- dovecot - dovecot.org

[Dovecot] Re: Expunge is not expunging unless called twice--revisited
by Glenn Leavell 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

On Tue May 30 05:45:12 EEST 2006, Jeff Blank jb000002 at mr-happy.com wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running dovecot-1.0.beta8 from FreeBSD ports, using mbox mail > store. My problem appears to have come up on the list about a month > ago, "Expunge is not expunging unless it is called twice". I ran > through Bill Boebel's telnet-IMAP session for myself, and I see that > his test case is now fixed (as Timo said), but mutt, for whatever > reason, uses +FLAGS.SILENT, and I'm still getting the behaviour in > Bill's original problem when I telnet and use +FLAGS.SILENT: > > 1 OK Logged in. > 2 select INBOX > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] > * Flags permitted. > * 1 EXISTS > * 1 RECENT > * OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen. > * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1148956034] UIDs valid > * OK [UIDNEXT 4] Predicted next UID > 2 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. > 3 UID STORE 3 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) > 3 OK Store completed. > 4 expunge > 4 OK Expunge completed. > 5 expunge > * 1 EXPUNGE > * 0 RECENT > 5 OK Expunge completed. > > After step 4, the message is still in the mailbox with "X-Status: D"; > the second expunge is required to remove it. I seem to get the same > behaviour with Thunderbird, so is this still a dovecot problem? (I > have Thunderbird set up to remove deleted messages immediately, not > move to trash or just mark as deleted.) I'm also still experiencing the twice-needed expunge problem (with mutt and +FLAGS.SILENT) just as Jeff described it. I have the problem both with Beta8 and with last night's CVS snapshot. I'm using Maildir. Thanks very much, Glenn

2 1

[Dovecot] Dovecot + Logcheck Regex
by Rik Wade 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

I'm using logcheck for log reporting on Debian Etch, and am currently getting a lot of log entries from Syslog falling through the standard logcheck regex filters. I'm running Dovecot 1.0beta8. The filters follow: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ (imap|pop3)-login: Login: [.[:alnum:]@-]+ \[(::ffff:)?[:0-9a-f.]+\]$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ (dovecot: )?(imap|pop3)-login: Disconnected \[(::ffff:)?[:0-9a-f.]+\]$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ (dovecot: )?(imap|pop3)$[^[:space:]]+$: File isn't in mbox format: [^[:space:]]+$ # dovecot 1.0 ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dovecot: (imap|pop3)-login: Login: user=<[.[:alnum:]@-]+>, method=(PLAIN|plain|LOGIN|login|(CRAM|cram|DIGEST|digest)-(MD5|md5)), rip=(::ffff:)?[:.[:digit:]]+, lip=(::ffff:)?[:0-9a-f.]+(, TLS)?$ The type of entry coming through is: Jun 5 09:05:57 myhostname dovecot: IMAP(myusername): Disconnected for inactivity Jun 5 09:07:05 myhostname dovecot: IMAP(myusername): Disconnected: Logged out Jun 5 09:07:05 myhostname dovecot: IMAP(myusername): Disconnected: Logged out The first alnum pattern doesn't match given a host name, but the messages given by Dovecot do not appear to be catered for in the logcheck files. I wondered whether anyone on the dovecot list was also using logcheck and had fixed the regex patterns? -- rik

1 0

[Dovecot] Specifying with openssl to use
by Chase 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

I'm trying to setup dovecot on Solaris 10. I can get it all working except TLS/SSL. I traced my problem down to the version of openssl that Solaris 10 ships with. The fix is supposed to be to use a newer version of openssl. Without removing the built-in version of openssl I've installed openssl-0.9.8b to /usr/local. When I "./configure" dovecot it seems to always pick up the broken version of openssl in /usr/sfw. How do I make dovecot use an alternate copy of openssl? How is it even finding the one in /usr/sfw? Thanks, -Chase I tried setting CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS already.

3 4

[Dovecot] Since Updating Dovecot - Problem by connecting with Client
by Mailing 04 Jun '06

04 Jun '06

Hi, in the last days I've updated my dovecot on my Gentoo System. Before all went fine. Since the update it doesn't work in any way. After the Update my Thunderbird Client says: The Connecction could not proceeded because it was rejected. Another message was, that I should use TLS or SSL to connect. I've not changed my config - probably the update does - and it's only a simple configuration in my home-network. Has anybody an idea which is causing the problem? the config looks like this: protocols = imap imaps listen = [::] default_mail_env = maildir:%h/.mail mechanism = plain Thx for help k1x

