by PGNet Dev 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser(a)example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<8MKVNHmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Queue 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<OHfzNHmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in testing 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<yMxJNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Junk 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<uDCbNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Trash 2020-11-13 05:43:21 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<kA/uNXmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in Sent 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 401 Unauthorized 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<cEw/NnmNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Error: Mailbox Drafts: Transaction commit failed: FTS transaction commit failed: backend deinit (attempted to index 1 messages (UIDs 3..3)) 2020-11-13 05:43:22 indexer-worker(testuser(a)example.com)<2OUMCHqNrl/DJgEA+IOfAw>: Info: Indexed 0 messages in INBOX I get NO output atm in my solr logs @ this 'index'; just, atm, in the dovecot logs, above I've checked all my usual perms. Indexing _was_ working with a prior solr v8.6.3 ... Either I've misconfigured some perm, and am missing it, or new-solr-version v8.7.0 is causing me some grief. (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x? (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob?

2 9

Submission service capabilities listing
by Dan 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hello all, I'm attempting to implement a submission server with questions in regards to how Dovecot handles the backend hosts capabilities. To my understanding, Dovecot will connect to the host specified in either submission_host or submission_relay_host, and gather a list of capabilities. Once gathered, after the client sends the EHLO greeting Dovecot will respond back with capabilities that the backend host is capable of. My question is, When does this occur? Running a tcpdump with the filter set to the relay host IP, I don't see any traffic until after I send the EHLO command. Dovecot states that CHUNKING is available, but the backend host does not have that capability. Is there a way to disable CHUNKING explicitly? Thanks. submission_relay_host = x.x.x.x submission_host = x.x.x.x submission_relay_ssl = no submission_relay_ssl_verify = no protocol submission { passdb { driver = static args = host=x.x.x.x proxy=y nopassword=y port=587 } }

2 1

How do Cerbot files map to Dovecot?
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

I am postponing the Apache plugin issue (CentOS is not Certbot friendly) and requesting a standalone, generic certificate. After the command "1: Spin up a temporary webserver" I have the following 2 files in the folder /etc/letsencrypt: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 924 Nov 12 11:14 csr/0000_csr-certbot.pem -rw------- 1 root root 1708 Nov 12 11:14 keys/0000_key-certbot.pem The "key" is probably a direct replacement for the file in the distribution. What about the "csr" file? It seems to be a request, not the certificate itself. TIA

3 2

Fwd: Trying to install certbot on CentOS
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

On 11/12/2020 10:44 AM, Raymond Herrera wrote: > Following the advice obtained here, I am trying to get a LetsEncrypt > certificate. > > These are the instructions: > > Step 1: > https://snapcraft.io/docs/installing-snapd > > Step 2: > https://certbot.eff.org/lets-encrypt/centosrhel7-apache > > My problem is this error message: > > # snap install --classic certbot > > error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs > image using "squashfs": mount: > /tmp/sanity-squashfs-881328484: failed to setup loop device: No > such file or directory > > Apparently, RedHat/CentOS are not supporters of snap. > > TIA > > OS: CentOS 7 > Thanks to Leonardo and Michael, I have made some progress. The snaps application is not supported by RedHat/CentOS. The solution is simple, just use: # yum install certbot The new error message is this: # certbot certonly --apache Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log Could not choose appropriate plugin: The requested apache plugin does not appear to be installed The requested apache plugin does not appear to be installed I am trying to find which is the "requested apache plugin". The log mentions "authenticator". I am hoping that an Apache Certificate will be useful for Dovecot.

2 1

Guide on Renewing SSL Certificate for Apache, Postfix and Dovecot on CentOS 6.8 Linux
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

Good day from Singapore, Please check out the following link for my guide. https://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=160517863730596&w=2 Thank you very much. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ******************************************************************************************** Singaporean Targeted Individual Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Trying to install certbot on CentOS
by Raymond Herrera 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

Following the advice obtained here, I am trying to get a LetsEncrypt certificate. These are the instructions: Step 1: https://snapcraft.io/docs/installing-snapd Step 2: https://certbot.eff.org/lets-encrypt/centosrhel7-apache My problem is this error message: # snap install --classic certbot error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using "squashfs": mount: /tmp/sanity-squashfs-881328484: failed to setup loop device: No such file or directory Apparently, RedHat/CentOS are not supporters of snap. TIA OS: CentOS 7

3 2

Testing
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 12 Nov '20

12 Nov '20

Testing -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html ******************************************************************************************** Singaporean Targeted Individual Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Support TLS for pure remote doveadm commands
by Vincent Brillault 11 Nov '20

11 Nov '20

Dear all, A lot of doveadm commands (e.g. backup/sync, deduplicate, mailbox) support a `-S` (a.k.a `socket-path`) argument that allows to run the command remotely. Unfortunately, I think that there is a bug in the handling of the TLS configuration for this feature. After a bit of debugging, I think it's simply due to doveadm_mail_server_user_get_host (https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-server…) bailing out too quickly: It's used by doveadm_mail_server_user (https://github.com/dovecot/core/blob/master/src/doveadm/doveadm-mail-server…) to set its `user`, `host`, `hostip`, `port` and `ssl_flags`. When doveadm_port is not (or set to 0): - `user` is set to `input->username`: OK - `host` is set to `ctx->set->doveadm_socket_path` (the content of the `-S` option): OK - `hostip` is not set: OK (Later on, the `host` is used in that case) - `port` is set to 0: This is OK, as when the `hostip` (or rather the `server->ip` later in the code) is not set, this is only the default, the port is extracted from the `host` (or rather `server->name`) - `ssl_flags` is not modified: this is not OK as there is nothing else modifying it! Bailing out just a few line later (as in https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/dovecot/core/pull/145.patch) fixes the issue for me. To reproduce the issue, with dovecot-2.3.11.3-4, you will need two systems, A & B: A needs to have dovecot configured and port 9091 open in its firewall for B. B just need dovecot to be installed. - Testing without TLS: - Add the following to A's dovecot configuration (and reload it): ``` service doveadm { inet_listener { port = 9091 } } doveadm_password=VeryRandomString ``` - On B, create a file X containing (only): ``` doveadm_password=VeryRandomString ``` - On B, running `doveadm -c X mailbox list -u ${existing_user} -S ${A}:9091` should return the mailbox list - Switching to TLS: - Replace what was added to A's dovecot configuration (and reload it) with: ``` service doveadm { inet_listener { port = 9091 ssl = yes } } doveadm_password=VeryRandomString doveadm_ssl = ssl # Not strictly required ``` - On B, create a file Y containing (only): ``` doveadm_password=VeryRandomString doveadm_ssl=yes ``` - On B, running `doveadm -c Y mailbox list -u ${existing_user} -S ${A}:9091` will not work. - On A, you should see in the logs: `dovecot[16435]: doveadm(${B}): Error: SSL handshake failed: SSL_accept() failed: error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol` Applying the patch mentioned above makes the 2nd case work. What do you think? Cheers, Vincent

1 0