3 3

[Dovecot] imaps multiple domains proposal
by Jim Flowers 04 Jun '06

04 Jun '06

There was a thread earlier this year that noted a difficulty in modifying dovecot to handle multiple domain certificates. This is a proposal that may require only minor modifications. Virtual domains can be set up with a unique ip address for each server; mail.domain1.tld ###.###.###.1, mail.domain2.tld ###.###.###.2, etc. Users are instructed to enter 'mail.domain?.tld' for their imap server. When an SSL TCP connection is established on port 993, the server program will know the IP # that was used for the connection and can use getnameinfo to extract the domain name (%d). This can then be used to build a specific reference to the certificate to be used, prior to responding to CLIENT_HELLO. Something like /etc/ssl/%d/[certs|private]/dovecot.pem One technique would be to include this in multiple dovecot.conf listen parameters read on startup, similar to tpop3d: listen = ###.###.###.1:993(domain1.tld);tls=stls,\ /etc/ssl/domain1.tld/certs/dovecot.pem,\ /etc/ssl/domain1.tld/private/dovecot.pem listen = ###.###.###.2:993(domain2.tld);tls=stls,\ /etc/ssl/domain2.tld/certs/dovecot.pem,\ /etc/ssl/domain2.tld/private/dovecot.pem Alternatively, as virtual servers almost always use some form of lookup (in my case mysql) the certificate used could be determined at time of connection, similar to the way ssl_ca is handled. For example: user_query = SELECT '125'as uid, '125' as gid, maildir as home, '/etc/ssl/%d/certs/dovecot.pem' as cert, '/etc/ssl/%d/private/dovecot.pem as priv FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' In this manner the certificate returned would match the server ip/FQDN and can also be customized for the specific domain involved. Seeing their own domain name as the CN for both the certificate and CA goes a long way to establish credibility for most secure email users. Could this be done? -- Jim Flowers<jflowers(a)ezo.net>

4 5

[Dovecot] "Bug" report (and patch)
by Soren Hansen 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

1 0

[Dovecot] outlook express 6 imap client workaround
by david williams 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

My outlook express users connecting with imap are having issues with client timeout. The wiki says to add oe6-fetch-no-newmail, but when I add that workaround I get this error in the logs: Jun 2 10:00:13 mail dovecot: IMAP(username): Unknown client workaround: oe6-fetch-no-newmail I'm using 1.0b7. Any ideas?

3 2

Re[2]: [Dovecot] dovecot can't start!
by Oleg D. 02 Jun '06

02 Jun '06

MB> Hmmm... I was seeing a problem rather like this with 1.0beta8 under Solaris MB> with Sun's compiler: only it was with the IMAP protocol rather than POP. MB> The problem there was an assumption Tio had made that everyone was using a MB> C99-compatible compiler. Apparently this handles some aspects of variable MB> initialisation differently from earlier C compilers. MB> In my case adding a command-line option to the C compiler to flip it into MB> C99 mode seemed to solve the problem. The option for our compiler was MB> "-xc99" -- however if your compiler has such an option it may have a MB> different name. If you check the manual page for your C compiler you may MB> find an equivalent option to try. MB> However another solution was provided by Timo in the form of a simple patch MB> that made changes to a couple of source files. I hope Timo doesn't mind: MB> I'm re-sending his patch as an attachment to this message as it is tiny. MB> You could try applying it and rebuilding Dovecot. MB> Cheers, MB> Mike Brudenell But I use FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p15 with native compiler. Really nobody has this problem on freebsd? And the main - Why I can't start dovecot without SSL :) Why I see in log "pop3-login: BUG: SSL initialization parameters not given while they should have been" even if I have "ssl_disable = yes" in dovecot.conf 1.0b3 works fine. This problem is main for me because I don't want to use SSL. -- Best regards, Oleg mailto:dzoleg@rsute.ru

4 6

[Dovecot] Duplicate Attachments....
by Charles Marcus 02 Jun '06

02 Jun '06

Love Dovecot, many thanks for it! But, I have a question regarding the storing of emails, with respect to efficiency... Our business model (advertising industry) is such that our users exchange a lot of emails with attachments - most less than a megabyte, but some considerably larger. Consequently, I have been looking for a good, open source imap server that doesn't store multiple copies of the same attachment - but instead, stores a checksum, and whenever a message is stored with a duplicate attachment, the attachment is stored only once, and simply referenced by some kind of link to other emails. This would *drastically* reduce the storage requirements for our company - imagine a message with a 10MB attachment, sent to 40 of our users, sometimes more than once. Now multiply this by 3 times per day, for 5 years... Are there any plans for Dovecot to support this type of storage in the future? Does this require the use of an SQL DB for storing the message components? -- Best regards, Charles

9 14

[Dovecot] Platform change, considerations?
by Peter Lindgren 02 Jun '06

02 Jun '06

Hello! I am switching hardware platform for my dovecot 1.0beta3 installation. From Sun Sparc (SS4) to Intel i386. OS platform will only change from OpenBSD 3.7 to 3.9. From Dovecot 1.0beta3 to beta8. Is there anything special to consider, in terms of endianness or other incompatibilities? I plan on a fresh install (compile) on the new machine, migrate the settings manually (by hand), test the new server and then migrate old mail. Can I just mount the disks and copy, or should I go through NFS to be safe from potential endianness problems? Or perhaps copy with IMAP using my Thunderbird client? The live switch (the old server is in production) isn't that delicate, several hours downtime is OK. There's a backup server that can receive any mail I might loose during downtime, which can be copied though IMAP later. Thanks for any input! /Peter -- Peter Lindgren, dataingenjör E-post: peter "at" norrskenkonsult punkt com http://www.norrskenkonsult.com

2 1